Fwd: Data request
meant to include the list in this, as per request ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:29:58 -0500 Subject: Re: Data request To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> hi grarpamp i am very curious why this is asked for; i might be a little naive, to not tell myself immediately by looking. here is the information you request, partly censored since the reason of request is unclear: Last-Modified: Mon, 17 May 2021 2[ ]8 GMT d[ ]af59a550e52a55a37edddbf8e83464fc247f16ef896eae758d80[ ]4
Truncation to 216 bits is still 56 bits more than sha1, the likelihood that anyone's going to collide sha256 like that without a break anytime before 2122... is zero.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 4:18 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Truncation to 216 bits is still 56 bits more than sha1, the likelihood that anyone's going to collide sha256 like that without a break anytime before 2122... is zero.
I received a reply from you a month or two after I responded to your request.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 5:02 AM xm <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 4:18 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Truncation to 216 bits is still 56 bits more than sha1, the likelihood that anyone's going to collide sha256 like that without a break anytime before 2122... is zero.
I received a reply from you a month or two after I responded to your request.
misread the date. guess it was two or three months.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 5:03 AM xm <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 5:02 AM xm <0xloem@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 4:18 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Truncation to 216 bits is still 56 bits more than sha1, the likelihood that anyone's going to collide sha256 like that without a break anytime before 2122... is zero.
I received a reply from you a month or two after I responded to your request.
misread the date. guess it was two or three months.
nono just one or two months. having logical mental errors pretty heavily these couple days.
the truncation was to create a surprise if the use was for pretention a month delay to state this is a surprise I guess it's important to drop the bits more ! it's on me that I don't have a pgp key. it's on your email that I don't receive one from it.
ohhh 2022 is _this_ year! i'm psychologically stuck in an event from last decade. what is this link about?
On 1/3/22, k <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
it's on me that I don't have a pgp key. it's on your email that I don't receive one from it.
Yes pgp is useful, though things like age are as well. For example, people can play with this key which will expire and be destroyed on or before 2022-04-30... age19nr5khmhtwe0jp0f2yvh2cevsqaev5tjkq0zw5t5ruy2uvrgfsysl7r6ch https://github.com/FiloSottile/age https://gnupg.org/
I'm quite surprised that age's interface doesn't provide for signing of messages.
participants (4)
-
grarpamp -
k -
Karl
-
xm