Jim Bell's criminal garbage
If it wasn't obvious before it should be quite plain by now - Jim Bell is no fit helper for our cause. It seems uncontroversial to say that most anti-social-criminals are political conservatives. And Jim has recently spent over a decade in close quarters with them. This need not be a negative - Malatesta had to wait 10 years to be tried over his lifetime. And he is a widely respected anarchist to this day. It only becomes a negative when he gets out and starts associating himself with the like of Jeff Berwick, Julian Assange and Elon Musk. Fouler anti-social-criminals it would be hard to find - they represent murderers, rapists and thieves. There have been arguments made for including criminals in revolutionary activities. I always try to remain open to new ideas from the fringe. But there must be a test of some kind. Is the present situation so bad it warrants such extremely risky measures? I would argue that the last time this situation applied was 2002. Then - since 2010 - I've argued regularly that no earthly power, or combination of them, could stop the global anarchist revolution. And since then all Govts, Religions and Corporates have gotten weaker and crypto-anarchy much stronger. TL/DR we don' need no steenkin' criminal badges! The strong do what they will - the weak suffer what they must. Fuck Jim Bell and all who sail in him.
participants (1)
-
professor rat