https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fny99f8amM aka inception asto propaganda about propaganda +_+ Opinions about ^ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13603570 let's see how long it takes before the usual suspects start bashing eachothers worldviews. nazis, nazis everywhere and oh hitler and ... sigh
On 02/09/2017 06:50 AM, No wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fny99f8amM
aka inception asto propaganda about propaganda +_+
Opinions about ^
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13603570
let's see how long it takes before the usual suspects start bashing eachothers worldviews. nazis, nazis everywhere and oh hitler and ... sigh
The prologue 'Living in an unreal world' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtjfoEvsR9w is quite good. There are pieces missing from the Youtube copy as noted in the comments. About 10 minutes missing total. As one commenter mentioned the bit about how counterculture plays into the big picture was redacted, which personally pisses me off as counterculture is crucial as a pushback against the mindwashing, and understanding how that counterculture gets 'spun' used, and disabused by the mindwashers is imperative. As far as the documentary itself, the sociological info is good but Curtis seems to have been pwnd by GCHQ regarding the Middle East. I don't accept his premise in regard to it nor does he present any evidence for his hypotheses. Further, what he's proposing in Hypernormalization as root causes of the turmoil in the Middle East doesn't match up with 'The Power of Nightmares' or his more recent written piece "The Baby and the Baathwater', about the US government's involvement in bringing the Baath party to power after WWII. Rr
On 02/09/2017 07:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:50:07PM +0100, No wrote:
let's see how long it takes before the usual suspects start bashing eachothers worldviews. nazis, nazis everywhere and oh hitler and ... sigh Godwin's law on top of the thread? Don't remember ever seeing this before :)
You know... I didn't even notice until you brought it up. I just noticed the Request for 'critique' and started typing. Rr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2017 09:50 AM, No wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fny99f8amM
aka inception asto propaganda about propaganda +_+
Opinions about ^
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13603570
let's see how long it takes before the usual suspects start bashing eachothers worldviews. nazis, nazis everywhere and oh hitler and ... sigh Hypernormalisation
I recently watched Adam Curtis' latest documentary, Hypernormalisation. Being a long time fan of Curtis' work, I found Hypernormalisation a little disconcerting. Mainstream historians often do very well at exposing the "important but neglected" details of once-controversial political events. But when their accounts directly involve living persons in positions of power their standards of evidence may take a holiday. As an example, Overthrow: America's Century Of Regine Change by Stephen Kinzer stands out as a remarkably complete and insightful work until it arrives at the first Bush Administration. From there, the author begins repeating the U.S. propaganda line contradicting well documented, readily available factual evidence. It now appears that Adam Curtis has also found a need to exercise discretion in truth-telling. I may change my mind tomorrow. Maybe there's something ironic or Mobius-self-referential behind the narrative of Hypernormalisation that I just don't get. But right now I question the wisdom of Curtis even starting this project, which accepts current propaganda narratives, rejected by a consensus of independent journalists, as plain facts. This is largely accomplished by dancing around the ground truth of key turning point events central to the narrative's accounts of the present wars in Libya and Syria. In a film whose message might be summed up as "civilization has gone insane and no one knows what is real any more," gross misattribution of the origins of the wars against Libya and Syria casts a long shadow: Had more factual views of the role of US/NATO powers in these events been acknowledged, however briefly, that shadow would not be quite so dark: But as the presentation stands, it proves its own point by hiding information essential to understanding reality, depriving the audience of insights with regard to fact vs. fiction on the world stage - a definition of insanity. I don't expect Mr. Curtis to be a superhero or a martyr. But I have come