-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 "what would Aaron do?" let's find out next year! that's my intent at least. - --- Days before Swartz's funeral, Lawrence Lessig eulogized his friend and sometime-client in an essay, Prosecutor as Bully. He decried the disproportionality of Swartz's prosecution and said, "The question this government needs to answer is why it was so necessary that Aaron Swartz be labeled a 'felon'. For in the 18 months of negotiations, that was what he was not willing to accept."[110] Cory Doctorow wrote, "Aaron had an unbeatable combination of political insight, technical skill, and intelligence about people and issues. I think he could have revolutionized American (and worldwide) politics. His legacy may still yet do so." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz best regards, and for shame, earth humans... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEAREKAH0WIQRBwSuMMH1+IZiqV4FlqEfnwrk4DAUCYcpe8F8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0NDFD MTJCOEMzMDdEN0UyMTk4QUE1NzgxNjVBODQ3RTdDMkI5MzgwQwAKCRBlqEfnwrk4 DHmzAQCnHHNdoD9uJAjl6WtMNIbIxgHTBlewKajEyC6Usa4VLgEApGeeNoX3yofX 5EcKvxDIhQLoRCDCWnCdSYLnAJPJwAM= =y9fb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz United States v. Swartz From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Jump to navigation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#mw-head) [Jump to search](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#searchInput) United States v. Aaron Swartz [District-Massachusetts.png](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:District-Massachusetts.png) Court [United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_...) Full case name United States of America v. Aaron Swartz Defendant [Aaron Swartz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) Prosecution [Carmen Ortiz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_Ortiz) [Stephen Heymann](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Heymann) Citation(s) [1:11-cr-10260](https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.mad.137971) Court membership Judge(s) sitting Nathaniel M. Gorton In United States of America v. Aaron Swartz, [Aaron Swartz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz), an [American](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States) computer programmer, writer, political organizer and [Internet activist](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacktivism), was prosecuted for multiple violations of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act) of 1986 (CFAA), after downloading academic journal articles through the MIT computer network from a source ([JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR)) for which he had an account as a Harvard research fellow. Facing trial and the possibility of imprisonment, Swartz committed suicide, and the case was consequently dismissed.[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Landergan-2)[3](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-DocketAlarm-3) Contents - [1 Background](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Background) - [2 Arrest, charges and indictments](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Arrest,_charges_and_in...) - [3 Federal prosecution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Federal_prosecution) - [3.1 Plea negotiations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Plea_negotiations) - [3.2 Federal prosecutory rationale and responses](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Federal_prosecutory_ra...) - [3.2.1 About the prosecution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#About_the_prosecution) - [3.2.2 About the law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#About_the_law) - [3.3 Reactions, complaints and post-dismissal motions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Reactions,_complaints_...) - [4 Notes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#Notes) - [5 See also](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#See_also) - [6 References](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#References) - [7 External links](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#External_links) Background On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested by [MIT Police](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology_Police_D...) on state breaking-and-entering charges, in connection with the systematic downloading of [academic journal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journal) articles from [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR).[4](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-gerstein-4)[5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-IncidentReport-5)[6](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-hak-6)[7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-2011-tech-7) Federal prosecutors eventually charged him with two counts of [wire fraud](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_wire_fraud#Wire) and eleven violations of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act),[8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Superced-8) charges carrying a cumulative maximum penalty of $1 million in fines plus 35 years in prison, [asset forfeiture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_forfeiture), [restitution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restitution) and [supervised release](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_probation_and_supervised_release).[9](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-SwartzAaronPR-9) On January 11, 2013, two years after his initial arrest, Swartz was found dead in his [Brooklyn](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooklyn) apartment, where he had hanged himself.[10](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-BusinessInsider-10)[11](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-autogenerated1-11)[12](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Time-12) [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR) is a digital repository that archives − and disseminates online − manuscripts, GIS systems, scanned plant specimens and content from [academic journal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journal) articles.[13](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-ithaka-13) Swartz was a [research fellow](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_fellow) at [Harvard University](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_University), which provided him with a JSTOR account. Visitors to MIT's "open campus" were authorized to access JSTOR through its network.[14](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-14) According to state and federal authorities, Swartz downloaded a large number[i](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#endnote_quantity_downl...) of academic journal articles from JSTOR through MIT's computer network, over the course of a few weeks in late 2010 and early 2011.[5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-IncidentRepo...) They said Swartz downloaded the documents to a [laptop computer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laptop_computer) connected to a networking switch in a controlled-access wiring closet.[15](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-lindsay-15)[16](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-jstor-statement-16)[17](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-HuffPost_20130112-17)[18](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-cohen-18) According to press reports, the door to the closet was kept unlocked.[19](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-peters-19)[20](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-macfarquhar-20)[21](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JM-21) Arrest, charges and indictments On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested near the Harvard campus[6](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-hak-6)[22](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-22) by two MIT police officers and a U.S. Secret Service agent. He was arraigned in [Cambridge District Court](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_District_Court) on two state charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony.[4](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-gerstein-4)[5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-IncidentReport-5)[18](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-cohen-18)[23](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-23) On July 11, 2011, Swartz was indicted in federal District Court on four felony counts: [wire fraud](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_fraud), [computer fraud](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_fraud), unlawfully obtaining information from a [protected computer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_computer) and recklessly damaging a protected computer.[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-2011-tech-7)[24](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-TechTimeline-24)[25](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Internet_Activist_Charged_in_Data_Theft-25) On November 17, 2011, Swartz was indicted by a Middlesex County Superior Court grand jury on state charges of breaking and entering with intent, grand larceny and unauthorized access to a computer network.[26](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-26)[27](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-MassDA-27) On December 16, 2011, the district attorney's office filed a [nolle prosequi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolle_prosequi) declaration in the case generated by Swartz's initial January 6, 2011 arrest.[5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-IncidentRepo...) The state charges against Swartz stemming from the November 17, 2011 indictment were dropped on March 8, 2012.[28](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-StateDrop-28) The state charges were dropped due to a deal being reached in which the data was returned by Swartz. [28](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-StateDrop-28) A report later submitted to the president of MIT about the Swartz case suggests, however, that Massachusetts state law required the Middlesex district attorney to dismiss the charges after the Boston U.S. Attorneys' Office and the Secret Service failed to promptly hand over evidence requested by Swartz's attorney during the Massachusetts case's discovery process.[29](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-MIT_Presiden...) Writing in Massachusetts Lawyers' Weekly, [Harvey Silverglate](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Silverglate) reported that lawyers familiar with the original case told him they had expected it to be dismissed after a "'continuance without a finding' ... The charge [would be] held in abeyance ... without any verdict ... for a period of a few months up to maybe a couple of years."[30](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Silverglate-...) After the publication of his Massachusetts Lawyers' Weekly piece, Silverglate explained to [CNET](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNET)'s Declan McCullagh that if the defendant manages to stay out of further legal trouble after such a continuance, the case is typically dismissed.[31](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-return-31) "Tragedy intervened," Silverglate had written, "when [U.S. Attorney Carmen] Ortiz's office took over the case to 'send a message.'"[30](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Silverglate-...) According to [Verge](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Verge) reporter Jeff Blagdon[32](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Blagdon-32) and the Huffington Post,[33](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Grim-33) federal rather than local prosecutors had been "calling the shots" on the prosecution of the case since Swartz's arrest. Both cited a letter from Swartz's attorneys to the Department of Justice.[34](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-p4Peters-34)
The lead prosecutor in Mr. Swartz's [federal] case, AUSA Stephen Heymann ... and [Secret Service] Agent Pickett directed and controlled the investigation of Mr. Swartz from the time of [his] arrest on January 6 ... Heymann's involvement in the case had commenced very early in the investigation.[34](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-p4Peters-34)
Federal prosecution On April 13, 2011, as part of their investigation, federal authorities interviewed Swartz's former partner, [Wired](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_(magazine)) journalist [Quinn Norton](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinn_Norton); she penned an article, "Life Inside the Aaron Swartz Investigation," detailing her experiences in the case.[35](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Quinn-35)[36](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-36)
I mentioned ... a two-year-old public post on ... Aaron's blog. It had been fairly widely picked up by other blogs. I couldn't imagine that these people who had just claimed to have read everything I'd ever written had never looked at their target's blog, which appeared in his FBI file, or searched for what he thought about "open access." They hadn't. So this is where I was profoundly foolish. I told them about the Guerilla Open Access Manifesto. And in doing so, Aaron would explain to me later (and reporters would confirm), I made everything worse.[35](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Quinn-35)
On July 19, 2011, the July 11th federal indictment[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-2011-tech-7)[24](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-TechTimeline-24) was unsealed, charging Swartz with two counts of fraud and two counts related to accessing and damaging a protected computer.[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[25](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Internet_Activist_Charged_in_Data_Theft-25) According to the indictment, Swartz surreptitiously attached a laptop to MIT's computer network, which ran a script named "keepgrabbing.py",[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-2011-tech-7) allowing him to "rapidly download an extraordinary volume of articles from JSTOR."[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[37](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-CB1-37) Prosecutors in the case said Swartz acted with the intention of making the papers available on [P2P file-sharing sites](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer_file_sharing).[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[15](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-lindsay-15) Swartz surrendered to authorities, pleading not guilty on all counts, and was released on $100,000 unsecured [bail](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bail).[38](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-NewYorkTimesOpinion1-38) After his arrest, JSTOR released a statement saying that though it considered Swartz's access to be a "significant misuse" committed in an "unauthorized fashion," it would not pursue civil litigation against him;[16](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-jstor-statement-16)[38](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-NewYorkTimesOpinion1-38) MIT did not comment on the proceedings.[39](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-lessig-obitu...) The New York Times wrote of the case: "a respected Harvard researcher who also is an Internet folk hero has been arrested in Boston on charges related to computer hacking, which are based on allegations that he downloaded articles that he was entitled to get free."[38](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-NewYorkTimes...) [The Awl](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Awl) similarly commented that "Swartz is being charged with hacker crimes, not copyright-infringement crimes, because he didn't actually distribute any documents, plus JSTOR didn't even want him prosecuted."[40](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-awl-40) Assistant U.S. Attorneys [Stephen Heymann](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Heymann) and Scott Garland were the lead prosecutors, working under the supervision of U.S. Attorney [Carmen Ortiz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_Ortiz).[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndictment-1)[17](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-HuffPost_20130112-17)[41](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Wired_20130113-41) The case was brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which was passed in 1986 to enhance the government's ability to prosecute hackers who accessed computers to steal information or to disrupt or destroy computer functionality.[42](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-42)[43](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-crln-43) "If convicted on these charges," said Ortiz, "Swartz faces up to 35 years in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, restitution, forfeiture and a fine of up to $1 million."[9](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-SwartzAaronP...) On September 12, 2012, the prosecution filed a superseding indictment adding nine more felony counts.[8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Superced-8)[44](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-techdirt-44) [George Washington University Law School](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington_University_Law_School) Professor [Orin Kerr](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orin_Kerr), writing on the legal blog [Volokh Conspiracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volokh_Conspiracy), opined that the risk of a maximum sentence in Swartz's case was not high.[45](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Kerr2-45) In an interview with Boston's [WBUR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WBUR), retired federal judge [Nancy Gertner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Gertner) said a sentence of 35 years for a case like Swartz's "never occurs." She questioned the propriety of pressing these charges at all. Referring to decision-making by Ortiz's office, she said "this is the example of bad judgment I saw too often," suggesting that a two-year diversion program leading to expunged charges would have been more fitting.[46](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-46) Plea negotiations Swartz's attorney, [Elliot Peters](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliot_Peters), stated that prosecutors at one point offered a plea deal of four months in prison and pleading guilty to 13 charges, and warned that if Swartz rejected the deal, future deals would be less attractive;[47](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-47) and that two days before Swartz's death, that "Swartz would have to spend six months in prison and plead guilty to 13 charges if he wanted to avoid going to trial."[48](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-AP_20130114-...) Under the six-month deal, after Swartz pled guilty to the 13 charges, the government would have argued for a six-month sentence, and Swartz would have argued for a lesser sentence; the judge would then be free to assign whatever sentence the judge thought appropriate, up to six months.[49](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-49) Peters later filed a complaint with the DOJ's [Office of Professional Responsibility](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Professional_Responsibility), stating that if Swartz didn't plead guilty, Heymann "threatened that he would seek for Mr. Swartz to serve seven years in prison," a difference in duration Peters asserts went "far beyond" the disparity encouraged by the [plea-bargain portion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_responsibility) of the [Federal Sentencing Guidelines](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Federal_Sentencing_Guidelines).[34](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-p4Peters-34) Andy Good, Swartz's initial lawyer, told [The Boston Globe](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boston_Globe): "I told Heymann the kid was a suicide risk. His reaction was a standard reaction in that office, not unique to Steve. He said, 'Fine, we'll lock him up.' I'm not saying they made Aaron kill himself. Aaron might have done this anyway. I'm saying they were aware of the risk, and they were heedless."[50](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-cullen-50) Marty Weinberg, who took the case over from Good, said he nearly negotiated a plea bargain in which Swartz would not serve any time. "JSTOR signed off on it," he said, "but MIT would not."[50](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-cullen-50) Two days before his death, JSTOR announced on January 9, 2013 that it would make "more than 4.5 million articles" available to the public free of charge. The "Register & Read" service, in beta for the previous 10 months, was capped at three articles every two weeks (78 per year), readable online only, with some downloadable for a fee.[51](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-LibraryJournal-51)[52](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JSTOR_RaR-52) After his death, Ortiz's office dismissed the charges against Swartz.[2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Landergan-2)[3](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-DocketAlarm-3) She said, "This office's conduct was appropriate in bringing and handling this case ... This office sought an appropriate sentence that matched the alleged conduct—a sentence that we would recommend to the judge of six months in a low security setting ... At no time did this office ever seek—or ever tell Mr. Swartz's attorneys that it intended to seek—maximum penalties under the law."[53](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-53)[54](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Ortiz2013-54) On January 12, 2013, [Alex Stamos](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Stamos), a [computer forensics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_forensics) investigator employed by the Swartz legal defense team, posted an online summary of the [expert testimony](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness) he had been prepared to present in the JSTOR case, had Swartz lived to see trial. He wrote:
If I had taken the stand as planned and had been asked by the prosecutor whether Aaron's actions were "wrong," I would probably have replied that what Aaron did would better be described as "inconsiderate." In the same way it is inconsiderate ... to check out every book at the library needed for a History 101 paper. It is inconsiderate to download lots of files on shared wifi ...[55](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-55)
Federal prosecutory rationale and responses U.S. Attorney Ortiz asserted after the 2011 indictment that "stealing is stealing, whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars. It is equally harmful to the victim, whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away."[9](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-SwartzAaronPR-9)[40](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-awl-40) About the prosecution At a January 24, 2013 memorial for Swartz, [Carl Malamud](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Malamud) recalled their work with PACER. He noted that they had brought millions of U.S. District Court records out from behind PACER's "pay wall" and found them full of privacy violations.
We sent our results to the Chief Judges of 31 District Courts ... They redacted those documents and they yelled at the lawyers that filed them ... The Judicial Conference changed their privacy rules.
... [To] the bureaucrats who ran the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ... we were thieves ...
So they called the FBI ... [The FBI] found nothing wrong ...
