[TriggerWarning: Sexist-Racist-Baiting, cmon...] Selma Burke
You know... THAT "Selma Burke". The Black Woman who never received credit for her portrait of Franklin D, Roosevelt on the US dime. https://twitter.com/Crystal1Johnson/status/838140498841763840 Rr
On 3/5/2017 10:52 AM, Razer wrote:
You know... THAT "Selma Burke". The Black Woman who never received credit for her portrait of Franklin D, Roosevelt on the US dime.
https://twitter.com/Crystal1Johnson/status/838140498841763840
That is because she never had anything whatsoever to do with the portrait of Franklin D Roosevelt on the US dime. Like most black inventors, scientists, artists, etc, her achievements are largely fictional, fraudulent, or plaigarized. The portrait on the US dime is by John R. Sinnock, and resembles his previous works on Roosevelt, predating her works, so she copied from him, badly. He did not copy from her.
Burke was chosen to sculpt a portrait of then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt honoring the Four Freedoms.[9] Completed in 1944, the 3.5-by-2.5-foot plaque was unveiled in September 1945 at the Recorder of Deeds Building in Washington, D.C., where it still hangs today.[10] Some have suggested that the plaque may have served as John R. Sinnock's inspiration for his obverse design on the Roosevelt dime.[10] Sinnock, however, denied this vehemently, claiming the design for the dime was based on earlier medals he had sculpted in 1933 and 1934 as well as photographs of FDR.[11][12]
Her work next to the quote here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_Burke#Biography
Sinnock denied this claim and said that the obverse portrait of the President was a composite of two studies which he made from life in 1933 and 1934. Sinnock said that he also consulted photographs of FDR and had the advice and criticism of two prominent sculptors who specialize in work in relief
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Sinnock#Urban_folklore Designer does not mean creator of the image, and his denials bore me without images of his "/studies which he made from life in 1933 and 1934/" as evidence. As far as I can find there are no such 'studies' that produced any tangible image. It's easy to see his plagiarization in the hair details. Rr
On 3/5/2017 12:21 PM, Razer wrote:
Designer does not mean creator of the image, and his denials bore me without images of his "/studies which he made from life in 1933 and 1934/" as evidence. As far as I can find there are no such 'studies' that produced any tangible image.
Here is the medal. As you can see the black woman plagiarized the white man. What would you expect.
On 03/04/2017 08:52 PM, whitebread wrote:
On 3/5/2017 12:21 PM, Razer wrote:
Designer does not mean creator of the image, and his denials bore me without images of his "/studies which he made from life in 1933 and 1934/" as evidence. As far as I can find there are no such 'studies' that produced any tangible image.
Here is the medal.
As you can see the black woman plagiarized the white man. What would you expect.
I expect that you're blind. Not even a remote resemblance to the image on a dime: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/1_Dime_%28United_S... I could start with the ear and go from there but you simply aren't worth the bandwidth whitebread. Rr
On 3/5/2017 3:43 PM, Razer wrote:
I expect that you're blind. Not even a remote resemblance to the image on a dime:
Here is the dime and medal side by side. It is obvious that John R. Sinnock simply cloned his medal to make the dime, simplifying the hair slightly but not changing it in the otherwise, and that Selma Burk plagiarized John R. Sinnock's medal. Well, obviously, because she is black, and all famous black inventors, artists, scientists etc either plagiarized their stuff, or their inventions are fictional. Just as you cannot find a plausibly innocent black who was lynched, you cannot find a plausibly smart black intellectual. You look really really hard for black victims of white racism, come up with Emmett Till. You look really really hard for smart blacks, come up with Selma Burke. You look really really hard for innocent blacks gunned down by policeman, come up with Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin. You look really really hard for the great white upper class rapist, come up with the Duke University Lacrosse Team, and Haven Monahan at the University of Virginia. Recapping the story of Haven Monahan: http://www.vdare.com/posts/uva-rape-hoax-the-importance-of-three-words-catfi... You look really really hard for a great woman scientist, and proceed to award not one but two Noble prizes to the mediocrity Marie Curie.
Umn... The CEO of the company that made your computer didn't actually make your computer, and the US Mint's chief engraver didn't actually engrave the image on the US dime. But then you're the simpleton who though Edison himself actually invented the incandescent lightbulb.
On 3/6/2017 1:14 AM, Razer wrote:
Umn... The CEO of the company that made your computer didn't actually make your computer, and the US Mint's chief engraver didn't actually engrave the image on the US dime.
Kind of obvious that the engraver did, for he personally engraved the medal, and the dime shows the same hand.
But then you're the simpleton who though Edison himself actually invented the incandescent lightbulb.
Edison himself personally with his own hands built the prototype for the first light bulb that was sufficiently useful and sufficiently buildable that people could and did buy it to light their facilities, which light bulb was substantially based on the work of Swan, who also built prototypes with his own hands. The first light bulbs that you could actually buy were produced by a company owned and run by Edison and Swan, and everyone who actually built the early light bulbs that were actually sold learned how to build them at the feet of Edison and Swan. Just as the first junction transistor was built by Shockley with his own hands, and every single person in the entire world today who builds transistors learned at the feet of someone who learned at the feet of someone who learned at the feet ... of Shockley. The art of building modern electronic devices has been one hundred percent transmitted by personal apprenticeship and hands on training. From Shockley's company came the traitorous eight, who founded Fairchild. From Fairchild came the Fairchildren, who founded Silicon Valley.
