My apologies to Professor Rat, although I don't recall what I did years ago.
Karl Semich confirms much of what I say about Dumb-Bell by siding with him. Someone so practiced in bad-faith and bullshit recognizes a fellow- obscurantist. Those sincere in teasing out the issues at stake are invited to chase down my blog posts where I published much of Jim and I's email conversations or I can supply them on any bona fide request. For money - that's a lot of work - say 2K worth of Btc at present strike. The rest is in the archives going back to ' abhorrent markets ' of 93 morphing into ' now its legal ' 2003. TL/DR Left APster Vs Right AP. Choose one. Ross Ulbricht chose . . . poorly.
What's going on with prof rat is obvious. What does he accomplish? Nothing. So he spends tons of time every single day trying to diss other/rival activists, etc., attempts to position himself in his own eyes as the good knowledgeable one with the most ideological purity whom people should listen to. But see, everybody knows he doesn't do anything. Maybe instead of him explaining how relatively minor figures don't meet his purity tests, he could set some positive goals and undertake the steps to meet them.
* by contrast. In other words, prof rat dissing others is an attempt by rat to establish himself as good by contrast. If all these activists he complains about are impure, than by golly he must be the purist authority on the planet -- people centuries for now will remember him. Of course we all know that's nonsense. He's forgettable. On 2022-09-05 03:45, Douglas Lucas wrote:
What's going on with prof rat is obvious. What does he accomplish? Nothing. So he spends tons of time every single day trying to diss other/rival activists, etc., attempts to position himself in his own eyes as the good knowledgeable one with the most ideological purity whom people should listen to. But see, everybody knows he doesn't do anything. Maybe instead of him explaining how relatively minor figures don't meet his purity tests, he could set some positive goals and undertake the steps to meet them.
The "Professor Rat", who likes to claim without evidence that he's the "Matthew Taylor" of years past, is curiously always claiming to exclusively represent and define what "cypherpunk" is and is not, notably including some ridiculously false idea on murdering and death threatting random people. Sorry but cypherpunks are quite diverse and hardly agree completely on any topic other than the pure 2+2 mathematics of code, and certainly aren't out to murder other randoms in the space. And unlike Ratboy "Matt" and Batboy "Juan", cpunks, outside of occaisional hot debate, are actually rather respectful and appreciative of each other and whatever computer codes get written.
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 01:30:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
And unlike Ratboy "Matt" and Batboy "Juan", cpunks, outside of occaisional hot debate, are actually rather respectful
'cpunks' are a collection of either corrupt assholes who like to pose as 'anti-state' while working for intel-sun-joogle-microshit and what have you, or outright cops like jim bell, you and your cousin professor turd. and by the way, what's your name, you nameless, 'anonymous', pentagon turd.
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 03:45:43 +0000 Douglas Lucas <dal@riseup.net> claims that : jewnazi turd yahoo.au "spends tons of time every single day trying to diss other/rival activists" wait, what? You are pretending that jewnazi-turd-yahoo.au, the lowest cop on this list, is an 'activist'? Well, yeah, he's a govcorp activist, just like you. hey lucas, tell us again how amazin electronic surveillance is, when used by 'good' cops?
participants (4)
-
Douglas Lucas -
grarpamp -
professor rat -
punk