We don't need any ChatGPT
So long as we have Semich, Garofalo and Gramps ' . . . To date, there’s been little evidence of the harmful effects of LLMs in the real world. But these recent events at Stack Overflow support the argument that the scale of these systems does indeed create new challenges. The site’s mods say as much in announcing the ban on ChatGPT, noting that the “volume of these [AI-generated] answers (thousands) and the fact that the answers often require a detailed read by someone with at least some subject matter expertise in order to determine that the answer is actually bad has effectively swamped our volunteer-based quality curation infrastructure.” The worry is that this pattern could be repeated on other platforms, with a flood of AI content drowning out the voices of real users with plausible but incorrect data. Exactly how this could play out in different domains around the web, though, would depend on the exact nature of the platform and its moderation capabilities. Whether or not these problems can be mitigated in the future using tools like improved spam filters remains to be seen." https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2022/12/twitter-comes-of-a...
This has obviously already been happening in various manners, and reflects power balances regarding present use of these technologies. In a normal world, a wiki with AI contribution works great, because there are more benevolent AI bot devs than malicious ones.
participants (2)
-
professor rat
-
Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many