PCR: “It's open season on all White people” - WTC7 - co-ordinated hoaxes - White supremacist Israeli border walls - [PEACE]
A little rambling, perhaps useful for forwarding to someone. Since border walls are White supremacist tools of oppression, that means Israeli's are White supremacists. Easy as 1, 2 and 3 :) Paul Craig Roberts Slams Dems & Western Media: "It's Open Season On All White People" https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-11/paul-craig-roberts-slams-dems-west... https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/10/the-survival-of-the-fittest/ … Only White Supremacists kill people and build walls, unless they are Israelis, but we are not permitted to say anything about that. By law the US has borders that the law demands be enforced. If immigrants can simply walk across the border, why can’t they fly into the country or come by ships? What is the point of passport control? Indeed, what’s the point of passports? The concept of citizenship simply disappears. … If the US would simply stop overthrowing reformist governments in Latin America, the resources of those countries would be taken out of foreign hands and be put to work for the local people, which is what Venezuela is doing much to the chagrin of American oil companies. The last time Honduras elected a reformer, America’s first black president—Obama—overthrew him. Brazil’s Workers Party was destroyed with the US-orchestrated imprisonment of its leader, Lula da Silva, and removal from office of his successor. In their place Washington has installed a corrupt agent of the Americans. Oppression is applied to the supporters among the people of reformist politicians to ensure that voting ceases to put reformers in power. As General Smedley Butler said, “I was the enforcer in Latin America for the New York Banks and the United Fruit Company.” Perhaps it is poetic justice that the peoples whose resources are carted off to America decide to go with the resources. … The El Paso shooting has been turned not only into an attack on President Trump but also into an attack on white people. Suddenly the “Muslim terrorist threat” has disappeared. Its replacement is the domestic terrorist threat of “white supremacy.” The attack on whites is indiscriminate. The attack on Trump extends to all of the Americans who elected him—“Trump deplorables”—in Hillary’s words. All whites become “racists” and are covered in guilt. The anti-white propaganda is effective. Actress Rosanna Arquette said that her white skin makes her ashamed. The success in teaching emotionally and mentally weak white people to feel guilt is to make it easier for those who wish to displace them to run over them. And most definitely, the core white populations of the Western world are being overrun. As white populations have become too brainwashed and loaded with guilt to defend themselves, perhaps the Social Darwinists were correct after all. The fit survive, and white people are no longer among the fit. CNN former host Reza Aslan, now a professor at the University of California, tweeted: “The President is a white nationalist terror leader. His supporters—ALL OF THEM—are by definition white nationalist terror supporters. The MAGA hat is a KKK hood. And this evil, racist scourge must be eradicated from society.” ... For those who prefer RedIce, full Russian-blooded Lana Lokteff continues to deliver: How\ To\ Become\ An\ Empowered\ Female https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2K4gYzopYE I\ Quit.\ They\ Won. [Snowflake warning - disheartening...] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUNofrZnLDo And for your ultimate fix, no less than the daily stormer itself :) http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake. Ps. I LUV it when the pigs do their job right (by accident ofc) and snuff rich little white supremacist punks. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
On 2019-08-12 10:32 pm, Razer wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
When Kathryn Steinle was shot in the back on the embarcadero, how did her killer know she believed she had privilege? White people are second class citizens. A white person does not dare be rude to a nonwhite, but it is just fine for nonwhites to be rude to whites. Police are more likely to shoot whites in a confrontation, because they know they can get away with it. There are a lot more confrontations between police and nonwhites, in part because nonwhites know they can get away with confronting police when whites cannot. When non whites walk down the street, they take up more space on the pavement than whites, expecting whites to get out of the way. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Ty James for saying that. Something you hear only Tucker Carlson -------- Original Message -------- On Aug 12, 2019, 3:33 PM, wrote:
On 2019-08-12 10:32 pm, Razer wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
When Kathryn Steinle was shot in the back on the embarcadero, how did her killer know she believed she had privilege?
White people are second class citizens.
A white person does not dare be rude to a nonwhite, but it is just fine for nonwhites to be rude to whites.
Police are more likely to shoot whites in a confrontation, because they know they can get away with it. There are a lot more confrontations between police and nonwhites, in part because nonwhites know they can get away with confronting police when whites cannot.
When non whites walk down the street, they take up more space on the pavement than whites, expecting whites to get out of the way.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 00:11 rooty <arpspoof@protonmail.com> wrote:
Ty James for saying that. Something you hear only Tucker Carlson
-------- Original Message -------- On Aug 12, 2019, 3:33 PM, < jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
On 2019-08-12 10:32 pm, Razer wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
When Kathryn Steinle was shot in the back on the embarcadero, how did her killer know she believed she had privilege?
White people are second class citizens.
A white person does not dare be rude to a nonwhite, but it is just fine for nonwhites to be rude to whites.
Police are more likely to shoot whites in a confrontation, because they know they can get away with it. There are a lot more confrontations between police and nonwhites, in part because nonwhites know they can get away with confronting police when whites cannot.
When non whites walk down the street, they take up more space on the pavement than whites, expecting whites to get out of the way.
Usually, I never read James' messages because they are full of hypocrite
victimising. So I created another filter for him years ago. I heard about "man spreading", but never about "non-white spreading", hahaha!! "Get out of my way because I want to walk like John Wayne, like a man with bloody hemorrhoids, opening pretty wide my legs, and using all the pavement, peregrine!" Hahaha!!! It's a hilarious idea, James! ;D It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al. Believe me, "white people are not second class citizens." They probably never will be humiliated in markets being prejudged thieves, being followed for employees or another embarrassing situation. And a brown boy, even being innocent, will probably be shoot instead a white guy... :(( Hey! Did you notice most of the serial killers around the whole world are white like you? ;)
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al.
On the contrary, it is totally OK to be rude to white people. Look at all the murderous hatred spewed against white people on twitter and facebook. If anyone said anything like that against any other race, his twitter account or you tube channel would be immediately shut down by twitter, facebook, or youtube. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:41:33 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al.
On the contrary, it is totally OK to be rude to white people.
Look at all the murderous hatred spewed against white people on twitter and facebook.
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people' Further, tell me what's the color of the skin of the vast majority of politicians, cops, soldiers, bankers, CIA, NSA, or any other branch of YOUR govcorp? Look! It's white as well! I can see exactly what you are doing james. Just like the white jews hysterically whining about 'antisemitism', you are playing the victim while looting and destroying the whole world. PS : I suggest you get a history book and learn about the portuguese empire, dutch empire, spanish empire, british empire. Oh and don't forget the roman empire, americunt empire, slavery in the USA, apartheid in the USA, and the very creation of the USA by slave owners like jefferson, washington, franklin, henry and all the rest. All of them...white european scum.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:22:15PM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:41:33 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al.
On the contrary, it is totally OK to be rude to white people.
Look at all the murderous hatred spewed against white people on twitter and facebook.
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Further, tell me what's the color of the skin of the vast majority of politicians, cops, soldiers, bankers, CIA, NSA, or any other branch of YOUR govcorp? Look! It's white as well!
I can see exactly what you are doing james. Just like the white jews hysterically whining about 'antisemitism', you are playing the victim while looting and destroying the whole world.
PS : I suggest you get a history book and learn about the portuguese empire, dutch empire, spanish empire, british empire. Oh and don't forget the roman empire, americunt empire, slavery in the USA, apartheid in the USA, and the very creation of the USA by slave owners like jefferson, washington, franklin, henry and all the rest. All of them...white european scum.
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and.... I won't go on, I feel the vomit rising up. -- GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4 C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:06:08 -0400 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy
heh, well, the 'patriarchy' only exists in the minds of feminazis, so not really a problem. Except as an excuse for western feminazis to spread their unhinged, neo-puritan, anti-sex cancer all over the world. See previous references to western imperialism.
with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Yeah. It's the other side of the 'democratic and egalitarian', child-murdering clintons and obombas.
I won't go on, I feel the vomit rising up.
On August 14, 2019 1:31:36 AM PDT, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:06:08 -0400 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy
heh, well, the 'patriarchy' only exists in the minds of feminazis, so not really a problem. Except as an excuse for western feminazis to spread their unhinged, neo-puritan, anti-sex cancer all over the world. See previous references to western imperialism.
with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Yeah. It's the other side of the 'democratic and egalitarian', child-murdering clintons and obombas.
I won't go on, I feel the vomit rising up.
Yeah. #Metoo John. ( bwahahaha!) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On 2019-08-14 3:06 am, John Newman wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Democracy has been tried before. It always self destructs much the way it is self destructing now, leading, after a longer or shorter period of chaos and ruin, to rule by Caesar. One of the common modes of self destruction is that people vote their tribe, ethnicity, race, and religion, which eventually results in tribal warfare and the recreation of states with a common race and religion, which is the failure mode that we are entering into now. The reactionary movement is people positioning themselves for the coming end of democracy. We hope to survive it, we hope for our children to survive it, and our politics and plots are aimed at making the transition shorter, smoother, and less bloody. We look at how people in the past have successfully dealt with the problems we are now encountering, and look at the past how people in the past have bloodily and catastrophically responded unwisely to the problems we are encountering now, to learn from past success and past failure. Trump as holy American Emperor (King under God) would be the ideal solution, God Emperor Trump (cult of personality and all that) a more realistic and practical solution, but a long period of bloody chaos is more realistic and likely. Trump is a deal maker, not a warrior, therefore not the best candidate for God Emperor. But war approaches, and you go with the leader you have, not the leader you want. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:13:38AM +0800, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 3:06 am, John Newman wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Democracy has been tried before. It always self destructs much the way it is self destructing now, leading, after a longer or shorter period of chaos and ruin, to rule by Caesar.
In the FLOSS world we are becoming aware of certain concepts which may be useful to us collectively in the near future when we see the next cyclical currency reset: - the model of the benevolent dictator (e.g. RMS, Linus, van Rossum etc) - the right to fork - any sub-group, or individual, has the right to fork, to start again, to discard any or all, and to create anew - absolute individual sovereignty - the right to pursue ones own path, unilaterally When a benevolent Soul is identified, that one ought be recognised, 'loved' by those who seek a benevolent dictator - kind of an implicit in foundation in "democracy" which sadly ends up mob or oligarchic rule. Stable money is possible, e.g. 800 years stable, even where private bank interest are sucking the life blood of the nations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tally_stick … The most prominent and best recorded use of the split tally stick or "nick-stick"[6][7] being used as a form of currency[8] was when Henry I introduced the tally stick system in medieval England in around 1100. He would accept the tally stick only for taxes, and it was a tool of the Exchequer for the collection of taxes by local sheriffs (tax farmers "farming the shire")[citation needed] for seven centuries. The split tally of the Exchequer was in continuous use until 1826. In 1834 tally sticks representing six centuries worth of financial records were ordered to be burned in a stove in the Houses of Parliament. The resulting fire set the chimney ablaze and then spread until most of the building was destroyed.[8] This event was described by Charles Dickens in an 1855 article on administrative reform.[9] … Along the Danube and in Switzerland the tally was still used in the 20th century in rural economies. ... and remove the parasite (((international banker))) (((European style socialist))) "elites", and have a system of identification of benevolent dictators (i.e. no "God given" right to rule due to birth), and long term stability, along with phenomenal prosperity for the entire planet, is possible. The "old testament" consciousness is solidly poverty consciousness - a zero sum game. The industrial revolution demonstrates both a) incredible abundance beyond the wildest dreams of our forebears b) the greatest possible slow down in this advance due to the poverty consciousness of our (((parasitic overlords))) - suppressing Telsa, indebting the world, keeping all on the treadmill of survival in the face of the most fantastic abundance we've ever known
One of the common modes of self destruction is that people vote their tribe, ethnicity, race, and religion, which eventually results in tribal warfare and the recreation of states with a common race and religion, which is the failure mode that we are entering into now.
