Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money. Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer wrote:

Nervous laugh...

...

On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:

...

I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

"Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations. Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs? Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer wrote:

...

On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote: Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.

Sent from my iPhone

Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.

RR

...

On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer wrote:

...

Nervous laugh...

...

On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:

...

I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake, getting John to fix the leak and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that implausible? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Razer wrote:

Got it. Totally altruistic motivation...

On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote:

"Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations.

Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer wrote:

On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:

Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.

Sent from my iPhone

Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.

RR

On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer < Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:

Nervous laugh...

On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:

I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or

...

any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

I still don't get who would make suck a fake and why.

such*

On 10/10/2015 01:57 PM, rysiek wrote:

Dnia sobota, 10 października 2015 13:39:55 Razer pisze:

...

On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:

...

Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.

Sent from my iPhone Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. So... are you saying Michael Best is profiting from disclosure of Cryptome server logs with full metadata of Cryptome users? I wonder who made those logs available in the first place!

I dunno. Did BB make any money from acting the 'unofficial spokesman for anonymous', or did that happen later, now that he has a contributor spot on the_Intercept_

Are you also saying that John Young's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as distributor?

Apples-Oranges. John Young's appearance in name was not by his choice. RR