Texas Welcomes All Antifa BLM Leftist Commie Anarcho Thieves Arsonists Etc
The two internet tough guys on here wouldn't last a week in Texas, now they can either put up and move to TX and walk their talk, or pussie out shut up and scurry back to their ratholes... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCA6g6-kEAg 9.41 9.42 w Benton Ross Watson https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/ SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property. (b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and: (1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or (2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor. Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994. Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property: (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and (3) he reasonably believes that: (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
On 11/21/21, Douglas Lucas <dal@riseup.net> wrote:
what the actual fuck am I looking at
Up pops another list lurking troll, months and years go by on every topic from crypto tools to hardware even politic, yet nothing but crickets from these worthless lurkers, then they pop up with their idiotic nonsensical tweet phrases trying to hipster 1+ themselves. Lurkers get lost. Internet tough guys, so full of arson thievery destruction assault trespass rape murder on people, all turned into the true wussies they are the moment they cross the TX border. Walk your talk against people in the real world of TX, if you dare be such true an heros. Voluntaryism libertarian even crypto-agorism etc, even hippie communes full of peace love and necessary charity, may all eventually dispel legacy state thievery and murder, but ideology of arson thievery destruction assault trespass murder against people, violating non agression, the idea that no rules and no self-defense applies to such agressors... all rather likely to still be met with lead, as in all of history and DNA.
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 03:48:48 -0500 turd grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> vomited:
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
so that's yet another nazi law coming from the US. Shocking! We're talking about the same fascist cesspool were slavery was legal for a 100 years and then concentration camps for blacks were legal for the next 100 years. Not to mention the endless list of other crimes against humanity that US nazi turds have commited and commit. Starting of course with the INVASION of the american continent and LAND THEFT, and then WAR against the whole world. Now, as to this particular nazi 'law', the fundamental fact here is that COPS like grarpamp and professor turd are not included as targets. That is, the 'law' doesn't allow honest people to kill the actual criminals, the criminals being the very same COPS who wrote the 'law' So, this 'law' is the typical right wing, fascist farce that would allow random US psychos to muder random poor, brown people but would never allow the killing of actual STATE CRIMINALS like the COP grarpamp. Worthless piece of non human shit 'grarpamp' is invited to move to texas and then start killing his COP coworkers, to 'defend his 'private property' and so prove that he's a Real Libertarian Nazi, of the kind who sucks Trump's Cock.
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 03:48:48 -0500 turd grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> vomited:
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
so that's yet another nazi law coming from the US. Shocking! We're talking about the same fascist cesspool where* slavery was legal plus : the nazi turd 'grarpamp' is probably too stupid to even understand how his 'laws' work. " the turd reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary" see, there's that little word there 'reasonably', and so one has to ask who determines what is 'reasonable'? The self-evident answer is of course the US nazi state. So, psychos can murder poor people only when the state thinks it's 'reasonable'. The rest of the wording is also ambiguous and open to 'interpretation', like any other nazi dictate coming from the US nazi state(grarpamp's employers) and will in practice mean whatever the US state nazis want it to mean. no different from this stupid joke "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against UNREASONABLE searches and seizures" which means of course the US nazi govt can do anything they want and call it 'reasonable'. then again, this is a mailing list for US COPS.
participants (3)
-
Douglas Lucas -
grarpamp -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0