Fwd: [ PFIR ] Clinton campaign -- and some cyber experts -- say Russia is behind email release
My dear Lauren (bcc), Did I mention how much I love you today? It's a strange coincidence, but I love you even more when I can use your messages to annoy Putin fans in public lists! :D Lots of tender kisses, hihi! :* Ceci (yep, always a troll, but I am a very cute troll, less boring than Putin fans, hihi! *-*) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "PFIR (People For Internet Responsibility) Announcement List" < pfir@pfir.org> Date: Jul 24, 2016 6:34 PM Subject: [ PFIR ] Clinton campaign -- and some cyber experts -- say Russia is behind email release To: <pfir-list@pfir.org>
Clinton campaign -- and some cyber experts -- say Russia is behind email release
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-campaign--and-some-cyber-exp...
A top official with Hillary Clinton's campaign on Sunday accused the Russian government of orchestrating the release of damaging Democratic Party records in order to help the campaign of Republican Donald Trump -- and some cyber security experts in the U.S. and overseas agree. The extraordinary charge came as some national security officials have been growing increasingly concerned about possible efforts by Russia to meddle in the election, according to several individuals familiar with the situation.
- - -
Murderous dictator Putin wants a fellow dictator in the White House, whom he can manipulate like a puppet and rebuild the Soviet Union. He knows that Trump admires vicious dictators and their methods, and loves Putin in particular. Putin knows that Trump would make the perfect patsy. Trump's business dealings in Russia are deep -- and his campaign manager has long worked with dictators in Russia and elsewhere. Meanwhile at the GOP convention last week, the platform was changed into a pro-Russia love-fest, leaving the countries that Putin has crushed or wants to crush at his mercy. And Trump says if NATO countries won't pay whatever extortion Trump demands, he'll just let them be taken by Putin. Get the picture?
--Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein (lauren@vortex.com): http://www.vortex.com/lauren Founder: - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com Google+: http://google.com/+LaurenWeinstein Twitter: http://twitter.com/laurenweinstein Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com I have consulted to Google, but I am not currently doing so -- my opinions expressed here are mine alone. _______________________________________________ pfir mailing list http://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:59:36 -0300 Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
My dear Lauren (bcc),
Did I mention how much I love you today? It's a strange coincidence, but I love you even more when I can use your messages to annoy Putin fans in public lists!
If I were a putin fan I wouldn't find what weinstein says to be annoying, at all. Rather, I'd realize that weinstein repeatedly shoots himself in the foot. What weinstein is saying is that the only people who dared to call out the clinton 'democratic' criminals is wikileaks and the russian government. (oops! a 'conspiracy theory' eh) No one in the US had the decency and the guts to leak stuff about the motherfucking democrats - the russians had to do it. Just how pathetic americans are? "Murderous dictator Putin wants a fellow dictator in the White House, whom he can manipulate like a puppet and rebuild the Soviet Union." OK, so weinstein is mccarthy reborn. Weinstein is a left-wing american fascist, a sick puppet of that murderous cunt clinton, and is having a fit about putin? Pot calling the kettle black. Pot, meet kettle! http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Pot+meet+Kettle :D
Lots of tender kisses, hihi! :*
Ceci (yep, always a troll, but I am a very cute troll, less boring than Putin fans, hihi! *-*)
That's a matter of opinion. A left-wing fascist like weinstein to me is both boring and revolting =)
On Jul 24, 2016 11:02 PM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
That's a matter of opinion. A left-wing fascist like weinstein to
me is both boring and revolting =) I know, haha! I will send you Vegemite because we are so different that you probably will love it, my dear! :)) Ah, I love Lauren, but I know you always will hate great part of my friends or contacts, Juan. (Less my another anarchist friend who lives in Buenos Aires, also hates North America and calls "nasist" my friend who works in NASA, hahaha!! I can't kick him because is a petulant child yet, but he will grow up and my revenge will be terrible: I will send Vegemite for him too, hahaha!!) Live and let live, my dear. But being sincere, I still prefer living in a world without politicals. :) You know I really think Putin and Trump stink more than Vegemite and fermented shark (Iceland typical food) and blue cheese mixed together, ugh ugh ugh!!! :P
I guess I have to laugh at this, below. Does Hillary Clinton or her corrupt cronies really think that Americans care who, exactly, who obtained and leaked the DNC emails? And why should we believe that ONLY ONE individual (or group) had them? There are probably plenty of DNC insiders who are disgusted with how bad a choice Clinton is, this year. Might at least one of them leak a master-key (quite anonymously, we suppose) to people they figure would go ahead and use it? No doubt Russia has the talent, and certainly the motivation, but so do many other people. I'm waiting, hoping, that they also release a few tens of thousands of "private" Hillary emails, the ones they've been rumoring on the media over the last few days. We'll learn a lot. We first heard of her private server over a year ago, as I recall. About that time, I first heard that the deleted emails had been chosen through a process of negative-elimination: The emails that were saved were those that contained one or more of a number of keywords. Lack those keywords, and the message wasn't saved. It sounds like a system that her buddies designed to be able to eliminate everything they wanted to erase: "Just remember not to enter any relevant keyword, and you know the message won't survive." What were those keywords? There should have been plenty of emails that were so short they didn't make the cut, even if they were indeed government business. It is virtually certain, therefore, that this system was designed and known to Hillary Clinton virtually from the moment it was first used. It's way to dangerous to elect a person, Hillary Clinton, who may have foolishly depended on having a system to delete messages, when it's possible those same messages were copied, and eventually found their way to unknown others. The blackmail possibilities would be endless. I would have thought that by now, somebody would have performed experiments on a mock-up of her server, perhaps the same hardware and software they used, to try to determine if somebody would have been able to break in. Offer a $100,000 reward, or something like it. Jim Bell Clinton campaign -- and some cyber experts -- say Russia is behind email release https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-campaign--and-some-cyber-exp... A top official with Hillary Clinton's campaign on Sunday accused the Russian government of orchestrating the release of damaging Democratic Party records in order to help the campaign of Republican Donald Trump -- and some cyber security experts in the U.S. and overseas agree. The extraordinary charge came as some national security officials have been growing increasingly concerned about possible efforts by Russia to meddle in the election, according to several individuals familiar with the situation.
On 7/27/16, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
of them leak a master-key (quite anonymously, we suppose) to people they ... I'm waiting, hoping, that they also release a few tens of thousands of "private" Hillary emails, the ones they've been rumoring on the media over
Similarly as before, if Snowden has anything left, it will drop before election or no more than a year into 2017. Since further damning an outgoing executive branch is pointless, 2017 is more likely.
It's way to dangerous to elect a person, Hillary Clinton, who may have foolishly
Doesn't matter, it foolish elect this fake career politician state bitch regardless. Get rid of careerists and statists. With 325M people to pick from you can find better.
participants (4)
-
Cecilia Tanaka
-
grarpamp
-
jim bell
-
juan