"Was the overly aggressive posture of the Department of Justice prosecutors and law enforcement officials," he asked, "revenge because they were embarrassed that — in their view at least — we somehow got away with something in the PACER incident? Was the merciless JSTOR prosecution the revenge of embarrassed bureaucrats because they looked stupid in the New York Times, because the U.S. Senate called them on the carpet?"[56](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Mercy-56) Former [Nixon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Richard_Nixon) [White House](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House) counsel [John Dean](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dean) wrote an article on the legal blog justia.com entitled "Dealing with Aaron Swartz in the Nixonian Tradition: Overzealous Overcharging Leads to a Tragic Result", saying "these are not people who are conscientiously and fairly upholding our federal laws. Rather, they are typically authoritarian personalities who get their jollies from shamelessly beating up on unfortunate people like Aaron Swartz."[57](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-57) [George Washington University](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington_University) law professor [Orin Kerr](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orin_Kerr) wrote on January 15, 2013 that "the charges brought here were pretty much what any good federal prosecutor would have charged."[58](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-58)[59](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-59) [Duke University](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_University_School_of_Law) law professor [James Boyle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Boyle_(academic)) replied in The Huffington Post: "I think that in [Kerr's] descriptions of the facts [and of] the issues surrounding prosecutorial discretion ... he tends ... to minimize or ignore facts that might put [Swartz] in a more favorable light."[60](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-60) In response to a piece by Larissa MacFarquhar in the [New Yorker](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Yorker), retired journalist Jane Scholz objected to what she perceived as an effort "to turn Swartz into a hero for facing government prosecution after hacking the JSTOR archive", arguing that "Swartz was apparently familiar with laws protecting proprietary-information-management systems, so he should not have been surprised by the severity of the prosecution's response to his crime. It is a crime, and not a victimless one. I am a retired journalist; during my working years, my salary depended, and today my pension relies, on people paying for copyrighted content. In recent years, as the business that supports journalism has declined, thousands of journalists have lost pay, benefits, and, ultimately, their jobs. [ ... ] I find it ironic that Swartz made several million dollars selling the rights to his own copyrighted programming to Conde Nast. Swartz's is a sad story, but it's not a heroic one." Law professor Mike Maddison commented on Scholz's letter: "it is difficult to find a better example of the glib equation of 'my career isn't the success that it once was' and 'somebody committed a crime' that infects contemporary dialogues about IP rights."[61](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-61) [David Aaronovitch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Aaronovitch) noted in [The Times](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Times) that JSTOR was itself a "product of philanthropy" but that it had to charge access fees so that it could pay [academic publishers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publisher) for rights to their publications. He decried the "reckless" behavior of a generation which "cannot be persuaded—yet—that copyright matters".[62](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-62) In contrast, [Peter Ludlow](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Ludlow) in [The Chronicle of Higher Education](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chronicle_of_Higher_Education) argued that due to the [publish or perish](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish_or_perish) nature of academia and the importance that journals' reputations have, "[w]hen an academic signs away copyright to an academic publisher, it amounts to a 'contract of adhesion'—meaning a contract in which one party has all the power and it was not freely bargained" and that "like the original authors, JSTOR had to negotiate its licensing agreements from a position of weakness", which Ludlow illustrated with a bargaining agreement from JSTOR's history, which stipulated that the publishers "be compensated if there was a loss to their (minimal) sales of rights to older materials, and they demanded compensation even before JSTOR covered its own expenses". Ludlow concluded that "Until academics get their acts together and start using new modes of publication, we need to recognize that actions like Aaron Swartz's civil disobedience are legitimate."[63](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-63) Rob Weir, who describes himself as an "associate editor of a very small journal", writes in [Inside Higher Ed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Higher_Ed) that "Many wonder why money accrues to those whose only 'creation' is to aggregate the labor of others, especially when some form of taxpayer money underwrote many of the articles. That's a legitimate concern, but defending Swartz's method elevates vigilantism above the rules of law and reason." While he concedes that "JSTOR charges university libraries a king's ransom for its services", he also argues that "even a modest journal is expensive to produce" and that "if you want anyone to read your journal, you'll give it to JSTOR or some other aggregator. Unless, of course, you can drum up lots of free advertising". He concludes that the "[information wants to be free](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free)" adage fails to account for the "hidden costs within the culture of free", and proposes that "[there ain't no such thing as a free lunch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_ain%27t_no_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch)" is the appropriate summary of production costs in the [Information Age](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Age), which he transmutes to "if you can't do the time, don't do the crime" for "hackers and info thieves".[64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-64) [Tim Wu](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Wu), writing in [The New Yorker](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Yorker), called out what he perceived as lack of proportionality, writing that "The act was harmless — [ ... ] meaning that there was no actual physical harm, nor actual economic harm. The leak was found and plugged; JSTOR suffered no actual economic loss. It did not press charges. Like a pie in the face, Swartz's act was annoying to its victim, but of no lasting consequence."[65](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-65) Wu went on to compare Swartz's act with that of [Steve Jobs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs) and [Steve Wozniak](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak), who, according to Wu, "in the nineteen-seventies, committed crimes similar to, but more economically damaging than, Swartz's. Those two men hacked AT&T's telephone system to make free long-distance calls, and actually sold the illegal devices ([blue boxes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_box)) to make cash. Their mentor, [John Draper](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Draper), did go to jail for a few months (where he wrote one of the world's first word processors), but Jobs and Wozniak were never prosecuted. Instead, they got bored of [phreaking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phreaking) and built a computer. The great ones almost always operate at the edge" writes Wu, in support of this thesis that "We can rightly judge a society by how it treats its eccentrics and deviant geniuses—and by that measure, we have utterly failed [in the case of Swartz]."[66](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-66) About the law After Boyle's Huffington Post column, Kerr returned to the topic, advocating reform of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) under which Swartz was prosecuted. "The problem raised by the Swartz case is ... [that] felony liability under the statute is triggered much too easily. The law needs to draw a distinction between low-level crimes and more serious crimes, and current law does so poorly ..."[67](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-OK-67) [Chris Soghoian](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Soghoian), a technology policy analyst at the [American Civil Liberties Union](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties_Union), argued similarly, "Existing laws don't recognise the distinction between two types of computer crimes: malicious crimes committed for profit ... and cases where hackers break into systems to prove their skillfulness or spread information that they think should be available to the public."[68](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-stuff1-68) [Jennifer Granick](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Granick), Director of Civil Liberties at the [Stanford Center for Internet and Society](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Center_for_Internet_and_Society), both defended Swartz and challenged the scope of the law under which he was prosecuted.[69](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-69)[70](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-70) Law professor [Stephen L. Carter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_L._Carter) agrees that the prosecution of Swartz was ridiculous, but also lays the blame on Congress for creating a new type of federal felony roughly every week.[71](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-71) Carter considers that the CFAA is a good example of this phenomenon. He writes: "Enacted in the 1980s, before the Internet explosion, the statute makes a criminal of anyone who 'intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access' and, in the process, obtains financial information, government information or 'information from any protected computer.'" Carter then gives the following example: "You're sitting in your office, when suddenly you remember that you forgot to pay your Visa bill. You take a moment to log on to your bank account, and you pay the bill. Then you go back to work. If your employer has a policy prohibiting personal use of office computers, then you have exceeded your authorized access; since you went to your bank website, you have obtained financial information. Believe it or not, you're now a felon. The likelihood of prosecution might be small, but you've still committed a crime." Carter further writes that the problem with the statute was well-known, and that "some federal courts have given the statute's language a narrow construction, but others have read it broadly, and the [Obama administration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_administration) has opposed efforts in Congress to narrow its scope. [Alex Kozinski](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Kozinski), chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, warned in an opinion last spring [of 2012] the government's position 'would make criminals of large groups of people who would have little reason to suspect they are committing a federal crime.'"[72](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-72) In 2013, [Zoe Lofgren](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Lofgren) and [Ron Wyden](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Wyden) have advanced a legislative proposal called "[Aaron's Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron%27s_Law)" to amend the CFAA in order to eliminate the aforementioned vagueness and also eliminate the "redundant provisions that enable a person to be punished multiple times ... for the same crime".[73](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-RonZoe-73) In an opinion piece for Wired magazine, they wrote that "This is, in fact, what happened to Aaron Swartz — more than a third of the charges in the superseding indictment against him were under this redundant CFAA provision."[73](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-RonZoe-73) Reactions, complaints and post-dismissal motions See also: [Aaron Swartz § Aftermath](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz#Aftermath) Speaking at his son's funeral, Robert Swartz said, "[Aaron] was killed by the government, and MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."[74](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-guy-74) [Mitch Kapor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Kapor) posted the statement on [Twitter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter).[75](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-75) Carmen Ortiz's husband, IBM executive Tom Dolan, replied through his own Twitter feed, @TomJDolan, "Truly incredible that in their own son's obit they blame others for his death and make no mention of the 6 month offer."[76](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Guard-76) In [Esquire](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquire_(magazine)), [Charlie Pierce](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Pierce) wrote that "the glibness with which her husband and her defenders toss off a 'mere' six months in federal prison, low-security or not, is a further indication that something is seriously out of whack with the way our prosecutors think these days."[77](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-77) Contacted by [The Guardian](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian), Ortiz's spokesperson had "no comment" to make on the matter;[76](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Guard-76) [Reuters](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters) reported being unable to contact Dolan.[78](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-ReutersMSN-7...) On January 16, 2013, Ortiz released an official statement, in which she reiterated that "I must, however, make clear that this office's conduct was appropriate in bringing and handling this case," and that her subordinates "took on the difficult task of enforcing a law they had taken an oath to uphold, and did so reasonably."[78](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-ReutersMSN-7...) On January 28, 2013, the lawyers for Swartz's estate sent a letter to the Justice Department accusing Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen Heymann of professional misconduct.[33](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Grim-33)[79](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Castillo-79) They said Heymann "may have misrepresented to the Court the extent of the federal government's [early] involvement in the investigation."[80](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Jeralyn-80)
Emails and reports further illustrated ... that AUSA Heymann was himself involved in the investigation even before Mr. Swartz was arrested on January 6, 2011.[34](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-p4Peters-34)
The lawyers also said Heymann "abused his discretion when he attempted to coerce" Swartz into pleading guilty:[33](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Grim-33)[79](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Castillo-79)[80](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Jeralyn-80)
Swartz ... naturally felt extreme pressure to waive his rights ... The difference between an offer of four months and a threat of seven years went far beyond the minimal reduction ... that should properly have applied for [a defendant's] "acceptance of responsibility" under the Sentencing Guidelines.[34](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-p4Peters-34)[80](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Jeralyn-80)
On March 15, the lawyers asked the federal court to modify the protective order on Swartz's file to permit public disclosure of the discovery materials, including the names and titles of MIT, JSTOR and law enforcement employees. The lawyers said that withholding the names would make the documents "less intelligible and thus far less useful to Congress."[81](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Anderson-81) The First Assistant U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts, Jack Pirozzolo, said he was taking a role in the discussions and would be asking the court to give the affected employees an opportunity to be heard on the proposed disclosures.[81](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Anderson-81) The Department of Justice sought to redact the names of the prosecutors involved in the case. On April 3, 2013, a U.S. Attorney's Office spokesperson said, "Our argument against it is that not only does it have an effect on the people involved in the case, but there's also sometimes a residual effect." The Attorney's Office reported threats and hacking attempts against prosecutors already known to be involved: "threatening emails" received by Ortiz and Heymann, the hacking of Heymann's [Facebook](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook) account and that "Heymann's father, a Harvard professor, received a postcard with his photo in a guillotine".[82](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Smith-82) The postcard and some email excerpts were published by [Wired](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_(magazine)) magazine.[83](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-83) On May 13, 2013, the court granted the estate's motion in part, permitting public disclosure of much of the material the estate's lawyers had sought to have unsealed, provided that the names of MIT and government employees were first redacted. The estate's argument for disclosure of these names was "substantially outweighed by the interest of the government and the victims in shielding their employees from potential retaliation," wrote Judge Nathaniel Gorton.[84](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Mullin-84) The judge also ruled that information disclosing details of computer network security at MIT should not be made public.[84](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Mullin-84) The prosecutors and Swartz's lawyers were ordered to propose the terms of the disclosures and redactions by May 27, 2013.[84](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-Mullin-84) [Kevin Poulsen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Poulsen) filed a [FOIA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_(United_States)) lawsuit and in November 2013 obtained the release of 130 pages from the file that the [US Secret Service](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secret_Service) has on Swartz, out of approximately 20,000 pages that the agency has in relation to Swartz.[85](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-85) Of Heymann, [BuzzFeed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed) has noted: "Back in 2008, young hacker [Jonathan James](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_James) killed himself in the midst of a federal investigation led by the same prosecutor."[86](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-86) In January 2013, [WikiLeaks](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks) claimed through its Twitter account that Swartz had been in contact with [Julian Assange](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange) through 2010 and 2011, and that Swartz may have been a source of leaked materials.[87](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-87) If true, this would offer an explanation as to why charges against Swartz were pursued by the federal government despite JSTOR dropping charges and urging that the government and MIT do the same.[88](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-88) Notes [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#ref_quantity_downloade...) The MIT network administration office told MIT police that "approximately 70 gigabytes of data had been downloaded, 98% of which was from JSTOR."[5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-IncidentRepo...) The first federal indictment alleged "approximately 4.8 million articles ... 1.7 million [of which] were made available by independent publishers for purchase through JSTOR's Publisher Sales Service."[1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-JulyFedIndic...) The superseding indictment characterized the amount as "a major portion of the total archive in which JSTOR had invested ... " removing the estimates.[89](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz#cite_note-89) See also - [Academic journal publishing reform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journal_publishing_reform) References - - [July 2011 Initial Federal Indictment of Aaron Swartz](http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/217115/20110719-schwartz.pdf). Posted by [New York Times](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times), 19 July 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2013. - - Landergan, Katherine (2013-01-14). ["US District Court drops charges against Aaron Swartz - MIT - Your Campus"](http://www.boston.com/yourcampus/news/mit/2013/01/us_district_court_drops_ch...). Boston.com. Retrieved 2013-01-23. - - United States v. Swartz, [1:11-cr-10260](https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/Massachusetts_District_Court/1--11-cr-1026...), 106 ([D. Mass.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_...) filed Jan. 14, 2013). - - Gerstein, Josh (July 22, 2011). ["MIT also pressing charges against hacking suspect"](https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2011/07/mit-also-pressing-cha...). Politico. Swartz['s] alleged use of MIT facilities and Web connections to access the JSTOR database … resulted in two state felony charges for breaking into a 'depository' and breaking & entering in the daytime, according to local prosecutors. - - Commonwealth v. Swartz, [Nos. 11-52CR73 & 11-52CR75](http://mitcrimeclub.org/SwartzFilings-state.pdf), MIT Police Incident Report ([Mass. Dist. Ct.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_District_Court) dismissed Dec. 16, 2011) ("MIT's IS&T Department … explained that they were able to determine that this laptop was illegally downloading…. IS&T had put an approximate value on the downloaded information at $50,000.