On 11/15/20, jamesd@echeque.com wrote: <snip>

To this end, the US government under Obama and Hillary funded and armed ISIS, which Russia was none too happy about.

That sounds to me like the kind of thing that would be c1assified information. How did you learn this?

On 11/15/20, Zenaan Harkness wrote:

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 05:28:52PM -0500, Karl wrote:

...

On 11/15/20, jamesd@echeque.com wrote: <snip>

...

To this end, the US government under Obama and Hillary funded and armed ISIS, which Russia was none too happy about.

That sounds to me like the kind of thing that would be c1assified information. How did you learn this?

No. Just public information...

The terrorists fighting us now? We just finished training them. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/08/18/the-terrorists-f...

There are many public examples reports of weapons caches and squads of "rebels", "mysteriously" swapping sides (to ISIS), even on the very day they were "released" from US training to "fight Assad".

The things you're describing ... they have been happening for my entire life, constantly, under every administration, every president. What need would such warmongering meet?

On 2020-11-16 09:07, Karl wrote:

What need would such warmongering meet?

These are holy wars. Harvard and the state department hold that all religions, rightly understood, are progressivism. Jesus, Mohamed, Moses, Buddha, Rama, etc, all supposedly pointed the way to Obama the lightbringer, who stopped the oceans from rising, healed the planet, and brought world peace, and our currently vastly improved understanding of right and wrong. Our major military objective in Afghanistan appears to be to teach nine year old girls to put a condom on a banana. Not all Mohammedans in Afghanistan are cool with this.

On 11/15/20, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:

...

On 11/15/20, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:

...

To this end, the US government under Obama and Hillary funded and armed ISIS, which Russia was none too happy about.

On 2020-11-16 08:28, Karl wrote:

...

That sounds to me like the kind of thing that would be c1assified information. How did you learn this?

It is only a secret if you keep your head in the sand.

ISIS funding is all over wikileaks, and all over the Clinton emails, which one of the many reasons why batsoup and rat hate wikileaks so much. Pretending that it is secret is like "No proof of fake ballots". For a sufficiently high and ever escalating standard of proof.

Asking me how I know the state Department armed and funded ISIS is like asking me how I know that seven hundred thousand fake ballots were added the pile in the early hours of Wednesday morning in Pensylvania. These things are officially secret, but not actually secret at all.

I don't expect the ballot information is on wikileaks yet ...

Direct funding and arming of Free Syria Army was open and overt, and Free Syria army was in fact ISIS, something very widely known, and very widely complained about, and a pipeline for US arms to ISIS.

It is as secret as the Democrats printing themselves ballots.

Wikileaks sounds important. I recall there's been a lot of controversy around them.