What is Steven Schear's standing to post here?
So let me get this straight. These so-called high powered lawyers mis-estimated whether SCOTUS would assume Texas has standing (standing is the first basic test to determine in a U.S. court if a plaintiff is qualified to bring a suit). Give me a break! Only 2nd or 3rd string constitutional lawyers could make this error. ..' Give us a break, Steve. Zenaan Harkness is Nazi, Fag, Moron Eunuch and Dead-Man-Walking, one of several here whose shitty identity depends on being 3rd rate and making errors. You look like a complete fucking idiot respecting his standing to post here.
On Sat, the CARPET MUNCHING RAT skwaked:
So let me get this straight. These so-called high powered lawyers mis-estimated whether SCOTUS would assume Texas has standing (standing is the first basic test to determine in a U.S. court if a plaintiff is qualified to bring a suit). Give me a break! Only 2nd or 3rd string constitutional lawyers could make this error. ..'
Give us a break, Steve. Zenaan Harkness is Nazi, Fag, Moron Eunuch and Dead-Man-Walking, one of several here whose shitty identity depends on being 3rd rate and making errors.
You look like a complete fucking idiot respecting his standing to post here.
You look like a REAL anarchist calling for censorship around here :D
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, 20:15 professor rat <pro2rat@yahoo.com.au> wrote: Zenaan Harkness is Nazi, Fag, Moron Eunuch and Dead-Man-Walking, one of
several here whose shitty identity depends on being 3rd rate and making errors.
Well, here the little rodent is right, hihihi! :)
You look like a complete fucking idiot respecting his standing to post here.
No, Steven is correct. NO censorship. Even to stupid hypocrite creatures like ZH and jamesd. (Sorry, professor. Jamesd is crazier than us. Always forget this disgraceful being.)
participants (3)
-
Cecilia Tanaka -
professor rat -
Zenaan Harkness