On Mar 5, 2017, at 3:48 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 06:42:59 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
Edison himself personally with his own hands built
donald cuack is a sick piece of lying shit and nothing but a troll. Too bad he still hasn't suffered an accident.
James Donald's racist misogynistic rants are a pretty obvious clue to his real psychology: He loves taking it up the ass from burly black men. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and i only hope he can come to terms with his desires. James, remember to use protection!
I point out that their poster boys and poster girls for black and female victims of white males are fake, and their poster boys and poster girls for smart or creative blacks and females are fake. And they respond, not by finding better poster girls, not by defending their existing poster girls, but by personal attacks. What does this tell you about supposed victimization of blacks and females, and supposed black and female talent?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:11:41 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
And they respond, not by finding better poster girls, not by defending their existing poster girls, but by personal attacks.
you also wrote : "Just as you cannot find a plausibly innocent black who was lynched, " So you are an apologist for murder and you are whining because you are being 'attacked' by digital data on the interweb?
On 3/7/2017 5:41 AM, juan wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:11:41 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
And they respond, not by finding better poster girls, not by defending their existing poster girls, but by personal attacks.
you also wrote :
"Just as you cannot find a plausibly innocent black who was lynched, "
Emmett Till was not lynched, he was quietly and furtively murdered for the same reasons and in the same way as lots of white people are furtively and quietly murdered today. Hitting on someone else's girl, or merely being alone in private with someone else's girl remains today one of major causes of murder. If you had one plausibly innocent black victim of lynching, in all of the United States, in the entire history of the United States, you would not be reduced to the absurdly desperate expedient making the victim of an entirely routine murder your poster boy. A lynching is conducted openly in public by high status people who believe themselves, and are believed by others, to be defending the community. Emmett Till, on the other hand, quietly vanished, and his hidden corpse was later discovered. Which still happens today quite a lot for the same reasons regardless of race.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:40 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> vomited:
A lynching is conducted openly in public by high status people who believe themselves, and are believed by others, to be defending the community.
No, you are lying. Is there anything else you can do, apart from lying? lynch : to put to death, especially by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority http://www.dictionary.com/browse/lynch?s=t
On 3/7/2017 7:47 AM, juan wrote:
lynch : to put to death, especially by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority
Presumably there is a distinction between being "put to death" and furtively bumped off in a dark alley. Fine: What black man was put to death without legal authority unjustly? Name him. Or, if you want to define every murder of a black man as lynching, let us start counting whites murdered by blacks as compared to blacks murdered by whites. If you want to count every murder of a black as lynching, observe that there are approximately five hundred white people killed by blacks every year, The number of black people killed by whites, counting whites as hispanic is roughly comparable, about two hundred per year, but there is a big difference, a huge difference, in the character of the killings: Almost every black man killed by a white man was engaged in a felony at the time he was killed. Only about one non felonious black is killed by a "white" man (actually hispanic) per year.
On 3/7/2017 10:53 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
If you want to count every murder of a black as lynching, observe that there are approximately five hundred white people killed by blacks every year,
The number of black people killed by whites, counting whites as hispanic is roughly comparable, about two hundred per year, but there is a big difference, a huge difference, in the character of the killings: Almost every black man killed by a white man was engaged in a felony at the time he was killed. Only about one non felonious black is killed by a "white" man (actually hispanic) per year.
I meant to say of course "counting hispanics as white", not "counting whites as hispanic". Today, blacks are killed by whites in the course of that black man committing a crime. In the days of lynchings, a lynching consisted of killing a black man after he committed a serious crime, instead of while he was committing a crime.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:11:41 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
And they respond, not by finding better poster girls, not by defending their existing poster girls, but by personal attacks.
you also wrote : "Just as you cannot find a plausibly innocent black who was lynched, " So you are an apologist for murder and you are whining because you are being 'attacked' by digital data on the interweb?
On 3/7/2017 7:43 AM, juan wrote:
you also wrote :
"Just as you cannot find a plausibly innocent black who was lynched, "
So you are an apologist for murder and you are whining because you are being 'attacked' by digital data on the interweb?
None of the lynchings were murders. If any lynched black in the entire history of the United States was plausibly innocent, you would have a better poster boy.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 9:35 AM, John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
James Donald's racist misogynistic rants are a pretty obvious clue to his real psychology:
He loves taking it up the ass from burly black men.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and i only hope he can come to terms with his desires.
James, remember to use protection!
It's never too late, Donald. People need to search their happiness in all the possible places. I bet it's *out* the closet, my dear. :) It’s never too late to be your authentic self, Donald. Wish you good luck! <3 # 95 Year Old Comes Out As Gay. https://youtu.be/USukifYeFVo "Can you imagine 90 years to be in the closet?" "But I want to - I want to go to sleep and have somebody close to me, not for any other reason but to be sure that someone cares, you know? That's all." http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/grandfather-comes-out-gay-95-... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/95-year-old-comes-out_us_58b85858e4b02a4... # Aww Late Bonus Du Jour... :3 :3 :3 https://www.buzzfeed.com/remysmidt/calm-down
participants (5)
-
Cecilia Tanaka -
James A. Donald -
John Newman -
juan -
Razer