Rittenhouse's close associations with list Nazi-Fag-Morons
The right spent months downplaying Rittenhouse's associations with the far right. It's been less than 3 weeks since the trial ended and he's sitting down w/Schaffer, who posts Nazi imagery and just hosted a pillow-soft 2.5 hr-long interview w/Nick Fuentes. https://angrywhitemen.org/2021/10/16/in-2018-blazetv-host-decried-immigratio...
On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:06:37 -0800 jdb10987@yahoo.com wrote:
These days, when a person is critized for being "anti-immigration", that person is usually actually being "anti-ILLEGAL-immigration. What amounts to "anti-open-borders.
Funny how the worthless piece of shit Jim Bell stupidly denied that he's a pro-US-borders US-nazi, but he just forgot his previous lies, and now he's again defending the 'borders' of his nazi government. yeah Jim, you're the Supreme Emperor of US 'anarchy'.
anti-ILLEGAL-immigration
what is 'illegal' immigration exactly, you stupid piece of evil shit? Tell us how you, the Supreme Emperor of US nazi 'libertarianism', define ILLEGAL? Oh wait.
I'm not aware if there are any "open-borders" nations on Earth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen does it hurt to be as stupid as you are Jim? And that's just one example. I am 'aware' of de-facto 'open borders' in 'other places'. 'De facto' open borders being of course natural law 'borders'.
But if they exist, someone will identify a few.
Actually, i'm against GOVERNMENT borders. (Because I'm against governments. See? That's simple enough). But I'm in favor of PRIVATE BORDERS. In my comments below, I am criticizing people who are (apparently) in favor of governments, but nevertheless, they don't like government borders. They are the ones exhibiting inconsistency, not me. Jim Bell On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:20 AM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0<punks@tfwno.gf> wrote: On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:06:37 -0800 jdb10987@yahoo.com wrote:
These days, when a person is critized for being "anti-immigration", that person is usually actually being "anti-ILLEGAL-immigration. What amounts to "anti-open-borders.
Funny how the worthless piece of shit Jim Bell stupidly denied that he's a pro-US-borders US-nazi, but he just forgot his previous lies, and now he's again defending the 'borders' of his nazi government. yeah Jim, you're the Supreme Emperor of US 'anarchy'.
anti-ILLEGAL-immigration
what is 'illegal' immigration exactly, you stupid piece of evil shit? Tell us how you, the Supreme Emperor of US nazi 'libertarianism', define ILLEGAL? Oh wait.
I'm not aware if there are any "open-borders" nations on Earth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen does it hurt to be as stupid as you are Jim? And that's just one example. I am 'aware' of de-facto 'open borders' in 'other places'. 'De facto' open borders being of course natural law 'borders'.
But if they exist, someone will identify a few.
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Actually, i'm against GOVERNMENT borders. (Because I'm against governments. See? That's simple enough).
That's simply a stupid lie. Nothing you said so far shows that you are against government borders. You took for granted that 'illegal' immigration exists. Only government nazis (i.e. you) regard 'illegal' immigration as a meaningful concept. Not only that but in the past you've repeatedly pretended that 'libertarians' should defend government borders because of the 'welfare state' and cited a white supremacist turd to 'prove' your position. What's simple enough is that you laughably try to pretend to be against governmetns while promoting joogle-government surveillance, FUCKIGN GOVERNMENT VACCINES, US GOVERNMENT PATENTS, FUCKING US-MUSK CORPORATISM, et cetera. You have to very VERY stupid to pretend to be against governemnt Jim.
But I'm in favor of PRIVATE BORDERS.
There's no such thing as PRIVATE BORDERS Jim. But thanks for showing that now you're playing the narcho-fascist game, according to which the world will be owned by one or two corporations that will enforce their 'private' 'borders'. Furthermore, when narcho-fascists like you babble about 'private borders' what they mean is that they regard governmetn borders as 'private'.
In my comments below, I am criticizing people who are (apparently) in favor of governments, but nevertheless, they don't like government borders.
You didn't do that.
They are the ones exhibiting inconsistency, not me.
And you're wrong in that regard too. It's quite possible for a person to be pro-government and still be against government borders. As a matter of FUCKING FACT you claimed
I'm not aware if there are any "open-borders" nations on Earth.
and I informed you that something called europe has a lot of 'nations' with 'open borders' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen and of course you ignored that glaring fact but you're laughably dishonest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen and of course you ignored that glaring fact because* you're laughably dishonest.
participants (4)
-
jdb10987@yahoo.com
-
jim bell
-
professor rat
-
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0