CNN - asking the right questions
Zenaan Harkness: I'm -pretty- sure we're not descending into 1939, but hey, please holler if I'm missing something...
--- How Hitler Became a Dictator by Jacob G. Hornberger Whenever U.S. officials wish to demonize someone, they inevitably compare him to Adolf Hitler. The message immediately resonates with people because everyone knows that Hitler was a brutal dictator. But how many people know how Hitler actually became a dictator? My bet is, very few. Id also bet that more than a few people would be surprised at how he pulled it off, especially given that after World War I Germany had become a democratic republic. The story of how Hitler became a dictator is set forth in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by William Shirer, on which this article is based. In the presidential election held on March 13, 1932, there were four candidates: the incumbent, Field Marshall Paul von Hindenburg, Hitler, and two minor candidates, Ernst Thaelmann and Theodore Duesterberg. The results were: Hindenburg 49.6 percent Hitler 30.1 percent Thaelmann 13.2 percent Duesterberg 6.8 percent At the risk of belaboring the obvious, almost 70 percent of the German people voted against Hitler causing his supporter Joseph Goebbels, who would later become Hitlers minister of propaganda, to lament in his journal, Were beaten; terrible outlook. Party circles badly depressed and dejected. Since Hindenberg had not received a majority of the vote, however, a runoff election had to be held among the top three vote-getters. On April 19, 1932, the runoff results were: Hindenburg 53.0 percent Hitler 36.8 percent Thaelmann 10.2 percent Thus, even though Hitlers vote total had risen, he still had been decisively rejected by the German people. On June 1, 1932, Hindenberg appointed Franz von Papen as chancellor of Germany, whom Shirer described as an unexpected and ludicrous figure. Papen immediately dissolved the Reichstag (the national congress) and called for new elections, the third legislative election in five months. Hitler and his fellow members of the National Socialist (Nazi) Party, who were determined to bring down the republic and establish dictatorial rule in Germany, did everything they could to create chaos in the streets, including initiating political violence and murder. The situation got so bad that martial law was proclaimed in Berlin. Even though Hitler had badly lost the presidential election, he was drawing ever-larger crowds during the congressional election. As Shirer points out, In one day, July 27, he spoke to 60,000 persons in Brandenburg, to nearly as many in Potsdam, and that evening to 120,000 massed in the giant Grunewald Stadium in Berlin while outside an additional 100,000 heard his voice by loudspeaker. Hitlers Rise to Power The July 31, 1932, election produced a major victory for Hitlers National Socialist Party. The party won 230 seats in the Reichstag, making it Germanys largest political party, but it still fell short of a majority in the 608-member body. On the basis of that victory, Hitler demanded that President Hindenburg appoint him chancellor and place him in complete control of the state. Otto von Meissner, who worked for Hindenburg, later testified at Nuremberg, Hindenburg replied that because of the tense situation he could not in good conscience risk transferring the power of government to a new party such as the National Socialists, which did not command a majority and which was intolerant, noisy and undisciplined. Political deadlocks in the Reichstag soon brought a new election, this one in November 6, 1932. In that election, the Nazis lost two million votes and 34 seats. Thus, even though the National Socialist Party was still the largest political party, it had clearly lost ground among the voters. Attempting to remedy the chaos and the deadlocks, Hindenburg fired Papen and appointed an army general named Kurt von Schleicher as the new German chancellor. Unable to secure a majority coalition in the Reichstag, however, Schleicher finally tendered his resignation to Hindenburg, 57 days after he had been appointed. On January 30, 1933, President Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler chancellor of Germany. Although the National Socialists never captured more than 37 percent of the national vote, and even though they still held a minority of cabinet posts and fewer than 50 percent of the seats in the Reichstag, Hitler and the Nazis set out to to consolidate their power. With Hitler as chancellor, that proved to be a fairly easy task. The Reichstag Fire On February 27, Hitler was enjoying supper at the Goebbels home when the telephone rang with an emergency message: The Reichstag is on fire! Hitler and Goebbels rushed to the fire, where they encountered Hermann Goering, who would later become Hitlers air minister. Goering was shouting at the top of his lungs, This is the beginning of the Communist revolution! We must not wait a minute. We will show no mercy. Every Communist official must be shot, where he is found. Every Communist deputy must this very day be strung up. The day after the fire, the Prussian government announced that it had found communist publications stating, Government buildings, museums, mansions and essential plants were to be burned down . Women