On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:31:04 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

However if your political tendencies are towards Libertarianism (ie Feudalism)

well go figure - rayzer showing yet again that he is lagughable ignorant and dishonest. background : rayzer is a marxist : that is, the most despicable kind of lefty totalitarian out there. so yeah libertarianism (real name, liberalism) is feudalism and war is peace.

and I KNOW more than a few of you are,

yeah, this being the cpunks mailing list, it is to be expected. Thanks for embarrasing yourself yet again.

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:11:44 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

On 06/28/2016 09:54 AM, juan wrote:

...

rayzer is a marxist

CLANG!

Wrong.

Try again troll.

your past comments about marx make you a marxist. at any rate, you clearly are a dishonest retard who say that liberalism (what anglos now call 'libertarianism') is feudalism. If you are not the world's champion of trolls, then what are you.

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:10:32 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

On 06/28/2016 10:23 AM, juan wrote:

...

your past comments about marx make you a marxist.

I comment about a lot of things.

I don't think so. And regardless, when your comments are pro-marx then you can be called a marxist.

Everything you extrapolate from there just goes a long way to illustrating your unique kind of mental illness.

uh oh

...

at any rate, you clearly are a dishonest retard who say that liberalism (what anglos now call 'libertarianism') is feudalism. If you are not the world's champion of trolls, then what are you.

There's probably a name for it. If not, there should be.

name for a dishonest shitbag like you : of course : dishonest shitbag. Quite descriptive isn't it. So tell me rayzer what does a marxist statist like you do in a supposedly crypto-anarchist list WHINING about liberalism/libertarianism? What, are you worried that some people don't want to get their driver licenses and want to ignore the supreme authority of your state?

Rr

On 06/28/2016 01:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:

On 6/28/16, grarpamp wrote:

...

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19513

http://archive.is/nFCHI

In every organization there's always a time window, a time for even 'statment coming', a corporate lockdown, and management / censorship of media, image, and self.

It'll probably be year end before an overall picture as to these events starts to solidify for history.

Yes, the last few years of internal Tor Project drama is starting to become clear. It's worse than I could ever have imagined. Frightening. And so I can see why they need to lock it all down. So it goes.

On 06/28/2016 06:25 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:04:26PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:

...

On 06/28/2016 01:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:

...

On 6/28/16, grarpamp wrote:

...

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19513

http://archive.is/nFCHI

In every organization there's always a time window, a time for even 'statment coming', a corporate lockdown, and management / censorship of media, image, and self.

It'll probably be year end before an overall picture as to these events starts to solidify for history.

Yes, the last few years of internal Tor Project drama is starting to become clear. It's worse than I could ever have imagined. Frightening. And so I can see why they need to lock it all down. So it goes.

"need to"? or do you mean merely "chose to"?

That's a hard call. I'm tempted to say "need to". Because it could get MUCH worse before starting to clear up. But maybe "feel that they need to try to" would have been best. Because I fear that it's hopeless now.