New York » Penal Law Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree
https://www.womenslaw.org/laws/ny/statutes/sec-25045-unlawful-surveillance-s... Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when: 1. For his or her own, or another person’s amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 2. For his or her own, or another person’s sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 3. (a) For no legitimate purpose, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a motel, hotel or inn, without such person’s knowledge or consent. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn, there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate purpose; or 4. Without the knowledge or consent of a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record, under the clothing being worn by such person, the sexual or other intimate parts of such person; or 5. For his or her own, or another individual’s amusement, entertainment, profit, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, the actor intentionally uses or installs or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast, or record such person in an identifiable manner: (a) engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in subdivision ten of section 130.00 of this part; (b) in the same image with the sexual or intimate part of any other person; and (c) at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent. Unlawful surveillance in the second degree is a class E felony.
https://www.womenslaw.org/laws/ny/statutes/sec-25045-unlawful-surveillance-s... Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when: 1. For his or her own, or another person’s amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 2. For his or her own, or another person’s sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 3. (a) For no legitimate purpose, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a motel, hotel or inn, without such person’s knowledge or consent. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn, there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate purpose; or 4. Without the knowledge or consent of a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record, under the clothing being worn by such person, the sexual or other intimate parts of such person; or 5. For his or her own, or another individual’s amusement, entertainment, profit, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, the actor intentionally uses or installs or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast, or record such person in an identifiable manner: (a) engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in subdivision ten of section 130.00 of this part; (b) in the same image with the sexual or intimate part of any other person; and (c) at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent. Unlawful surveillance in the second degree is a class E felony.
Dear Madam Attorney General: This morning the surveillance team in Chelsea is asking once again how am I going to prove what happened at the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Respectfully, Ms. James as our Attorney General I submit Senator Gillibrand presented at the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Today's message to your esteemed office is to once again remind the New York FBI that, yes, as a citizen of New York State I do not mind being under surveillance. However, I do not hold the burden of proof for events like the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Madam Attorney General, New York State has a very robust Penal Law Section 250.45 that Gunnar Larson personally respects (below). This being said, Madam Attorney General a journalist engaged New York's Adult Survivors Protection Act with a litigation investment vehicle. This case is famous across the United States and Governor Hochul has touted the Adult Survivors Protection Act as a success with this example. As a journalist myself, recognized as a international scholar and a guest writer at LitigationFinanceJournal.com, I am concerned about two RICOs in New York State that xNY.io - Bank.org is evolving beyond. Today the surveillance folks asked me about the Bloomberg Crypto Summit and how I am going to prove the set of events. As a disclosure technique, Madam Attorney General I must abide to Penal Law Section 250.45. Furthermore, I would like your office's approval to engage the New York False Claims Act concerning Palantir's Gotham software solution. Attorney General James, my office has contacted your esteemed office several times suggesting our Cyprus bussiness is protected by York Laws EXC - Executive Article 15 - (Executive) HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 298-A - Application of article to certain acts committed outside the state of New York. Palantir has announced a new software contract that we feel violates New York's False Claims Act and New York Human Rights Law. Furthermore, I am concerned that the Bloomberg Crypto Summit burden of proof further complicates the matter. Finally, I have contacted the litigation investment agency behind the success story touted by Govern Hochul mentioned above, but have not heard back. This further complicate the RICO concern. Given several factors, if we execute this approach has potential to be successful similar to the Adult Survivors Protection Act. The litigation funder will be touted in landmark connotation. These Directors behind the RICO are not above the law and I look forward to hearing from the Attorney General's office concerning New York's False Claims Act. Have a great day. Thank you, Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson xNY.io - Bank.org 917-580-8053 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 11:13 AM Subject: New York » Penal Law Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org> https://www.womenslaw.org/laws/ny/statutes/sec-25045-unlawful-surveillance-s... Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when: 1. For his or her own, or another person’s amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 2. For his or her own, or another person’s sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 3. (a) For no legitimate purpose, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a motel, hotel or inn, without such person’s knowledge or consent. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn, there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate purpose; or 4. Without the knowledge or consent of a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record, under the clothing being worn by such person, the sexual or other intimate parts of such person; or 5. For his or her own, or another individual’s amusement, entertainment, profit, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, the actor intentionally uses or installs or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast, or record such person in an identifiable manner: (a) engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in subdivision ten of section 130.00 of this part; (b) in the same image with the sexual or intimate part of any other person; and (c) at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent. Unlawful surveillance in the second degree is a class E felony.