The banking system of servitude and indebtedness (fundamentally poverty consciousness) plays a very large part in this forever war, tribal or otherwise. Some education in gratitude, empathy, creativity and non zero sum games is sorely needed yet denied to the majority. Those who accumulate wealth (at the highest levels at least), have done so by the creation of a mathematically unstable system - and this foundation of money creation through debt is arbitrary - we can have stable money, just as much as unstable money, but TPTB have gained great wealth and control through the catalyzing of chaos such as WWII and the leashing and using of that chaos to their own ends as they have done. This chaotic opportunity creation (a fundamentally abusive and enslaving construct) is merely one of many constructs or 'shared common delusions' which we may collectively create/ institute/ uphold as our education, will and insight allow...
The reactionary movement is people positioning themselves for the coming end of democracy. We hope to survive it, we hope for our children to survive it, and our politics and plots are aimed
Some would disagree with this - our politics of "democracy" where those elected once each four years are divided into two "supposedly oppositional" halves, each of which has a small cadre or caucus of "their executive", provides a ready, and almost entirely non-democratic, system of control by those with money. Thus the creation and expansion of oligarchic power and control. Let's not forget the big picture…
at making the transition shorter, smoother, and less bloody.
Perhaps "hoped for" or "proclaimed" or "intended". Just pointing out the obvious discrepancy between purported result, and reality.
We look at how people in the past have successfully dealt with the problems we are now encountering, and look at the past how people in the past have bloodily and catastrophically responded unwisely to the problems we are encountering now, to learn from past success and past failure.
In principle yes. And to real degree in practice. And we have a fundamental systemic issue of a system of usury, enslavement by any reasonable definition of the term, which has been foisted or perpetrated upon our kings and queens of old and upon the nations (therefore the people) generally. Usury is fundamentally, as in mathematically, unstable or "chaotic" to use that term in its mathematical sense. Mathematically or algorithmically chaotic systems of money are but one class of various systems of money. When a fundamental construct (shared common delusion) of our community inter relationships is chaotic, we will have cyclical chaos as we witness generally today, interspersed with relatively non chaotic times of prosperity (at least for those nations/ families at the top of the chaotic financial food chain) and in any case, of relative social stability.
Trump as holy American Emperor (King under God) would be the ideal solution,
Perhaps many would instinctively recoil at this description, whereas the highest intention of this is now more widely known as "benevolent dictator for life, for example as to some degree exampled in the FLOSS world at the per project granularity, by various individuals as BDFLs of various projects, albeit that Richard Stallman is to some limited degree an overarching benevolent dictator figure for the whole community." Finding such individuals with a high enough IQ to assess the fundamentals of (any) problem at issue, and with sufficient (albeit dissatisfactory to many) social/ communication and self organisation capacity to manifest those insights of "the greater good" (as a benevolent dictator naturally turns their mind, heart, Soul), is somewhat rare on the scale of "all humans", and so when we do find them, we ought uphold their truths, support their calls to action, and handle their social un-graces as best we can. When/ if any benevolent dictator turns predatorial or non benevolent, urgently fork and reset as necessary.
God Emperor Trump (cult of personality and all that) a more realistic and practical solution,
Cult of personality is indeed more practical in the face of modern Western humans, thus the public and political success of the washed out principles of Linus Torvalds (utility above all else, don't tell me about your bloody freedom principles I don't want to know about all that politics) in comparison to Richard Stallman (notably socially inept, but absolutely relentlessly staunch on his clearly stated fundamental principles of freedom in relation to computer software). Cest la vie. Me, I put my attention, intention and weight (as humble or not so as it is) behind the RMS'es of the world... give me freedom first, at almost any sacrifice. Prisoner's dilemma, eat your heart out! :D
but a long period of bloody chaos is more realistic and likely.
The fundamental driver of today's chaos is the Federal Reserve debt machine, which enslaves practically all. Releasing this yoke is ultimately an inner battle - Putin has demonstrated on a solid few occasions now that wiping out "debt" to the tune of many billions of dollars, can be done by the literal stroke of a digital pen. There's is no mathematical reason we cannot have a global debt jubilee - reset without war. The pain that those who hold "debt", viciously and emotionally demanding that the world pay them NOW or else World War 3 is better, is merely an inner emotional block, another prisoner's dilemma. The best in the medium term for literally everybody is a global debt jubilee. And if Lord Rothschild (remember the Fed) decides (and can convince his sons to agree) that a global debt jubilee is to be had, then it shall be had. One can hope. Such would be the greatest victory for empathy, righteousness and all that is good. Such would redeem the last 4000+ years of Jewish usury on the goyim (all those who are not Jewish). Let us forgive and move forward in sanity.
Trump is a deal maker, not a warrior, therefore not the best candidate for God Emperor. But war approaches, and you go with the leader you have, not the leader you want.
Indeed, practicality and all... As always, remember the Fed.
Interesting beginnings of a rebuild of moral standing: IMF And World Bank Announce Debt Jubilee For World's Poorest Countries https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/action-plan-g20-debt-relief-program-worl... The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has just announced an unprecedented debt cancellation program with the G20 and World Bank for countries that were heavily burdened with debt before the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.imf2020.org/press https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Development_Association .. In total, the IMF says debt cancellation will cover 111 countries. .. The rollout of a debt jubilee by the IMF and its partners suggests the 100-year debt-super cycle's "kick the can down the road" plan has finally hit a wall. Former Assistant Treasury Secretary (in the Reagan Administration) Dr. Paul Craig Roberts has been very vocal about the need for a debt jubilee: “The problem is there is already more debt than can be serviced. That’s why they are trying to bail it out by issuing more debt. It’s like kicking the can down the road until it blows up. When does it blow up? It didn’t blow up with a $4.5 trillion Federal Reserve balance sheet. Will it blow up at $10 trillion or does it have to be $15 trillion, or does the Fed’s balance sheet have to be the size of the US GDP before it blows up? I can’t say that I know, but I do know bailing out debt by creating more debt is not a solution.” https://usawatchdog.com/kicking-the-can-until-it-blows-up-paul-craig-roberts... .. Debt cancellation, or a debt jubilee, is a much better option than a temporary freeze on interest payments. Does this mean the CIA's Venezuela regime change operation is going to be replaced with a debt jubilee? The list of the first 27 countries does not include Venezuela: https://usawatchdog.com/kicking-the-can-until-it-blows-up-paul-craig-roberts... and looking here: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/venezuela It seems that Venezuela's problems are with the USA directly, and so shall continue to rely on the Russian "firewall" to protect itself. Well, at least some progress on the "moral standing for humans" front is being made, and this is a good thing.
Individual sovereignty is the foundation of anarchism/ political anarchy. It is purported to be the foundation of democracy. "Human rights" (though that term has in certain cases been completely degraded in the main stream media to "moar gibs, muh human right to be fed, clothed and housed by the sweat of others") is another way to say "individual sovereignty". We live in a technocratic almost post-industrial world. A Musk or Bezos can roll out a global system of enslavement, becoming a super predator. In this world of super predators, can individual sovereignty be upheld practically, widely, viably, by the average soccer mum, without national sovereignty, i.e. in a One World Order? We may posit that national sovereignty, a balance of national powers, is a less dangerous option to a One World Order. A sovereign nation which wields its sovereignty in justice and righteousness, refusing to preference the million Marxist minorities to the detriment of procreation and stable happy families, is surely an asset to any anarchist seeking that his personal rights and freedoms be respected - we have no need to be led astray by the classic Western (((MSM))) false dichotomies where The End Of History (and the wanton destruction of our history and curture) leads to nothing but abject nihilism, the destruction of family and procreation, and the breakdown of community structures and sanity itself. To this end, Russia. Unlike Cambodia which just as with Russia was also subjected to despotism few would imagine, when Russia was on death's door with the Western ((("Harvard boys"))) vultures carving up the people's assets "for the glory of capitalism" with their ruthless "economic shock therapy", the Russian people had produced Putin, a young patriotic and highly principled man, who by providence was in the right place at the right time, and has allowed and helped Russia to rise again, a phoenix resplendent of dignity and yet the results of a people hit as hard or harder than any other. This difference in this example, speaks to a difference in the people, a fundamental in-built/ genetic difference - it is not Putin per se, it is all Russians! Everyone is SO not the same! Peoples are inherently different, and thank God for that. In fact Putin was and remains by many accounts, the most accomodating to the West, leader that Russia could possibly have elected, and yet here we are, treated with stern (and Oh so appropriate) rebuke from this fatherly and humble man "Putin", speaking on behalf of all Russians, still speaking with us, over and over again still speaking with those who will listen, despite our collective Western descent into madness at the precipice of our own despotism and destruction! And it is not World War Three we now experience, merely the sigh of relief possible with a drilled "lock down". What's not to be grateful for? By God we owe it to ourselves to be grateful to all Russia... Despite incredible and relentless efforts by our Western oligarchs, Russia still stands! And we are not once again fighting and killing whites against whites, all against all. Technically, scientifically, literally and actually, we Whites _are_ the minority on this planet and in times past we have been caused to fight ourselves, to slaughter our best on the front lines of "the war" murder machine. For Russia and her national sovereignty, there is some undermine in their "Harvard boys" constitution still, but great strides were recently made in their recent referendum. The Western world waits until November. Make good use of this time, it's a rare respite ... On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:15:11PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:13:38AM +0800, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 3:06 am, John Newman wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Democracy has been tried before. It always self destructs much the way it is self destructing now, leading, after a longer or shorter period of chaos and ruin, to rule by Caesar.
In the FLOSS world we are becoming aware of certain concepts which may be useful to us collectively in the near future when we see the next cyclical currency reset:
- the model of the benevolent dictator (e.g. RMS, Linus, van Rossum etc)
- the right to fork - any sub-group, or individual, has the right to fork, to start again, to discard any or all, and to create anew
- absolute individual sovereignty - the right to pursue ones own path, unilaterally
When a benevolent Soul is identified, that one ought be recognised, 'loved' by those who seek a benevolent dictator - kind of an implicit in foundation in "democracy" which sadly ends up mob or oligarchic rule.
Stable money is possible, e.g. 800 years stable, even where private bank interest are sucking the life blood of the nations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tally_stick … The most prominent and best recorded use of the split tally stick or "nick-stick"[6][7] being used as a form of currency[8] was when Henry I introduced the tally stick system in medieval England in around 1100. He would accept the tally stick only for taxes, and it was a tool of the Exchequer for the collection of taxes by local sheriffs (tax farmers "farming the shire")[citation needed] for seven centuries. The split tally of the Exchequer was in continuous use until 1826. In 1834 tally sticks representing six centuries worth of financial records were ordered to be burned in a stove in the Houses of Parliament. The resulting fire set the chimney ablaze and then spread until most of the building was destroyed.[8] This event was described by Charles Dickens in an 1855 article on administrative reform.[9] … Along the Danube and in Switzerland the tally was still used in the 20th century in rural economies.
