DC Panel Explains Denial Of Ethics Subpoena On Ex-DOJ Atty
DC Panel Explains Denial Of Ethics Subpoena On Ex-DOJ Atty <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1814649?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-03-19&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=9> By Ali Sullivan A subpoena from D.C. attorney ethics authorities demanding that former U.S. Department of Justice attorney Jeffrey Clark produce documents pertaining to his alleged role in promoting Donald Trump's stolen election narrative would be "sufficiently testimonial and potentially incriminating" to implicate the Fifth Amendment, a D.C. Court of Appeals panel ruled. Opinion attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1814649?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-03-19&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=9> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1814649?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-03-19&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=9>
participants (1)
-
Gunnar Larson