Re: www.nsa-observer.net is on clear web, don't use clear web.
On 2/4/15, grarpamp
... Moving 10G/day/node to or from clearnet is possible. Posting in the darknet might find you parallel armies of sympathetic nodes willing to help with task.
don't use clear-web, not even once. not even one-way. it is DEF CON wireless; pre-pwned and malicious since many years. this includes: - don't use DNS - don't use HTTP over public IPv4 or IPv6 - don't use HTTPS over public IPv4 or IPv6 - don't use TCP over public IPv4 of IPv6 - do use UDP VPN at least past first last-mile ISP, most likely to be onery and RST'ery. - do use Tor bridges to avoid like UDP VPN above, with even better cover. - must use resume capable HTTP/1.1 range based capable client with secure digest verification! (multiple reports of cryptome.org streams of Cfour.7z getting RST inline, or otherwise frequent and frustrating failures before complete on some specific provider networks; bonus points for RST inject filtering, but not all OS support it.) for array of onion hosts (location hidden mirrors) - 5 x connections, to 5 of 9 onions, max two conns per host - 18 x connections to 9 onions, two conns per host [ e.g. aria2c --piece-length=1M --min-split-size=1M --split=18 --max-connection-per-server=3 --max-concurrent-downloads=18 ... aria2c does sha256 for free ] => 1.8MByte/sec to 3.5MByte/sec sustained over 50G archive in whole over various rounds of testing the fy2014 dist. add randomized filling, and you can stack parallel instances with multiple Tor clients for added capacity. ... anything more seems limited by client side, even in best of circumstances ... hey look, latter is simpler! two things to solve it. ;) best regards,
On 2/4/15, coderman
... don't use clear-web, not even once. not even one-way. it is DEF CON wireless; pre-pwned and malicious since many years.
in earlier thread, why not crowd source or lay utilize idle, to process archives with SIGINT and technical annotations? consider this example, or ask your technical friend about their complaints with shallow attention porn media which is most media. --- in "crowd sourced" wikipedia, the first image is a fiction, while the program itself, QUANTUMSQUIRREL is in fact authentic and in use recently and likely ongoing. this is an example of something (misunderstanding, witting or unwitting assertion, etc.) that an "expert" would avoid, and not allow into reference corpus. best regards,
On 2/4/15, coderman
... in "crowd sourced" wikipedia, the first image is a fiction, while the program itself, QUANTUMSQUIRREL is in fact authentic and in use recently and likely ongoing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailored_Access_Operations , https://peertech.org/files/Attrition_by_Tailored_Quantum_Squirrel.png
participants (1)
-
coderman