... and remove the parasite (((international banker))) (((European style socialist))) "elites", and have a system of identification of benevolent dictators (i.e. no "God given" right to rule due to birth), and long term stability, along with phenomenal prosperity for the entire planet, is possible.
The "old testament" consciousness is solidly poverty consciousness - a zero sum game.
The industrial revolution demonstrates both
a) incredible abundance beyond the wildest dreams of our forebears
b) the greatest possible slow down in this advance due to the poverty consciousness of our (((parasitic overlords))) - suppressing Telsa, indebting the world, keeping all on the treadmill of survival in the face of the most fantastic abundance we've ever known
One of the common modes of self destruction is that people vote their tribe, ethnicity, race, and religion, which eventually results in tribal warfare and the recreation of states with a common race and religion, which is the failure mode that we are entering into now.
The banking system of servitude and indebtedness (fundamentally poverty consciousness) plays a very large part in this forever war, tribal or otherwise.
Some education in gratitude, empathy, creativity and non zero sum games is sorely needed yet denied to the majority.
Those who accumulate wealth (at the highest levels at least), have done so by the creation of a mathematically unstable system - and this foundation of money creation through debt is arbitrary - we can have stable money, just as much as unstable money, but TPTB have gained great wealth and control through the catalyzing of chaos such as WWII and the leashing and using of that chaos to their own ends as they have done.
This chaotic opportunity creation (a fundamentally abusive and enslaving construct) is merely one of many constructs or 'shared common delusions' which we may collectively create/ institute/ uphold as our education, will and insight allow...
The reactionary movement is people positioning themselves for the coming end of democracy. We hope to survive it, we hope for our children to survive it, and our politics and plots are aimed
Some would disagree with this - our politics of "democracy" where those elected once each four years are divided into two "supposedly oppositional" halves, each of which has a small cadre or caucus of "their executive", provides a ready, and almost entirely non-democratic, system of control by those with money.
Thus the creation and expansion of oligarchic power and control.
Let's not forget the big picture…
at making the transition shorter, smoother, and less bloody.
Perhaps "hoped for" or "proclaimed" or "intended". Just pointing out the obvious discrepancy between purported result, and reality.
We look at how people in the past have successfully dealt with the problems we are now encountering, and look at the past how people in the past have bloodily and catastrophically responded unwisely to the problems we are encountering now, to learn from past success and past failure.
In principle yes.
And to real degree in practice.
And we have a fundamental systemic issue of a system of usury, enslavement by any reasonable definition of the term, which has been foisted or perpetrated upon our kings and queens of old and upon the nations (therefore the people) generally.
Usury is fundamentally, as in mathematically, unstable or "chaotic" to use that term in its mathematical sense.
Mathematically or algorithmically chaotic systems of money are but one class of various systems of money.
When a fundamental construct (shared common delusion) of our community inter relationships is chaotic, we will have cyclical chaos as we witness generally today, interspersed with relatively non chaotic times of prosperity (at least for those nations/ families at the top of the chaotic financial food chain) and in any case, of relative social stability.
Trump as holy American Emperor (King under God) would be the ideal solution,
Perhaps many would instinctively recoil at this description, whereas the highest intention of this is now more widely known as "benevolent dictator for life, for example as to some degree exampled in the FLOSS world at the per project granularity, by various individuals as BDFLs of various projects, albeit that Richard Stallman is to some limited degree an overarching benevolent dictator figure for the whole community."
Finding such individuals with a high enough IQ to assess the fundamentals of (any) problem at issue, and with sufficient (albeit dissatisfactory to many) social/ communication and self organisation capacity to manifest those insights of "the greater good" (as a benevolent dictator naturally turns their mind, heart, Soul), is somewhat rare on the scale of "all humans", and so when we do find them, we ought uphold their truths, support their calls to action, and handle their social un-graces as best we can.
When/ if any benevolent dictator turns predatorial or non benevolent, urgently fork and reset as necessary.
God Emperor Trump (cult of personality and all that) a more realistic and practical solution,
Cult of personality is indeed more practical in the face of modern Western humans, thus the public and political success of the washed out principles of Linus Torvalds (utility above all else, don't tell me about your bloody freedom principles I don't want to know about all that politics) in comparison to Richard Stallman (notably socially inept, but absolutely relentlessly staunch on his clearly stated fundamental principles of freedom in relation to computer software).
Cest la vie.
Me, I put my attention, intention and weight (as humble or not so as it is) behind the RMS'es of the world... give me freedom first, at almost any sacrifice. Prisoner's dilemma, eat your heart out! :D
but a long period of bloody chaos is more realistic and likely.
The fundamental driver of today's chaos is the Federal Reserve debt machine, which enslaves practically all.
Releasing this yoke is ultimately an inner battle - Putin has demonstrated on a solid few occasions now that wiping out "debt" to the tune of many billions of dollars, can be done by the literal stroke of a digital pen.
There's is no mathematical reason we cannot have a global debt jubilee - reset without war.
The pain that those who hold "debt", viciously and emotionally demanding that the world pay them NOW or else World War 3 is better, is merely an inner emotional block, another prisoner's dilemma.
The best in the medium term for literally everybody is a global debt jubilee.
And if Lord Rothschild (remember the Fed) decides (and can convince his sons to agree) that a global debt jubilee is to be had, then it shall be had.
One can hope.
Such would be the greatest victory for empathy, righteousness and all that is good.
Such would redeem the last 4000+ years of Jewish usury on the goyim (all those who are not Jewish). Let us forgive and move forward in sanity.
Trump is a deal maker, not a warrior, therefore not the best candidate for God Emperor. But war approaches, and you go with the leader you have, not the leader you want.
Indeed, practicality and all...
As always, remember the Fed.
To this end, Russia.
Russia is the last untouched territory, still resisting to the 'global' system which is now in control of the vast majority of the planet. But despite what you may think, this has very few to do with 'modern Russians', it's a more historical consequence and the result of the past events ... still a "mass" is present there... 'Modern Russia' is vastly awful. A perfect example of social and cultural emptiness, mediocrity and vulgarity. To some extent even far worse than west ... 'Modern Russia' is one thing and 'what still could exist in Russia' is one other thing ... Putin is a middleman, a compromise, a perfect example of modern 'Menshevik'. In other terms a hypocritical political personage whose goal is to keep the illusion alive ... bullshit army with super-weapons made of cheap Chinese parts and vintage songs (very badly interpreted what's more) Until 1991, Marxism-Leninism was ruling in Russia (USSR) ... what they - the communists- achieved and constructed is still there despite the ideology been (purposively) destroyed. There is an intangible "mass" present there, a 'force field' still alive that the other 'mass' of the west is fearing... But All this is now invisible to the common people. The official 'ideology' of Russia is to drink beer, vodka, get girls, go to the nearby mall and buy good products and show to others how rich (sic) you are (well... how good you stole everything 20 years ago) 'Воры и проститутки' ... it's modern Russia.... and all what you will meet there, nothing else. Well among that, every 100,000 of such people there remains one very different of 'them', a straw, a drop of water... and this is the real Russia... invisible.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:51:12PM +0000, таракан wrote:
To this end, Russia.
Russia is the last untouched territory, still resisting to the 'global' system which is now in control of the vast majority of the planet.
But despite what you may think, this has very few to do with 'modern Russians', it's a more historical consequence and the result of the past events ... still a "mass" is present there...
'Modern Russia' is vastly awful. A perfect example of social and cultural emptiness, mediocrity and vulgarity. To some extent even far worse than west ...
'Modern Russia' is one thing and 'what still could exist in Russia' is one other thing ...
Putin is a middleman, a compromise, a perfect example of modern 'Menshevik'. In other terms a hypocritical political personage whose goal is to keep the illusion alive ... bullshit army with super-weapons made of cheap Chinese parts and vintage songs (very badly interpreted what's more)
Until 1991, Marxism-Leninism was ruling in Russia (USSR) ... what they - the communists- achieved and constructed is still there despite the ideology been (purposively) destroyed.
There is an intangible "mass" present there, a 'force field' still alive that the other 'mass' of the west is fearing...
But All this is now invisible to the common people. The official 'ideology' of Russia is to drink beer, vodka, get girls, go to the nearby mall and buy good products and show to others how rich (sic) you are (well... how good you stole everything 20 years ago)
'Воры и проститутки' ... it's modern Russia.... and all what you will meet there, nothing else.
Well among that, every 100,000 of such people there remains one very different of 'them', a straw, a drop of water... and this is the real Russia... invisible.
From foreign view, I do not see hypocrisy of Putin, I just see him make steady steps in the face of great difficulties.
I believe Russia is just getting her feet, barely, with international chains still around her neck - she needs another referendum to release these bonds, then a time of recuperation, and then new life. It is slow from individual perspective unfortunately. There is a deep wisdom in the Russian, enough to not only stay alive after 1991, but to reach today's standing in the world despite relentless Western bullying and financial chains. I pray that Russia shall be consecrated, and rise again, in peace and compassion. This is probably easier to see from the outsider "Westerner" point of view, but the West is a financial crack addict struggling to get home at night time. Russia needs time, and she will have it. 2014 did not become major war. We are still in the balance. We exist. We be.
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:13:38 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 3:06 am, John Newman wrote:
James is a bitter, crazy old fuck, a member of a bunch of dumb assholes who call themselves "neo-reactionaries", who wants to be able to enforce a patriarchy with Donald Trump as the "God Emperor" and....
Democracy has been tried before. It always self destructs
democracy is superior to monarchy...as a tool of oppression. Some of the stuff you write is incredibly stupid. I mean, even a fake libertarian, true fascist like you should know better. democracy is better for the ruling class because the fucktards who vote for politicians (130 millions of fucktards in the american cesspool for instance) believe they are 'self governing' when in reality they are just disposable cogs at the service of govcorp.
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On the contrary, it is totally OK to be rude to white people.
Look at all the murderous hatred spewed against white people on twitter and facebook.
On 2019-08-14 2:22 am, Punk wrote:
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Leftism is defection against near, and alliance with far in order to destroy near. Thus white leftists ally with none whites in order to destroy their nearby white enemies in the pursuit of power. Democrats import non whites to live on crime, welfare, and voting democrat, without thinking beyond the next election. Hatred of white males is the KKKrazy glue that holds the Democratic Party coalition of the fringes together. To seize despotic power and loot the country, you need an enemy, and the deplorables in flyover country have been nominated as the enemy, much as Trotsky nominated the more successful peasants. Without that KKKrazy glue, the mestizo portion of the Democrat coalition would be shooting the black portion of the Democrat coalition in the streets, and the Muslim portion of the Democrat coalition would be tossing the gay portion of the Democrat coalition from high buildings. Thus, for example, the Populares, who wanted a more democratic Roman Empire, allied with the Samnites, who wanted to kill every Roman male and overthrow the walls of Rome. And similarly the Democracy protestors in China ally with the USG state department (far), who want China to return to poverty and chaos. Facebook is controlled by a Jew, and Jews notoriously fail to identify as white, and delusively imagine that the pets that they have affirmative actioned into positions of power will go along with Jews adopting white or nonwhite identity as convenient at any given moment, hence the Jewish enthusiasm for the Islamic conquest of Europe, even though it is obvious that they will be the next to be liquidated. The Jew Trotsky, a failed urban money lender, told the peasants that he too was a peasant, and their real enemy was the kulak, that the enemy of the peasant with one cow was the peasant with two cows. Meanwhile he told the Jews that he too was a Jew, and that together with him, they would murder the peasants - except that he soon noticed it was more lucrative to torture the Jew for hoarded gold coins, than to torture the peasant for buried seed corn, and the disproportionately Jewish Russian communists wound up murdering far more Jews than Hitler did. Trotskyists, who are mostly Jewish, hate Jews more than Nazis do, just as white Democrats hate whites. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 07:17:57AM +0800, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
It is NOT fine to ANY person to be rude, being orange, white, black, yellow, red, green, blue, violet, rainbow, et al.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On the contrary, it is totally OK to be rude to white people.