and children were to be sent in front of terrorist groups . The burning of the Reichstag was to be the signal for a bloody insurrection and civil war . It has been ascertained that today was to have seen throughout Germany terrorist acts against individual persons, against private property, and against the life and limb of the peaceful population, and also the beginning of general civil war. So how was Goering so certain that the fire had been set by communist terrorists? Arrested on the spot was a Dutch communist named Marinus van der Lubbe. Most historians now believe that van der Lubbe was actually duped by the Nazis into setting the fire and probably was even assisted by them, without his realizing it. Why would Hitler and his associates turn a blind eye to an impending terrorist attack on their national congressional building or actually assist with such a horrific deed? Because they knew what government officials have known throughout history that during extreme national emergencies, people are most scared and thus much more willing to surrender their liberties in return for security. And thats exactly what happened during the Reichstag terrorist crisis. Suspending Civil Liberties The day after the fire, Hitler persuaded President Hindenburg to issue a decree entitled, For the Protection of the People and the State. Justified as a defensive measure against Communist acts of violence endangering the state, the decree suspended the constitutional guarantees pertaining to civil liberties: Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications; and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed. Two weeks after the Reichstag fire, Hitler requested the Reichstag to temporarily delegate its powers to him so that he could adequately deal with the crisis. Denouncing opponents to his request, Hitler shouted, Germany will be free, but not through you! When the vote was taken, the result was 441 for and 84 against, giving Hitler the two-thirds majority he needed to suspend the German constitution. On March 23, 1933, what has gone down in German history as the Enabling Act made Hitler dictator of Germany, freed of all legislative and constitutional constraints. The Judiciary Under Hitler One of the most dramatic consequences was in the judicial arena. Shirer points out, Under the Weimar Constitution judges were independent, subject only to the law, protected from arbitrary removal and bound at least in theory by Article 109 to safeguard equality before the law. In fact, in the Reichstag terrorist case, while the court convicted van der Lubbe of the crime (who was executed), three other defendants, all communists, were acquitted, which infuriated Hitler and Goering. Within a month, the Nazis had transferred jurisdiction over treason cases from the Supreme Court to a new Peoples Court, which, as Shirer points out, soon became the most dreaded tribunal in the land. It consisted of two professional judges and five others chosen from among party officials, the S.S. and the armed forces, thus giving the latter a majority vote. There was no appeal from its decisions or sentences and usually its sessions were held in camera. Occasionally, however, for propaganda purposes when relatively light sentences were to be given, the foreign correspondents were invited to attend. One of the Reichstag terrorist defendants, who had angered Goering during the trial with a severe cross-examination of Goering, did not benefit from his acquittal. Shirer explains: The German communist leader was immediately taken into protective custody, where he remained until his death during the second war. In addition to the Peoples Court, which handled treason cases, the Nazis also set up the Special Court, which handled cases of political crimes or insidious attacks against the government. These courts consisted of three judges, who invariably had to be trusted party members, without a jury. A Nazi prosecutor had the choice of bringing action in such cases before either an ordinary court or the Special Court, and invariably he chose the latter, for obvious reasons. Defense lawyers before this court, as before the Volksgerichtshof, had to be approved by Nazi officials. Sometimes even if they were approved they fared badly. Thus the lawyers who attempted to represent the widow of Dr. Klausener, the Catholic Action leader murdered in the Blood Purge, in her suit for damages against the State were whisked off to Sachsenhausen concentration camp, where they were kept until they formally withdrew the action. Even lenient treatment by the Special Court was no guarantee for the defendant, however, as Pastor Martin Niemoeller discovered when he was acquitted of major political charges and sentenced to time served for minor charges. Leaving the courtroom, Niemoeller was taken into custody by the Gestapo and taken to a concentration camp. The Nazis also implemented a legal concept called Schutzhaft or protective custody which enabled them to arrest and incarcerate people without charging them with a crime. As Shirer put it: Protective custody did not protect a man from possible harm, as it did in more civilized countries. It punished him by putting him behind barbed wire. On August 2, 1934, Hindenburg died, and the title of president was abolished. Hitlers title became Fuehrer