Boyce blocked my address in his private e-mail. I've sent a message to another e-mail address. I was banned and can't subscribe again. Phew, hard times... :-/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> Date: Jun 22, 2016 7:12 PM Subject: Fwd: Re: Hi, Boyce! (was Fwd: tor-talk subscription update) To: <tor-talk-owner@lists.torproject.org> Hi Boyce. I can't subscribe again. I was talking seriously about being on topic. If you search in my messages, you find references about my rapes. Sorry, I am receiving lots of messages talking about rape me again. And again. And again. I won't go to a Python meeting because my presence was public and two persons that mention the rape are surely Brazilian. Some of my friends are trying to discover their identities and I am being more cautelous than usual. Sorry, don't you think it was a bit injust call me a "rape apologetics"? Being sincere, it was disgusting enough for making me crying until now. Cecilia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> Date: Jun 22, 2016 6:59 PM Subject: Re: Hi, Boyce! (was Fwd: tor-talk subscription update) To: "Griffin Boyce" <griffin@cryptolab.net> Cc: "cpunks" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Hi again, Boyce. I will re-subscribe and be on topic now. You can moderate my messages to be sure I will be strictly on topic, if you want. I am humbly asking to return because there are some interesting subjects there, about Tor Project in general. Sorry for being deeply sincere, but mentioning "ludicrous rape apologetics" makes really clear your beliefs and preferences. Hope to be accepted again. Cecilia On Jun 22, 2016 6:23 PM, "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:

Boyce,

I asked to Roger about the tor-talk moderation rules weeks ago and did not receive any answer. I can send the message in private to you, if you don't believe.

** I was already raped twice and I do have deep physical and emotional scars. Do you really think I loved my experiences and I deserve to be called "ludicrous rape apologetics"? **

I was talking about truth and lies, about judgements without proofs. I was a real victim in the past, I didn't tell lies. I know in my own burned skin what is being a victim of rape. Please, you can offend my intelligence, but it is really injust and pretty sick to call me "rape apologetics".

I bet you will leave ja.group post lies in tor-talk list, Boyce. How about being *fair*, please? I can create a fake account just for reading tor-talk list, but I prefer to use my own name and be transparent, expose myself when talking about lies. So, the ja.group or any person can contact me if they really want to talk about the truth.

Thanks for the answer, but you were unfair and really disgusting.

Cecilia On Jun 22, 2016 6:03 PM, "Griffin Boyce" <griffin@cryptolab.net> wrote:

...

Cecilia Tanaka wrote:

...

Boyce, please, just pro-Jake people were banned or it was just a lovely coincidence? How about a bit of transparency, please?

Hello Cecilia,

This is the relevant thread on tor-project: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-June/000459.html

As you can see, the emphasis is on off-topic posts and not the members' personal beliefs. Though having my inbox overrun with more than 300 messages filled with the most ludicrous rape apologetics was certainly a factor in my decision to ask for the ability to remove subscribers.

juan wrote:

...

...

I'm obviously re-subscribing right now. The fuck is wrong

...

with you.

You're banned. Go elsewhere.

so you work for the department of defense, eh shitbag? Too stupid and coward to even admit it =)

Senpai isn't going to notice you bro.