… The suspect … was arrested for two counts of Breaking and Entering in the daytime with the intent to commit a felony."). - - Hak, Susana; Paz, Gabriella (January 26, 2011). ["Compilation of December 15, 2010–January 20, 2011"](http://mitcrimeclub.org/11pologDec15Jan20.pdf) (PDF). Hak–De Paz Police Log Compilations. MIT Crime Club. p. 6. Jan. 6, 2:20 p.m., Aaron Swartz, was arrested at 24 Lee Street as a suspect for breaking and entering…. - - Kirschbaum, Connor (August 3, 2011). ["Swartz indicted for JSTOR theft"](http://tech.mit.edu/V131/N30/swartz.html). [The Tech](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tech_(newspaper)). [Massachusetts Institute of Technology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology). Retrieved January 12, 2013. - - ["September 2012 Superseding Federal Indictment of Aaron Swartz"](https://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2012/09/swartzsuperseding.pdf) (PDF). wired.com. 2012-09-12. Retrieved 2013-05-20. - - US Attorney's Office District of Massachusetts (July 19, 2011). ["Alleged Hacker Charged With Stealing Over Four Million Documents from MIT Network"](https://web.archive.org/web/20120526080523/http://www.justice.gov/usao/ma/ne...). Press release. Archived from [the original](https://www.justice.gov/usao/ma/news/2011/July/SwartzAaronPR.html) on May 26, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2013. - - [Thomas, Owen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Thomas_(writer)) (January 12, 2013). ["Family of Aaron Swartz Blames MIT, Prosecutors For His Death"](http://www.businessinsider.com/statement-family-aaron-swartz-2013-1). [Business Insider](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Insider). Retrieved January 12, 2013. - - ["Aaron Swartz, internet freedom activist, dies aged 26"](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21001452). BBC News. January 13, 2013. Retrieved 2013-01-13. - - ["Aaron Swartz, Tech Prodigy and Internet Activist, Is Dead at 26"](http://business.time.com/2013/01/13/tech-prodigy-and-internet-activist-aaron...). Time. January 13, 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2013. - - ["Terms and Conditions of Use"](https://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp). JSTOR. New York: ITHAKA. January 15, 2013. JSTOR's integrated digital platform is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to … scholarly materials: journal issues …; manuscripts and monographs; …; spatial/geographic information systems data; plant specimens; … - - [Granick, Jennifer, Towards Learning from Losing Aaron Swartz: Part 2, The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School blog, 15 January 2013.](http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/01/towards-learning-losing-aaron-swar...) Retrieved 26 January 2013. - - Lindsay, Jay (July 19, 2011). ["Feds: Harvard fellow hacked millions of papers"](https://news.yahoo.com/feds-harvard-fellow-hacked-millions-papers-203301454....). Boston. Associated Press. Retrieved 2013-01-15. - - ["JSTOR Statement: Misuse Incident and Criminal Case"](http://about.jstor.org/news/jstor-statement-misuse-incident-and-criminal-cas...). JSTOR. Retrieved January 12, 2013. - - Carter, Zach; Grim, Ryan; Reilly, Ryan J (January 12, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz, Internet Pioneer, Found Dead Amid Prosecutor 'Bullying' In Unconventional Case"](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/12/aaron-swartz_n_2463726.html). Huffington Post. - - Cohen, Noam (January 20, 2013). ["How M.I.T. ensnared a hacker, bucking a freewheeling culture"](https://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/technology/how-mit-ensnared-a-hacker-buck...). The New York Times. p. A1. 'Suspect is seen on camera entering network closet' [in an unlocked building].… Within a mile of MIT … he was stopped by an MIT police captain and [U.S. Secret Service agent] Pickett. - - Peters, Justin (February 7, 2013). ["The Idealist: Aaron Swartz wanted to save the world. Why couldn't he save himself?"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130210170319/http://www.slate.com/articles/tec...). Slate. N.Y.C. 6. Archived from [the original](http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/02/aaron_swartz_he_...) on February 10, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2013. The superseding indictment … claimed that Swartz had 'contrived to break into a restricted-access wiring closet at MIT.' But the closet door had been unlocked—and remained unlocked even after the university and authorities were aware that someone had been in there trying to access the school's network. - - [Larissa MacFarquhar](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larissa_MacFarquhar) (March 11, 2013). ["Requiem for a dream: The tragedy of Aaron Swartz"](http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/03/11/130311fa_fact_macfarquhar). The New Yorker. [Swartz] wrote a script that instructed his computer to download articles continuously, something that was forbidden by JSTOR's terms of service.… He spoofed the computer's address…. This happened several times. MIT traced the requests to his laptop, which he had hidden in an unlocked closet. - - Merritt, Jeralyn (January 14, 2013). ["MIT to conduct internal probe on its role in Aaron Swartz case"](http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/1/14/51325/7871/crimenews/MIT-to-Conduct-...). TalkLeft (blog). Att'y Jeralyn Merritt. The wiring closet was not locked and was accessible to the public. If you look at the pictures supplied by the Government, you can see graffiti on one wall. - - [Lipinski, Pearle and Joseph Maurer, Police Log (12/19-2/5)](http://tech.mit.edu/V131/N6/polog.html), [The Tech](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tech_(newspaper)), 18 February 2011 (Volume 131, Issue 6). Retrieved 24 January 2011. - - Singel, Ryan (February 27, 2011). ["Rogue academic downloader busted by MIT webcam stakeout, arrest report says"](https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/mit-webcam-swartz/). Wired. N.Y.C. Swartz is accused … of stealing the articles by attaching a laptop directly to a network switch in … a 'restricted' room, though neither the police report nor the indictment [mentions] a door lock or signage indicating the room is off-limits. - - Kao, Joanna [The Tech’s coverage of Aaron Swartz](http://techblogs.mit.edu/news/2013/01/the-techs-coverage-of-aaron-swartz/) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20171031182652/http://techblogs.mit.edu/news/201...) 2017-10-31 at the [Wayback Machine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine) [The Tech](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tech_(newspaper)), 12 January 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2013 - - Bilton, Nick (July 19, 2011). ["Internet Activist Charged in Data Theft"](http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/reddit-co-founder-charged-with-data...). Boston: Bits Blog, The New York Times Company. Retrieved July 19, 2011. - - Hawkinson, John (November 18, 2011). ["Swartz indicted for breaking and entering"](http://tech.mit.edu/V131/N53/swartz.html). The Tech. MIT. p. 11. Swartz … was indicted … in Middlesex Superior Court … for breaking and entering, larceny over $250, and unauthorized access to a computer network. - - ["Cambridge man indicted on breaking & entering charges, larceny charges in connection with data theft"](http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1655830732/Reddit-co-founder-indi...) (Press release). Middlesex District Attorney. November 17, 2011. Swartz … was indicted today on charges of Breaking and Entering with Intent to Commit a Felony, Larceny over $250, and Unauthorized Access to a Computer Network by a Middlesex Superior Grand Jury. - - Hawkinson, John [State drops charges against Swartz; federal charges remain](http://tech.mit.edu/V132/N12/swartz.html) [The Tech](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tech_(newspaper)), 16 March 2012. Retrieved 14 May 2013. - - Harold Abelson, Peter A. Diamond, Andrew Grosso, and Douglas W. Pfeiffer (July 26, 2013). [Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz](http://swartz-report.mit.edu/docs/report-to-the-president.pdf) (PDF) (Report). p. 36. Retrieved June 6, 2017. After the state indictment, Martin Weinberg filed demands for discovery. In state prosecutions that involve joint investigations with outside law enforcement agencies or foreign jurisdictions, Massachusetts state law governing criminal discovery requires that the District Attorney obtain from those agencies and jurisdictions certain evidence that may be relevant to the case. Some of this evidence was in the sole possession of the Boston U.S. Attorney's Office and the U.S. Secret Service. Mr. Weinberg demanded this material as discovery from the DA's Office, and the USAO refused to produce it to that office. As a result, the DA's Office could not comply with the Massachusetts discovery laws so as to continue its prosecution, and it dismissed its charges. - - Silverglate, Harvey (January 23, 2013). ["The Swartz suicide and the sick culture of the DOJ"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130129065612/http://masslawyersweekly.com/2013...). Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. Archived from [the original](http://masslawyersweekly.com/2013/01/23/the-swartz-suicide-and-the-sick-cult...) on January 29, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2013. - - [McCullagh, Declan, Swartz didn't face prison until feds took over case, report says](http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57565927-38/swartz-didnt-face-prison-until...), [cnet](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNET), 25 January 2013. Retrieved 7 February 2013. - - Blagdon, Jeff (March 14, 2013). ["US Attorney's Office accused of deliberately withholding evidence in Aaron Swartz trial"](https://www.theverge.com/2013/3/14/4102792/us-attorneys-office-accused-of-wi...). The Verge. Vox Media. Swartz's laptop … w[as] seized by the Cambridge Police Department on January 6th, 2011, when Swartz was first arrested ... Heymann had an email proving that the US Attorney's Office, ... not the Cambridge Police Department, was calling the shots on the search and seizure. - - Grim, Ryan; Reilly, Ryan (March 14, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz lawyers accuse prosecutor Stephen Heymann of misconduct"](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/aaron-swartz-prosecutorial-miscondu...). Huffington Post. The handling of the case has already stunted the career of U.S. Attorney … Ortiz, who has become politically toxic and is no longer discussed seriously as a contender for judicial vacancies. - - Peters, Elliot; Daniel Purcell (January 28, 2013). ["Re: United States v. Aaron Swartz"](https://www.scribd.com/doc/130344110/Aaron-Swartz-Lawyers-Accuse-Prosecutor-...). Letter to Robin Ashton, Counsel, US Dept of Justice. Keker & Van Nest LLP. The [federal prosecutors] remarkably suggest … the Cambridge Police Department, not the Secret Service, was in possession of the computer equipment…. The Secret Service was plainly in charge of the investigation at MIT. - - Norton, Quinn (March 3, 2013). ["Life inside the Aaron Swartz investigation"](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/life-inside-the-aaron...). The Atlantic. D.C. Retrieved 2013-03-08. - - Madrigal, Alexis (March 3, 2013). ["Editor's note to Quinn Norton's account of the Aaron Swartz investigation"](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/editors-note-to-quinn...). The Atlantic. D.C. Retrieved 2013-03-08. - - Lundin, Leigh (July 31, 2011). ["The Thief Who Stole Knowledge"](http://criminalbrief.com/?p=17625). Computer Crimes. Criminal Brief. - - Schwartz, John (July 19, 2011). ["Open-Access advocate is arrested for huge download"](https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/20/us/20compute.html). The New York Times. - - Lessig, Lawrence (January 12, 2013). ["Prosecutor as bully"](https://lessig.tumblr.com/post/40347463044/prosecutor-as-bully). Retrieved January 12, 2013. - - [Was Aaron Swartz Stealing? - The Awl](http://www.theawl.com/2011/08/was-aaron-swartz-stealing) - - Poulsen, Kevin (January 12, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz, Coder and Activist, Dead at 26"](https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/aaron-swartz/). Wired. - - McCool, Grant (July 30, 2012). ["Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: The 1980s-Era Hacking Law Out Of Step With Today's Internet, Analysts Say"](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/29/computer-fraud-and-abuse-act_n_1716...). Huff Post Tech. Reuters. Retrieved 2013-01-17. - - Sims, Nancy (October 2011). ["Library licensing and criminal law: The Aaron Swartz case"](http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/9/534.full). [College & Research Libraries News](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_%26_Research_Libraries_News). Association of College and Research Libraries. 72 (9): 534–37. [doi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doi_(identifier)):[10.5860/crln.72.9.8637](https://doi.org/10.5860%2Fcrln.72.9.8637). [ISSN](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)) [0099-0086](https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0099-0086). Retrieved January 13, 2013. - - ["US Government Ups Felony Count in JSTOR/Aaron Swartz Case From Four To Thirteen"](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120917/17393320412/us-government-ups-fel...). Tech dirt. 2012-09-17. Retrieved January 12, 2013. - - Orin Kerr (January 16, 2013). ["The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz Part 2: Prosecutorial Discretion"](http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aaron-swartz-p...). Retrieved January 16, 2013. - - Boeri, David. ["Retired Federal Judge Joins Criticism Over Handling Of Swartz Case"](http://www.wbur.org/2013/01/16/gertner-criticizes-ortiz-swartz). WBUR. Retrieved 17 May 2013. This is the example of bad judgment I saw too often." When asked if she was referring to the bad judgement of Carmen Ortiz, Gertner responded, "That's right. - - Daly, Michael (15 January 2013). ["Aaron Swartz's Unbending Prosecutors Insisted on Prison Time"](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/01/15/aaron-swartz-s-unbending-pr...). The Daily Beast. Retrieved 6 January 2017. - - Lavoie, Denise (January 14, 2013). ["Mass. lawyer: told federal prosecutors Swartz suicidal"](http://bigstory.ap.org/article/feds-dismiss-charges-against-swartz-cite-suic...). Associated Press. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130116223709/http://bigstory.ap.org/article/fe...) from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved 2013-02-08. - - [Orin Kerr](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orin_Kerr) (16 January 2013). ["The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz (Part 2: Prosecutorial Discretion)"](http://volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aaron-swartz-part-...). [The Volokh Conspiracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Volokh_Conspiracy). Retrieved 6 January 2017. - - Cullen, Kevin (January 15, 2013). ["On humanity, a big failure in Aaron Swartz case"](http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/15/humanity-deficit/bj8oThPDwzgxBSHQt3t...). Boston Globe. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130117062007/http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013...) from the original on January 17, 2013. - - Schwartz, Meredith (January 9, 2013). ["Many JSTOR Journal Archives Now Free to Public"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130112012740/http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013...). [Library Journal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Journal). Archived from [the original](http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/01/academic-libraries/many-jstor-journal-a...) on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2013. - - ["Register & Read"](http://about.jstor.org/rr). About. [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR). Retrieved January 14, 2013. - - Laura Smith-Spark (January 17, 2013). ["Prosecutor defends case against Aaron Swartz"](http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/17/tech/aaron-swartz-death/). CNN. Retrieved January 17, 2013. - - [Ortiz, Carmen M.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_Ortiz) (Jan 16, 2013). ["Statement of United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz Regarding The Death of Aaron Swartz"](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/557005-statement-of-us-attorney-orti...). US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. Retrieved Jan 17, 2013. - - Stamos, Alex (January 12, 2013). ["The truth about Aaron Swartz's "crime""](http://unhandled.com/2013/01/12/the-truth-about-aaron-swartzs-crime/). Unhandled Exception. The government provided no evidence that these downloads caused a negative effect on JSTOR or MIT, except due to silly overreactions such as turning off all of MIT's JSTOR access due to downloads from a pretty easily identified user agent. - - Malamud, Carl (January 24, 2013). ["Aaron's Army"](https://public.resource.org/aaron/army/index.html). Speech at Memorial for Aaron Swartz. Public.Resource.Org. [T]he bureaucrats who ran the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts … called the FBI…. They found nothing wrong. - - ["Dealing With Aaron Swartz in the Nixonian Tradition: Overzealous Overcharging Leads to a Tragic Result"](http://verdict.justia.com/2013/01/25/dealing-with-aaron-swartz-in-the-nixoni...). verdict.justia.com. January 25, 2013. Retrieved 2013-01-26. - - Lauerman, John (January 15, 2013). ["MIT's embrace of Web freedom clashes with hacking case"](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-15/mit-s-embrace-of-web-freedom-clash...). Bloomberg. N.Y.C. - - Kerr, Orin (January 14, 2013). ["The criminal charges against Aaron Swartz (Part 1: The law)"](http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-charges/). The Volokh Conspiracy. Eugene Volokh. - - Boyle, James (January 18, 2013). ["The Prosecution of Aaron Swartz: A reply to Orin Kerr"](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-boyle/prosecution-aaron-swartz_b_2508242...). Huffington Post. - - [Copyright Crime: The Legacy of Aaron Swartz | madisonian.net](http://madisonian.net/2013/03/23/copyright-crime-the-legacy-of-aaron-swartz/) - - Aaronovitch, David (January 17, 2013). ["Even if everything's free, there can be a price: The death of hacker Aaron Swartz reveals a young generation unaware of its own great power–or responsibilities"](http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/davidaaronovitch/article365...). The Times. p. 23. Retrieved 2013-01-20. - - [Aaron Swartz Was Right - The Chronicle Review - The Chronicle of Higher Education](https://chronicle.com/article/Aaron-Swartz-Was-Right/137425/) - - [Essay argues that Aaron Swartz was wrong | Inside Higher Ed](http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/22/essay-argues-aaron-swartz-was...) - - [Will Aaron Swartz's suicide spark copyright reform? - The Week](http://theweek.com/article/index/238778/will-aaron-swartzs-suicide-spark-cop...) - - [How the Legal System Failed Aaron Swartz-and Us : The New Yorker](http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/01/everyone-interesting-...) - - Kerr, Oren, [Aaron’s Law, Drafting the Best Limits of the CFAA, And A Reader Poll on A Few Examples](http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/27/aarons-law-drafting-the-best-limits-of-the-...) [Volokh Conspiracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Volokh_Conspiracy), 27 January 2013. Retrieved 23 April 2013. - - Wagner, Daniel; Verena Dobnik (January 13, 2013). ["Swartz' death fuels debate over computer crime"](http://bigstory.ap.org/article/swartz-death-fuels-debate-over-computer-crime). Associated Press. JSTOR's attorney, Mary Jo White — formerly the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan — had called the lead Boston prosecutor in the case and asked him to drop it, said Peters. - - ["Towards Learning from Losing Aaron Swartz: Part 2"](http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/01/towards-learning-losing-aaron-swar...). Cyberlaw.stanford.edu. January 15, 2013. Retrieved 2013-01-20. - - ["With the CFAA, Law and Justice Are Not The Same: A Response to Orin Kerr"](http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/01/cfaa-law-and-justice-are-not-same-...). Cyberlaw.stanford.edu. 2013-01-14. Retrieved 2013-01-20. - - [CBA National Magazine - Copyright and "I'm right to nuke you" ethics](http://www.nationalmagazine.ca/Blog/January_2013/Copyright_and_I_m_right_to_...) - - ["The Overzealous Prosecution of Aaron Swartz"](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/the-overzealous-prosecution-of-aar...). Bloomberg. - - Lofgren, Zoe and Ron Wyden, ["Introducing Aaron's Law, a Desperately Needed Reform of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act"](https://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/06/aarons-law-is-finally-here/), Wired, 20 June 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2013. - - Guy, Sandra (January 15, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz was 'killed by government,' father says at funeral"](http://www.suntimes.com/business/17594002-420/aaron-swartz-memorialized-at-s...). Chicago Sun-Times. - - [Murphey, Shelly, US attorney's husband stirs Twitter storm on Swartz case](http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/16/attorney-husband-causes-backlash-twi...), [The Boston Globe](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boston_Globe), 16 January 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2013. - - [Aaron Swartz: husband of prosecutor criticises internet activist's family | Technology | theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jan/15/aaron-swartz-husband-pros...) - - Pierce, Charles P. (January 17, 2013). ["Still More About The Death Of Aaron Swartz"](http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/aaron-swartz-case-011713), [Esquire](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquire_(magazine)). Retrieved January 18, 2013. - - ["Prosecutor defends her actions after Aaron Swartz suicide"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131213183321/http://news.msn.com/science-techn...). Archived from [the original](https://news.msn.com/science-technology/prosecutor-defends-her-actions-after...) on 2013-12-13. Retrieved 2013-12-10. - - Castillo, Michael (March 14, 2003). ["J'accuse! Aaron Swartz's lawyers fight prosecutors with document dump"](http://upstart.bizjournals.com/news/technology/2013/03/14/aaron-swartz-lawye...). Upstart Business Journal. - - Merritt, Jeralyn (March 13, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz lawyers seek misconduct review against prosecutor"](http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/3/13/21474/4122/misconduct/Aaron-Swartz-L...). TalkLeft (blog). Att'y Jeralyn Merritt. - - Anderson, Derek (March 16, 2013). ["Swartz estate seeks release of documents: Papers are under protective order"](http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/03/15/aaron-swartz-defense-estate-files-mo...). Boston Globe. p. B2. Pirozzolo … has become involved in the Swartz case. - - Smith, Erin (April 3, 2013). ["U.S. attorney: Keep names out of Aaron Swartz case"](http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/04/us_attorney_keep...). Boston Herald. Threatening emails have been sent to … Ortiz and … Heymann. - - Kravets, David (April 2, 2013). ["Aaron Swartz's Prosecutors Were Threatened and Hacked, DOJ Says"](https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/04/swartz-prosecutors-threatened). Wired. - - Mullin, Joe [Aaron Swartz prosecutors will unseal evidence, but won’t name names](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/aaron-swartz-prosecutors-must-un...) 13 May 2013, [arstechnica](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arstechnica). Retrieved 26 May 2013. - - Poulsen, Kevin (November 7, 2013). ["Secret Service Report Noted Aaron Swartz's 'Depression Problems'"](https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/11/swartz-foia-november/). Wired. - - ["Internet Activist's Prosecutor Linked to Another Hacker's Death"](https://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/internet-activists-prosecutor-linke...). [BuzzFeed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed). - - ["WikiLeaks claims Aaron Swartz was an ally and possible source, breaking anonymity"](https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/19/3893268/wikileaks-tweets-aaron-swartz-was...). 