and Reich Chancellor. Not surprisingly, he used the initial four-year temporary grant of emergency powers that had been given to him by the Enabling Act to consolidate his omnipotent control over the entire country. Accepting the New Order Oddly enough, even though his dictatorship very quickly became complete, Hitler returned to the Reichstag every four years to renew the temporary delegation of emergency powers that it had given him to deal with the Reichstag-arson crisis. Needless to say, the Reichstag rubber-stamped each of his requests. For their part, the German people quickly accepted the new order of things. Keep in mind that the average non-Jewish German was pretty much unaffected by the new laws and decrees. As long as a German citizen kept his head down, worked hard, took care of his family, sent his children to the public schools and the Hitler Youth organization, and, most important, didnt involve himself in political dissent against the government, a visit by the Gestapo was very unlikely. Keep in mind also that, while the Nazis established concentration camps in the 1930s, the number of inmates ranged in the thousands. It wouldnt be until the 1940s that the death camps and the gas chambers that killed millions would be implemented. Describing how the average German adapted to the new order, Shirer writes, The overwhelming majority of Germans did not seem to mind that their personal freedom had been taken away, that so much of culture had been destroyed and replaced with a mindless barbarism, or that their life and work had become regimented to a degree never before experienced even by a people accustomed for generations to a great deal of regimentation . The Nazi terror in the early years affected the lives of relatively few Germans and a newly arrived observer was somewhat surprised to see that the people of this country did not seem to feel that they were being cowed . On the contrary, they supported it with genuine enthusiasm. Somehow it imbued them wi --- Oh snap: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/22/clinton-campaign-looking-...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/23/2016 07:56 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
Zenaan Harkness: I'm -pretty- sure we're not descending into 1939, but hey, please holler if I'm missing something...
---
How Hitler Became a Dictator by Jacob G. Hornberger
Whenever U.S. officials wish to demonize someone, they inevitably compare him to Adolf Hitler. The message immediately resonates with people because everyone knows that Hitler was a brutal dictator.
But how many people know how Hitler actually became a dictator? My bet is, very few. I’d also bet that more than a few people would be surprised at how he pulled it off, especially given that after World War I Germany had become a democratic republic.
The story of how Hitler became a dictator is set forth in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by William Shirer, on which this article is based.
Three missing elements in this (very useful) summary: First, the rise of the Third Reich happened while Germany was in economic ruins due to the Great Depression and Treaty of Versailles, literally on the brink of mass starvation. The people were desperate and the NSDAP offered a simple explanation (Jews and Communists did it) and a simple solution (get rid of the Jews and Communists). Under these conditions the Nazis were able to organize a national militia, the SA (Sturmabteilung a.k.a. Brown Shirts) and employ terrorist tactics to help the German people vote correctly. Second, Germany had a very strong culture of obedience to authority, a moral imperative synonymous with "honor." This mind set was dominant throughout the European sphere of influence in the 19th century, and although it was in decline (i.e. the much lamented decadence of the "yellow nineties" and outbreaks of anarchism in the early 20th century) it remained firmly in place there: The older Germans I met as a child were very much "Old World" people, and even as a child I could see that clearly. Third, Herr Hitler & Co. kept their key campaign promises: They did in fact restore Germany's economy and turned the country (back) into an industrial powerhouse. This was accomplished by implementing many reforms borrowed from Roosevelt's New Deal, and with the kindly assistance of capital provided by U.S. industrialists who heartily approved of the Nazis' political philosophy and economic policies. The Nazis earned the gratitude - and compliance - of the German people. Hitler was a passionate nationalist; Trump is a vulgar opportunist. Once in power, Hitler united his nation and did, in fact, make it great again - at least in terms of economic prosperity and industrial production. Trump has already mobilized the already divided American people into warring factions: Our natural born Fascists are out of the closet, the political Left is snarling and screeching while its leadership digs in for four years of mortal combat, and "moderates" of all stripes - a sleeping demographic giant - are looking for something they can actually DO about this train wreck for the first time in generations. The Internet has broken the monopoly of Big Capital over the content mass communications, so the Nazi's famous full spectrum domestic