Look at all the murderous hatred spewed against white people on twitter and facebook.
On 2019-08-14 2:22 am, Punk wrote:
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Leftism is defection against near, and alliance with far in order to destroy near.
Thus white leftists ally with none whites in order to destroy their nearby white enemies in the pursuit of power. Democrats import non whites to live on crime, welfare, and voting democrat, without thinking beyond the next election. Hatred of white males is the KKKrazy glue that holds the Democratic Party coalition of the fringes together. To seize despotic power and loot the country, you need an enemy, and the deplorables in flyover country have been nominated as the enemy, much as Trotsky nominated the more successful peasants.
Without that KKKrazy glue, the mestizo portion of the Democrat coalition would be shooting the black portion of the Democrat coalition in the streets, and the Muslim portion of the Democrat coalition would be tossing the gay portion of the Democrat coalition from high buildings.
Thus, for example, the Populares, who wanted a more democratic Roman Empire, allied with the Samnites, who wanted to kill every Roman male and overthrow the walls of Rome. And similarly the Democracy protestors in China ally with the USG state department (far), who want China to return to poverty and chaos.
Facebook is controlled by a Jew, and Jews notoriously fail to identify as white, and delusively imagine that the pets that they have affirmative actioned into positions of power will go along with Jews adopting white or nonwhite identity as convenient at any given moment, hence the Jewish enthusiasm for the Islamic conquest of Europe, even though it is obvious that they will be the next to be liquidated.
-Surely- you got the memo about it being anti-Semitic to name a the Jews in power? Any PC sheeple should know by now that Jews may not identify much as White, but that the rest of us goy are supposed to identify -them- as White. Sheesh! Back to the Neo-Marxist FaceSlut Ministry for you or it's a lifetime being rectified by the Jewish Googlag!
The Jew Trotsky, a failed urban money lender, told the peasants that he too was a peasant, and their real enemy was the kulak, that the enemy of the peasant with one cow was the peasant with two cows. Meanwhile he told the Jews that he too was a Jew, and that together with him, they would murder the peasants - except that he soon noticed it was more lucrative to torture the Jew for hoarded gold coins, than to torture the peasant for buried seed corn, and the disproportionately Jewish Russian communists wound up murdering far more Jews than Hitler did.
Now that's interesting ... where can we read up on this juicy little snippet of 'istory?
Trotskyists, who are mostly Jewish, hate Jews more than Nazis do, just as white Democrats hate whites.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:17:57 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 2:22 am, Punk wrote:
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Leftism is defection against near, and alliance with far in order to destroy near.
You just make up bullshit as you go james. You were talking about 'whites' and when I presented the obvious fact that 'whites' are the number one enemy of freedom you had to change the script on the fly and switch to 'leftist' whites. So now the question is what the fuck do you mean by 'leftism', because by any common standard, the plutocratic fascists from twitter, facebook, amazon, and all the rest of silicon-valley-US-military-govcorp are anything but left. Ok, I just checked. The 'worth' of the worthless piece of white shit who 'invented' twatter is 4700 millions. Surely the scumbag is a commie. ...and according to wikimierda "he is of english, irish and italian descent - was raised catholic, and his uncle is a catholic priest" (and I don't mean that to defend "the left" in any shape or form. The left are murderous scum...exactly like the right.)
Thus white leftists ally with none whites in order to destroy their nearby white enemies in the pursuit of power.
False. The white fascists from twitter, general electric and raytheon do NOT "ally with non-whites". What they do is drop white phosphorous on non-whites.
Democrats import non whites to live on crime, welfare, and voting democrat,
no, the people who live on welfare are the parasites from wall street and all the rest of american 'industry', which is just a house of cards propped by the government, its wars and inflation of the dollar. And they are all white scum.
Facebook is controlled by a Jew, and Jews notoriously fail to identify as white,
european jews are white, full stop. And although jews are wildly overrepresented in the american nazi empire, they are still a relative minority. So the majority of people running facebook are non-jew whites, while the rest are white jews. Bottom line : A L L W H I T E S.
Trotskyists, who are mostly Jewish, hate Jews more than Nazis do, just as white Democrats hate whites.
ah yes, self hating whites who are 'lefties' with thousands of millions of dollars. Nothing say 'communist' like having 1000 millions dollars. And war is peace.
On 2019-08-15 10:25 am, Punk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:17:57 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 2:22 am, Punk wrote:
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Leftism is defection against near, and alliance with far in order to destroy near.
You just make up bullshit as you go james. You were talking about 'whites' and when I presented the obvious fact that 'whites' are the number one enemy of freedom you had to change the script on the fly and switch to 'leftist' whites.
Your argument is that those imposing second class status on whites are themselves largely white (though a lot of them are Jews that probably do not identify as white) I then explained why white people do this to other white people - for much the same reasons as the the largely Jewish Soviet Communist party disproportionately murdered Jews. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:41:35 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-15 10:25 am, Punk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:17:57 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-14 2:22 am, Punk wrote:
Tell me James, who created and who controls twitter and facebook and all the infrastructure that enables those honeypots? Yeah, it was 'white people'
Leftism is defection against near, and alliance with far in order to destroy near.
You just make up bullshit as you go james. You were talking about 'whites' and when I presented the obvious fact that 'whites' are the number one enemy of freedom you had to change the script on the fly and switch to 'leftist' whites.
Your argument is that those imposing second class status on whites are themselves largely white
Yes. I wouldn't even call it an argument. It's just a plain fact. It's also a plain libertarian fact. There's a class of people - the ruling class - who are above natural law and who call themselves "the government and associated businesses".
(though a lot of them are Jews that probably do not identify as white)
First, the absolute percentage of jews in the ruling class is small though of course it's not small at all compared to the total number of jews. Second, they are for all intents and purposes white europeans. And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
I then explained why white people do this to other white people
No you didn't. You didn't explain, at all, why is there a ruling class.
for much the same reasons as the the largely Jewish Soviet Communist party disproportionately murdered Jews.
except they didn't.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
what
So now the question is what the fuck do you mean by 'leftism', because by any common standard, the plutocratic fascists from twitter, facebook, amazon, and all the rest of silicon-valley-US-military-govcorp are anything but left.
Take a look at a the recently leaked list of sites deranked by Google. Right wing sites are artificially deranked, left wing sites are artificially upranked.
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter. I point out that it's ridiculous to refer to filthy rich assholes as "the left"...and you reply they must be "left" because they censor some "right wingers" ?
Google has a policy of responding to searches by producing politically correct results,
yes, and? (I know why they do that, seems you don't). Also, I would class censorship as something both typically right wing and left wing. In case you didn't get the memo both conservatives and 'progressives' are anti libertarian assholes. Then again your whole non argument is that one of the two identical factions of the american ruling class, the 'democrats', are 'evil leftists' and radically different from their rethuglican mirror image...which is both hilarious and derangedly false.
On 2019-08-15 3:56 pm, Punk wrote:
First, the absolute percentage of jews in the ruling class is small though of course it's not small at all compared to the total number of jews. Second, they are for all intents and purposes white europeans.
When war comes, the brown democrats will see Jews as white Europeans, as you do, but this is going to come as a mighty big shock to a great many Jews. Many, probably most Jews, do not think of themselves as white Europeans. And as we drift towards tribal war, one of the major failure modes of democracy, this matters a lot. People are voting and organizing on race, ethnicity, tribe, and religion, not class. The Holodomor, which murdered about ten million or so, was in substantial part caused by Jewish animus towards Christians. Note also the historical tendency of Jews to back Muslims in the never ending war between Christians and Muslims, even though Jews have only ever prospered under Christian rule. Similarly observe Jewish support for the Islamic conquest of Europe, even though it is absolutely obvious that Muslims are already beginning to expel Jews from Europe. This echoes the similarly self destructive Jewish behavior during the crusades. It always seems to come as shock to Jews when they ally with anti Christian factions, and the anti Christian factions do not ally back. In the crusades, the Jews supported the Muslims, but the Muslims did not support the Jews, a story that the brown Democrats are now re-enacting. And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to? What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they think they belong to.
I then explained why white people do this to other white people
No you didn't. You didn't explain, at all, why is there a ruling class.
There is always a ruling class. The problem is that our ruling class is losing internal cohesion, partly due to tribalization, and partly due to loss of moral character in our ruling class. The purpose of political correctness is to humiliate and degrade by demanding that people accept an obvious lie, thus demonstrating who has the power and who shall submit. Point deer, make horse. https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2015/06/03/the-purpose-of-absurdity/ PC is the opposite of the old honor codes. Instead of an honor code, we have a dishonor code. Instead of compliance testing young potential elite members for courage, honor, and dignity, we compliance test them for cowardice, lying, and groveling. And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
So now the question is what the fuck do you mean by 'leftism', because by any common standard, the plutocratic fascists from twitter, facebook, amazon, and all the rest of silicon-valley-US-military-govcorp are anything but left.
Take a look at a the recently leaked list of sites deranked by Google. Right wing sites are artificially deranked, left wing sites are artificially upranked.
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.
Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution. Left is the party for knocking over the apple cart to grab some apples. They loudly announce that this will produce an abundance of apples, and for a short while it does. Right is the party of order, as exemplified in the French Revolution. When a mysterious apple shortage ensues, they launch a hunt for the witches casting the magic spells causing the mysterious shortage of apples, and a hunt for some more apple carts to knock over. Thus most of the people murdered in the French Revolution were not aristocrats, but rather people accused of "hoarding", "profiteering", and ""price gouging". Typically bakers and peasants. This not only describes socialism, but also such innovations as the sexual revolution and the destruction of marriage. They figured that men would get more sex, but most men are getting less sex. Similarly, about fifty percent of men who transition to the female role suicide, and the rest are mostly working as whores. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
MSNBC tells us most white people need to be destroyed https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/12/msnbc-panelist-white-people-destroy/ When calls for war, mass murder, and mass destruction receive social approval and state backing, war, mass murder, and mass destruction always follows. War is easy, peace is hard, in the sense that falling off a cliff is easy, climbing a cliff is hard. To avoid war, always have crack down on the trouble makers on your own side, and listen to the enemy. Leftists are not listening, and they are not restraining their zealots. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On August 15, 2019 9:02:05 AM PDT, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
MSNBC tells us most white people need to be destroyed
Well they got part of it right. Scumbag Nazis like you need to be destroyed, with malice. Ps. It's a testament to the ineffectually, the endangerment created by non-violent 'action', that the crowd didn't swarm and destroy this piece of human shit's vehicle <http://bayimg.com/daNHjaAgk> as soon as it stopped and the perp hid behind the cops ... like the Snowflake coward he is, leaving him able to do it again at his leisure. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
On August 15, 2019 9:02:05 AM PDT, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
MSNBC tells us most white people need to be destroyed
https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/12/msnbc-panelist-white-people-destroy/
When calls for war, mass murder, and mass destruction receive social approval and state backing, war, mass murder, and mass destruction always follows.
