Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money. Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
Nervous laugh...
On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone
Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. RR
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net <mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net>> wrote:
Nervous laugh...
On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
"Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations. Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs? Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote: Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone
Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.
RR
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
Nervous laugh...
On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Got it. Totally altruistic motivation... On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote:
"Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations.
Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net <mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net>> wrote:
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone
Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.
RR
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net <mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net>> wrote:
Nervous laugh...
On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake, getting John to fix the leak and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that implausible? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
Got it. Totally altruistic motivation...
On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote:
"Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations.
Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone
Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.
RR
On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer < <Rayzer@riseup.net>Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
Nervous laugh...
On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or
any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:10:24 -0400 Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake,
Or maybe the slide was made using those very same logs by some 'legitimate' government critter. I still don't get who would make suck a fake and why. getting John to fix the
leak and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that implausible?
Dnia sobota, 10 października 2015 13:39:55 Razer pisze:
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone
Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.
So... are you saying Michael Best is profiting from disclosure of Cryptome server logs with full metadata of Cryptome users? I wonder who made those logs available in the first place! Are you also saying that John Young's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as distributor? -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
On 10/10/2015 01:57 PM, rysiek wrote:
Dnia sobota, 10 października 2015 13:39:55 Razer pisze:
On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money.
Sent from my iPhone Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. So... are you saying Michael Best is profiting from disclosure of Cryptome server logs with full metadata of Cryptome users? I wonder who made those logs available in the first place!
I dunno. Did BB make any money from acting the 'unofficial spokesman for anonymous', or did that happen later, now that he has a contributor spot on the_Intercept_
Are you also saying that John Young's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as distributor?
Apples-Oranges. John Young's appearance in name was not by his choice. RR
participants (4)
-
Juan -
Michael Best -
Razer -
rysiek