propaganda regimen can not be duplicated here and now. Although I would much rather have seen Sanders in the White House, attempting to implement an updated New Deal solution to the ongoing collapse of the U.S. economy, a Democratic Party under the literal control of Clinton and her network stopped Sanders by every means necessary, and handed the White House to Donald Trump. So now we get to see a radical solution to the various crises presently facing the United States and the world: Four years of open warfare between the American Right Fringe and Everyone Else. Our economic power brokers are already lining up behind Trump, leaving "boots on the ground" in the form of mass popular movements as his opponents' only viable response. We have been taught all our lives that this means armed conflict, because that's an option our rulers are very well prepared to control and use to their own advantage. But economic warfare through strikes, occupations and mass non-cooperation are powerful weapons that hit a ruling class hard where it counts - in their balance sheets and quarterly reports. Mass movements using nonviolent strategies and tactics can move political mountains - or failing this, the struggle to move those mountains builds the committed support networks that must exist for a last resort armed insurgency to succeed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYNdeeAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq0oQH/3FqhyYT6j8Yyw0A7aUPWUkG Yi0Z3j/MWMTE73YhxWaWtxKQfwfO4Sy41dCz/Pzjxn7ZZb0NNTn+A0WUANcuCHGQ 4Wtt/GDFwhlhYifQ3XLOQaQfOk7/96kMlMMTgAwqq0FXBztWZ20nIn2M8lZP1tW8 9Jjaeh1uobhsnzLo9bbjf0p671lMS3T0WGO04ay6wSTG3c1J40zQuXs2geqfPZmx 17hS3mFhbE1GDSp+cj2BtOCaeEwwu/7O7SCWYiNDb6bLz7iDdArO5b1jlh2hLRn4 HNA68H+gCoRhJ/c2KGr2U5ySa0DUgiDC7llnHNeaZHGsmq+lD4tW1GWdg6Sz48I= =iZjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:53:34 -0500 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Although I would much rather have seen Sanders in the White House, attempting to implement an updated New Deal solution to the ongoing collapse of the U.S. economy,
I wonder what an 'updated' new deal is considering that the Original New Deal was chemically pure fascism...
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder what an 'updated' new deal is considering that the Original New Deal was chemically pure fascism...
in which Juan-who-swears-he's-not-an-authoritarian-right-winger demonstrates that he gets his analysis of fundamental political categories from authoritarian right wingers (the only people--especially Hayek himself and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg--who describe the New Deal as having anything whatsoever to do with fascism, which it did not).
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:26:58 -0500 z9wahqvh <z9wahqvh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder what an 'updated' new deal is considering that the Original New Deal was chemically pure fascism...
in which Juan-who-swears-he's-not-an-authoritarian-right-winger demonstrates that he gets his analysis of fundamental political categories from authoritarian right wingers
Are you denying that roosevelt was a fascist? Funnily enough that's exactly what pro-roosevelt authoritarians would do. And no, I don't get my political analysis from right wingers but I know full well that for some people - left wing fascists - anything they don't like is 'right wing'.
(the only people--especially Hayek himself and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg--who describe the New Deal as having anything whatsoever to do with fascism, which it did not).
Sure, because you say so.
On 11/23/2016 08:53 PM, juan wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:26:58 -0500 z9wahqvh <z9wahqvh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder what an 'updated' new deal is considering that the Original New Deal was chemically pure fascism...
in which Juan-who-swears-he's-not-an-authoritarian-right-winger demonstrates that he gets his analysis of fundamental political categories from authoritarian right wingers
Are you denying that roosevelt was a fascist? Funnily enough that's exactly what pro-roosevelt authoritarians would do.
And no, I don't get my political analysis from right wingers but I know full well that for some people - left wing fascists - anything they don't like is 'right wing'.
Although his fellow "upper class twits" called Roosevelt a Class Traitor and Bolshevik, and organized a coup against him (the "Business Plot"). But his policies actually were "good for Business" and his performance in dragging the U.S. into WWII do qualify him for the "fascist" designation. That label fits every President before or since, to a greater or lesser but usually greater extent, if I recall correctly. But as an anarchist, I don't give half a shit what labels fit which rulers; I do prefer economic policies that redistribute wealth - therefore power - down the social hierarchy somewhat. Others may view the world in single digit binary terms, rejecting as worthless /any/ but their own ideal solutions, perfectly and uniformly implemented. That's only a small part of the definition of Fascism, so I will refrain from calling names on account of it. Juan. ROTFLMAO :o)
participants (4)
-
juan
-
Steve Kinney
-
xorcist at sigaint.org
-
z9wahqvh