19 January 2013. - - ["Aaron Swartz Case: US DOJ Drops All Pending Charges Against The JSTOR Liberator, Days After His Suicide"](https://www.ibtimes.com/aaron-swartz-case-us-doj-drops-all-pending-charges-a...). [International Business Times](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Business_Times). 15 January 2013. - - ["Superseding Indictment, USA v. Swartz, 1:11-cr-10260, No. 53 (D.Mass. Sep. 12, 2012)"](https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/Massachusetts_District_Court/1--11-cr-1026...). Docketalarm.com. 2012-09-12. Retrieved 2013-01-23.. External links - [Case Docket: USA v. Swartz](https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.mad.137971) - ["Overview"](http://docs.jstor.org/). JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR) [open access publication – free to read](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access). July 30, 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130923020057/http://docs.jstor.org/) from the original on September 23, 2013. - ["Summary of Events"](http://docs.jstor.org/summary.html). JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR) [open access publication – free to read](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access). July 30, 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130921064511/http://docs.jstor.org/summary.htm...) from the original on September 21, 2013. - ["Documents"](http://docs.jstor.org/documents.html). JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. [JSTOR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSTOR) [open access publication – free to read](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access). July 30, 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130815222515/http://docs.jstor.org/documents.h...) from the original on August 15, 2013.. Over 300 subpoenaed documents available for download. - [Guerilla Open Access Manifesto](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Guerilla_Open_Access_Manifesto)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz Aaron Swartz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For the British actor, see Aaron Swartz (actor). For other people with similar names, see Aaron Schwartz (disambiguation). Aaron Swartz Aaron Swartz profile.jpg Swartz at a Creative Commons event in December 13, 2008 Born Aaron Hillel Swartz[1]
November 8, 1986 Highland Park, Illinois,[2] U.S. Died January 11, 2013 (aged 26) Brooklyn, New York, U.S. Cause of death Suicide by hanging Education Stanford University Occupation Software developer, writer, internet activist Organization Creative Commons (development), Reddit (co-founder), Watchdog.net, Open Library, DeadDrop, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Demand Progress (co-founder), ThoughtWorks, Tor2web Title Fellow, Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Awards ArsDigita Prize (2000) American Library Association's James Madison Award (posthumously) EFF Pioneer Award 2013 (posthumously) Internet Hall of Fame 2013 (posthumously) Website aaronsw.com Aaron Hillel Swartz (November 8, 1986 – January 11, 2013) was an American computer programmer, entrepreneur, writer, political organizer, and Internet hacktivist. He was involved in the development of the web feed format RSS,[3] the Markdown publishing format,[4] the organization Creative Commons,[5] and the website framework web.py,[6] and joined the social news site Reddit six months after its founding.[7] He was given the title of co-founder of Reddit by Y Combinator owner Paul Graham after the formation of Not a Bug, Inc. (a merger of Swartz's project Infogami and Redbrick Solutions,[8] a company run by Alexis Ohanian and Steve Huffman). Swartz's work also focused on civic awareness and activism.[9][10] He helped launch the Progressive Change Campaign Committee in 2009 to learn more about effective online activism. In 2010, he became a research fellow at Harvard University's Safra Research Lab on Institutional Corruption, directed by Lawrence Lessig.[11][12] He founded the online group Demand Progress, known for its campaign against the Stop Online Piracy Act. In 2011, Swartz was arrested by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) police on state breaking-and-entering charges, after connecting a computer to the MIT network in an unmarked and unlocked closet, and setting it to download academic journal articles systematically from JSTOR using a guest user account issued to him by MIT.[13][14] Federal prosecutors, led by Carmen Ortiz, later charged him with two counts of wire fraud and eleven violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,[15] carrying a cumulative maximum penalty of $1 million in fines, 35 years in prison, asset forfeiture, restitution, and supervised release.[16] Swartz declined a plea bargain under which he would have served six months in federal prison.[17] Two days after the prosecution rejected a counter-offer by Swartz, he was found dead by suicide in his Brooklyn apartment.[18][19] In 2013, Swartz was inducted posthumously into the Internet Hall of Fame.[20] Contents 1 Early life 1.1 Entrepreneurship 2 Activism 2.1 PACER 2.2 Progressive Change Campaign Committee 2.3 Demand Progress 2.4 Opposition to the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) 2.5 Wikipedia 3 United States v. Aaron Swartz case 3.1 The download 3.2 Arrest and prosecution 4 Death, funeral, and memorial gatherings 4.1 Death 4.2 Funeral and memorial gatherings 5 Response 5.1 US Department of Justice 5.2 Family response 5.3 MIT 5.4 Press 5.5 Internet 5.5.1 Hacks 5.5.2 Petition to the White House 5.6 Commemorations 6 Legacy 6.1 Open Access 6.2 Congress 6.2.1 Congressional investigations 6.2.2 Amendment to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 6.2.3 Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act 7 Media 7.1 The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz 7.2 Killswitch 7.3 Other films 8 Works 8.1 Specifications 8.2 Software 8.3 Publications 9 Notes 10 See also 11 References 12 External links 12.1 Further reading 12.2 Documentary Early life Swartz in 2002 with Lawrence Lessig at the launch party for Creative Commons File:Aaron Swartz - The Network Transformation.webmPlay media Swartz describes the nature of the shift from centralized one-to-many systems to the decentralized many-to-many topology of network communication. San Francisco, April 2007 (9:29) Aaron Swartz was born in Highland Park, 25 miles North of Chicago,[2][21] the child of a Jewish family.[22] He was the eldest child of Susan and Robert Swartz and brother to Noah and Ben Swartz.[1][23] He was an atheist.[24] His father founded the software firm Mark Williams Company. At an early age, Swartz immersed himself in the study of computers, programming, the Internet, and Internet culture.[25] He attended North Shore Country Day School, a small private school near Chicago, until 9th grade,[26] when he left high school and enrolled in courses at Lake Forest College.[27][28] In 1999, at age 12, he created the website The Info Network, a user-generated encyclopedia.[29] The site won the ArsDigita Prize, given to young people who create "useful, educational, and collaborative" noncommercial websites and led to early recognition of Swartz's nascent talent in coding.[1][30][31] At age 14, he became a member of the working group that authored the RSS 1.0 web syndication specification. In 2005, he enrolled at Stanford University but left the school after his first year.[32] Entrepreneurship During Swartz's first year at Stanford, he applied to Y Combinator's first Summer Founders Program, proposing to work on a startup called Infogami, a flexible content management system designed to create rich and visually interesting websites[33] or a form of wiki for structured data. After working on it with co-founder Simon Carstensen over the summer of 2005, Swartz opted not to return to Stanford, choosing instead to continue to develop and seek funding for Infogami.[33] As part of his work on Infogami, Swartz created the web.py web application framework because he was unhappy with other available systems in the Python programming language. In early fall of 2005, he worked with his fellow co-founders of another nascent Y-Combinator firm, Reddit, to rewrite its Lisp codebase using Python and web.py. Although Infogami's platform was abandoned after Not a Bug was acquired, Infogami's software was used to support the Internet Archive's Open Library project and the web.py web framework was used as basis for many other projects by Swartz and many others.[6] When Infogami failed to find further funding, Y-Combinator organizers suggested Infogami merge with Reddit,[34][35] which it did in November 2005, creating a new firm, Not a Bug, devoted to promoting both products.[34][36] As a result, Swartz was given the title of co-founder of Reddit. Although both projects initially struggled, Reddit made large gains in popularity in 2005–2006. In October 2006, based largely on Reddit's success, Not a Bug was acquired by Condé Nast Publications, owner of Wired magazine.[25][37] Swartz moved with his company to San Francisco to continue to work on Reddit for Wired.[25] He found corporate office life uncongenial and ultimately was asked to resign from the company.[38] In September 2007, he joined Infogami co-founder Simon Carstensen to launch a new firm, Jottit, in another attempt to create a markdown-driven content management system in Python.[39] Activism In 2008, Swartz founded Watchdog.net, "the good government site with teeth," to aggregate and visualize data about politicians.[40][41] That year, he wrote a widely circulated Guerilla Open Access Manifesto.[42][43][44][45] On December 27, 2010, he filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to learn about the treatment of Chelsea Manning, alleged source for WikiLeaks.[46][47] PACER In 2008, Swartz downloaded about 2.7 million federal court documents stored in the PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) database managed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.[48] The Huffington Post characterized his actions this way: "Swartz downloaded public court documents from the PACER system in an effort to make them available outside of the expensive service. The move drew the attention of the FBI, which ultimately decided not to press charges as the documents were, in fact, public."[49] PACER was charging 8 cents per page for information that Carl Malamud, who founded the nonprofit group Public.Resource.Org, contended should be free, because federal documents are not covered by copyright.[50][51] The fees were "plowed back to the courts to finance technology, but the system [ran] a budget surplus of some $150 million, according to court reports," reported The New York Times.[50] PACER used technology that was "designed in the bygone days of screechy telephone modems ... putting the nation's legal system behind a wall of cash and kludge."[50] Malamud appealed to fellow activists, urging them to visit one of 17 libraries conducting a free trial of the PACER system, download court documents, and send them to him for public distribution.[50] After reading Malamud's call for action,[50] Swartz used a Perl computer script running on Amazon cloud servers to download the documents, using credentials belonging to a Sacramento library.[48] From September 4 to 20, 2008, it accessed documents and uploaded them to a cloud computing service.[51] He released the documents to Malamud's organization.[51] On September 29, 2008,[50] the GPO suspended the free trial, "pending an evaluation" of the program.[50][51] Swartz's actions were subsequently investigated by the FBI.[50][51] The case was closed after two months with no charges filed.[51] Swartz learned the details of the investigation after filing a FOIA request with the FBI, and described their response as the "usual mess of confusions that shows the FBI's lack of sense of humor."[51] PACER still charges per page, but customers using Firefox have the option of saving the documents for free public access with a plug-in called RECAP.[52] At a 2013 memorial for Swartz, Malamud recalled their work with PACER. They brought millions of U.S. District Court records out from behind PACER's "pay wall", he said, and found them full of privacy violations, including medical records and the names of minor children and confidential informants. We sent our results to the Chief Judges of 31 District Courts ... They redacted those documents and they yelled at the lawyers that filed them ... The Judicial Conference changed their privacy rules. ... [To] the bureaucrats who ran the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ... we were thieves that took $1.6 million of their property. So they called the FBI ... [The FBI] found nothing wrong ...[53] A more detailed account of his collaboration with Swartz on the PACER project appears in an essay on Malamud's website.[54] Writing in Ars Technica, Timothy Lee,[55] who later made use of the documents obtained by Swartz as a co-creator of RECAP, offered some insight into discrepancies in reports on how much data Swartz downloaded: "In a back-of-the-envelope calculation a few days before the offsite crawl was shut down, Swartz guessed he got around 25 percent of the documents in PACER. The New York Times similarly reported Swartz had downloaded "an estimated 20 percent of the entire database". Based on the facts that Swartz downloaded 2.7 million documents while PACER, at the time, contained 500 million, Lee concluded that Swartz downloaded less than 1% of the database.[48] Progressive Change Campaign Committee In 2009, wanting to learn about effective activism, Swartz helped launch the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.[56] He wrote in his blog: "I spend my days experimenting with new ways to get progressive policies enacted and progressive politicians elected."[57] He led the first activism event of his career with the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, delivering thousands of "Honor Kennedy" petition signatures to Massachusetts legislators, asking them to fulfill former Senator Ted Kennedy's last wish by appointing a senator to vote for healthcare reform.[58] Demand Progress In 2010,[59] Swartz co-founded Demand Progress,[60] a political advocacy group that organizes people online to "take action by contacting Congress and other leaders, funding pressure tactics, and spreading the word" about civil liberties, government reform, and other issues.[61] During academic year 2010–11, Swartz conducted research studies on political corruption as a Lab Fellow in Harvard University's Edmond J. Safra Research Lab on Institutional Corruption.[11][12] Author Cory Doctorow, in his novel Homeland, "drew on advice from Swartz in setting out how his protagonist could use the information now available about voters to create a grass-roots anti-establishment political campaign."[62] In an afterword to the novel, Swartz wrote: "These political hacktivist tools can be used by anyone motivated and talented enough.... Now it's up to you to change the system. ... Let me know if I can help."[62] Opposition to the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) Swartz in 2012 protesting against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) Swartz was involved in the campaign to prevent passage of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which sought to combat Internet copyright violations but was criticized on the basis that it would make it easier for the U.S. government to shut down web sites accused of violating copyright and would place intolerable burdens on Internet providers.[63] After the bill's defeat, Swartz was the keynote speaker at the F2C:Freedom to Connect 2012 event in Washington, D.C., on May 21, 2012. In his speech, "How We Stopped SOPA", he said: This bill ... shut down whole websites. Essentially, it stopped Americans from communicating entirely with certain groups.... I called all my friends, and we stayed up all night setting up a website for this new group, Demand Progress, with an online petition opposing this noxious bill.... We [got] ... 300,000 signers.... We met with the staff of members of Congress and pleaded with them.... And then it passed unanimously.... And then, suddenly, the process stopped. Senator Ron Wyden ... put a hold on the bill.[64][65] He added, "We won this fight because everyone made themselves the hero of their own story. Everyone took it as their job to save this crucial freedom."[64][65] He was referring to a series of protests against the bill by numerous websites, described by the Electronic Frontier Foundation as the biggest protest in Internet history, with over 115,000 sites posting their opposition.[citation needed] Swartz also spoke on the topic at an event organized by ThoughtWorks.[66] Wikipedia Swartz at 2009 Boston Wikipedia Meetup Swartz participated in Wikipedia since August 2003 under the username AaronSw.[67] In 2006, he ran unsuccessfully for the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.[68] In 2006, Swartz wrote an analysis of how Wikipedia articles are written, and concluded that the bulk of its content came from tens of thousands of occasional contributors, or "outsiders,” each of whom made few other contributions to the site, while a core group of 500 to 1,000 regular editors tended to correct spelling and other formatting errors.[69] He said: "The formatters aid the contributors, not the other way around."[69][70] His conclusions, based on the analysis of edit histories of several randomly selected articles, contradicted the opinion of Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, who believed the core group of regular editors provided most of the content while thousands of others contributed to formatting issues. Swartz came to his conclusions by counting the number of characters editors added to particular articles, while Wales counted the total number of edits.[69] United States v. Aaron Swartz case Main article: United States v. Aaron Swartz See also: § Open Access, and JSTOR According to state and federal authorities, Swartz used JSTOR, a digital repository,[71] to download a large number[ii] of academic journal articles through MIT's computer network over the course of a few weeks in late 2010 and early 2011. Visitors to MIT's "open campus" were authorized to access JSTOR through its network;[72] Swartz, as a research fellow at Harvard University, also had a JSTOR account.[15] The download On September 25, 2010, the IP address 18.55.6.215, part of the MIT network, began sending hundreds of PDF download requests per minute to the JSTOR website, enough to slow the site's performance.[73] This prompted a block of the IP address. In the morning, another IP address, also from within the MIT network, began sending more PDF download requests, resulting in a temporary block on the firewall level of all MIT servers in the entire 18.0.0.0/8 range. A JSTOR employee emailed MIT on September 29, 2010: Note that this was an extreme case. We typically suspend just one individual IP at a time and do that relatively infrequently (perhaps 6 on a busy day, from 7000+ institutional subscribers). In this case, we saw a performance hit on the live site, which I have only seen about 3 or 4 times in my 5 years here. The pattern used was to create a new session for each PDF download or every few, which was terribly efficient, but not terribly subtle. In the end, we saw over 200K sessions in one hour's time during the peak. — NAME REDACTED, JSTOR[74] According to authorities, Swartz downloaded the documents through a laptop connected to a networking switch in a controlled-access wiring closet at MIT.[14][15][75][76][77] The closet's door was kept unlocked, according to press reports.[72][78][79] When it was discovered, a video camera was placed in the room to record Swartz; his computer was left untouched. Recording was stopped once Swartz was identified; but rather than pursue a civil lawsuit against him, JSTOR reached a settlement with him in June 2011 where he surrendered the downloaded data.[80][81] On July 30, 2013, JSTOR released 300 partially redacted documents used as incriminating evidence against Swartz, originally sent to the United States Attorney's Office in response to subpoenas in the case United States v. Aaron Swartz.[82] (The following images are all excerpts from the 3,461-page PDF document.) "Root Cause Analysis" Report (side 1), showing a descriptive timeline of events from September 25, 2010, until December 26, 2010.[83] "Root Cause Analysis" Report (side 2), showing JSTOR response and incident resolution procedures.[84] Email sent from JSTOR to Stephan, Heymann (USAMA), estimating 3.5 million PDF files had been downloaded.[85] Email describing PDF download activity snapshots (see next images in gallery)[86] Describes PDF download activity, from JSTOR's databases to MIT servers, between November 1 and December 27.[87] PDF activity, from JSTOR to MIT, between January 1 to 15.[88] Arrest and prosecution On the night of January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested near the Harvard campus by MIT police and a Secret Service agent, and arraigned in Cambridge District Court on two state charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony.[13][14][77][89][90] On July 11, 2011, he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of wire fraud, computer fraud, unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer, and recklessly damaging a protected computer.[15][91] On November 17, 2011, Swartz was indicted by a Middlesex County Superior Court grand jury on state charges of breaking and entering with intent, grand larceny, and unauthorized access to a computer network.[92][93] On December 16, 2011, state prosecutors filed a notice that they were dropping the two original charges,[14] and the charges listed in the November 17, 2011 indictment were dropped on March 8, 2012.[94] According to a spokesperson for the Middlesex County prosecutor, this was done to avoid impeding a federal prosecution headed by Stephen P. Heymann, supported by evidence provided by Secret Service agent Michael S. Pickett.[95][94] On September 12, 2012, federal prosecutors filed a superseding indictment adding nine more felony counts, increasing Swartz's maximum criminal exposure to 50 years of imprisonment and $1 million in fines.[15][96][97] During plea negotiations with Swartz's attorneys, the prosecutors offered to recommend a sentence of six months in a low-security prison if Swartz pled guilty to 13 federal crimes. Swartz and his lead attorney rejected the deal, opting instead for a trial where prosecutors would be forced to justify their pursuit of him.[98][99] The federal prosecution involved what was characterized by numerous critics (such as former Nixon White House counsel John Dean) as an "overcharging" 13-count indictment and "overzealous", "Nixonian" prosecution for alleged computer crimes, brought by then U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz.[100] Swartz died by suicide on January 11, 2013.[101] After his death, federal prosecutors dropped the charges.[102][103] On December 4, 2013, due to a Freedom of Information Act suit by the investigations editor of Wired magazine, several documents related to the case were released by the Secret Service, including a video of Swartz entering the MIT network closet.[104] Death, funeral, and memorial gatherings External video video icon Aaron Swartz Memorial at The Great Hall of Cooper Union, (transcript) video icon Aaron Swartz Memorial at the Internet Archive, (partial transcript) video icon DC Memorial: Darrel Issa, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman, Alan Grayson Death On the evening of January 11, 2013, Swartz's girlfriend, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman, found him dead in his Brooklyn apartment.[72][105][106] A spokeswoman for New York's Medical Examiner reported that he had hanged himself.[105][106][107][108] No suicide note was found.[109] Swartz's family and his partner created a memorial website on which they issued a statement, saying: "He used his prodigious skills as a programmer and technologist not to enrich himself but to make the Internet and the world a fairer, better place".[23] Days before Swartz's funeral, Lawrence Lessig eulogized his friend and sometime-client in an essay, Prosecutor as Bully. He decried the disproportionality of Swartz's prosecution and said, "The question this government needs to answer is why it was so necessary that Aaron Swartz be labeled a 'felon'. For in the 18 months of negotiations, that was what he was not willing to accept."[110] Cory Doctorow wrote, "Aaron had an unbeatable combination of political insight, technical skill, and intelligence about people and issues. I think he could have revolutionized American (and worldwide) politics. His legacy may still yet do so."[111] Funeral and memorial gatherings Aaron Swartz Memorial sign at Internet Archive headquarters, San Francisco, January 24th, 2013 Aaron Swartz Memorial program at Internet Archive headquarters, San Francisco, January 24th, 2013 Swartz's funeral services were held on January 15, 2013, at Central Avenue Synagogue in Highland Park, Illinois. Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the World Wide Web, delivered a eulogy.[112][113][114][115] The same day, The Wall Street Journal published a story based in part on an interview with Stinebrickner-Kauffman.[116] She told the Journal that Swartz lacked the money to pay for a trial and "it was too hard for him to ... make that part of his life go public" by asking for help. He was also distressed, she said, because two of his friends had just been subpoenaed and because he no longer believed that MIT would try to stop the prosecution.[116] Several memorials followed soon afterward. On January 19, hundreds attended a memorial at the Cooper Union, speakers at which included Stinebrickner-Kauffman, open source advocate Doc Searls, Creative Commons' Glenn Otis Brown, journalist Quinn Norton, Roy Singham of ThoughtWorks, and David Segal of Demand Progress.[117][118][119] On January 24, there was a memorial at the Internet Archive headquarters in San Francisco (video[120]) with speakers including Stinebrickner-Kauffman, Alex Stamos, Brewster Kahle,[121] and Carl Malamud.[122] On February 4, a memorial was held in the Cannon House Office Building on Capitol Hill;[123][124][125][126] speakers at this memorial included Senator Ron Wyden and Representatives Darrell Issa, Alan Grayson, and Jared Polis,[125][126] and other lawmakers in attendance included Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representatives Zoe Lofgren and Jan Schakowsky.[125][126] A memorial also took place on March 12 at the MIT Media Lab.[127] Swartz's family recommended GiveWell for donations in his memory, an organization that Swartz admired, had collaborated with and was the sole beneficiary of his will.[128][129] Response US Department of Justice Carmen M. Ortiz, then US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, “As a parent and a sister, I can only imagine the pain felt by the family and friends of Aaron Swartz, […] I must, however, make clear that this office's conduct was appropriate in bringing and handling this case.” – official statement, January 16, 2013.[130] Family response Aaron's death is not simply a personal tragedy. It is the product of a criminal justice system rife with intimidation and prosecutorial overreach. Decisions made by officials in the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney's office and at MIT contributed to his death. —Statement by family and partner of Aaron Swartz[131] On January 12, 2013, Swartz's family and partner issued a statement criticizing the prosecutors and MIT.[131] Speaking at his son's funeral on January 15, Robert Swartz said, "Aaron was killed by the government, and MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."[132] Tom Dolan, husband of U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz, whose office prosecuted Swartz's case, replied with criticism of the Swartz family: "Truly incredible that in their own son's obit they blame others for his death and make no mention of the 6-month offer."[133] This comment triggered some criticism; Esquire writer Charlie Pierce replied, "the glibness with which her husband and her defenders toss off a 'mere' six months in federal prison, low-security or not, is a further indication that something is seriously out of whack with the way our prosecutors think these days."[134] MIT MIT maintains an open-campus policy along with an "open network."[79][135] Two days after Swartz's death, MIT President L. Rafael Reif commissioned professor Hal Abelson to lead an analysis of MIT's options and decisions relating to Swartz's "legal struggles."[136][137] To help guide the fact-finding stage of the review, MIT created a website where community members could suggest questions and issues for the review to address.[138][139] Swartz's attorneys requested that all pretrial discovery documents be made public, a move which MIT opposed.[140] Swartz allies have criticized MIT for its opposition to releasing the evidence without redactions.[141] On July 26, 2013, the Abelson panel submitted a 182-page report to MIT president, L. Rafael Reif, who authorized its public release on July 30.[142][143][144] The panel reported that MIT had not supported charges against Swartz and cleared the institution of wrongdoing. However, its report also noted that despite MIT's advocacy for open access culture at the institutional level and beyond, the university never extended that support to Swartz. The report revealed, for example, that while MIT considered the possibility of issuing a public statement about its position on the case, such a statement never materialized.[145] Press Aaron Swartz mural by Brooklyn graffiti artist BAMN The Huffington Post reported that "Ortiz has faced significant backlash for pursuing the case against Swartz, including a petition to the White House to have her fired."[146] Other news outlets reported similarly.[147][148][149] Reuters news agency called Swartz "an online icon" who "help[ed] to make a virtual mountain of information freely available to the public, including an estimated 19 million pages of federal court documents."[150] The Associated Press (AP) reported that Swartz's case "highlights society's uncertain, evolving view of how to treat people who break into computer systems and share data not to enrich themselves, but to make it available to others,"[63] and that JSTOR's lawyer, former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Mary Jo White, had asked the lead prosecutor to drop the charges.[63] As discussed by editor Hrag Vartanian in Hyperallergic, Brooklyn, New York muralist BAMN ("By Any Means Necessary") created a mural of Swartz.[151] "Swartz was an amazing human being who fought tirelessly for our right to a free and open Internet," the artist explained. "He was much more than just the 'Reddit guy'." Speaking on April 17, 2013, Yuval Noah Harari described Swartz as "the first martyr of the Freedom of Information movement". However, according to Harari, Swartz's stance did not illustrate the belief in the freedom of persons or speech, but stemmed from the increasing belief among the young generation that above anything else, information should be free.[152] Aaron Swartz's legacy has been reported as strengthening the open access to scholarship movement. In Illinois, his home state, Swartz's influence led state university faculties to adopt policies in favor of open access.[153] James Fallows, writing in The Atlantic, offers a short eulogy.[154] Internet Hacks On January 13, 2013, members of Anonymous hacked two websites on the MIT domain, replacing them with tributes to Swartz that called on members of the Internet community to use his death as a rallying point for the open access movement. The banner included a list of demands for improvements in the U.S. copyright system, along with Swartz's Guerilla Open Access Manifesto.[155] On the night of January 18, 2013, MIT's e-mail system was taken offline for ten hours.[156] On January 22, e-mail sent to MIT was redirected by hackers Aush0k and TibitXimer to the Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology. All other traffic to MIT was redirected to a computer at Harvard University that was publishing a statement headed "R.I.P Aaron Swartz,"[157] with text from a 2009 posting by Swartz,[158] accompanied by a chiptune version of "The Star-Spangled Banner". MIT regained full control after about seven hours.[159] In the early hours of January 26, 2013, the U.S. Sentencing Commission website, USSC.gov, was hacked by Anonymous.[160][161] The home page was replaced with an embedded YouTube video, Anonymous Operation Last Resort. The video statement said Swartz "faced an impossible choice".[162][163] A hacker downloaded "hundreds of thousands" of scientific-journal articles from a Swiss publisher's website and republished them on the open Web in Swartz's honor a week before the first anniversary of his death.[164] Petition to the White House See also: Carmen Ortiz and Stephen Heymann After Swartz's death, more than 50,000 people signed an online petition[165] to the White House calling for the removal of Ortiz, "for overreach in the case of Aaron Swartz."[166] A similar petition[167] was submitted calling for prosecutor Stephen Heymann's firing.[168][169] In January 2015, two years after Swartz's death, the White House declined both petitions.[170] Commemorations External video video icon IHoF Induction Ceremony – Aaron Swartz on YouTube On August 3, 2013, Swartz was posthumously inducted into the Internet Hall of Fame.[20] There was a hackathon held in Swartz' memory around the date of his birthday in 2013.[171][172] Over the weekend of November 8–10, 2013, inspired by Swartz's work and life, a second annual hackathon was held in at least 16 cities around the world.[173][174][175] Preliminary topics worked on at the 2013 Aaron Swartz Hackathon[176] were privacy and software tools, transparency, activism, access, legal fixes, and a low-cost book scanner.[177] In January 2014, Lawrence Lessig led a walk across New Hampshire in honor of Swartz, rallying for campaign finance reform.[178][179] Memorial site: Remember Aaron Swartz.[180] “Aaron Swartz made our world more free. Be Free, Internet. Thank you, Aaron, for what you gave us.” – public.resource.org.[181] Mark Bernstein.[182] Henry Farrell, “Remembering Aaron Swartz.”[183] Quinn Norton, “My Aaron Swartz, whom I loved.”[184] In 2017, the Turkish-Dutch artist Ahmet Öğüt commemorated Swartz through a work entitled "Information Power to The People" and depicting his bust.[185] A sculpture of Aaron Swartz entitled Information Power to The People created by Ahmet Öğüt A clay statue of Aaron Swartz at the Internet Archive Legacy Open Access See also: § United States v. Aaron Swartz case A long-time supporter of open access, Swartz wrote in his Guerilla Open Access Manifesto:[44] The world's entire scientific ... heritage ... is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations.... The Open Access Movement has fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. Supporters of Swartz responded to news of his death with an effort called #PDFTribute[186] to promote Open Access.[187][188] On January 12, Eva Vivalt, a development economist at the World Bank, began posting her academic articles online using the hashtag #pdftribute as a tribute to Swartz.[188][189][190] Scholars posted links to their works.[191] The story of Aaron Swartz has exposed the topic of open access to scientific publications to wider audiences.[192][193] In the wake of Aaron Swartz, many institutions and personalities have campaigned for open access to scientific knowledge.[194] Swartz's death prompted calls for more open access to scholarly data (e.g., open science data).[195][196] The Think Computer Foundation and the Center for Information Technology Policy (CITP) at Princeton University announced scholarships awarded in memory of Aaron Swartz.[197] In 2013, Swartz was posthumously awarded the American Library Association's James Madison Award for being an "outspoken advocate for public participation in government and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed scholarly articles."[198][199] In March, the editor and editorial board of the Journal of Library Administration resigned en masse, citing a dispute with the journal's publisher, Routledge.[200] One board member wrote of a "crisis of conscience about publishing in a journal that was not open access" after the death of Aaron Swartz.[201][202] In 2002, Swartz had stated that when he died, he wanted all the contents of his hard drives made publicly available.[203][204] Congress Several members of the U.S. House of Representatives – Republican Darrell Issa and Democrats Jared Polis and Zoe Lofgren – all on the House Judiciary Committee, have raised questions regarding the government's handling of the case. Calling the charges against him "ridiculous and trumped up," Polis said Swartz was a "martyr", whose death illustrated the need for Congress to limit the discretion of federal prosecutors.[205] Speaking at a memorial for Swartz on Capitol Hill, Issa said Ultimately, knowledge belongs to all the people of the world.... Aaron understood that.... Our copyright laws were created for the purpose of promoting useful works, not hiding them. Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren issued a statement saying "[Aaron's] advocacy for Internet freedom, social justice, and Wall Street reform demonstrated ... the power of his ideas ..."[206] In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder,[207] Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn asked, "On what basis did the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts conclude that her office's conduct was 'appropriate'?" and "Was the prosecution of Mr. Swartz in any way retaliation for his exercise of his rights as a citizen under the Freedom of Information Act?"[208][209][210] Congressional investigations Issa, who chaired the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, announced that he would investigate the Justice Department's actions in prosecuting Swartz.[205] In a statement to The Huffington Post, he praised Swartz's work toward "open government and free access to the people." Issa's investigation has garnered some bipartisan support.[206] On January 28, 2013, Issa and ranking committee member Elijah Cummings published a letter to U.S. Attorney General Holder, questioning why federal prosecutors had filed the superseding indictment.[97][211] On February 20, WBUR reported that Ortiz was expected to testify at an upcoming Oversight Committee hearing about her office's handling of the Swartz case.[212] On February 22, Associate Deputy Attorney General Steven Reich conducted a briefing for congressional staffers involved in the investigation.[213][214] They were told that Swartz's Guerilla Open Access Manifesto played a role in prosecutorial decision-making.[43][213][214] Congressional staffers left this briefing believing that prosecutors thought Swartz had to be convicted of a felony carrying at least a short prison sentence in order to justify having filed the case against him in the first place.[213][214] Excoriating the Department of Justice as the "Department of Vengeance", Stinebrickner-Kauffman told the Guardian that the DOJ had erred in relying on Swartz's Guerilla Open Access Manifesto as an accurate indication of his beliefs by 2010. "He was no longer a single issue activist," she said. "He was into lots of things, from healthcare, to climate change to money in politics."[43] On March 6, Holder testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that the case was "a good use of prosecutorial discretion."[215] Stinebrickner-Kauffman issued a statement in reply, repeating and amplifying her claims of prosecutorial misconduct. Public documents, she wrote, reveal that prosecutor Stephen Heymann "instructed the Secret Service to seize and hold evidence without a warrant... lied to the judge about that fact in written briefs... [and] withheld exculpatory evidence... for over a year," violating his legal and ethical obligations to turn such evidence over to the defense.[216] On March 22, Senator Al Franken wrote Holder a letter expressing concerns, writing that "charging a young man like Mr. Swartz with federal offenses punishable by over 35 years of federal imprisonment seems remarkably aggressive – particularly when it appears that one of the principal aggrieved parties ... did not support a criminal prosecution."[217] Amendment to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Main article: Aaron's Law Wikisource has original text related to this article: Rep Zoe Lofgren Introduces Bipartisan Aaron's Law In 2013, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) introduced a bill, Aaron's Law (H.R. 2454, S. 1196[218]) to exclude terms of service violations from the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and from the wire fraud statute.[219] Lawrence Lessig wrote of the bill, "this is a critically important change.... The CFAA was the hook for the government's bullying.... This law would remove that hook. In a single line: no longer would it be a felony to breach a contract."[220] Professor Orin Kerr, a specialist in the nexus between computer law and criminal law, wrote that he had been arguing for precisely this sort of reform of the Act for years.[221] The ACLU, too, has called for reform of the CFAA to "remove the dangerously broad criminalization of online activity."[222] The EFF has mounted a campaign for these reforms.[223] Lessig's inaugural Chair lecture as Furman Professor of Law and Leadership was entitled Aaron's Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age; he dedicated the lecture to Swartz.[224][225][226][227] The Aaron's Law bill stalled in committee. Brian Knappenberger alleges this was due to Oracle Corporation's financial interest in maintaining the status quo.[228] Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR) is a bill that would mandate earlier public release of taxpayer-funded research. FASTR has been described as "The Other Aaron's Law."[229] Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Senator John Cornyn (R-Tex.) introduced the Senate version, in 2013 and again in 2015, while the bill was introduced to the House by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) and Kevin Yoder (R-Kans.). Senator Wyden wrote of the bill, "the FASTR act provides that access to taxpayer funded research should never be hidden behind a paywall."[230] While the legislation had not passed as of October 2015, it helped to prompt some motion toward more open access on the part of the US administration. Shortly after the bill's original introduction, the Office of Science and Technology Policy directed "each Federal agency with over $100 million in annual conduct of research and development expenditures to develop a plan to support increased public access to the results of research funded by the Federal Government."[231] Media Swartz has been featured in various works of art and has posthumously received dedications from numerous artists. In 2013, Kenneth Goldsmith dedicated his "Printing out the Internet" exhibition to Swartz.[232][233] The fate of Aaron Swartz was also featured in conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza's 2014 documentary America: Imagine the World Without Her, wherein D'Souza compares Swartz's prosecution to his own conviction for violating campaign finance laws, and alleges that both cases exemplify selective, overzealous prosecution.[234][235] There are also dedicated biographical films for Aaron: The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz Main article: The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz On January 11, 2014, marking the first anniversary of his death, a preview was released of The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz,[236] a documentary about Swartz, the NSA and SOPA.