USA: Rubio: "Last night a working mother of 7 was confirmed by the Senate and then sworn in as an associate justice of the Supreme Court by an African American associate justice. What a country!" - [ENJOY] [PEACE]
Marco Rubio, USA Senator: Marco Rubio @marcorubio Last night a working mother of 7 was confirmed by the Senate and then sworn in as an associate justice of the Supreme Court by an African American associate justice. What a country! 10:13 PM · Oct 27, 2020 https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1321047430209671169C Found here: Watch: Leftists melt down as qualified, faithful, successful woman appointed to Supreme Court https://notthebee.com/article/leftists-across-nation-shriek-as-qualified-fai...
On Tuesday, October 27, 2020, 04:45:01 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Marco Rubio, USA Senator:
Marco Rubio @marcorubio
> Last night a working mother of 7 was confirmed by the Senate and then sworn in as an associate justice of the Supreme Court by an African American associate justice. > What a country! > 10:13 PM · Oct 27, 2020 https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1321047430209671169C
Found here: > Watch: Leftists melt down as qualified, faithful, successful woman appointed to Supreme Court https://notthebee.com/article/leftists-across-nation-shriek-as-qualified-fai... We should all remember that Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed in 1993 by a vote of 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg At the time, the Democrats had about 56 Senators, and 60 votes were necessary to confirm, so the Republicans would have been able to engineer her loss easily, had they wanted to do that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States#/media... Nobody expected ALL of the Democrat Senators to vote to confirm Barrett, but the fact that NONE of them did shows their complete dishonesty. Jim Bell
On 10/28/20, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States
Nobody expected ALL of the Democrat Senators to vote to confirm Barrett, but the fact that NONE of them did shows their complete dishonesty.
Hard to vote independently when most bills are multi-issue craploads, so they duck into herd to claim immunity. The conscience free vote for them would be not to vote any bill, unless single issue voting. Yet see them herding over single-issue of appointments... reeks of brokenness. The vote... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett_Supreme_Court_nomination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett "Senate confirmed Barrett to the Supreme Court by a vote of 52–48. Every Republican senator except Susan Collins voted to confirm her, whereas every member of the Senate Democratic Caucus voted in opposition. Barrett is the first Justice since 1870 to be confirmed without a single vote from the Senate minority party. Straight party-line votes have been called "the new normal" in the Supreme Court confirmation process." The officiants and witnesses to each of the office and judicial oath swearing ceremonies (were those deemed to be necessary final acts) could also be considered another four votes in favor by them not having stood down their expected performance of same. In effect, a two judge supreme panel just ruled that the entire process was kosher, if not biased themselves.
participants (3)
-
grarpamp -
jim bell -
Zenaan Harkness