On October 23, 2015 7:49:17 PM Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/23/2015 10:21 AM, Shelley wrote:
(I thought it was a joke/troll post & initially ignored it.)
What makes you think that it's not?
What makes you think that it's coderman's list?
I reflected upon that after I had already run my mouth about it. It didn't seem to be presented as a quote, or a "look at this BS I found!" post. As I said, I'd basically ignored it until others began commenting about who was/was not on the list.
I noticed eugen, too! Wtf, codermange?
Jim Fucking Bell is on there, but not Cari Machet. Riiight.
Maybe that tells you something, maybe not.
What set includes Jim Bell and Paul Syverson, but not Cari Machet?
Nothing coherent comes to mind.
Looking at it the other way: which set might include people like coderman, Jim Bell, Brian Carroll... mk @ desu = liberté. Nadim K? If this is someone else's list, it makes no sense to me that coderman would be on it (if it were indeed a list of "crackpots and cranks.") He files a lot of FOIA requests, and that probably irks a fair number of people with an interest in keeping the info hidden. Jim: he needs no further explanation. A glorious thorn in the side of a bunch of people would couldn't deserve it more. And, so on... It could be some kind of tactic to attempt to squelch voices of dissent/advocates of crypto, sure. They've been doing such things long before Snowden found out about it. Perhaps if I ask nicely, coderman will enlighten us as to whether this filter is a list of his own or a random pastebin he happened upon? -S
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Seth <list@sysfu.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 01:59:51 -0700, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
---
Email filter update. This is a list with trolls, troublemakers and other nuts mostly on the security mailing lists. Since I filter those the discussion is much more civil. And with far less conspiracies.
Pondering the meaning seeing as how OP's own email address is included in the list.
Now that's meta-trolling if I ever dun seen it.
-- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
On 10/24/2015 07:38 AM, Shelley wrote:
I noticed eugen
Did you notice, by going to the domain, 'eugen' hearts cryogenics? (and perhaps eugen-ics?) Someone else on this list does too. I know who. But I'm not saying. I will say, because of that, the odds are in favor of the list belonging to someone with an interest in cryogenics. RR
On October 23, 2015 7:49:17 PM Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/23/2015 10:21 AM, Shelley wrote:
(I thought it was a joke/troll post & initially ignored it.)
What makes you think that it's not?
What makes you think that it's coderman's list?
I reflected upon that after I had already run my mouth about it. It didn't seem to be presented as a quote, or a "look at this BS I found!" post. As I said, I'd basically ignored it until others began commenting about who was/was not on the list.
I noticed eugen, too! Wtf, codermange?
Jim Fucking Bell is on there, but not Cari Machet. Riiight.
Maybe that tells you something, maybe not.
What set includes Jim Bell and Paul Syverson, but not Cari Machet?
Nothing coherent comes to mind.
Looking at it the other way: which set might include people like coderman, Jim Bell, Brian Carroll... mk @ desu = liberté. Nadim K?
If this is someone else's list, it makes no sense to me that coderman would be on it (if it were indeed a list of "crackpots and cranks.") He files a lot of FOIA requests, and that probably irks a fair number of people with an interest in keeping the info hidden.
Jim: he needs no further explanation. A glorious thorn in the side of a bunch of people would couldn't deserve it more.
And, so on...
It could be some kind of tactic to attempt to squelch voices of dissent/advocates of crypto, sure. They've been doing such things long before Snowden found out about it. Perhaps if I ask nicely, coderman will enlighten us as to whether this filter is a list of his own or a random pastebin he happened upon?
-S
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Seth <list@sysfu.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 01:59:51 -0700, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
---
Email filter update. This is a list with trolls, troublemakers and other nuts mostly
on the
security mailing lists. Since I filter those the discussion is much more civil. And with far less conspiracies.
Pondering the meaning seeing as how OP's own email address is included in the list.
Now that's meta-trolling if I ever dun seen it.
-- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
On October 24, 2015 10:16:35 AM Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/24/2015 07:38 AM, Shelley wrote:
I noticed eugen
Did you notice, by going to the domain, 'eugen' hearts cryogenics? (and perhaps eugen-ics?)
Someone else on this list does too. I know who. But I'm not saying.
I will say, because of that, the odds are in favor of the list belonging to someone with an interest in cryogenics.
RR
I was going by eugen's posts I've seen on various lists. He has always been kind and polite, and contributes useful info. ...what's wrong with cryogenics? There are several Transhumanists on this list, that's just one of many areas of interest. As for eugenics... I have chosen it for myself. Someone pissed in my family's gene pool ages ago and I refuse to propagate that mess. I wish other people in my family had the same view. Looking at the state of this planet, there appear to be many other people for whom that would be a wise choice. That's not for me or anyone else to decide, though. Merely my opinion, which ain't worth much. -S
participants (2)
-
Razer -
Shelley