To make sure the obvious is stated: The problem here is that it means that people who make iphones and operate trojan networks on iphones can abuse children with impunity and pin the abuse on others, by manipulating the evidence apple collects. This would be a better program if it were on an open source phone available for public audit, and stored the photos on a public secure place like a blockchain. Then, if you're an abused kid, you can take a photo of yourself and suddenly everyone knows. But with this, your parents can pay the black market to keep abusing you.

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021, 3:59 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:

On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:38:13 -0400 Karl wrote:

...

This would be a better program if it were on an open source phone available for public audit,

LMAO! Fuck you karl, US govt agent of feminazi kind.

Punk, only part of my brain is working for the US govt! It is the part filled with scared habits, but it is not all of me. I am, however, a proud feminazi who refuses to consciously oppress white men. Happy hacking.

Would make sharing harder, but

Peter Fairbrother

the point of moot is to give the kind of access to crypto protection that an expert can create to every user.

Hi Peter, I received your message disordered a little, are you able to rephrase what easy-to-use cryptographic technology you're referring to here?

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021, 9:00 PM Peter Fairbrother wrote:

On 07/08/2021 01:06, Karl wrote:

...

Would make sharing harder, but

Peter Fairbrother

the point of moot is to give the kind of access to crypto protection that an expert can create to every user.

Hi Peter,

I received your message disordered a little, are you able to rephrase what easy-to-use cryptographic technology you're referring to here?

moot (or m-o-o-t) was (in 2000) (is, in the disassembled-bits-in-the-garage sense) a proposed bootable based-on-OpenBSD OS CD with end-to-end real-time and stored messaging and deniable storage apps under which the user would have to be really dumb to expose content, even under the UK's gimme-the-keys-or-go-to-jail laws.

https://misc.openbsd.narkive.com/csKqlk8N/m-o-o-t-some-decisions cool, thanks for explaining Peter Fairbrother

the laws:

0 It's all about who is in control

1 Someone else is after the stuff you have

2 Stuff you don't have can't be taken from you

3 Everywhere can be attacked

4 Complex systems provide more places to attack

5 Attack methods are many, varied, ever-changing and eternal

6 Only those you trust can betray you

7 Holes for good guys are holes for bad guys too

8 A system which is hard to use will be abused, misused and unused