to expect better work than Hypernormalisation from him. Parts of the show were really quite excellent. But the more he built on the central themes of the presentation, the more disjointed and dissonant the narrative looked to me, until Curtis appeared to prove his own point about the world going insane as the narrative itself went off the rails and broke contact with reality. I do not expect a Call To Action at the end of a Curtis story, but an implicit statement that our only option is to "just give up," reinforced by an object lesson in same, is a call to action of its own sort. I appreciate and recommend the whole Curtis canon of documentaries, and my expectations for the future are not diminished: I can easily believe that in this case, the material Curtis was working with bit back and he did the best he could to salvage a no-win situation. So I do suggest that readers who are not familiar with Adam Curtis check out The Power Of Nightmares and/or The Century Of The Self before viewing Hypernormalisation. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYnJnZAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq02MIALQ8xIJM5Jvc9llJX8OmQgHQ RF3zUtv+EpGxKRFmXx4+Jle293Qxf1IDMqAochdUu6UbwNc4d5f6FshDIGibvOyv ZN6Sulmm49w5pdOagSAKu/4i+hZescb/rbHJ6qtmFR9+pTt6AKSKzYsLCkBV3u3+ ACn1/rGJUNw62ZXkqa8t4BsQR6Nkk9p4yzhSWYLChF8h1TlGFFmEk2rQDqGrSn9R kOKi1VyxYK/UDXU0eALWR9i9w3bEHFHAyz4yR9EqcoJqdGo0L89P3PhHqBnuMhjB fcU9wURQ5nDSPeewUeUDRV0UZxIJJgjm/9AjkRh84RVTkwsbhQsynPP8u7e6VKI= =ie8Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Postscript: Hypernormalization has a LOT of filler, in the form of redundant content and long stretches of stock footage that "fit in" but do not contribute to the narrative. This is not at all typical of Curtis' work - as far as I know it's unique to this presentation. To me this suggests that a LOT of content may have landed on the cutting room floor after review by the BBC. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYnJt2AAoJEECU6c5XzmuqqCEH/Axgf6SelGU8C8ci1NXOoP0v w7haSwb4B64PloUaXup0PmqYXdUBiFaOdrht/KDgRvkLGazP807l1eYLZ/jVmDn7 k3cHffs/VJbv8xDos/WxUwv2P78Uk2lZL5yFHbm3Yk2TgYmiV21MyPFKpnPUPr1I 7obhpSqO7pxaSIO20cppGNHVadpeWnsKfR4GwG+d/Ue5uxJ3Xjb7O/2zBDx99l50 XaKrvWhNqUwkY96UpsYdc6cMA5jRk7cQebVszXE2Var2CM0amngxCVWqfUZCMk7H KbZ1AYZsMTf6ioQXwaLGLyGOW8D3E6CY2rw8IyhUicQRMLPEL8k1CHpfq7h9lbI= =Hplc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
for starters curtis is a tax funded employee (i.e. parasite) of the english crown. A BBC fellow/accomplice to be more precise, the BBC being the biggest state-funded propaganda engine in the world. https://web.archive.org/web/20140116091402/http://filmcomment.com/entry/inte... " If you ask me what my politics are, I’m very much a creature of my time. I don’t really have any. I change my mind over different issues, but I am much more fond of a libertarian view. I have a more libertarian tendency..." sure. curtis must be a libertarian of the rayzer school. "what my politics are - I don’t really have any" sure sure.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:56:25 -0800 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 02/09/2017 02:08 PM, @#$%^&*() wrote:
sure. curtis must be a libertarian of the rayzer school.
I thought I was a commie fashust joo-krischan in the employ of the Pentagram?
Right. *That* is the rayzer school of libertarianism. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sarcasm?s=t http://www.dictionary.com/browse/irony?s=t irony : "the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning:"
Rr
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:08:35PM -0300, Juan wrote:
for starters curtis is a tax funded employee (i.e. parasite) of the english crown. A BBC fellow/accomplice to be more precise, the BBC being the biggest state-funded propaganda engine in the world.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140116091402/http://filmcomment.com/entry/inte...
" If you ask me what my politics are, I’m very much a creature of my time. I don’t really have any. I change my mind over different issues, but I am much more fond of a libertarian view. I have a more libertarian tendency..."
sure. curtis must be a libertarian of the rayzer school.
"what my politics are - I don’t really have any" sure sure.
:D The positive sign here is that "MSM" folk, even someone who produces relatively well received "documentaries", feels the need to justify his political position, to proclaim "Hey, I'm just one of you, I don't really have any politics either believe me?"
participants (6)
-
Georgi Guninski
-
juan
-
No
-
Razer
-
Steve Kinney
-
Zenaan Harkness