Re: Re: [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:13:04AM +0200, Krisztián Pintér wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:57 AM, stef <s@ctrlc.hu> wrote:
let me summarize (and ask you to reread and understand) grapamps response to you: email is dead.
email is not dead, it is a zombie that walks around for at least 20 years.
i like your analogy :) is there a non-zero probability that zombie analogies are the opposite to car analogies? -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt
Dnia czwartek, 18 września 2014 11:16:28 stef pisze:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:13:04AM +0200, Krisztián Pintér wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:57 AM, stef <s@ctrlc.hu> wrote:
let me summarize (and ask you to reread and understand) grapamps response to you: email is dead.
email is not dead, it is a zombie that walks around for at least 20 years.
i like your analogy :)
is there a non-zero probability that zombie analogies are the opposite to car analogies?
Did you just implicitly make a car analogy about zombie analogies?.. -- Pozdr rysiek
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:01:39PM +0200, rysiek wrote:
is there a non-zero probability that zombie analogies are the opposite to car analogies?
Did you just implicitly make a car analogy about zombie analogies?..
i very carefully postulated a theory, that's semantically quite far from analogies i believe - nice try though :P -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt
participants (2)
-
rysiek -
stef