Conclusion to a mini thread on the LWN article: Handling attacks on a community https://lwn.net/Articles/814508/ Posted Mar 15, 2020 11:25 UTC (Sun) by zenaan (subscriber, #3778) https://lwn.net/Articles/814970/ [I wrote:] >> So is it fair to assume then that you agree with all the resignations (RMS), knee-bending (Torvalds), and turmoil (openSUSE and many others)? [Cyberax wrote:] > Absolutely. People should learn to behave like decent human beings, and not like entitled brats. [I responded:] In other words: Cyberax: "Richard Matthew Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and staunch catalyst, visionary, upholder and all around grandfather for the entire FLOSS/Libre movement for ~30 years now, behaved or spoke, in my ever so high opinion, "like an entitled brat," and so therefore (I say) it is a great thing that he was "resigned" from his FSF." So ... speaking of "entitled brats" ... ["Mummy told me I am fully entitled to be free from all confronting words by anyone forever." - You know, that's not a bad definition of "snowflake", not bad at all ... we shall be making use of that :D] Now for a definition of snowflake: Snowflake: 1. An entitled brat. 2. A wilting fragile flower. 3. A human who considers themselves entitled to be protected against all confronting words for the rest of their lives. 4. A useless human who achieves attention by whining about words they cannot resist reading, which have been written by others and which they find some way to take offence to. 5. A dangerous saboteur who typically hides for many years behind niceness and pretence, before striking a true leader when the leader appears to be under attack. WARNING to future founders: When you found any organisation or entity in this world, be clear about the inviolable rights your organisation shall protect and perhaps enshrine these in a "bro-CoC" code of conduct, such as: - the right to free speech - the right to challenge anyone at any time, on their actions and/or their words - the right to offend people with truths which they may find confronting - the right to speak your mind and your opinion (presumably "modulo is it lawful in the list administrator's jurisdiction") - the right to "be an ass" when you're having a bad day, and that this may never be held as a ground for your dismissal or expulsion or demotion or etc - the right to joust, verbally, yet vigorously, with anyone at any time It is important to enshrine your bro-CoC, because if you don't, then saboteurs pretending to be snowflakes, or pretending to protect snowflakes, shall eventually damage both you and your organisation by introducing a snow-CoC. Also consider ways to clandestinely determine the loyalty of those who proclaim to be your "friend" and/or "supporter". Good luck - and may your eyes be open!
Starting a new tech, software or other project? Snowflakes threatening the lifeblood of your will to be bothered at all? Don't wanna get bogged down in Code of Conduct (CoC) politics nor risk the pioneer-sabotaging, community undermining nature of "snowflake" CoC-wielding petty nazis? Then look no further .. than the Bro-CoC! Pre-empt CoC wielding snowflakes from undermining your project and community, and from undermining the founder(s); Set aside the potential for a back door Snow-CoC being inserted into what was "a community". Mandate your Bro-CoC from the start. Yee haw muffaluggerahs :D Here's are some ideas to start, others are earlier in this thread, and no doubt plenty elsewhere: What is No Code of Conduct? https://nocodeofconduct.com/ (Personally I prefer the noun Bro-CoC to No-CoC, but each to his own...) Also note - at least for mailing lists, there's absolutely no reason to not have a minimum of TWO "general discussion" lists - one for Snow-CoCs and the other for Bro-CoCs. Easy peasy. I strongly suggest using the following email list names for your new project: snow-CoCs@my.project.tld men@my.project.tld
participants (1)
-
Zenaan Harkness