On 2019-08-16 12:44 am, Razer wrote:
Well they got part of it right. Scumbag Nazis like you need to be destroyed, with malice.
Pretty sure that Trump voters are "Scumbag Nazis" also. And the other thirty percent of whites will, their surprise, find that they look like Trump voters. The left murders the King, then they murder the priests and the aristocrats, then there is, surprise surprise, a mysterious grain shortage, and they murder the peasants for ""hoarding" grain and "price gouging" --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 22:58:59 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
When war comes, the brown democrats will see Jews as white Europeans, as you do, but this is going to come as a mighty big shock to a great many Jews.
I don't think so - jews are not that stupid.
Many, probably most Jews, do not think of themselves as white Europeans.
It doesn't matter, that's what they are. The problem with your views is that you as a racist want to explain politics in terms of 'race'. Note that of course there's no jewish race. Jewism is just a pseudo culture.
And as we drift towards tribal war, one of the major failure modes of democracy, this matters a lot. People are voting and organizing on race, ethnicity, tribe, and religion, not class.
Let me restate the obvious fact that you just ignored. Democracy is an even more toxic form of statism BECAUSE it's more efficient...from the point of view of the ruling class.
The Holodomor, which murdered about ten million or so, was in substantial part caused by Jewish animus towards Christians.
that's christian bullshit. Not to mention the obvious fact that christianity has a good deal of jewism in it. So the distinciont between jewism and kkkristianity is mostly irrelevant. A distinction without a difference.
Note also the historical tendency of Jews to back Muslims
jewism, islam and kkkristianity are the same totalitarian garbage. They are all the same from the point of view of libertarianism.
Similarly observe Jewish support for the Islamic conquest of Europe,
which exists only in your mind. Like patriarchy exists only in the mind of feminazis.
And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they think they belong to.
there's no jew race.
I then explained why white people do this to other white people
No you didn't. You didn't explain, at all, why is there a ruling class.
There is always a ruling class.
That of course is not an explanation at all.
The problem is that our ruling class is losing internal cohesion,
That's hilarious. First, the americunt nazi ruling class is at their peak, and their power keeps increasing by the day. Second, if it were true that they are 'losing internal cohesion', how on earth would that be a problem? We should be celebrating! So at this point, I have to rhetorically ask, what class do you think you belong to? And what are your political beliefs? The only reason I ask is because the very first author that shows up on jim.com is Lysander Spooner, but, YOU NEVER READ A WORD HE WROTE. So why waste time mentioning spooner and then adding a bunch of fake libertarians like the rand cunt and hayek? Why don't you fill jim.com with CHRISTIAN MONARCHIC 'literature'. I guess the reason is that you are a fucking fraud. But let's continue.
The purpose of political correctness is to humiliate and degrade by demanding that people accept an obvious lie,
That's a typical feature of totalitarianism, but that's not the reason why fake 'progressives' in the west are 'politically correct'. Try again.
...And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
And why is that a problem for LIBERTARIANS?
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.
Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution.
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it. The left included the LIBERTARIANS, or whoever passed for libertarian. So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
This not only describes socialism, but also such innovations as the sexual revolution and the destruction of marriage.
destruction of marriage only exists in your head.
They figured that men would get more sex, but most men are getting less sex.
that's because what you call "the left" are just recycled puritans. You should love them. The "left" you whine about are exactly the same anti-sex conservative puritan garbage as the right.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
When war comes, the brown democrats will see Jews as white Europeans, as you do, but this is going to come as a mighty big shock to a great many Jews.
On 2019-08-16 4:01 am, Punk wrote:
I don't think so - jews are not that stupid.
They have been exactly that stupid in the Islamisation of France, which they are now fleeing.
Many, probably most Jews, do not think of themselves as white Europeans.
It doesn't matter, that's what they are.
That most of them do not think of themselves as Europeans means they do stupid shit as they did in France. Which matters enough that Jews are fleeing, and have largely fled, France.
The problem with your views is that you as a racist want to explain politics in terms of 'race'. Note that of course there's no Jewish race. Jewism is just a pseudo culture.
Jews vote on their ethnicity, not on their economic class. The problem is not that I am "racist", but that every voting block mobilized by the Democrats is "racist".
And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they think they belong to.
there's no jew race.
Persuade them of that.
So at this point, I have to rhetorically ask, what class do you think you belong to?
Reactionaries don't believe in the Marxist class analysis, neither did Lysander Spooner, whom you claim to be an adherent of. The reactionary class categorization is priests (including professors, the mainstream media, public intellectuals, lawyers, judges, etc) warriors (including officers, soldiers, police, rentacops, mercs, etc) merchants (capitalists, entrepeneurs, businessmen, and such) and the masses. In which categorization I am primarily a merchant, trying out for the priesthood. But I spend more time on merchant stuff.
And what are your political beliefs? The only reason I ask is because the very first author that shows up on jim.com is Lysander Spooner, but, YOU NEVER READ A WORD HE WROTE.
You interpret Lysander Spooner as a commie. I interpret him otherwise. I was an anarcho capitalist, but as tribalism grew, I realized that anarcho capitalism was incapable of defending itself against tribes and religions (defining religions broadly, as I have defined priests broadly, to include communism and progressivism) Something like anarchocapitalism worked in saga period Iceland because it was a state enforced theocracy, and the official religion upheld the right of every man to himself avenge wrongs done to him - the official religion denied the state the monopoly of legitimate of violence. The fragility of that system became apparent when Christianity hit them. I have therefore come to the conclusion that the best system is a long established and stable monarchy, as exemplified by the Emirate of Dubai, and such monarchies can only grow out of military dictatorship. So I now favor military dictatorship, thinly disguised as the Republic, for America, as Augustus become military dictator of Rome, under a thin disguise of the Republic continuing. Which is the usual outcome when democracy self destructs, as it is self destructing now. The outcome I hope for is Holy American Emperor Trump, King under God, but a more likely and more readily achievable outcome is God Emperor Trump. And a far more likely outcome than either of those is a long period of chaos and ruin.
...And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
And why is that a problem for LIBERTARIANS?
One King three thousand miles is a lesser problem than a thousand kings three miles away. The loss of cohesion in the ruling elite leads to anarcho tyranny, not anarcho capitalism. Yesterday I was trying to transfer a sum of money while avoiding tax impact, and one bank thought the legalities worked one way, and the other bank thought the legalities worked a different way, and they could not agree because the laws and regulations are complicated, intrusive, obscure, incomprehensible, there is no one who actually knows what that mean, except that no matter what you do, if they want to charge you with something, they will probably find something to charge you with.
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.4
Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution.
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it.
What the french left supported in place of monarchy, feudalism, and theocracy was terror, mass murder, socialism, total war, and the enlightenment, the enlightenment being a state imposed religion immensely more destructive than Christianity.
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
Dubai. I want liberty. If you want liberty, China is better than the US, but Dubai (Monarchy) and Thailand (Monarchy plus military dictatorship) a lot better than either the US or China. The greatest period of liberty was England from 1660 to 1820, when Kings had real power. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Which matters enough that Jews are fleeing, and have largely fled, France.
nonsense. Your anti-muslim, pro-jew-kristian-nazis rants get tiring - and are wholly irrelevant.
The problem with your views is that you as a racist want to explain politics in terms of 'race'. Note that of course there's no Jewish race. Jewism is just a pseudo culture.
Jews vote on their ethnicity, not on their economic class.
more highly stupid nonsense. According to wikimierda there are 6 millions (HAHA!) jews in the american cesspool. So let's say 3 million jew voters. Completely IRRELEVANT figure. And fuck the jews anyway. Hopefully the fact that jew non-culture is murderous supremacist garbage has been made clear enough.
And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they think they belong to.
there's no jew race.
Persuade them of that.
fuck them. Jewism is a theocratic supremacist mafioso club. Not. A. Race.
So at this point, I have to rhetorically ask, what class do you think you belong to?
Reactionaries don't believe in the Marxist class analysis, neither did Lysander Spooner, whom you claim to be an adherent of.
sonny, I don't subscribe to the marxist 'class analysis'. I subscribe to the LIBERTARIAN class analysis that piece of shit jew marx PLAGIARIZED. here's ONE of the only TWO decent articles that narcho fascist outlet mises.org has https://mises.org/library/classical-liberal-roots-marxist-doctrine-classes educate your-self.
The reactionary class categorization is priests (including professors, the mainstream media, public intellectuals, lawyers, judges, etc) warriors (including officers, soldiers, police, rentacops, mercs, etc) merchants (capitalists, entrepeneurs, businessmen, and such) and the masses.
In which categorization I am primarily a merchant, trying out for the priesthood. But I spend more time on merchant stuff.
you are either a member of the govcorp mafia (and you probably are), or else you're poor and a victim of the crimes commited by govcorp. So yeah, I'll assume you're an americunt govcorp criminal. As a matter of fact your fascist propaganda makes you a moral accomplice of them, even if you're not stealing, torturing and killing like your americunt govcorp officers do.
And what are your political beliefs? The only reason I ask is because the very first author that shows up on jim.com is Lysander Spooner, but, YOU NEVER READ A WORD HE WROTE.
You interpret Lysander Spooner as a commie. I interpret him otherwise.
I don't 'interpret' him as a commie, and I'm not a commie either. You as a fascist clown are the obvious commie. Any retard who gets the A of the ABC of political theory knows that trumpist totalitarianism IS practical communism. Look at the 18 TRILLIONS bank bailout. That's communism. So I stand by what I said : you NEVER read a SINGLE WORD that spooner wrote. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spooner-a-plan-for-the-abolition-of-slave... Educate yourself. That's spooner who correctly wanted to make piece-of-shit slave owners pay for their crimes. Such a commie.
Something like anarchocapitalism worked in saga period Iceland
LMAO! You are an ignoramus parroting the garbage that fascist jew friedman invented. Iceland was a SLAVE SOCIETY at that time and run by FUCKING PIRATES. THE THIEVING, MURDERING VIKINGS. But hey, maybe that's as far as your 'understanding' of 'freedom' goes.
because it was a state enforced theocracy,
Just read the nonsense you write. Iceland was 'anarchistic', THEOCRATIC and state enforced. Get a dictionary.
I have therefore come to the conclusion that the best system is a long established and stable monarchy,
So, change your piece of shit website to reflect your Newfound High Knowledge.
...And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
And why is that a problem for LIBERTARIANS?
One King three thousand miles is a lesser problem than a thousand kings three miles away. The loss of cohesion in the ruling elite leads to anarcho tyranny, not anarcho capitalism. Yesterday I was trying to transfer a sum of money while avoiding tax impact, and one bank thought the legalities worked one way, and the other bank thought the legalities worked a different way, and they could not agree because the laws and regulations are complicated, intrusive, obscure, incomprehensible, there is no one who actually knows what that mean, except that no matter what you do, if they want to charge you with something, they will probably find something to charge you with.
yes, that's how statism works. It has nothing to do with 'democracy'.