[237][238] The film was officially released at the January 2014 Sundance Film Festival.[239] Democracy Now! covered the release of the documentary, as well as Swartz's life and legal case, in a sprawling interview with director Brian Knappenberger, Swartz's father, brother, and his attorney.[240] The documentary is released under a Creative Commons License;[241][242] it debuted in theaters and on-demand in June 2014.[243] Mashable called the documentary "a powerful homage to Aaron Swartz". Its debut at Sundance received a standing ovation. Mashable printed, "With the help of experts, The Internet's Own Boy makes a clear argument: Swartz unjustly became a victim of the rights and freedoms for which he stood."[244] The Hollywood Reporter described it as a "heartbreaking" story of a "tech wunderkind persecuted by the US government", and a must-see "for anyone who knows enough to care about the way laws govern information transfer in the digital age".[245] Killswitch Main article: Killswitch (film) In October 2014, Killswitch, a documentary film featuring Aaron Swartz, as well as Lawrence Lessig, Tim Wu, and Edward Snowden, received its world premiere at the Woodstock Film Festival, where it won the award for Best Editing. The film focuses on Swartz's role in advocating for internet freedoms.[246][247] In February 2015, Killswitch was invited to screen at the Capitol Visitor's Center in Washington, D.C. by Congressman Alan Grayson. The event was held on the eve of the Federal Communications Commission's historic decision on Net Neutrality. Congressman Grayson, Lawrence Lessig, and Free Press CEO Craig Aaron spoke about Swartz and his fight on behalf of a free and open Internet at the event.[248][249] Congressman Grayson states that Killswitch is "one of the most honest accounts of the battle to control the Internet – and access to information itself."[248] Richard von Busack of the Metro Silicon Valley writes of Killswitch, "Some of the most lapidary use of found footage this side of The Atomic Café".[246] Fred Swegles of the Orange County Register remarks, "Anyone who values unfettered access to online information is apt to be captivated by Killswitch, a gripping and fast-paced documentary."[247] Kathy Gill of GeekWire asserts that "Killswitch is much more than a dry recitation of technical history. Director Ali Akbarzadeh, producer Jeff Horn, and writer Chris Dollar created a human-centered story. A large part of that connection comes from Lessig and his relationship with Swartz."[250] Other films Patriot of the Web is an independent biographical film about Aaron Swartz, written and directed by Darius Burke. The film was released on September 15, 2019, onto YouTube.[251][252] Actor Shawn Mcclintock plays Aaron Swartz.[253][254][non-primary source needed] The film had a limited video on demand release in December 2017 on Reelhouse[255] and in January 2018 on Pivotshare.[256] Another biographical film about Swartz, Think Aaron, is being developed by HBO Films.[257] Works Specifications Markdown: Swartz was a major contributor to John Gruber's Markdown,[4][258] a lightweight markup language for generating HTML, and author of its html2text translator. The syntax for Markdown was influenced by Swartz's earlier atx language (2002),[259] which today is primarily remembered for its syntax for specifying headers, known as atx-style headers:[260] Markdown itself remains in widespread use, with websites such as Reddit and GitHub using it. RDF/XML at W3C: In 2001, Swartz joined the RDFCore working group at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),[261] where he authored RFC 3870, Application/RDF+XML Media Type Registration. The document described a new media type, "RDF/XML", designed to support the Semantic Web.[262] Software DeadDrop: In 2011–2012, Swartz, Kevin Poulsen, and James Dolan designed and implemented DeadDrop, a system that allows anonymous informants to send electronic documents without fear of disclosure. In May 2013, the first instance of the software was launched by The New Yorker under the name Strongbox.[263][264][265] The Freedom of the Press Foundation has since taken over development of the software, which has been renamed SecureDrop.[266] Tor2web: In 2008,[267] Swartz worked with Virgil Griffith to design and implement Tor2web, an HTTP proxy for Tor-hidden services. The proxy was designed to provide easy access to Tor from a basic web browser.[268][269] The software is now maintained by Giovanni Pellerano within the GlobaLeaks project. Publications Swartz, Aaron; Hendler, James (October 2001). "The Semantic Web: A network of content for the digital city". Proceedings of the Second Annual Digital Cities Workshop. Kyoto, JP: Blogspace. Swartz, Aaron (January–February 2002). "MusicBrainz: A Semantic Web service" (PDF). IEEE Intelligent Systems. 17 (1): 76–77. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.380.9338. doi:10.1109/5254.988466. ISSN 1541-1672. Gruber, John; Swartz, Aaron (December 2004). "Markdown definition". Daring Fireball. Archived from the original on April 2, 2004. Swartz, Aaron (July 2008). "Guerilla Open Access Manifesto". Swartz, Aaron; Hendler, James (2009). Building programmable Web sites. S.F.: Morgan & Claypool. ISBN 978-1-59829-920-5. Swartz, Aaron (Interviewee). We can change the world (Video). Archived from the original on December 21, 2021 – via YouTube. Swartz, Aaron (Speaker) (May 21, 2012). Keynote address at Freedom To Connect 2012: How we stopped SOPA (Video). D.C. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021 – via YouTube. Swartz, Aaron (February 2013) [2009]. "Aaron Swartz's A Programmable Web: An Unfinished Work". Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology (open access PDF). Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 3 (2): 1–64. doi:10.2200/S00481ED1V01Y201302WBE005. Lay summary. "To Dan Connolly, who not only created the Web but found time to teach it to me." Swartz, Aaron; Lucchese, Adriano (November 2014). "Raw Thought, Raw Nerve: Inside the Mind of Aaron Swartz" (open access PDF/ePub). New York City: Discovery Publisher. Swartz, Aaron (January 2016). The Boy Who Could Change the World: The Writings of Aaron Swartz. The New Press. OL 25886237M. Notes ^ Swartz has been identified as a cofounder of Reddit, but the title is a source of controversy. With the merger of Infogami and Reddit, Swartz became a co-owner and director of parent company Not A Bug, Inc., along with Reddit cofounders Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian.[270] Swartz has been referred to as "cofounder" in the press and by investor Paul Graham (who recommended the merger); Ohanian describes him as "co-owner".[36][271] ^ The MIT network administration office told MIT police that "approximately 70 gigabytes of data had been downloaded, 98% of which was from JSTOR."[14] The first federal indictment alleged "approximately 4.8 million articles", "1.7 million" of which "were made available by independent publishers for purchase through JSTOR's Publisher Sales Service."[15] The subsequent DOJ press release alleged "over four million articles". The superseding indictment removed the estimates and instead characterized the amount as "a major portion of the total archive in which JSTOR had invested."[15] See also Scholia has a profile for Aaron Swartz (Q302817). Alexandra Elbakyan List of Wikipedia people Sci-Hub Shadow library References Yearwood, Pauline (February 22, 2013). "Brilliant life, tragic death". Chicago Jewish News. p. 1. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. "Aaron Hillel Swartz was not depressed or suicidal ... a rabbi's wife who has known him since he was a child says.... At age 13 he won the ArsDigita Prize, a competition for young people who create noncommercial websites...." Skaggs, Paula (January 16, 2013). "Aaron Swartz Remembered as Internet Activist who Changed the World". Patch. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved November 23, 2015. "RSS creator Aaron Swartz dead at 26". Harvard Magazine. January 14, 2013. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017. Retrieved February 17, 2014. "Swartz helped create RSS—a family of Web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works (blog entries, news headlines, ...) in a standardized format—at the age of 14." "Markdown". Aaron Swartz: The Weblog. March 19, 2004. Archived from the original on December 24, 2017. Retrieved February 15, 2013. Lessig, Lawrence (January 12, 2013). "Remembering Aaron Swartz". Creative Commons. Archived from the original on December 4, 2015. Retrieved November 1, 2017. "Aaron was one of the early architects of Creative Commons. As a teenager, he helped design the code layer to our licenses..." Grehan, Rick (August 10, 2011). "Pillars of Python: Web.py Web framework". InfoWorld. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017. Retrieved May 29, 2015. "Web.py, the brainchild of Aaron Swartz, who developed it while working at Reddit.com, describes itself as a 'minimalist's framework.' ... Test Center Scorecard: Capability 7; Ease of Development 9; Documentation 7; ...; Overall Score 7.6, Good." Goh, Melisa (January 12, 2013). "Aaron Swartz, Reddit Co-Founder And Online Activist, Dies At 26". NPR. Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved September 15, 2020. Lagorio-Chafkin, Christine (2018). We Are the Nerds: The Birth and Tumultuous Life of Reddit, the Internet's Culture Laboratory. Hachette Books. p. 4. ISBN 978-0316435406. Archived from the original on August 19, 2020. Retrieved May 20, 2020. Swartz, Aaron. "Sociology or Anthropology". Raw Thought. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Swartz, Aaron (May 13, 2008). "Simplistic Sociological Functionalism". Raw Thought. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Seidman, Bianca (July 22, 2011). "Internet activist charged with hacking into MIT network". Arlington, Va.: Public Broadcasting Service. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved August 23, 2017. "[Swartz] was in the middle of a fellowship at Harvard's Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, in its Lab on Institutional Corruption" "Lab Fellows 2010–2011: Aaron Swartz". Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics. Harvard University. 2010. Archived from the original on May 29, 2013. "During the fellowship year, he will conduct experimental and ethnographic studies of the political system to prepare a monograph on the mechanisms of political corruption." Gerstein, Josh (July 22, 2011). "MIT also pressing charges against hacking suspect". Politico. Archived from the original on September 12, 2015. Retrieved August 27, 2019. "[Swartz's] alleged use of MIT facilities and Web connections to access the JSTOR database ... resulted in two state felony charges for breaking into a 'depository' and breaking & entering in the daytime, according to local prosecutors." Commonwealth v. Swartz, 11-52CR73 & 11-52CR75, MIT Police Incident Report 11-351 (Mass. Dist. Ct. nolle prosequi December 16, 2011) ("Captain Albert P[...] and Special Agent Pickett were able to apprehend the suspect at 24 Lee Street.... He was arrested for two counts of Breaking and Entering in the daytime with the intent to commit a felony...."). "Indictment, USA v. Swartz, 1:11-cr-10260, No. 2 (D.Mass. July 14, 2011)". MIT. July 14, 2011. Archived from the original on January 17, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013. Superseded by "Superseding Indictment, USA v. Swartz, 1:11-cr-10260, No. 53 (D.Mass. September 12, 2012)". Docketalarm.com. September 12, 2012. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2013. US Attorney's Office District of Massachusetts (July 19, 2011). "Alleged Hacker Charged With Stealing Over Four Million Documents from MIT Network" (Press release). Archived from the original on May 26, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2013. Timothy, Lee. "Aaron Swartz and the Corrupt Practice of Plea Bargaining". Forbes. Archived from the original on October 7, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020. "Aaron Swartz, Tech Prodigy and Internet Activist, Is Dead at 26". Time. January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. Retrieved January 13, 2013. "Aaron Swartz, internet freedom activist, dies aged 26". BBC News. January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2013. "Internet Hall of Fame Announces 2013 Inductees". Internet Hall of Fame. June 26, 2013. Archived from the original on March 21, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2013. "The Brilliant Life and Tragic Death of Aaron Swartz". Rolling Stone. February 15, 2013. Archived from the original on October 4, 2017. Retrieved August 23, 2017. "By Eternity Solomon, January 13, 2013, Israeli Life USA". January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved February 7, 2021. Nelson, Valerie J. (January 12, 2013). "Aaron Swartz dies at 26; Internet folk hero founded Reddit". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 13, 2014. Retrieved February 20, 2020. "'Repairing the World' Was Aaron Swartz's Calling". Haaretz. Retrieved September 19, 2021. Swartz, Aaron (September 27, 2007). "How to get a job like mine". (blog). Aaron Swartz. Archived from the original on October 11, 2007. "We negotiated for months.... I started going crazy from having to think so much about money.... The company almost fell apart before the deal went through." "Reddit co-creator Aaron Swartz dies from suicide". Chicago Tribune. January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved January 14, 2013. Skaggs, Paula (January 15, 2013). "Internet activist Aaron Swartz's teachers remember 'brilliant' student". Patch. Northbrook, Ill. Archived from the original on November 4, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2015. "Swartz ... attended North Shore Country Day School through 9th grade." Swartz, Aaron (January 14, 2002). "It's always cool to run..." Weblog. Aaron Swartz. Archived from the original on October 31, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2013. "I would have been in 10th grade this year.... Now I'm taking a couple classes at a local college." "The Brilliant Life and Tragic Death of Aaron Swarz". Penske Media Corporation. February 15, 2013. Retrieved April 14, 2021. "Second ArsDigita Prize 2000 Finalists and Winners". December 1, 2001. Archived from the original on December 1, 2001. Retrieved March 6, 2016. Schofield, Jack (January 13, 2013). "Aaron Swartz obituary". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on September 20, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2016. "At 13 [he] won an ArsDigita prize for creating a non-commercial website." Sekhri, Aaron (January 14, 2013). "Aaron Swartz, prodigy and drop-out, takes own life". The Stanford Daily. Archived from the original on March 20, 2019. Retrieved March 20, 2019. Ryan, Singel (September 13, 2005). "Stars Rise at Startup Summer Camp". Wired. Archived from the original on November 30, 2014. Retrieved December 19, 2014. Swartz, Aaron (2007). "Introducing Infogami". Infogami. CondeNet. Archived from the original on December 24, 2007. "A passion for your users brings good karma: (Interview with) Alexis Ohanian, co-founder of reddit.com". StartupStories. November 11, 2006. Archived from the original on August 23, 2007. Singel, Ryan (July 19, 2011). "Feds Charge Activist as Hacker for Downloading Millions of Academic Articles". Wired. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. "Breaking News: Condé Nast/Wired Acquires Reddit". Techcrunch. October 31, 2006. Archived from the original on February 15, 2018. Retrieved June 25, 2017. Lenssen, Philipp (2007). "A Chat with Aaron Swartz". Google Blogoscoped. Archived from the original on April 27, 2010. Retrieved May 11, 2010. "Aaron Swartz's Jottit has been officially released". Reddit. 2007. Archived from the original on April 18, 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2015. Klein, Sam (July 24, 2011). "Aaron Swartz vs. United States". The Longest Now. Weblogs at Harvard Law School. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013. Retrieved February 7, 2013. "He founded watchdog.net to aggregate ... data about politicians – including where their money comes from." "The team". Watchdog.net. Archived from the original on December 23, 2008. "Founder Aaron Swartz ... We're funded by a grant from the Sunlight Network and the Sunlight Foundation." Norton, Quinn (March 3, 2013). "Life inside the Aaron Swartz investigation". The Atlantic. D.C. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved March 8, 2013. McVeigh, Karen, Aaron Swartz's partner accuses US of delaying investigation into prosecution Archived March 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, March 1, 2013. Retrieved May 20, 2015. Swartz, Aaron (July 2008). "Guerilla Open Access Manifesto". Internet Archive. "We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks." Murphy, Samantha (July 22, 2011). "'Guerilla activist' releases 18,000 scientific papers". MIT Technology Review. "In a 2008 'Guerilla Open Access Manifesto,' Swartz called for activists to 'fight back' against services that held academic papers hostage behind paywalls." Leopold, Jason (January 18, 2013). "Aaron Swartz's FOIA Requests Shed Light on His Struggle". The Public Record. Archived from the original on January 22, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013. "FOI Request: Records related to Bradley Manning". Muckrock. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013. Lee, Timothy B.,The inside story of Aaron Swartz's campaign to liberate court filings Archived June 16, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, Ars Technica, February 8, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2013. Will Wrigley (February 7, 2013). "Darrell Issa Praises Aaron Swartz, Internet Freedom at Memorial". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 11, 2013. Retrieved February 21, 2013. Schwartz, John (February 12, 2009). "An Effort to Upgrade a Court Archive System to Free and Easy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 21, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Singeln, Ryan (October 5, 2009). "FBI Investigated Coder for Liberating Paywalled Court Records". Wired. Archived from the original on February 11, 2014. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Johnson, Bobbie (November 11, 2009). "Recap: Cracking open US courtrooms". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on October 8, 2018. Retrieved December 10, 2016. Malamud, Carl (January 24, 2013). Aaron's Army (Speech). Memorial for Aaron Swartz at the Internet Archive. San Francisco. Archived from the original on September 11, 2018. Retrieved January 27, 2013. Malamud, Carl (March 30, 2013). "On Crime and Access to Knowledge: An Unpublished Essay". Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved March 17, 2015. "Timothy Lee (Bio)". Archived from the original on October 8, 2018. Retrieved May 6, 2016. "Progressive Change Campaign Committee Statement on the Passing of Aaron Swartz". Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved November 19, 2014. "How to Get a Job Like Mine (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)". aaronsw.com. Archived from the original on October 31, 2018. Retrieved July 11, 2013. BoldProgressives (September 23, 2009). "Victory! HonorKennedy.com". Archived from the original on April 23, 2017. Retrieved November 15, 2013 – via YouTube. Eckersley, Peter (January 12, 2013). "Farewell to Aaron Swartz, an Extraordinary Hacker and activist". Deeplinks Blog. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on November 25, 2018. Retrieved May 29, 2013. Matthews, Laura (July 19, 2011). "Who is Aaron Swartz, the JSTOR MIT Hacker?". International Business Times. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2013. "Our Mission" (blog). Demand Progress. Archived from the original on October 29, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2015. Sleight, Graham (February 1, 2013). "'Homeland,' by Cory Doctorow". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 16, 2018. Retrieved August 23, 2017. "As Doctorow made clear in his eloquent obituary, he drew on advice from Swartz in setting out how his protagonist could use the information now available about voters to create a grass-roots anti-establishment political campaign. ... One of the book's two afterwords is by Swartz." Wagner, Daniel; Verena Dobnik (January 13, 2013). "Swartz' death fuels debate over computer crime". Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 30, 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2013. "JSTOR's attorney, Mary Jo White – formerly the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan – had called the lead Boston prosecutor in the case and asked him to drop it, said Peters." Swartz, Aaron (May 21, 2012). "How we stopped SOPA" (video). Keynote address at the Freedom To Connect 2012 conference. New York: Democracy Now!. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved January 27, 2013. "[T]he 'Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeiting Act' ... was introduced on September 20th, 2010.... And [then] it began being called PIPA, and eventually SOPA." Aaron Swartz (interviewee) & Amy Goodman (May 21, 2012). Freedom to Connect: Aaron Swartz (1986–2013) on victory to save open Internet, fight online censors (Video). N.Y.C.: Democracy Now. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Swartz, Aaron (August 16, 2012). "How we stopped SOPA" (video). Speech at ThoughtWorks New York. Yahoo!. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2013. "Remembering Aaron Swartz The Wikipedian". thewikipedian.net. January 15, 2013. Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved February 7, 2013. "Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2006/Results/en". Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Election. September 24, 2006. "6th – 423 (18%) – AaronSw (Aaron Swartz)" Swartz, Aaron (September 4, 2006). "Who Writes Wikipedia?". Raw Thought. Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Blodget, Henry (January 3, 2009). "Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway?". Business Insider. Archived from the original on July 30, 2012. Retrieved January 12, 2013. "Terms and Conditions of Use". JSTOR. New York: ITHAKA. January 15, 2013. Archived from the original on September 16, 2015. Retrieved August 29, 2017. "JSTOR's integrated digital platform is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to ... scholarly materials: journal issues ...; manuscripts and monographs; ...; spatial/geographic information systems data; plant specimens; ..." Larissa MacFarquhar (March 11, 2013). "Requiem for a dream: The tragedy of Aaron Swartz". