Identity of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto might be revealed
craig Wright is a fraud. He's just self-centered So he can't be Satoshi Açık Pzt, Kas 15, 2021 02:51, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> yazdı:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10201229/True-identity-Bitcoin-crea...
jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> yazdı:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10201229/True-identity-Bitcoin-crea...
zeynepaydogan <zeynepaydogan@protonmail.com> wrote:
craig Wright is a fraud.
And a Liar and an Asshole.
So he can't be Satoshi
Only Satoshi can sign with the Satoshi Genesis, and with the handful of coins attributed to Satoshi. All others, the no-signers, are imposters full of shit, same for any court that assigns the namesake in absence of a publicly performed signing. In today's digital real world of cryptocurrency cryptography is the true and only decider, with any theft of keys or wrench abuse being sorted as best as can be as usual Satoshi's bag (some people estimate roughly 2% $60B) is unusable and meaningless, any reveal quickly becoming but a footnote to history, an influence no one really wants or would listen to anyway, crypto has already moved on. Distributed cryptocurrency has been unleashed, it is Freedom, of a type that pays little mind to such central points of influencial authority that reside in the legacy real world, and shall forever work to route around them, as it should.
these people both look unlikely to be satoshi lawyers debating evidence reviewed by people with no understanding of cryptography, anybody could make a mint. really, any of us could pull this off better than they likely could, and could likely sue both of them after the fact
participants (4)
-
grarpamp
-
jim bell
-
Karl
-
zeynepaydogan