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.4
Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution.
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it.
What the french left supported in place of monarchy, feudalism, and theocracy
By the way, do you know that the americunt 'revolution' and the french revolution were basically the same scam? With more than a few of the same clowns involved in both, and the french monarchy bankrolling the americunts? OOPS. So what's your take on the americunt 'revolution'? I guess you DON"T support it, so you are moving BACK TO ENGLAND? If you are a monarchist you must realize that the americunt government is illegitimate and the king of england the rightful owner of the 'land' and the people in it.
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
I want liberty.
No you don't. And answer the question. Why does your piece of shit site mention libertarians and pseudo libertarians instead of CHRISTIAN MONARCHISTS.
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
I want liberty.
On 2019-08-16 2:36 pm, Punk wrote:
No you don't.
I wander the world to avoid the impact of states, and of the three countries where I have found the most freedom, two have kings, and the third has a president equipped with death squads. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
HI James and punk. Please take a breather you have been going for days have glass water and relax. -------- Original Message -------- On Aug 16, 2019, 8:11 AM, wrote:
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
I want liberty.
On 2019-08-16 2:36 pm, Punk wrote:
No you don't.
I wander the world to avoid the impact of states, and of the three countries where I have found the most freedom, two have kings, and the third has a president equipped with death squads.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Interrupt serious talk with random noise and lols... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stjOxJuZfx4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bLmgUgPR58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ejj7XJHHJE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa1w_ew0HgE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-HXB0DQWFE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goUG-GZX9os https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oGKXIibAD8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v61Z3ZvDyRo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjWTVqOmaXk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIAvjD9rd8k
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:11:53PM +0800, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
I want liberty.
On 2019-08-16 2:36 pm, Punk wrote:
No you don't.
I wander the world to avoid the impact of states, and of the three countries where I have found the most freedom, two have kings, and the third has a president equipped with death squads.
Have a personal friend with a factory in China - comments that general liberty to travel (e.g. drive) and do what you choose within the country is notably above various such "liberties" in Australia. For one example police officers are stationed at busy intersections and don't stop anybody, regardless of speeding, running red lights, etc - only if there's an accident the police will charge you if you were the one running the red light.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:41:15 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
If you want liberty, China is better than the US,
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US, unless you're thieving scum from wall street. China seems to be rather fucked up though.
but Dubai (Monarchy)
lawl..
and Thailand (Monarchy plus military dictatorship) a lot better
nice thing about thailand is that prostitution is more 'tolerated' and there are no piece of shit jew-kkkristians. Apart from that, I expect thailand to be under the rule of jew-kristian anglo-american scum, associated with the local oligarchy. thailand's version of the americunt 'war on drugs' seems to be especially unhinged. anyway, freedom rankings are mostly pointless. Though I'd certainly choose the east over the jew-kkkristian western cesspool any time.
I wander the world to avoid the impact of states, and of the three countries where I have found the most freedom, two have kings, and the third has a president equipped with death squads.
1) your testimony has little value 2) correlation is not causation anyway
If you want liberty, China is better than the US,
On 2019-08-17 6:10 am, Punk wrote:
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where? In England and Europe you get thrown in jail for thought crimes that in the US would merely result in HR having you fired. What countries do you have in mind as more free than the US? I named several. Name a few. The US is as free or freer than any white country, considerably more free than any other democracy, considerably more free than Western Europe, England, Australia, or New Zealand. If you have counter example, name it.
nice thing about thailand is that prostitution is more 'tolerated' and there are no piece of shit jew-kkkristians. Apart from that, I expect thailand to be under the rule of jew-kristian anglo-american scum, associated with the local oligarchy.
Your expectations are incorrect.
thailand's version of the americunt 'war on drugs' seems to be especially unhinged.
I can buy testosterone there. Cannot buy it in the US. Cops there are courteous. Airport security helpful and friendly rather than jackbooted thugs. I can say anything in Thailand except that I cannot disrespect the King. I can even disrespect the state religion provided I do not do so in a holy place. And illegal drugs seem to be readily available, though I find legal drugs more than adequate. I have been to these places. It is obvious that you have not. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:54:59 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
If you want liberty, China is better than the US,
On 2019-08-17 6:10 am, Punk wrote:
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where?
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
In England and Europe you get thrown in jail for thought crimes that in the US would merely result in HR having you fired.
I never said europe was better...in that regard. It is no doubt worse in a few ways.
What countries do you have in mind as more free than the US? I named several. Name a few.
see above.
The US is as free or freer than any white country,
like I said I won't bother with rankings. But, the US has the highest incarceration on the planet. I suspect that counts for something.
nice thing about thailand is that prostitution is more 'tolerated' and there are no piece of shit jew-kkkristians. Apart from that, I expect thailand to be under the rule of jew-kristian anglo-american scum, associated with the local oligarchy.
Your expectations are incorrect.
which ones.
thailand's version of the americunt 'war on drugs' seems to be especially unhinged.
I can buy testosterone there. Cannot buy it in the US.
So? https://www.thethailandlife.com/thailand-drug-laws-facts-visit
Cops there are courteous. Airport security helpful and friendly rather than jackbooted thugs. I can say anything in Thailand except that I cannot disrespect the King.
Do you speak thai? As to cops being better, again, if you're comparing then to the americunt nazis your bar can hardly be lower...
I can even disrespect the state religion provided I do not do so in a holy place. And illegal drugs seem to be readily available, though I find legal drugs more than adequate.
I have been to these places. It is obvious that you have not.
That's right. Still, there's no reason to believe your reports. And regardless whatever is better in thailand is NOT explained because of 'monarchy'. So please stop wasting your and my time.
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where?
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
Most of those are blacks, and most of those blacks are descended from those that their home country did not want wandering around for much the same reasons as we do not want their descendants wandering around. The incarceration rate for whites is similar to that of most white countries.
The US is as free or freer than any white country,
like I said I won't bother with rankings.
What white countries have you been to? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 2019-08-17 8:41 am, Punk wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 08:35:38 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
What white countries have you been to?
anwers my questions - do you speak thai?
No I don't speak Thai. Now. Which countries have you been to? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:05:20 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-17 8:41 am, Punk wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 08:35:38 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
What white countries have you been to?
anwers my questions - do you speak thai?
No I don't speak Thai.
...so it would be rather hard for you to exercise your right to free speech in the kingdom of Siam. ...and I think the discussion is pretty much over. I'll invoke again the 'authority' of old Molinari, who explains here how monarchy and communism are pretty much the same system. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2019-August/076040.html Whole essay here : http://jim.com/Molinari.htm But of course, if you have a shred of intellectual honesty left in you, you are going to delete all that stuff and replace it with a good, nice, MONARCHO CHRISTIANO FASCIST 'home page'. ps: more than a few european countries are monarchies. And yet you claim the US is better. Tsk tsk. (sweden, the united cesspool, I mean UK, and spain, off the top of my head).
Now. Which countries have you been to?
ask the NSA.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 2019-08-17 9:22 am, Punk wrote:
ps: more than a few european countries are monarchies. And yet you claim the US is better. Tsk tsk. (sweden, the united cesspool, I mean UK, and spain, off the top of my head).
None of these are real monarchies, where the monarch exercises real power. And you still have not told me what countries you have been to, from which I conclude that you have not been to any of them. And you seem to think that Molinari is some kind of commie. He is not. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:32:04 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
On 2019-08-17 9:22 am, Punk wrote:
ps: more than a few european countries are monarchies. And yet you claim the US is better. Tsk tsk. (sweden, the united cesspool, I mean UK, and spain, off the top of my head).
None of these are real monarchies, where the monarch exercises real power.
Yeah that's another thing. Real monarchs don't have any real power. Never ever did. There's only one form of government : oligarchy. An organized gang of criminals and 'merchants' attacking disorganized people. Again this is a fundamental fact of both political theory and political reality.
And you still have not told me what countries you have been to, from which I conclude that you have not been to any of them.
And what difference would that make? You think people who visit disneyland become experts on americunt history? And yanks who visit thailand and don't speak the language actually know anything about thailand? LMAO.
And you seem to think that Molinari is some kind of commie. He is not.
When and where did I suggest that? Your mind reading skills are even worse than your grasp of political philosophy. I know that molinari was a liberal, an anarchist and had conservative (and thus fucked up) views on war. I know that because I actuall READ him. So again, what part you don't get when molinari makes it painfully clear that commies and feudalists like you, are two sides of the same coin? And that liberalism exists in oppostion to both? Quote AGAIN : " THE REGIME OF TERROR Suppose nevertheless that the partisans of an artificial organization, either the monopolists or the communists, are right; that society is not naturally organized, and that the task of making and unmaking the laws that regulate society continuously devolves upon men, look in what a lamentable situation the world would find itself. The moral authority of governors rests, in reality, on the self-interest of the governed. The latter having a natural tendency to resist anything harmful to their self-interest, unacknowledged authority would continually require the help of physical force. The monopolist and the communists, furthermore, completely understand this necessity. If anyone, says M. de Maistre, attempts to detract from the authority of God’s chosen ones, let him be turned over to the secular power, let the hangman perform his office. If anyone does not recognize the authority of those chosen by the people, say the theoreticians of the school of Rousseau, if he resists any decision whatsoever of the majority, let him be punished as an enemy of the sovereign people, let the guillotine perform justice. These two schools, which both take artificial organization as their point of departure, necessarily lead to the same conclusion: TERROR. " END QUOTE. You seem to have reading comprehension issues jim. Go find a 'private' tutor and pay him to teach how to read. And if you still have trouble understanding ingrish, here's the french original hi hi hi FRENCH QUOTE "Mais admettez que les partisans d'une organisation factice, monopoleurs ou communistes, aient raison; que la société ne soit point naturellement organisée, et qu'aux hommes incombe incessamment la tâche de faire et de défaire les lois qui la régissent, voyez dans quelle lamentable situation se trouvera le monde. L'autorité morale des gouvernants ne s'appuyant, en réalité, que sur l'intérêt des gouvernés, et ceux-ci ayant une naturelle tendance à résister à tout ce qui blesse leur intérêt, il faudra que la force matérielle prête incessamment secours à l'autorité méconnue. Monopoleurs et communistes ont, du reste, parfaitement compris cette nécessité. Si quelqu'un, dit M. de Maistre, essaye de se soustraire à l'autorité des élus de Dieu, qu'il soit livré au bras séculier, que le bourreau fasse son office. Si quelqu'un méconnaît l'autorité des élus du peuple, disent les théoriciens de l'école de Rousseau, s'il résiste à une décision quelconque de la majorité, qu'il soit puni comme criminel envers le peuple souverain, que l'échafaud en fasse justice. Ces deux écoles, qui prennent pour point de départ l'organisation factice, aboutissent donc nécessairement au même terme, à la TERREUR."
On 2019-08-17 2:59 pm, Punk wrote:
None of these are real monarchies, where the monarch exercises real power.
Real monarchs don't have any real power.
