https://surveillancelaw.org/ Perhaps 2014 is not quite 1984, though. This course explores how American law facilitates electronic surveillance—but also substantially constrains it. You will learn the legal procedures that police and intelligence agencies have at their disposal, as well as the security and privacy safeguards built into those procedures. The material also provides brief, not-too-geeky technical explanations of some common surveillance methods.
Is this the same federation that has some states legalize drugs in violation of federal and international law? How does one put faith in law, if there's open governmental violation of it?
On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:03:22 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte <l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
Is this the same federation that has some states legalize drugs in violation of federal and international law? How does one put faith in law, if there's open governmental violation of it?
What are you talking about? "Law" means "we government scumbags do whatever we want".
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:20:42AM -0300, Juan wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:03:22 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte <l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
Is this the same federation that has some states legalize drugs in violation of federal and international law? How does one put faith in law, if there's open governmental violation of it?
What are you talking about? "Law" means "we government scumbags do whatever we want".
Agreed. But another question is how the scumbags legally came to power? Looks like sheeple elected them? Sheeple scumbags too?
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:58:16PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
Agreed.
But another question is how the scumbags legally came to power?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler%27s_rise_to_power
Looks like sheeple elected them?
Sheeple scumbags too?
http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_pa...
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:58:16PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
Agreed.
But another question is how the scumbags legally came to power?
This is the most eloquent application of Godwin's law I have seen so far: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
On Tue, 19 May 2015 00:20:42 -0700, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:03:22 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte <l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
Is this the same federation that has some states legalize drugs in violation of federal and international law? How does one put faith in law, if there's open governmental violation of it?
What are you talking about? "Law" means "we government scumbags do whatever we want".
I prefer Marc Steven's [1] succinct definition in layman's term Law: An opinion backed by a gun [1] http://marcstevens.net/
Dnia wtorek, 19 maja 2015 00:16:31 grarpamp pisze:
Perhaps 2014 is not quite 1984, though. This course explores how American law facilitates electronic surveillance—but also substantially constrains it.
Ahahahaha haha ha ha haha hah haaaah oh wow. -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
participants (7)
-
Eugen Leitl -
Georgi Guninski -
grarpamp -
Juan -
Lodewijk andré de la porte -
rysiek -
Seth