" . . . to exhibit the genesis of the problems of production and distribution is to prepare the way for their solution.” (Système I: 89, 92) Proudhon’s discussion of the associations which would replace wage-labour (and so end labour as a commodity). In these members “straightway enjoy the rights and prerogatives of associates and even managers”, “have a deliberative voice in the council” and so are “a solution based upon equality – in other words, the organisation of labour, which involves the negation of political economy and the end of property.”  Hence “the socialisation of capital and property” for “it is necessary that […] all appropriated wealth again become collective wealth, that the capital taken from society returns to society” for “there is supremacy and dependence” between the worker and the capitalist and “capital introduces into society an inevitable feudalism”. (Système II: 204; I: 272–8, 217, 88; II: 168)  Unlike the utopian socialists, he rejected the idea of organising labour and instead argued that labour would organise itself. Proudhon proved right about unions? https://anarchistnews.org/content/unions-and-state Reposts not blue-collar police-unions as roadblocks