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 21, 2014. "[Swartz] wrote a script that instructed his computer to download articles continuously, something that was forbidden by JSTOR's terms of service.... He spoofed the computer's address.... This happened several times. MIT traced the requests to his laptop, which he had hidden in an unlocked closet." JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 136" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 134" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. Lindsay, Jay (July 19, 2011). "Feds: Harvard fellow hacked millions of papers". Boston. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 15, 2013. "JSTOR Statement: Misuse Incident and Criminal Case". JSTOR. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Cohen, Noam (January 20, 2013). "How M.I.T. ensnared a hacker, bucking a freewheeling culture". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved February 23, 2017. "'Suspect is seen on camera entering network closet' [in an unlocked building] ... Within a mile of MIT ... he was stopped by an MIT police captain and [U.S. Secret Service agent] Pickett." Peters, Justin (February 7, 2013). "The Idealist: Aaron Swartz wanted to save the world. Why couldn't he save himself?". Slate. N.Y.C. 6. Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2013. "The superseding indictment ... claimed that Swartz had 'contrived to break into a restricted-access wiring closet at MIT.' But the closet door had been unlocked—and remained unlocked even after the university and authorities were aware that someone had been in there trying to access the school's network." Merritt, Jeralyn (January 14, 2013). "MIT to conduct internal probe on its role in Aaron Swartz case". TalkLeft (blog). Att'y Jeralyn Merritt. Archived from the original on October 16, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2013. "The wiring closet was not locked and was accessible to the public. If you look at the pictures supplied by the Government, you can see graffiti on one wall." "JSTOR Statement: Misuse Incident and Criminal Case". JSTOR. July 19, 2011. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. "Aaron Swartz, Internet Pioneer, Found Dead Amid Prosecutor 'Bullying' In Unconventional Case". HuffPost. January 12, 2013. Archived from the original on May 29, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2020. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3142" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3143" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3127" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3128" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3129" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. JSTOR (July 30, 2013). "JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. Page 3136" (PDF-1.6). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017 – via Archive.org. Hak, Susana; Paz, Gabriella (January 26, 2011). "Compilation of December 15, 2010 – January 20, 2011" (PDF). Hak–De Paz Police Log Compilations. MIT Crime Club. p. 6. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 17, 2016. Retrieved January 22, 2013. "January 6, 2:20 pm, Aaron Swartz, was arrested at 24 Lee Street as a suspect for breaking and entering...." Singel, Ryan (February 27, 2011). "Rogue academic downloader busted by MIT webcam stakeout, arrest report says". Wired. N.Y.C. Archived from the original on March 22, 2014. Retrieved March 5, 2017. "Swartz is accused ... of stealing the articles by attaching a laptop directly to a network switch in ... a 'restricted' room, though neither the police report nor the indictment [mentions] a door lock or signage indicating the room is off-limits." Bilton, Nick (July 19, 2011). "Internet Activist Charged in Data Theft". Boston: Bits Blog, The New York Times Company. Archived from the original on July 21, 2011. Retrieved July 19, 2011. Hawkinson, John (November 18, 2011). "Swartz indicted for breaking and entering". The Tech. MIT. p. 11. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved May 18, 2013. "Swartz ... was indicted ... in Middlesex Superior Court ... for breaking and entering, larceny over $250, and unauthorized access to a computer network." "Cambridge man indicted on breaking & entering charges, larceny charges in connection with data theft" (Press release). Middlesex District Attorney. November 17, 2011. Archived from the original on June 16, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2015. "Swartz ... was indicted today on charges of Breaking and Entering with Intent to Commit a Felony, Larceny over $250, and Unauthorized Access to a Computer Network by a Middlesex Superior Grand Jury." Hawkinson, John State drops charges against Swartz; federal charges remain Archived November 19, 2015, at the Wayback Machine The Tech, March 16, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2013. Bombardieri, Marcella (March 30, 2014). "The inside story of MIT and Aaron Swartz". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on November 19, 2015. Retrieved November 19, 2015. "US Government Ups Felony Count in JSTOR/Aaron Swartz Case From Four To Thirteen". Tech dirt. September 17, 2012. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Zetter, Kim (January 29, 2013). "Congress Demands Justice Department Explain Aaron Swartz Prosecution | Threat Level". Wired. Archived from the original on January 31, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2013. Smith-Spark, Laura. "Prosecutor defends case against Aaron Swartz". CNN. Archived from the original on August 30, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2014. Cullen, Kevin; Ellement, John. "MIT hacking case lawyer says Aaron Swartz was offered plea deal of six months behind bars". Boston Globe. Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC. Archived from the original on July 21, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2014. "Dealing With Aaron Swartz in the Nixonian Tradition: Overzealous Overcharging Leads to a Tragic Result" Archived January 26, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Justia, John Dean, January 25, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2020. Boeri, David (February 20, 2013). "Ortiz Under Fire: Critics Say Swartz Tragedy Is Evidence Of Troublesome Pattern". WBUR. Archived from the original on November 2, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2014. Landergan, Katherine (January 14, 2013). "US District Court drops charges against Aaron Swartz – MIT – Your Campus". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 8, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013. United States v. Swartz, 1:11-cr-10260, 106 (D. Mass. filed January 14, 2013). Poulsen, Kevin (December 4, 2013). "This Is the MIT Surveillance Video That Undid Aaron Swartz". Wired. Archived from the original on December 5, 2013. Retrieved December 7, 2013. Kemp, Joe; Trapasso, Clare; Mcshane, Larry (January 12, 2013). "Aaron Swartz, co-founder of Reddit and online activist, hangs himself in Brooklyn apartment, authorities say". Daily News. New York. Archived from the original on January 14, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2013. "Swartz ... left no note before his Friday morning death in the seventh-floor apartment at a luxury Sullivan Place building, police sources said." "Co-founder of Reddit Aaron Swartz found dead". News. CBS. January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Lessig, Lawrence (January 12, 2013). "Prosecutor as bully". Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Schwartz, John (January 12, 2013). "Internet Activist, a Creator of RSS, Is Dead at 26, Apparently a Suicide". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2013. Gustin, Sam (January 14, 2013). "MIT orders review of Aaron Swartz suicide as soul searching begins". Time. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Lessig, Lawrence (January 12, 2013). "Prosecutor as bully". Lessig Blog, v2. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. "Aaron consulted me as a friend and lawyer.... [M]y obligations to Harvard created a conflict that made it impossible for me to continue as a lawyer.... I get wrong. But I also get proportionality." Doctorow, Cory (January 12, 2013), "RIP, Aaron Swartz", Boing Boing, archived from the original on January 17, 2013, retrieved January 16, 2013 Thomas, Owen (January 12, 2013). "Family of Aaron Swartz Blames MIT, Prosecutors For His Death". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 14, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Gallardo, Michelle (January 15, 2013). "Aaron Swartz, Reddit co-founder, remembered at funeral". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 9, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2013. "Aaron Swartz Memorial Ice Cream Social Hour – Free Software Foundation – working together for free software". Fsf.org. Archived from the original on January 18, 2013. Retrieved January 18, 2013. "Aaron Swartz Tribute: Hundreds Honor Information Activist". HuffPost. January 19, 2013. Archived from the original on November 9, 2014. Retrieved January 20, 2013. Ante, Spencer; Anjali Athavaley; Joe Palazzolo (January 14, 2013). "Legal case strained troubled activist". The Wall Street Journal. p. B1. Archived from the original on August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2017. "With the government's position hardening, Mr. Swartz realized that he would have to face a costly public trial.... He would need to ask for help financing his defense...." Hsieh, Steven, Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? Archived August 20, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Rolling Stone, January 23, 2013. Retrieved January 26, 2013. Peltz, Jennifer (January 19, 2013). "Aaron Swartz Tribute: Hundreds Honor Information Activist". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 22, 2013. Retrieved February 8, 2013. Fishman, Rob (January 19, 2013). "Grief And Anger at Aaron Swartz's Memorial". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on January 23, 2013. Retrieved January 26, 2013. Aaron Swartz Memorial at the Internet Archive, Part 1, January 24, 2013, retrieved November 24, 2021 Kahle, Brewster (January 12, 2013). "Aaron Swartz, hero of the open world, dies". Internet Archive Blogs. Retrieved November 24, 2021. "Memorial for Aaron Swartz | Internet Archive Blogs". Retrieved January 18, 2013. "Aaron Swartz DC Memorial". Aaronswartzdcmemorial.eventbrite.com. Archived from the original on February 4, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2013. Farrell, Henry (January 29, 2013). "Aaron Swartz Memorial in Washington DC". Crooked Timber. Archived from the original on February 15, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2013. Gross, Grant, Lawmakers pledge to change hacking law during Swartz memorial Archived November 11, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, InfoWorld, February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013. Carter, Zach (February 5, 2013). "Aaron Swartz Memorial on Capitol Hill Draws Darrell Issa, Elizabeth Warren". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013. Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman (March 13, 2013). "TarenSK: MIT Memorial Service". Archived from the original on June 12, 2013. Retrieved March 15, 2013. including links to video of the ceremony/speeches. Rob Fishman (January 19, 2013). "Grief And Anger at Aaron Swartz's Memorial". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on October 19, 2013. Retrieved July 16, 2014. Holden Karnofsky (January 16, 2013). "In memory of Aaron Swartz". Archived from the original on August 27, 2014. Retrieved July 16, 2014. Ortiz, Carmen M. (January 16, 2013). "Statement Of United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz Regarding The Death Of Aaron Swartz". www.justice.gov. Archived from the original on December 15, 2014. Retrieved November 24, 2021. "Remember Aaron Swartz". Tumblr. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013. Guy, Sandra (January 15, 2013). "Aaron Swartz was 'killed by government,' father says at funeral". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on August 24, 2014. "Swartz's father ... said that at a school event, 3-year-old Aaron read to his parents while all of the other parents read to their children." Murphey, Shelly, US attorney's husband stirs Twitter storm on Swartz case Archived October 9, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Boston Globe, January 16, 2013.. Retrieved January 17, 2013. Pierce, Charles P. (January 17, 2013). "Still More About The Death Of Aaron Swartz" Archived September 18, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Esquire. Retrieved January 18, 2013. "Swartz' death fuels debate over computer crime". USA Today. January 14, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved January 29, 2013. Smith, Gerry (January 15, 2013). "Aaron Swartz case 'snowballed out of MIT's hands,' source says". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. "President Reif writes to MIT community regarding Aaron Swartz" (Press release). MIT. January 13, 2013. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved April 7, 2013. "I have asked ... Abelson to lead a thorough analysis of MIT's involvement from the time that we first perceived unusual activity on our network in fall 2010...." "homepage". Swartz Review. MIT. January 23, 2013. Archived from the original on February 6, 2013. "IS&T has created this web site so [community members] can suggest questions and issues to guide the review... What questions should MIT be asking at this stage of the Aaron Swartz review?" Nanos, Janelle (January 24, 2013). "MIT prof announces plans for Swartz review: A website is launched allowing for discussion of how his case was handled". Boston Magazine. Archived from the original on October 16, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2013. "MIT and Aaron Swartz's lawyers argue over releasing evidence". Techdirt. March 20, 2013. Archived from the original on March 23, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. Rebecca Greenfield (March 19, 2013). "MIT's peace offering of Aaron Swartz documents still won't be enough". The Atlantic Wire. Archived from the original on April 12, 2015. Retrieved March 24, 2013. "Report Details MIT's Involvement in the Aaron Swartz Case". alum.mit.edu. August 2013. Archived from the original on August 29, 2013. Retrieved September 7, 2016. Schwartz, John (July 30, 2013). "M.I.T. Releases Report on Its Role in the Case of Aaron Swartz". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013. Retrieved July 30, 2013. "MIT releases report on its actions in the Aaron Swartz case". MIT news. MIT News Office. July 30, 2013. Archived from the original on August 3, 2013. Retrieved July 30, 2013. "Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 29, 2014. Retrieved July 30, 2013. Grandoni, Dino (January 15, 2013), "Tom Dolan, Husband of Aaron Swartz's Prosecutor", HuffPost, archived from the original on January 16, 2013, retrieved January 16, 2013 McCullagh, Declan, "Prosecutor in Aaron Swartz 'hacking' case comes under fire" Archived February 21, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, CNET, January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2013. Stout, Matt. "Ortiz: We never intended full penalty for Swartz" Archived January 18, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Boston Herald, January 17, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2013. Barnes, James. "Hacker's suicide linked to 'overzealous' prosecutors" Archived August 19, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, The Global Legal Post, January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2013. Dobuzinskis, Alex; P.J. Huffstutter (January 13, 2013). "Internet activist, programmer Aaron Swartz dead at 26". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved June 30, 2017. "That belief – that information should be shared and available for the good of society – prompted Swartz to found the nonprofit group Demand Progress." Vartanian, Hrag (February 7, 2013). "A roller tribute to two digital anarchist heroes". Brooklyn, NY: Hyperallergic. Archived from the original on June 5, 2013. Retrieved June 1, 2013. Yuval Noah Harari (April 18, 2013). "Data Processing – Part 1" (Video). YouTube. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved September 27, 2018. Keilman, John (January 18, 2016). "Legacy of open access activist still growing". Chicago Tribune. Section 1, Page 3. Archived from the original on November 22, 2018. Retrieved April 16, 2020. Fallows, James (January 12, 2013). "Aaron Swartz". The Atlantic. Retrieved November 24, 2021. "Anonymous hacks MIT Web sites to post Aaron Swartz tribute, call to arms". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 19, 2014. Retrieved January 13, 2013. Kao, Joanna (January 19, 2013). "MIT email was down for 10 hours last night, Mystery Hunt temporarily affected". Tech Blogs. MIT. Archived from the original on February 17, 2013. "A mail loop caused by a series of malformed email messages led to an exhaustion of system resources...." Aush0k; TibitXimer (January 22, 2013). "R.I.P Aaron Swartz". [harvard.edu]. Archived from the original on June 27, 2017. "hacked by aush0k and tibitximer" Swartz, Aaron (August 2, 2009). "Life in a world of pervasive immorality: The ethics of being alive". Raw Thought: Aaron Swartz's Weblog. Archived from the original on October 31, 2018. Retrieved January 24, 2013. "Is there sense in following [the] rules or are they just another example of the world's pervasive immorality?" Kao, Joanna (January 23, 2013). "MIT DNS hacked; traffic redirected". The Tech. MIT. p. 1. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved January 24, 2013. "From 11:58 a.m. to 1:05 pm, MIT's DNS was redirected ... to CloudFlare, where the hackers had configured servers to return a Harvard IP address.... By 7:15 pm, CloudFlare removed the 'mail.mit.edu' record, which referred to the machine ... at KAIST." Reported by Sabari Selvan. "United States Sentencing Commission(ussc.gov) hacked and defaced by Anonymous | Security updates". Ehackingnews.com. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013. Retrieved January 29, 2013. "Hackers take over sentencing commission website". Associated Press. January 26, 2013. Archived from the original on October 18, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2013. "'Two weeks ago today, a line was crossed,' the statement said." Aarons ArkAngel (January 26, 2013). "Anonymous Operation Last Resort: Anonymous hacked USSC.GOV" (Flash video). Archived from the original on August 24, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2013 – via YouTube. "Anonymous hackers target US agency site". BBC News. January 26, 2013. Archived from the original on September 26, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2018. "The hackers ... said the site was chosen for symbolic reasons. 'The federal sentencing guidelines ... enable prosecutors to cheat citizens of their constitutionally guaranteed right to a fair trial ...,' the video statement said." Stanza, Arrow (January 6, 2014). "Springer Link hacked in honor of Aaron Swartz" (Press release). Slashdot. Archived from the original on January 14, 2014. Retrieved January 14, 2014. "The material is published in honor of Aaron Swartz in springer-lta.co.nf". [Author's pseudonym is an anagram of "aaron swartz".] "Petition: "Remove United States District Attorney Carmen Ortiz from office for overreach in the case of Aaron Swartz."". Wh.gov. January 12, 2013. Archived from the original on February 18, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. Smith, Gerry (January 13, 2013). "Were The Charges Against Internet Activist Aaron Swartz Too Severe?". HuffPost. Archived from the original on August 5, 2016. Retrieved February 20, 2020. "Fire Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Heymann". White House. January 12, 2013. Archived from the original on October 19, 2013. Retrieved January 29, 2013. Glenn Greenwald (January 16, 2013). "Carmen Ortiz and Stephen Heymann: accountability for prosecutorial abuse | guardian.co.uk". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on August 4, 2013. Retrieved January 29, 2013. "Convicted hacker Stephen Watt on Aaron Swartz: 'It's just not justice'". VentureBeat. January 25, 2013. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved January 29, 2013. Fung, Brian; Peterson, Andrea (January 8, 2015). "After long delay, Obama declines to rule on petition calling for firing of DOJ officials over Aaron Swartz's suicide". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 16, 2015. Retrieved March 13, 2015. Rosenblatt, Seth (November 9, 2013). "Call to action kicks off second Aaron Swartz hackathon". CNET News. Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2013. Guthrie Weissman, Cale (November 8, 2013). "Tonight begins the second annual Aaron Swartz hackathon". Pando Daily. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2013. "Aaron Swartz Hackathon". Archived from the original on March 29, 2014. Retrieved November 9, 2013. Higgins, Parker (November 6, 2001). "Aaron Swartz Hackathons This Weekend to Continue his Work". Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2013. Rocheleau, Matt (October 21, 2013). "In Aaron Swartz' memory, hackathons to be held across globe, including at MIT, next month". Boston. Archived from the original on October 25, 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2013. "Worldwide Aaron Swartz Memorial Hackathon Series". Noisebridge. Archived from the original on November 8, 2013. Retrieved November 9, 2013. "Aaron projects". Noisebridge. Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved November 9, 2013. Lessig, Lawrence (January 10, 2014). "Aaron's Walk: The New Hampshire Rebellion". HuffPost. Archived from the original on July 31, 2014. Retrieved September 5, 2014. Boyko, Brian (January 11, 2014). "It Begins. Thank you". Archived from the original on September 4, 2014. Retrieved September 5, 2014. "Remember Aaron Swartz". Celebrating Aaron Swartz. Retrieved November 24, 2021. "Aaron Swartz". public.resource.org. Retrieved November 24, 2021. Bernstein, Mark (January 13, 2013). "Mark Bernstein: Aaron Swartz". www.markbernstein.org. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2021. Farrell, Henry (January 12, 2013). "Remembering Aaron Swartz". Crooked Timber. Archived from the original on November 21, 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2021. Norton, Quinn (January 12, 2013). "My Aaron Swartz, whom I loved. | Quinn Said". Quinn Said. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2021. "Information Power to The People". Ahmet Öğüt's website. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved March 31, 2019. "PDF Tribute". Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 15, 2013. Cutler, Kim-Mai (January 13, 2013). "PDF tribute to Aaron Swartz attracts roughly 1,500 links to copyright-protected research". