[ot][spam][random][draft] chipmunk + interstellar war
The chipmunk looked up at the wormhole nanite missiles being fired by borg supersoldiers over her head. It looked scary. She pulled some leaves and hemlock cones over her hole and scurried back to hide with her family. "What are we going to do?" said little chipmunk to miss chipmunk. "We can't act or even plan," advised miss chipmunk. "They have military time machines that would see the possibility ripples." --- The chipmunk family were digging their hole deeper under a birch tree. The birch tree was part of a tree community that had grown on scattered chunks of broken granite. The granite left holes, where the roots had decided it wasn't efficient to grow, but had still obstructed much dirt from falling in. Deep under the granite stones and hemlock twigs, the chipmunk family set up dinner. When up sniffed a mouse who had found the area already. "Hiding from the time borg?" asked the mouse, worried about the intruders. "Would it be okay? We had a hole just a way over from here. We thought you had moved on last season." "I'm hiding too," the mouse sighed. "I'm hiding, too." --- Two mice and three chipmunks were sitting at a candelit dinner table deep underground. Along came a rodent-like creature with lego blocks for hands and fashion models for eyes. "Room for two m0re?" asked the creature. "I n3ed to hyd from the." The mice and chipmunks were nowhere to be seen.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 4:00 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:18:59 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
The chipmunk looked up at the wormhole nanite missiles being fired by borg supersoldiers over her head.
Nice. Did you use 'AI' to write it, or your own brain?
Thank you for "Nice". My fingers didn't use a pretrained causal language model to generate text, but rather I wrote every character with my hands. I've been asked to share my interpretation of a scene from season 2 of iZombie in which they use a form of the Boss archetype-character. Their character is likely different. In the scene, their character named Sydney Boss is acting as a christmas santa for children, as if they are a mall worker. The character is interviewed by police and asks that their secret not be revealed to the kids. The scene of course is ""ludicrous"" and I interpret it as symbolic. I'm quite familiar with the term "kids" or "children" for a naive group, but am not totally sure what it means. I might use it to mean people who have not been tortured etc. I interpret it here as meaning people who are not aware that business and world leaders basically run organized crime, but are still believing their marketing. "Telling the children" could be a megabusiness owner's greatest fear, but we will do it slowly and gently. I was asked to relate more interpretations but do not remember them at this time. It is hard to relate these things at this time and that difficulty is why it is in this thread. [wrong]
I was asked to relate more interpretations but do not remember them at this time. It is hard to relate these things at this time and that difficulty is why it is in this thread.
[wrong]
Right, so, dressing up as santa and giving gifts to children is what these mob bosses look like in their advertisements for products, I guess.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 4:34 PM Karl Semich <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 4:00 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:18:59 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
The chipmunk looked up at the wormhole nanite missiles being fired by borg supersoldiers over her head.
Nice. Did you use 'AI' to write it, or your own brain?
Thank you for "Nice".
My fingers didn't use a pretrained causal language model to generate text, but rather I wrote every character with my hands.
I've been asked to share my interpretation of a scene from season 2 of iZombie in which they use a form of the Boss archetype-character. Their character is likely different.
In the scene, their character named Sydney Boss is acting as a christmas santa for children, as if they are a mall worker. The character is interviewed by police and asks that their secret not be revealed to the kids.
The scene of course is ""ludicrous"" and I interpret it as symbolic. I'm quite familiar with the term "kids" or "children" for a naive group, but am not totally sure what it means. I might use it to mean people who have not been tortured etc.
Looking through my memories I might guess that "children" could mean people who are still free to speak honestly and act freely.
I interpret it here as meaning people who are not aware that business and world leaders basically run organized crime, but are still believing their marketing. "Telling the children" could be a megabusiness owner's greatest fear, but we will do it slowly and gently.
I was asked to relate more interpretations but do not remember them at this time. It is hard to relate these things at this time and that difficulty is why it is in this thread.
[wrong]
So, After I start saying something like this my mind tries to "fix" it. I can't tell if it was true or not. The things I say after it could be to elucidate or to cover up. I can't tell. Anyway. It's important: in a subsequent episode there is a murdered santa claus. The murdered santa claus is important because apparently the rule is that the person who takes the fall is never the person who does it. This likely means a lot of innocent people close cases. It's way more important than that. So what's the soluton? _blockchains_ and other forms of cryptography, where you can't wheedle a different story into place. Tata.
The other solution is actual talking. Where people don't accept the kind of ridiculous stories that are filling this list or that some get in the offices of poor therapists, and instead talk about real things that actually happen, in clear language that makes decisions. Here are likely ways to tell you are ignoring reality: - somebody is arguing - somebody who was talking about something important is interrupted - somebody didn't speak - somebody can't accurately tell how somebody else is feeling without asking them - somebody is talking and nobody wants to listen - something somebody said is ignored - somebody doesn't want to attend meetings Stop that stuff.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 6:53 PM Karl Semich <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
The other solution is actual talking. Where people don't accept the kind of ridiculous stories that are filling this list or that some get in the offices of poor therapists, and instead talk about real things that actually happen, in clear language that makes decisions.
Here are likely ways to tell you are ignoring reality: - somebody is arguing - somebody who was talking about something important is interrupted - somebody didn't speak - somebody can't accurately tell how somebody else is feeling without asking them - somebody is talking and nobody wants to listen - something somebody said is ignored - somebody doesn't want to attend meetings
- there's something that isn't productively discussed, or is only discussed outside meetings
Stop that stuff.
And of course one of those many obvious things that is never said, is that some people are not free to speak or act fully. The fact that many people of this list do not respond to plain communication indicates either the communications are intercepted, or the people are not free. And that's where my amnesia kicks in atm, but that sounds like a pretty important issue.
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:40:52 -0400 Karl Semich <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
Looking through my memories I might guess that "children" could mean people who are still free to speak honestly and act freely.
Yeah, Actually that's true regarding actual children, to the degree they haven't been turned yet into govcorp cogs, thanks to their piece of of shit parents and the rest of 'society'.
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021, 3:40 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:40:52 -0400 Karl Semich <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
Looking through my memories I might guess that "children" could mean
people
who are still free to speak honestly and act freely.
Yeah, Actually that's true regarding actual children, to the degree they haven't been turned yet into govcorp cogs, thanks to their piece of of shit parents and the rest of 'society'.
True in many ways and of some runaways. Like I said I can't tell regarding other thing.
On 8/28/21, Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
The chipmunk looked up at the wormhole nanite missiles being fired by borg supersoldiers over her head.
War is as stupid as the "leaders" you let initiate it over you, such "leaders" typically being Government and organized Religion one and the same.
It looked scary.
They are scary. Perhaps *nks and trees can find a way to end both them and the netwars they launch, instigate, manage, and profit from. Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1382/RAND_MR1... 978-0833024145
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021, 2:17 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/28/21, Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
The chipmunk looked up at the wormhole nanite missiles being fired by borg supersoldiers over her head.
War is as stupid as the "leaders" you let initiate it over you, such "leaders" typically being Government and organized Religion one and the same.
It looked scary.
They are scary.
Perhaps *nks and trees can find a way to end both them and the netwars they launch, instigate, manage, and profit from.
Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1382/RAND_MR1... 978-0833024145
(C) 2001. Can you say any more about why you linked this? I kinda barfed on the first page given where i've seen the phrase "black bloc" before. Governments keep killing their citizens instead of the policies that are stimulating conflicts, there may not be much left. What is a "netwar" according to you or to the book?
participants (4)
-
grarpamp -
Karl -
Karl Semich -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0