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Sun, Feb 18, 2024, 7:59 AM Subject: Fwd: New York » Penal Law Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree To: <letitia.james@ag.ny.gov> Cc: Harris, Adrienne A (DFS) <Adrienne.Harris@dfs.ny.gov>, Reader, Shaun < sreader@curtis.com>, <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Dear Madam Attorney General: This morning the surveillance team in Chelsea is asking once again how am I going to prove what happened at the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Respectfully, Ms. James as our Attorney General I submit Senator Gillibrand presented at the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Today's message to your esteemed office is to once again remind the New York FBI that, yes, as a citizen of New York State I do not mind being under surveillance. However, I do not hold the burden of proof for events like the Bloomberg Crypto Summit. Madam Attorney General, New York State has a very robust Penal Law Section 250.45 that Gunnar Larson personally respects (below). This being said, Madam Attorney General a journalist engaged New York's Adult Survivors Protection Act with a litigation investment vehicle. This case is famous across the United States and Governor Hochul has touted the Adult Survivors Protection Act as a success with this example. As a journalist myself, recognized as a international scholar and a guest writer at LitigationFinanceJournal.com, I am concerned about two RICOs in New York State that xNY.io - Bank.org is evolving beyond. Today the surveillance folks asked me about the Bloomberg Crypto Summit and how I am going to prove the set of events. As a disclosure technique, Madam Attorney General I must abide to Penal Law Section 250.45. Furthermore, I would like your office's approval to engage the New York False Claims Act concerning Palantir's Gotham software solution. Attorney General James, my office has contacted your esteemed office several times suggesting our Cyprus bussiness is protected by York Laws EXC - Executive Article 15 - (Executive) HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 298-A - Application of article to certain acts committed outside the state of New York. Palantir has announced a new software contract that we feel violates New York's False Claims Act and New York Human Rights Law. Furthermore, I am concerned that the Bloomberg Crypto Summit burden of proof further complicates the matter. Finally, I have contacted the litigation investment agency behind the success story touted by Govern Hochul mentioned above, but have not heard back. This further complicate the RICO concern. Given several factors, if we execute this approach has potential to be successful similar to the Adult Survivors Protection Act. The litigation funder will be touted in landmark connotation. These Directors behind the RICO are not above the law and I look forward to hearing from the Attorney General's office concerning New York's False Claims Act. Have a great day. Thank you, Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson xNY.io - Bank.org 917-580-8053 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 11:13 AM Subject: New York » Penal Law Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org> https://www.womenslaw.org/laws/ny/statutes/sec-25045-unlawful-surveillance-s... Sec. 250.45 Unlawful surveillance in the second degree A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when: 1. For his or her own, or another person’s amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 2. For his or her own, or another person’s sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or 3. (a) For no legitimate purpose, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a motel, hotel or inn, without such person’s knowledge or consent. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom, changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom, shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn, there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate purpose; or 4. Without the knowledge or consent of a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record, under the clothing being worn by such person, the sexual or other intimate parts of such person; or 5. For his or her own, or another individual’s amusement, entertainment, profit, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, the actor intentionally uses or installs or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast, or record such person in an identifiable manner: (a) engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in subdivision ten of section 130.00 of this part; (b) in the same image with the sexual or intimate part of any other person; and (c) at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent. Unlawful surveillance in the second degree is a class E felony.
participants (1)
-
Gunnar Larson