The King of the emirate of Dubai, the land of which Dubai is the capital, quite obviously exercises real power, Dubai is largely his personal property, and Dubai is, for its citizens, and for the better sort of people among its non citizen majority, the most free country in the world (for other non citizens, not so free) The King of Thailand exercises a lot of power, though less than the King of Dubai. He has to accommodate the military, but the military have to accommodate him. You are free to say bad things about the military, but the one substantial restriction on freedom in Thailand is that you are not free to say bad things about the King.
Never ever did. There's only one form of government : oligarchy. An organized gang of criminals and 'merchants'
That is Commie class theory, that capitalism is rule by the capitalist class. Merchants never rule. We are always ruled by priests or warriors, and currently ruled by priests. Reactionary class theory: https://blog.jim.com/politics/reaction-101-priests-and-warriors --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 11:32:24 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
Never ever did. There's only one form of government : oligarchy. An organized gang of criminals and 'merchants'
That is Commie class theory, that capitalism is rule by the capitalist class.
Again no. You are the only commie here - a right wing commie, aka a fascist. Rule by the government and its accomplices in the 'private' sector is known as mercantilism and the very thing that libertarians oppose. You keep showing you're an ignorant fascist constantly playing dumb. This has been game over for you for a long while sonny. Here for instance is that adam smith guy pointing out what kind of pieces of shit merchants are "Our merchants and master manufacturers complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby lessening the sale of their goods, both at home and abroad. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits ; they are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains; they complain only of those of other people."
Merchants never rule.
Of course they do. Merchants tell politicians to manufacture laws to enrich them both and steal from the consumers. Again, A of the ABC of political economy. Again adam fucking smith : "But the cruellest of our revenue laws, I will venture to affirm, are mild and gentle in comparison of some of those which the clamour of our merchants and manufacturers has extorted from the legislature for the support of their own absurd and oppressive monopolies. Like the laws of Draco, these laws may be said to be all written in blood. " "Whenever the legislature attempts to regulate the differences between masters and their workmen, its counsellors are always the masters. When the regulation, therefore, is in favour of the workmen, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters. Thus the law which obliges the masters in several different trades to pay their workmen in money, and not in goods, is quite just and equitable." "When masters combine together, in order to reduce the wages of their workmen, they commonly enter into a private bond or agreement, not to give more than a certain wage, under a certain penalty. Were the workmen to enter into a contrary combination of the same kind, not to accept of a certain wage, under a certain penalty, the law would punish them very severely; and, if it dealt impartially, it would treat the masters in the same manner. " -- but of course it doesn't. bottom line james : you are an ignorant piece of anti-libertarian, fascist shit.
On August 17, 2019 12:35:38 AM UTC, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where?
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
Most of those are blacks, and most of those blacks are descended from those that their home country did not want wandering around for much the same reasons as we do not want their descendants wandering around.
You're so fucking disingenuous, or maybe just so fucking stupid, you don't think the effects of enslavement have rippled out to the modern day? There's a reason black people are over represented in things like extrajudicial killings (murder by pig), and incarceration, and those reasons are (a) racist assholes like you and (b) a system that already grinds the little guy down has ground the little black guy even harder for even longer, with no appreciation for the fact that the wealth of these "United States" were built on the bloody whipped backs of those self same people.
The incarceration rate for whites is similar to that of most white countries.
The US is as free or freer than any white country,
like I said I won't bother with rankings.
What white countries have you been to?
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:19:53AM +0000, John Newman wrote:
On August 17, 2019 12:35:38 AM UTC, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where?
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
Most of those are blacks, and most of those blacks are descended from those that their home country did not want wandering around for much the same reasons as we do not want their descendants wandering around.
You're so fucking disingenuous, or maybe just so fucking stupid, you don't think the effects of enslavement have rippled out to the modern day?
Come on John - that's a change of topic, so a bit of a straw man. Your 'arguments' will be received much more powerfully if you begin with acknowledgment of that part of your opponents 'argument' which you are able to acknowledge - reactionary topic changing suggests to the reader that you may be close to unable to assess (rationally that is) both sides of the argument you just pounded into emotionally - it's an easy thing to do, just as well --I'd-- never do that :D
There's a reason black people are over represented in things like extrajudicial killings (murder by pig), and incarceration,
We have a lot of bad laws. We jave some bad cops. We have many self serving politicians, and an administration (behind the politicians) which operates mostly in the murky shadows. For your argument that 'murder by pig' is supposedly significant (at least, to any discerning reader), you'd have to separate the actual statistics/ ratios, per race, per locality, for both sides of such shootings, and for both directions of such shootings - 'murder of pig' is the other direction. Only THEN can you normalise (if you have the statistical ability) for the delta between specific cases. Without doing this, you're emotionally handwaving or reacting. If you did do that, or found someone who has done that, this would be positively intriguing information - or at least something much close to information than your above spouting. There is a very simple stat which has been memed prodigiously in the last few "TDS" years - the murder rate, for blacks and whites, and by whom - blacks murder at an extremely high rate, and murder their own at similarly high rates. The testosterone of the black man is notably higher than (at least modern) white man. Combine this fact with a bunch of bullshit laws such as smoking and selling weed being "illegal; to jail sonny" and that testosterone in the blacks flairs up in particularly unfortunately useless ways like shooting one another, rather than uniting, forming their own local sanity coalitions... whitey appears to have a consistent advantage when it comes to strategic thinking.
and those reasons are (a) racist assholes like you
That's meaningless, emotionally reactive "leftist" crap.
and (b) a system that already grinds the little guy down
This is a very agreeable assertion. Pathetic laws which consistently advantage fake persons such as corporations, and the wealthy and powerful oligarchs.
has ground the little black guy even harder for even longer,
You really (seriously) should take in some african "immigrants" (fresh off a boat), and put them up in a spare room, sunroom, tent, whatever - especially islamic Africans fresh off the boat, especially if you have young children sharing your home, especially if those young or teenaged children are female. Enjoy the "love" John, enjoy the love and utopia of peaceful and inspiring miscegenating heavenly love, banging down your beaten sorry cracka arse. Would be very fitting that - may be smack some wake up sense into you, get a dose of the true bullshit we've been programmed to believe.
with no appreciation for the fact that the wealth of these "United States" were built on the bloody whipped backs of those self same people.
Local African king or warlord is offered gold for some of his own, regularly. The high testosterone rowdy males who step over their own tribal line (within their own dang localities and people even) are often offered the choice - go work for cracka in the New World, or we will point the bone at you | burn you alive | run you out of the tribe. Fine choice - what a great option indeed, go to the new world, possibly make a life their. So, some form of convict in other words. Remember, white Irish slaves were the first slaves in America... Anyway, in our own way we probably all wish the world was simpler - more black and white (no pun intended). Due to the limits of data collection and corresponding statistical analysis, we shall likely never know the true % of those slaves who were criminals vs "undesirable for non criminal reasons" or those just plain kidnapped "in coastal raids" into the slave trade by the (arguably largely Jewish) slavers or slave traders (la sluttie Wikkie do not seem to explain this part, simply using the term "Western European slave traders", so reader beware): Atlantic slave trade https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade Slavery in the colonial United States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_colonial_United_States African Slave Trade Patrol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Slave_Trade_Patrol I used to have a less politically slanted link than Wikipedia but cannot locate that atm... David Duke for example cites a book written by an orthodox Jewish rabbi, Rabbi Van de Kamp, published in 2013: Jewish Role in African Slave Trade Admitted by Rabbi in New Jewish Book https://davidduke.com/jewish-role-african-slave-trade-highlighted-new-dutch-... A seemingly well written but unattributed article refutes at least some of the "Jews were predominant in the early modern slave trade" position, although without addressing the above book in particular: Jews and the African Slave Trade https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
The incarceration rate for whites is similar to that of most white countries.
The US is as free or freer than any white country,
like I said I won't bother with rankings.
What white countries have you been to?
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:03:38AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:19:53AM +0000, John Newman wrote:
... laws ... has ground the little black guy even harder for even longer,
You really (seriously) should take in some african "immigrants" (fresh off a boat), and put them up in a spare room, sunroom, tent, whatever - especially islamic Africans fresh off the boat, especially if you have young children sharing your home, especially if those young or teenaged children are female.
Enjoy the "love" John, enjoy the love and utopia of peaceful and inspiring miscegenating heavenly love, banging down your beaten sorry cracka arse. Would be very fitting that - may be smack some wake up sense into you, get a dose of the true bullshit we've been programmed to believe.
OK, John "walk the talk, I ain't no pussy whipped talker muffa" Newman is our up front and deeply personal example du jour for "if you say it must be done, YOU must personally do it" slavery reparator. This is the anarchy "f#@k government" list after all John. John, for your dignity, you have no option bro, you MUST take in some (more than one) young male slavery reparation African boat Muslims seeking nuthin but a better dindoo life in the New World. We just -know- Salvini'll thank you :) You have a duty to your ancestors John, to your family and most importantly to the cypherpunks list you personally hail from, to personally do that which you want others to do - you MUST set the example John, or forEVER henseforth be known as John "The Cowardly Hypocrite" Newman... We remain riveted to your weekly reports. What shall it be now? Hypocrite or hailed reparator?
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:03:38 +1000 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:19:53AM +0000, John Newman wrote:
On August 17, 2019 12:35:38 AM UTC, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
your bar is pretty low. Majority of countries are better than the US,
Where?
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
Most of those are blacks, and most of those blacks are descended from those that their home country did not want wandering around for much the same reasons as we do not want their descendants wandering around.
You're so fucking disingenuous, or maybe just so fucking stupid, you don't think the effects of enslavement have rippled out to the modern day?
Come on John - that's a change of topic, so a bit of a straw man.
Nah, John's comment is spot on. I didn't bother replying to yet another despicable vomit from her majesty donald but chose to ignore it as just more racist provocation. That said, her majesty's comment show that he's a worthless piece of racist shit who deserves to end up tortured by his beloved americunt government.
There's a reason black people are over represented in things like extrajudicial killings (murder by pig), and incarceration,
We have a lot of bad laws.
We jave some bad cops.
haha hilarious. 'some' bad cops. Hey, the only good cops are dead cops.
and those reasons are (a) racist assholes like you
That's meaningless, emotionally reactive "leftist" crap.
LMAO. Go suck some 'good' cop cock.
US has the highest incarceration rate on the planet. Any country is freer than the US. Next.
Most of those are blacks, and most of those blacks are descended from those that their home country did not want wandering around for much the same reasons as we do not want their descendants wandering around.
You're so fucking disingenuous, or maybe just so fucking stupid, you don't think the effects of enslavement have rippled out to the modern day?
Nuts. Subsaharan Africans in Africa, who never experienced slavery, behave worse than whites, (check the murder rates) and some kinds of Africans behave worse than others. While subsaharan Africans are inherently worse behaved than whites, there is a marked difference between those who came here as slaves, and those who came here under their own power. When those blacks that sold their brethren to us migrate to the US under their own power, they and their children are far better behaved than the descendants of those that they sold, even though their children are raised in exactly the same environment. The problem is obviously a genetic propensity to bad conduct, a propensity considerably worse among the those descended from those who got enslaved for hunting other people's cattle and gathering from other people's gardens. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On August 17, 2019 8:42:21 PM PDT, SomeRacistScum wrote:
When those blacks that sold their brethren to us migrate to the US under their own power, they and their children are far better behaved than the descendants of those that they sold, even though their children are raised in exactly the same environment.
