BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"
From justsecurity.org A National Security wonkblog https://www.justsecurity.org/64968/why-the-ghost-keys-solution-to-encryption... Also: Give Up the Ghost: A Backdoor by Another Name (Jan 2019) https://www.justsecurity.org/62114/give-ghost-backdoor/ Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
On 7/20/19, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
https://www.justsecurity.org/64968/why-the-ghost-keys-solution-to-encryption... https://www.justsecurity.org/62114/give-ghost-backdoor/ Give Up the Ghost: A Backdoor by Another Name (Jan 2019)
Weasels trying to NLP their way into your crypto private comms... https://www.lawfareblog.com/principles-more-informed-exceptional-access-deba... https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-rod-j-rosenstein-... https://www.fbi.gov/news/speeches/raising-our-game-cyber-security-in-an-age-... Communicating in absolute secretly in private is natural human law and thus a right, since million years of human comms, regardless of now human evolution biological extension into tech and over distance. So the correct response is fuck off. Here it is again, FUCK OFF, F.U.C.K.O.F.F, see real easy, even the child of a sheep can say it to these fucks.
National Security
"National security" has been just fine since million years when human blobs figured out joint defense, and billion years when bio blobs did too. Today use of "national security" bleating is FUD speech for nothing more than "government's survival on top of you slaves". Fuck that. Become free.
JustSecurity is a prime source for factual info related to National Security. Here. Have a recent article about how the US ended up with kiddie koncentration kamps and why ICE is violating international law that protects refugees and asylum seekers in quite a few ways. You might actually learn something other than how to reactionary-ly fill a post with links. "Since the first Democratic presidential debates at the end of June, candidates, pundits and former government officials have discussed whether provisions of law that turn unauthorized border crossing into the federal crime of “improper entry” – in addition to a civil immigration law violation – should be repealed. The chair of the Republican National Committee characterized the proposal as a call for open borders. Some Obama administration officials have also argued against such proposals. Juliette Kayyem, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official during the Obama administration, asserted that Section 1325 was needed to protect borders and deport people. Sarah Saldaña, director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during the Obama administration, urged the law should stay on the books as a “tool” in the “tool box.” Former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson argued that decriminalizing unauthorized entry was tantamount to a declaration that our borders are open. Much of the debate has unfortunately failed to make clear that, even without these criminal laws on the books, the border would still be guarded by Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents, drones, fencing and (some) wall, and people who cross the border without authorization would still be subject to the administrative system Congress created to address violations of U.S. immigration law. For example, they would still be taken into Border Patrol custody, put into the administrative deportation system’s proceedings, deported if they are not ruled eligible for asylum or other relief, and in the meantime held – often unnecessarily – in ICE detention facilities for weeks, months or longer. Other laws would still criminalize smuggling, trafficking and a wide range of other criminal conduct should a person who crossed the border have committed such crimes. Also absent from much of the debate has been information on how laws that criminalize entry and reentry actually work in practice and how they have been used to punish asylum seekers and migrants in violation of due process and U.S. refugee treaty prohibitions – long before the Trump administration’s zero tolerance/family separation fiasco, and continuing to this day..." https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a... -- Rr Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On 7/20/19, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
DHS National Security koncentration kamps international law protects Democratic presidential debates Republican National Committee
Lol.
links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoSwRoOfb4w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3niFI0Mas
You might actually learn something
On July 21, 2019 10:46:18 AM PDT, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Lol.
links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoSwRoOfb4w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3niFI0Mas
You might actually learn something
Iow, I was wrong you're too ignorant to do anything besides watch youtube. Or pehaps you're illiterate. -- Rr Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On 7/21/19, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a... learn something
Well, what is it that people should learn and or support and or do from reading your linked post? Join the US Democratic Party and pray for Hope and Change? Join the US Republican Party and their flavor of Freedom? Get caught up in game of debating their charade of Fake Laws? Keep trying to forcibly make others do what you want, where they have applied no such force to you or to others? " About Us Just Security is an online forum for the rigorous analysis of U.S. national security law and policy. We aim to promote principled and pragmatic solutions to national security problems that decision-makers face. Our Board of Editors includes individuals with significant government experience, civil society attorneys, academics, and other leading voices. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law. We are grateful for support from the Open Society Foundations, Atlantic Philanthropies, New York University School of Law, and individual donors. The views expressed on this site are attributable to their individual authors writing in their personal capacity only, and not to any other author, the editors, or any other person, organization or institution with which the author might be affiliated or whom the author may advise or represent in legal proceedings. "
"principled and pragmatic solutions" Pragmatic == no detectable principles So, which is it - primciples or pragmatism? Kurt On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 2:14 PM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/21/19, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a... learn something
Well, what is it that people should learn and or support and or do from reading your linked post?
Join the US Democratic Party and pray for Hope and Change? Join the US Republican Party and their flavor of Freedom? Get caught up in game of debating their charade of Fake Laws? Keep trying to forcibly make others do what you want, where they have applied no such force to you or to others?
" About Us Just Security is an online forum for the rigorous analysis of U.S. national security law and policy. We aim to promote principled and pragmatic solutions to national security problems that decision-makers face. Our Board of Editors includes individuals with significant government experience, civil society attorneys, academics, and other leading voices. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
We are grateful for support from the Open Society Foundations, Atlantic Philanthropies, New York University School of Law, and individual donors.
The views expressed on this site are attributable to their individual authors writing in their personal capacity only, and not to any other author, the editors, or any other person, organization or institution with which the author might be affiliated or whom the author may advise or represent in legal proceedings. "
On July 21, 2019 2:13:41 PM PDT, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, what is it that people should learn and or support and or do from reading your linked post?
They should learn to spamcan your replies at the server like I just did and save some bandwidth. I don't now WTF makes you think Youtube is a reliable source of information and I don't fucking care. I simply make you vanish. Bye shit-for-brains. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:46:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
links
that is utter garbage grarpamp - those people are right wing scum, not libertarians. at 10:10 you have some worthless piece of shit defending trump and rockefeller because they are 'entrepreneurs' in the 'voluntary sector' (in his deranged mind) grarpamp, you should learn the A of the ABC before promoting those worthless govcorp agents and right wingers. Yes, they are govcorp agents posing as 'anarchists' - the exact sort of thing you can expect from right wing americans. So, again, please DO YOUR FUCKING HOMEWORK grarpamp.
On July 21, 2019 9:23:10 PM PDT, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:46:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
links
that is utter garbage grarpamp - those people are right wing scum, not libertarians.
That's typical here. Right wing scum referring to themselves as libertarians because that's what they believe Tim May was. He wasn't. He was a paranoid hermetic survivalist, but hardly right-wing like the pos's that infested this list on his departure years and years ago. That's why Ryseik and so many others stopped posting here. Most of them would be right at home on Gab, or Minds... Two Neonazi infested social media sites. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
participants (4)
-
grarpamp -
Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH -
Punk -
Razer