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 4, 2018. Retrieved June 25, 2017. Musil, Steven (January 13, 2013). "Researchers honor Swartz's memory with PDF protest". CNet News. Archived from the original on February 14, 2014. Retrieved January 14, 2013. Vivalt, Eva (January 12, 2013). "In memoriam". Aid Economics. Eva Vivalt. Archived from the original on March 13, 2013. "Who we are". aidgrade.org. 2012. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved April 7, 2013. Ohlheiser, Abby (January 14, 2013). "Aaron Swartz death: #pdftribute hashtag aggregates copyrighted articles released online in tribute to internet activist". Slate. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. "Economie de la publication scientifique et libre accès: un débat relancé par la mort d'Aaron Swartz". Slate (in French). January 21, 2013. Archived from the original on October 8, 2018. Retrieved October 8, 2018. Aaron, Swartz; Lessig, Lawrence; Bortolotti, Marie-Mathilde; Szidon, Amarante (March 22, 2017). Celui qui pourrait changer le monde : Aaron Swartz, écrits 1986–2013. Éditions B42 – DL 2017. ISBN 9782917855775. OCLC 993094009. "La controverse en matière de publication des articles scientifiques". Archived from the original on October 8, 2018. Retrieved October 8, 2018. Manjoo, Farhad How MIT Can Honor Aaron Swartz Archived August 19, 2018, at the Wayback Machine Slate, January 31, 2013. Retrieved May 9, 2013. Chan, Jennifer, To honor Aaron Swartz, let knowledge go free, U.S. News & World Report, 1 February 2013. Archived August 19, 2018, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved February 2, 2013. Project, Free Law. "RECAP Project – Turning PACER Around". recapthelaw.org. Archived from the original on May 9, 2016. Retrieved April 4, 2013. Kopfstein, Janus (March 13, 2013). "Aaron Swartz to receive posthumous 'Freedom of Information' award for open access advocacy". The Verge. Archived from the original on March 15, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. "James Madison Award". Ala.org. January 17, 2013. Archived from the original on March 22, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. "Entire library journal editorial board resigns, citing 'crisis of conscience' after death of Aaron Swartz". The Verge. Archived from the original on December 31, 2013. Retrieved August 29, 2017. New, Jake (March 26, 2013). "Journal's Editorial Board Resigns in Protest of Publisher's Policy Toward Authors". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on January 8, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2015. "It was just days after Aaron Swartz' death, and I was having a crisis of conscience about publishing in a journal that was not open access". Feral Librarian. Archived from the original on August 24, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2014. Swartz, Aaron. "If I get hit by a truck..." Archived from the original on January 17, 2003. Retrieved May 29, 2016. "Aaron Swartz". The Economist. January 19, 2013. Archived from the original on January 19, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. Sasso, Brendan; Jennifer Martinez (January 15, 2013). "Lawmakers slam DOJ prosecution of Swartz as 'ridiculous, absurd'". Hillicon Valley. The Hill. Archived from the original on April 17, 2014. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Reilly, Ryan J. (January 15, 2013). "Darrell Issa Probing Prosecution of Aaron Swartz, Internet Pioneer Who Killed Himself". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. "United States Senator John Cornyn, Texas". United States Senator John Cornyn, Texas. Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved January 19, 2013. Pearce, Matt (January 18, 2013). "Aaron Swartz suicide has U.S. lawmakers scrutinizing prosecutors". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. Carter, Zach (January 18, 2013). "John Cornyn Criticizes Eric Holder Over Aaron Swartz's Death". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. "Top senator scolds Holder over Reddit founder's suicide". The Washington Times. January 18, 2013. Archived from the original on January 19, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2013. "Issa letter to Holder on Aaron Swartz case" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2013. Boeri, David and David Frank, Ortiz Under Fire: Critics Say Swartz Tragedy Is Evidence Of Troublesome Pattern Archived November 2, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, WBUR, February 20, 2013. Retrieved February 24, 2013. Reilly, Ryan J., Aaron Swartz Prosecutors Weighed 'Guerilla' Manifesto, Justice Official Tells Congressional Committee Archived June 25, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, HuffPost, February 22, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013. Masnick, Mike, DOJ Admits It Had To Put Aaron Swartz In Jail To Save Face Over The Arrest Archived June 25, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, techdirt, February 25, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2013. Masnick, Mike (March 7, 2013). "Holder: DOJ used discretion in bullying Swartz, press lacked discretion in quoting facts". Techdirt. Archived from the original on November 8, 2018. Retrieved April 12, 2013. Masnick, Mike (March 8, 2013). "Aaron Swartz's partner accuses DOJ of lying, seizing evidence without a warrant & withholding exculpatory evidence". Techdirt. Archived from the original on November 8, 2018. Retrieved June 28, 2019. Carter, Zach (March 22, 2013). "Al Franken Sends Eric Holder Letter Over 'Remarkably Aggressive' Aaron Swartz Prosecution". HuffPost. Archived from the original on March 25, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. H.R. 2454 at Congress.gov; H.R. 2454 Archived July 15, 2018, at the Wayback Machine at GovTrack; H.R. 2454 Archived November 12, 2013, at the Wayback Machine at OpenCongress. S. 1196 at Congress.gov; S. 1196 Archived July 15, 2018, at the Wayback Machine at GovTrack; S. 1196 Archived November 12, 2013, at the Wayback Machine at OpenCongress. Musil, Steven (November 30, 2011). "New 'Aaron's Law' aims to alter controversial computer fraud law". Internet & Media News. CNET. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Greenberg, Andrew 'Andy' (January 16, 2013). "'Aaron's Law' Suggests Reforms To Computer Fraud Act (But Not Enough To Have Protected Aaron Swartz)". Forbes. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2013. Kerr, Oren, Aaron's Law, Drafting the Best Limits of the CFAA, And A Reader Poll on A Few Examples Archived August 19, 2018, at the Wayback Machine Volokh Conspiracy, January 27, 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2013. "Help Protect The Next Aaron Swartz". Aclu.org. January 11, 2013. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 7, 2013. "Reform Draconian Computer Crime Law". Action.eff.org. Archived from the original on February 7, 2013. Retrieved February 7, 2013. "Video of Lawrence Lessig's lecture, Aaron's Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age". February 20, 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013 – via YouTube. Lawrence Lessig. "the next words: A Lecture on Aaron's Law". Lessig. Archived from the original on February 8, 2013. Retrieved February 21, 2013. "Transcript: Lawrence Lessig on 'Aaron's Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age'". Archived from the original on November 22, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2013. "Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review – A summary of Lawrence Lessig's Chair Lecture at Harvard Law School". Harvardcrcl.org. January 14, 2013. Archived from the original on May 30, 2015. Retrieved May 30, 2015. Dekel, Jonathan (May 1, 2014). "Swartz doc director: Oracle and Larry Ellison killed Aaron's Law". Postmedia. Archived from the original on October 3, 2018. Retrieved October 23, 2015. Peterson, Andrea (February 16, 2013). "How FASTR Will Help Americans". Thinkprogress.org. Archived from the original on February 27, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. "Wyden Bill Makes Taxpayer Funded Research Available to the Public | U.S. Senator Ron Wyden". Wyden.senate.gov. February 14, 2013. Archived from the original on February 19, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013. "White House Issues Public Access Directive". Publishers Weekly. February 22, 2013. Archived from the original on June 6, 2013. Retrieved May 28, 2013. Zak, Dan (July 26, 2013). "'Printing Out the Internet' exhibit is crowdsourced work of art". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved August 20, 2013. "Crowdsourced art project aims to print out entire internet". CBC News. July 30, 2013. Archived from the original on September 2, 2013. Retrieved August 20, 2013. Mahler, Jonathan (July 24, 2014). "Heady Summer, Fateful Fall for Dinesh D'Souza, a Conservative Firebrand". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2016. Retrieved December 12, 2016. McGovern, Joe (August 11, 2014). "America: Imagine the World Without Her". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on September 20, 2016. Retrieved December 12, 2016. "Aaron Swartz documentary". TakePart. Archived from the original on November 19, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2014. Zelman, Joanna. "WATCH: Aaron Swartz Found NSA Scope 'Scary'". HuffPost. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved February 20, 2020. "Sneak preview of The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" Archived June 17, 2018, at the Wayback Machine – PandoDaily "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story Of Aaron Swartz – Festival Program". Sundance Institute. Archived from the original on March 25, 2014. "The Internet's Own Boy: Film on Aaron Swartz Captures Late Activist's Struggle for Online Freedom". Democracy Now!. January 21, 2014. Archived from the original on January 21, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014. Knappenberger, Brian. "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz". Internet Archive. Retrieved August 3, 2014. Newton, Casey (January 23, 2014). "'The Internet's Own Boy' fights for reform after Aaron Swartz's death". The Verge. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved August 29, 2017. Matheson, Whitney (June 28, 2014). "Internet's Own Boy: Tech activist's legacy". USA Today. p. B8. "'The Internet's Own Boy' Is a Powerful Homage to Aaron Swartz". Mashable. January 23, 2014. Archived from the original on January 25, 2014. Retrieved January 23, 2014. DeFore, John (January 21, 2014). "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz: Sundance Review". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on February 5, 2014. Retrieved January 23, 2014. von Busack, Richard. "Breaking the Internet: Killswitch Screens at Cinequest". Metro Silicon Valley. Archived from the original on September 16, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2015. Swegles, Fred. "Battle for Internet Control Fuels O.C. -produced Movie". Orange County Register. Archived from the original on April 4, 2017. Retrieved April 16, 2015. Grayson, Alan. "Grayson Screen Award Winning "Killswitch" Documentary". Congressman Grayson's House of Rep Official Web Page. Archived from the original on February 27, 2015. Retrieved February 23, 2015. "The Price That You Pay for Rocking The Boat". HuffPost. March 27, 2015. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015. Retrieved March 27, 2015. Gill, Kathy. "Lawrence Lessig at 'Killswitch' Seattle Premiere: Money, Politics, and the Battle for the Internet". GeekWire. Archived from the original on June 6, 2015. Retrieved June 5, 2015. "Archived copy". YouTube. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved September 2, 2020. Burke, Darius (September 15, 2019), Patriot of the Web (Biography, Drama, History, Thriller), Mary Peyton Stewart, Charles Luise, Scott Sederquist, Michael Barry, Grandad Productions, Writer1Films, archived from the original on April 4, 2017, retrieved September 15, 2020 "Patriot of the Web". IMDb. October 13, 2018. Archived from the original on April 4, 2017. Retrieved July 21, 2018. "Patriot of the Web (@aswartzmovie)". Twitter. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved February 19, 2018. "Patriot of the Web". reelhouse.org. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved February 19, 2018. "Patriot of the Web – Darius Burke – Watch Online for Just $4.99 – grandadproductions". grandadproductions. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved February 19, 2018. Andreeva, Nellie (December 4, 2017). "'Think Aaron' Movie Based on Life Of "Hacktivist' Aaron Swartz in Works at HBO Films". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on November 6, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2020. Gruber, John. "Daring Fireball: Markdown". Daring Fireball. Archived from the original on April 2, 2004. Retrieved April 25, 2014. "atx, the true structured text format". www.aaronsw.com. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved November 2, 2020. Gruber, John. "Daring Fireball – Markdown – Syntax". Daring Fireball. Archived from the original on February 22, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2015. "RDFCore Working Group Membership". W3. December 1, 2002. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved January 15, 2013. Swartz, A. (September 2004). "Request for Comments No. 3870, 'application/rdf+xml' Media Type Registration". Network Working Group. The Internet Society. Archived from the original on September 17, 2013. Retrieved January 15, 2013. "A media type for use with the Extensible Markup Language serialization of the Resource Description Framework.... [It] allows RDF consumers to identify RDF/XML documents...." Poulsen, Kevin. "Strongbox and Aaron Swartz". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on June 5, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2013. Davidson, Amy (May 15, 2013). "Introducing Strongbox". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on June 29, 2013. Retrieved June 20, 2013. Kassner, Michael (May 20, 2013). "Aaron Swartz legacy lives on with New Yorker's Strongbox: How it works". TechRepublic. Archived from the original on July 29, 2013. Retrieved June 20, 2013. Charlton, Alistair (October 16, 2013). "Aaron Swartz-Designed Whistleblower Tool SecureDrop Launched by Press Freedom Foundation". International Business Times. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Aaron, Swartz. "In Defense of Anonymity". Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2014. Zetter, Kim (December 12, 2008). "New Service Makes Tor Anonymized Content Available to All". Wired. Archived from the original on March 18, 2014. Retrieved February 22, 2014. "tor2web brings anonymous Tor sites to the "regular" web". arstechnica.com. Archived from the original on November 2, 2018. Retrieved February 22, 2014. "Not A Bug, Inc.: Private company information". Bloomberg Business. October 31, 2006. Archived from the original on June 9, 2015. Retrieved May 30, 2015. "The company owns and operates portals that allow users to post contents and create Websites.... As of October 31, 2006, [it] is a subsidiary of CondéNet, Inc.... Key Executives for Not A Bug, Inc.: ... Huffman, President and Director; ... Swartz, Treasurer and Director; ... Ohanian, Secretary and Director." "There was a third 'co-founder' of reddit", Today I Learned, Reddit, October 18, 2010, archived from the original on April 21, 2017, retrieved August 25, 2017, "Aaron isn't a founder of reddit." External links This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. (June 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Aaron Swartz at Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Commons News from Wikinews Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata Official website Edit this at Wikidata Aaron Swartz's Wikipedia user page Github.com/aaronsw (Aaron Swartz) Aaron Swartz on Twitter Edit this at Wikidata Remembrances (2013– ), with obituary and official statement from family and partner The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz, The Documentary Network, June 29, 2014, a film by Brian Knappenberger – Luminant Media The Aaron Swartz Collection at Internet Archive (2013– ) (podcasts, e-mail correspondence, other materials) Aaron Swartz at IMDb Posting about Swartz as Wikipedia contributor Archived January 13, 2018, at the Wayback Machine (2013), at The Wikipedian Case Docket: US v. Swartz Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz JSTOR Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz – A collection of documents and events from JSTOR's perspective. Hundreds of emails and other documents they provided the government concerning the case. Federal law enforcement documents about Aaron Swartz, released under the Freedom of Information Act Further reading External video video icon Presentation by Justin Peters on The Idealist, June 11, 2016, C-SPAN Nanos, Janelle (January 2014). "Losing Aaron". Boston. Peters, Justin (2016). The Idealist: Aaron Swartz and the Rise of Free Culture on the Internet. Scribner. ISBN 978-1476767727. Biography of Swartz. Poulsen, Kevin. "MIT Moves to Intervene in Release of Aaron Swartz's Secret Service File." Wired. July 18, 2013. Documentary Brian Knappenberger (Producer and Director), The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz. Participant Media: 2014. Via The Internet Archive, www.archive.org/ Run time: 105 minutes. Ali Akbarzadeh (Director), Killswitch: The Battle to Control the Internet, Akorn Entertainment: 2014
https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/free-pacer-bill-end-fees-online-... Free PACER? Bill to end fees for online court records advances in Senate By Nate Raymond 3 minute read The U.S. Capitol building is seen in Washington, U.S., November 16, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz The U.S. Capitol building is seen in Washington, U.S., November 16, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com Summary Related documents Senate panel advances bill for free public access to court filings U.S. House of Representatives passed similar bill in prior Congress (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate panel on Thursday advanced a bipartisan bill that would overhaul the federal judiciary's PACER electronic court record system and make the downloading of filings free for the public through the elimination of costly fees. The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to send the Open Courts Act of 2021 to the full Senate for its consideration after adopting an amendment that provided for additional funding and addressed the judiciary's concerns on technical issues. The panel approved the measure on voice vote without any recorded opposition, and in a sign of the bill's support, nearly all of the committee members elected to co-sponsor the legislation by the end of the hearing. Similar legislation has been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, which during the last Congress passed a version of the bill despite opposition from the judiciary over its costs. The House Judiciary Committee has yet to take up the latest measure. The Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts, the judiciary's administrative agency, in a statement said it was committed to modernizing its system but that the judiciary remains "concerned" about the funding to make PACER free. PACER, which stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is run by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Users pay $0.10 per page with a cap of $3 per document (with transcripts excluded). The judiciary previously estimated it would take in about $142 million in PACER fees in the last fiscal year. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the committee's Democratic chair, said that while big law firms have no problem paying those fees, for individuals, small business, small law firms and non-profits the charges could be overly expensive. Under the legislation, the Administrative Office must develop a modern, secure publicly accessible database for records. Durbin said a revamp was needed, particularly calling out PACER's "tortuous" search system. Gabe Roth, the executive director of the court reform group Fix the Court, said the bill "modernizes the entire case management and filing system in a way that can make the judiciary's IT a crown jewel and not an embarrassment." To fund the new system, on a short-term basis, high-volume PACER users who currently spend more than $25,000 a quarter to download filings would still be charged fees as would federal agencies. Once the new database system is up and running, operational costs will primarily be covered by annual agency fees and appropriations from Congress.
Swartz Free PACER?
Some locations offer free pacer access. Most of them are not secure platforms or lan's. Plugin hardware and software is now discreet sized. Network overlays exist. Put the pieces and action together [better, years later, again]... Long term... "freeing" pacer, via any branch of govt method, is a point[source/less] band-aid, not freedom. Best focus on freeing from govt as a whole instead.
On Monday, December 27, 2021, 06:17:55 PM PST, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Swartz Free PACER?
Some locations offer free pacer access. Most of them are not secure platforms or lan's. Plugin hardware and software is now discreet sized. Network overlays exist. Put the pieces and action together [better, years later, again]...
Long term... "freeing" pacer, via any branch of govt method, is a point[source/less] band-aid, not freedom. Best focus on freeing from govt as a whole instead. ---- Jim Bell's comment: I have used PACER in the past, although not within the last year or so. It seems to have a limit: For free, you can use an amount, maybe it once was $30.00 over 3 months, for downloading Federal cases. I don't recall the usual per page charge, because I've never downloaded so many pages that I've exceeded the 3-month limit. Jim Bell
[accidentally sent as private message originally, resending to the list. oops.] On 12/27/21 23:16, jim bell wrote:
Jim Bell's comment:
I have used PACER in the past, although not within the last year or so. It seems to have a limit: For free, you can use an amount, maybe it once was $30.00 over 3 months, for downloading Federal cases. I don't recall the usual per page charge, because I've never downloaded so many pages that I've exceeded the 3-month limit.
Jim Bell
Most recently I remember it being $15 over a quarter (3 months). I'll have to go fishing for the last email I got from them to be sure, as it's been a while since I've needed to use PACER. -- Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com
On 12/28/21, coderman <coderman@protonmail.com> wrote:
these are great things as is this whole great wonderful thread. please share https urls to keep people safer from the topic of the thread.
this one is new to me. i'm getting a zero-length document from that url here.
participants (5)
-
coderman
-
grarpamp
-
jim bell
-
Shawn K. Quinn
-
Victim of Undiscussed Horrifically Abusive Brainwashing