Affluent people are known to be socially conforming weasels, and terrorists are known to grow from the ground where innocent blood is spilled. The ethnic aspect is nonexistent in your argument. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
Right and left were defined in the French Revolution.
On 2019-08-16 4:01 am, Punk wrote:
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it. The left included the LIBERTARIANS, or whoever passed for libertarian.
The left immediately started issuing lots of fiat money, imposed price controls, and engaged in mass conscription. I don't much like your version of libertarianism. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:18:01 +0800 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
Right and left were defined in the French Revolution.
On 2019-08-16 4:01 am, Punk wrote:
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it. The left included the LIBERTARIANS, or whoever passed for libertarian.
The left immediately started issuing lots of fiat money, imposed price controls, and engaged in mass conscription.
no that was monarchist JOHN LAW in MONARCHSIT FRANCE, IN 1700 "In 1716 Law established the Banque Générale, a private bank, in France and that one year later was nationalised, at John Law's request to become the Banque Royale, the first Central Bank of France. " and by the way, you stupid liar, I didn't mean that the socialists and libertarians during the french revolution were the same party. I only pointed out that both sat 'on the left' and that both opposed monarchy.
I don't much like your version of libertarianism.
Too bad my version is the real deal. And of course you don't like it. You are, after all, an american. You don't know what freedom means.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
wow - so much cypherpunk sophistication
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:18:01 +0800
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
Right and left were defined in the French Revolution.
On 2019-08-16 4:01 am, Punk wrote:
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it. The left included the LIBERTARIANS, or whoever passed for libertarian.
jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
The left immediately started issuing lots of fiat money, imposed price controls, and engaged in mass conscription.
On 2019-08-16 2:47 pm, Punk wrote:
and by the way, you stupid liar, I didn't mean that the socialists and libertarians during the french revolution were the same party. I only pointed out that both sat 'on the left' and that both opposed monarchy.
The people you are calling libertarians are those who opposed price controls on grain. Events proved that it was a disastrous idea for them to sit on the left, as the left implemented the reverse of their policies, and executed large numbers of them. For two hundred and fifty years, libertarians have been kissing up to the left, and for two hundred and fifty years, the left has responded with brutal violence. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
so let me quote two authors that james links but never read Molinari : "As once happened in England, monopoly for the benefit of one caste, and then in the name of a certain class of society, was finally replaced by communal production. The consumers as a whole, behaving like shareholders, named a director responsible for supervising the actions of the director and of his administration. We will content ourselves with making one simple observation on the subject of this new regime. Just as the monopoly on security logically had to spawn universal monopoly, so communistic security must logically spawn universal communism. In reality, we have a choice of two things: Either communistic production is superior to free production, or it is not. If it is, then it must be for all things, not just for security. If not, progress requires that it be replaced by free production. Complete communism or complete liberty: that is the alternative! " james is of course wholly in the statist-monopolistic-communist camp. Spooner : "The question still remains, how comes such a thing as "a nation" to exist? How do millions of men, scattered over an extensive territory --- each gifted by nature with individual freedom; required by the law of nature to call no man, or body of men, his masters; authorized by that law to seek his own happiness in his own way, to do what he will with himself and his property, so long as he does not trespass upon the equal liberty of others; authorized also, by that law, to defend his own rights, and redress his own wrongs; and to go to the assistance and defence of any of his fellow men who may be suffering any kind of injustice --- how do millions of such men come to be a nation, in the first place? How is it that each of them comes to be stripped of his natural, God-given rights, and to be incorporated, compressed, compacted, and consolidated into a mass with other men, whom he never saw; with whom he has no contract; and towards many of whom he has no sentiments but fear, hatred, or contempt? How does he become subjected to the control of men like himself, who, by nature, had no authority over him; but who command him to do this, and forbid him to do that, as if they were his sovereigns, and he their subject; and as if their wills and their interests were the only standards of his duties and his rights; and who compel him to submission under peril of confiscation, imprisonment, and death? Clearly all this is the work of force, or fraud, or both."
On 2019-08-15 10:25 am, Punk wrote:
So now the question is what the fuck do you mean by 'leftism', because by any common standard, the plutocratic fascists from twitter, facebook, amazon, and all the rest of silicon-valley-US-military-govcorp are anything but left.
Take a look at a the recently leaked list of sites deranked by Google. Right wing sites are artificially deranked, left wing sites are artificially upranked. Google has a policy of responding to searches by producing politically correct results, even image searches for couples will systematically uprank mixed race couples, image searches for high status profession will systematically uprank images of members of the profession that belong to official victim groups. You tube, similarly, purges and artificially deranks politically incorrect videos. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Believe me, "white people are not second class citizens."
Sarah Jeong issued, over many years, an enormous pile of tweets expressing hatred of white people, and among those tweets a few expressing intent to murder all white people. Naturally she was appointed to the editorial board of the New York Times. Needless to say this appointment has been stoutly defended by every goodthinking leftist, though I see some white male leftists showing symptoms of mental breakdown, their mask of sanity slipping. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
In the past year, all of the following headlines have appeared, in well-read publications: * The White Guy Problem * White Men Must be Stopped: The Very Future of Mankind Depends on It * I Don’t Know What To Do With Good White People * Ten Things White People Need To Stop Saying * Dear White People: Here’s a List of Things We’d Wish You’d Stop Doing What is new is the direct indictment of white people as a race. This happened through a strange rhetorical transformation over the past few years. At first, “white men are our greatest threat” postings tended to be ironic, a way of putting the racist shoe on the other foot. They were meant to show that blaming an entire race for the harmful actions of a few individuals is senseless. Then the tenor changed. What started as irony turned into an actual belief that white people, specifically white men, are more dangerous and immoral than any other people, and that systematic state discrimination against them is therefore moral, necessary, virtuous, and deserved. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Points well taken, and the same way soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen are indoctrinated to killing people, provided legal protection and honored with medals for murder (megadeath is best), for ideological purposes. The enemy is not like us, they are inhuman. Vivid examples abound, herewith: slide shows, video games, talking heads, armaments parades, headline gorey news. Militarize your country, home and self, open carry, dress in uniforms, wave torches, spray AKs: Bloodletting is strength, bloodlessness is weakness. So taught too are hyper-sexualized cammied hunters, freedom fighters, terrorists, fanatics, psychotics, loonies desiring respect and obedience, NRA erotic massagers. At 10:49 AM 8/13/2019, you wrote:
In the past year, all of the following headlines have appeared, in well-read publications:
* The White Guy Problem * White Men Must be Stopped: The Very Future of Mankind Depends on It * I Donât Know What To Do With Good White People * Ten Things White People Need To Stop Saying * Dear White People: Hereâs a List of Things Weâd Wish Youâd Stop Doing
What is new is the direct indictment of white people as a race. This happened through a strange rhetorical transformation over the past few years. At first, âwhite men are our greatest threatâ postings tended to be ironic, a way of putting the racist shoe on the other foot. They were meant to show that blaming an entire race for the harmful actions of a few individuals is senseless.
Then the tenor changed. What started as irony turned into an actual belief that white people, specifically white men, are more dangerous and immoral than any other people, and that systematic state discrimination against them is therefore moral, necessary, virtuous, and deserved.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 11:49 <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
In the past year, all of the following headlines have appeared, in well-read publications:
* The White Guy Problem * White Men Must be Stopped: The Very Future of Mankind Depends on It * I Don’t Know What To Do With Good White People * Ten Things White People Need To Stop Saying * Dear White People: Here’s a List of Things We’d Wish You’d Stop Doing
Jeez, your country is pretty strange! Ugh, radical SJWs give me allergic crisis! :P I am deeply sorry about these ridiculous statements and this fake politically correct world. White cis men never were the problem. Racism, bigotry, and all kinds of discrimination are the problem.
On 2019-08-13 4:14 pm, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Hey! Did you notice most of the serial killers around the whole world are white like you? ;)
That is because only white killers are sufficiently competent to get away with it time after time after time. Far more blacks are killers than whites are killers. Far more whites are murdered by blacks than blacks are murdered by whites. A black man is safe in white district. A white man is not safe in black district.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 11:32 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
Ps. I LUV it when the pigs do their job right (by accident ofc) and snuff rich little white supremacist punks.
My darling, Please, ignore that Australian eternal fire garbage. No heart, no soul, no music, or poetry. No useful comments or news about interesting subjects. He only brings hate and discord to this list, to this world. Sometimes, life becomes lighter and more pleasant using filters and avoiding to spend time giving attention to hateful people. Z. is so proud of being a "white man" and his skin is much darker than mine (3 shades, at least), a Japanese girl living in a pretty hot tropical country. I bet a simple and cheap 23andMe DNA Test will show us he has Black, Muslim, and Jewish blood too. It would be a honor for me, not a shame. Take care, Rr... <3 c.
The rich white punks. http://bayimg.com/OANglaaGK Ps. "In San Jose, a Different Approach to Gun Control" https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/us/san-jose-mayor-gun-insurance.html San Jose's mayor suggests liability insurance for guns. NOTHING different here. Making guns more expensive to own just means more poor people will be disarmed, but a rich kid from the 'burbs who actually has a spare $1,500 dollars kicking around can still buy a Bushmaster to shoot up a garlic festival or threaten a WalMart (see the pic). You can bet the insurance will be exorbitantly expensive or perhaps even unavailable in high-crime neighborhoods. You know... where people actually need them because the police ALWAYS put most of their manpower where the money and people who have it are. -Rr Excuuuse my brevity. Not. On August 13, 2019 12:35:58 AM PDT, Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 11:32 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being
'white
people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
Ps. I LUV it when the pigs do their job right (by accident ofc) and snuff rich little white supremacist punks.
My darling,
Please, ignore that Australian eternal fire garbage. No heart, no soul, no music, or poetry. No useful comments or news about interesting subjects. He only brings hate and discord to this list, to this world. Sometimes, life becomes lighter and more pleasant using filters and avoiding to spend time giving attention to hateful people.
Z. is so proud of being a "white man" and his skin is much darker than mine (3 shades, at least), a Japanese girl living in a pretty hot tropical country. I bet a simple and cheap 23andMe DNA Test will show us he has Black, Muslim, and Jewish blood too. It would be a honor for me, not a shame.
Take care, Rr... <3
c.
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:32:12 -0700 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
ah, when you say "nazis" you don't include all your fellow, white, european, jew-facists. And you don't include all the anglo-american, white, 'lefty' fascists. your definition of nazi is pretty selective eh.
Ps. I LUV it when the pigs do their job right (by accident ofc) and snuff rich little white supremacist punks.
what about rich little european jews?
Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
Pic attacked. Some comedy for ya, Tazer: http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/memetic-monday-dog-days-of-dog-whistles/ http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/memetic-tuesday-reluctant-relinquishment/ On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:32:12AM -0700, Razer wrote:
No. Not really. Not ALL 'white people'. Just people who think being 'white people' gives them some privilege or another. IOW It's open season on Nazis. Snowflake.
Ps. I LUV it when the pigs do their job right (by accident ofc) and snuff rich little white supremacist punks.
Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
participants (10)
-
Cecilia Tanaka -
grarpamp -
jamesd＠echeque.com -
John Newman -
John Young -
Punk -
Razer -
rooty -
Zenaan Harkness -
таракан