https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21018675 https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112300.html https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/8.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/9.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:36:06AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21018675
https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112300.html
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/8.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/9.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT
Is "Apache 2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" creating per-project balkanization? Why was Apache 2.0 license insufficient?
participants (2)
-
grarpamp -
Zenaan Harkness