[ot][spam][crazy][wrong] Building a Nuke out of Wet Noodles
i don't know how to or want to build a nuke. but because it is a dangerous weapon, it is harder for me to pursue. it is even harder if we build it out of something preposterous sounding, like wet noodles. how would you build a nuke out of wet noodles? i dunno. nukes probably involve some kind of exotically heavy metal, and some arrangement of directing exotic particles to impact some shape of the metal. so, maybe building it out of wet noodles, would be finding a way to make a nuclear explosion out of flour and water, and a way of producing a particle gun out of flour and water? not sure. i really know very little about this! maybe i can find atomic bomb plans and paste them here.
Real Jocular Instructions For Bombing Your Voting Booth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon#Types **** Fission weapons **** The two basic fission weapon designs All existing nuclear weapons derive some of their explosive energy from nuclear fission reactions. Weapons whose explosive output is exclusively from fission reactions are commonly referred to as atomic bombs or atom bombs (abbreviated as A-bombs). This has long been noted as something of a misnomer, as their energy comes from the nucleus of the atom, just as it does with fusion weapons. In fission weapons, a mass of fissile_material (enriched_uranium or plutonium) is forced into supercriticality—allowing an exponential_growth of nuclear chain_reactions—either by shooting one piece of sub-critical material into another (the "gun" method) or by compression of a sub-critical sphere or cylinder of fissile material using chemically-fueled explosive_lenses. The latter approach, the "implosion" method, is more sophisticated and more efficient (smaller, less massive, and requiring less of the expensive fissile fuel) than the former. A major challenge in all nuclear weapon designs is to ensure that a significant fraction of the fuel is consumed before the weapon destroys itself. The amount of energy released by fission bombs can range from the equivalent of just under a ton to upwards of 500,000 tons (500 kilotons) of TNT (4.2 to 2.1×106 GJ). [11] All fission reactions generate fission_products, the remains of the split atomic nuclei. Many fission products are either highly radioactive (but short- lived) or moderately radioactive (but long-lived), and as such, they are a serious form of radioactive_contamination. Fission products are the principal radioactive component of nuclear_fallout. Another source of radioactivity is the burst of free neutrons produced by the weapon. When they collide with other nuclei in the surrounding material, the neutrons transmute those nuclei into other isotopes, altering their stability and making them radioactive. The most commonly used fissile materials for nuclear weapons applications have been uranium-235 and plutonium-239. Less commonly used has been uranium-233. Neptunium-237 and some isotopes of americium may be usable for nuclear explosives as well, but it is not clear that this has ever been implemented, and their plausible use in nuclear weapons is a matter of dispute.[12] **** Fusion weapons **** Main article: Thermonuclear_weapon The basics of the Teller–Ulam_design for a hydrogen bomb: a fission bomb uses radiation to compress and heat a separate section of fusion fuel. The other basic type of nuclear weapon produces a large proportion of its energy in nuclear fusion reactions. Such fusion weapons are generally referred to as thermonuclear weapons or more colloquially as hydrogen bombs (abbreviated as H-bombs), as they rely on fusion reactions between isotopes of hydrogen (deuterium and tritium). All such weapons derive a significant portion of their energy from fission reactions used to "trigger" fusion reactions, and fusion reactions can themselves trigger additional fission reactions.[13] Only six countries—United_States, Russia, United Kingdom, China, France, and India—have conducted thermonuclear weapon tests. Whether India has detonated a "true" multi-staged thermonuclear_weapon is controversial.[14] North_Korea claims to have tested a fusion weapon as of January 2016[update], though this claim is disputed.[15] Thermonuclear weapons are considered much more difficult to successfully design and execute than primitive fission weapons. Almost all of the nuclear weapons deployed today use the thermonuclear design because it is more efficient.[16] Thermonuclear bombs work by using the energy of a fission bomb to compress and heat fusion fuel. In the Teller-Ulam_design, which accounts for all multi- megaton yield hydrogen bombs, this is accomplished by placing a fission bomb and fusion fuel (tritium, deuterium, or lithium_deuteride) in proximity within a special, radiation-reflecting container. When the fission bomb is detonated, gamma_rays and X-rays emitted first compress the fusion fuel, then heat it to thermonuclear temperatures. The ensuing fusion reaction creates enormous numbers of high-speed neutrons, which can then induce fission in materials not normally prone to it, such as depleted_uranium. Each of these components is known as a "stage", with the fission bomb as the "primary" and the fusion capsule as the "secondary". In large, megaton-range hydrogen bombs, about half of the yield comes from the final fissioning of depleted uranium.[11] Virtually all thermonuclear weapons deployed today use the "two-stage" design described above, but it is possible to add additional fusion stages—each stage igniting a larger amount of fusion fuel in the next stage. This technique can be used to construct thermonuclear weapons of arbitrarily large yield. This is in contrast to fission bombs, which are limited in their explosive power due to criticality danger (premature nuclear chain reaction caused by too-large amounts of pre-assembled fissile fuel). The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated, the Tsar_Bomba of the USSR, which released an energy equivalent of over 50 megatons of TNT (210 PJ), was a three-stage weapon. Most thermonuclear weapons are considerably smaller than this, due to practical constraints from missile warhead space and weight requirements.[17] Edward_Teller, often referred to as the "father of the hydrogen bomb" Fusion reactions do not create fission products, and thus contribute far less to the creation of nuclear_fallout than fission reactions, but because all thermonuclear_weapons contain at least one fission stage, and many high-yield thermonuclear devices have a final fission stage, thermonuclear weapons can generate at least as much nuclear fallout as fission-only weapons. Furthermore, high yield thermonuclear explosions (most dangerously ground bursts) have the force to lift radioactive debris upwards past the tropopause into the stratosphere, where the calm non-turbulent winds permit the debris to travel great distances from the burst, eventually settling and unpredictably contaminating areas far removed from the target of the explosion.
I just realised that if we made a working nuclear bomb out of wet noodles it might explode when used! I wouldn't want anybody to get hurt. That would be really bad.
is there anything else that i can do other than plan how wet noodles could be used to stew up some nuclear weapons? could wet noodles be turned into fissile material? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fissile_material
the reason for wet noodles is that they are a ridiculous choice to make anything with, hence they are a pleasant challenge for my puzzle-oriented brain
i think the reason for nuke is to resist the seemingly-ridiculous mental inhibitions around anything similar to anything that could ever be construed as dangerous or harmful in some way, which includes everything that exists. maybe something more useful than a nuke would be more interesting though.
participants (1)
-
k