How Feminism, aka worthless feminazi scum is funded
feminazi scum (aka feminists) got a 200 millions loan from the americunt government. Notice how feminist scum in a banana republic is 'financed' by the supreme scum of the planet, the americunt government. Though of course, the loan will be repaid with money stolen from argie taxpayers. So americunt scum will actually get back their 'capital' PLUS usury. https://www.iadb.org/es/noticias/el-bid-acompana-medidas-para-impulsar-la-ig...
On 1/6/19, Juan wrote:
feminazi scum (aka feminists) got a 200 millions loan from the americunt government. Notice how feminist scum in a banana republic is 'financed' by the supreme scum of the planet, the americunt government. Though of course, the loan will be repaid with money stolen from argie taxpayers. So americunt scum will actually get back their 'capital' PLUS usury. https://www.iadb.org/es/noticias/el-bid-acompana-medidas-para-impulsar-la-ig...
Pure genius. So, Juan, what is your solution?
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 18:08:58 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/6/19, Juan wrote:
feminazi scum (aka feminists) got a 200 millions loan from the americunt government. Notice how feminist scum in a banana republic is 'financed' by the supreme scum of the planet, the americunt government. Though of course, the loan will be repaid with money stolen from argie taxpayers. So americunt scum will actually get back their 'capital' PLUS usury. https://www.iadb.org/es/noticias/el-bid-acompana-medidas-para-impulsar-la-ig...
Pure genius. So, Juan, what is your solution?
what's the solution to that sort of blatant crime? Enforcement of personal rights.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 02:19:23 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/6/19, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
what's the solution to that sort of [genius, lol]? Enforcement of personal rights.
So, how do you define those?
*I* don't define them. They are a standard libertarian concept.
And, how are you going to enforce them?
with enough people and guns - or RPGs
On 1/7/19, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
with enough people and guns - or RPGs
Where are you going to find these people? How are you going to organize them? Who gets to carry the hardware? Where is it made? At corporations led by nasty witches allowed to perfect their nature of aborting, drowning, murdering babies?
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 03:59:22 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/7/19, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
with enough people and guns - or RPGs
Where are you going to find these people?
These people are nowhere to be found.
How are you going to organize them?
me? the system is self-organizing
Who gets to carry the hardware?
whoever wants to carry it
Where is it made?
at home
At corporations led by nasty witches allowed to perfect their nature of aborting, drowning, murdering babies?
Not sure if that's 'feminist' sarcasm?
On 1/6/19 5:54 PM, Punk wrote:
feminazi scum (aka feminists) got a 200 millions loan from the americunt government.
Notice how feminist scum in a banana republic is 'financed' by the supreme scum of the planet, the americunt government. Though of course, the loan will be repaid with money stolen from argie taxpayers. So americunt scum will actually get back their 'capital' PLUS usury.
https://www.iadb.org/es/noticias/el-bid-acompana-medidas-para-impulsar-la-ig...
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources. If that seems "wrong" look up Emma Goldman, Lucy Parsons and Simone De Beauvoir. Feminazis seem to have originated in the New Left. Presenting a caricature of reactionary Marxism, the New Left rose to prominence in the 1960s, displacing and discrediting Liberal and Pacifist voices in U.S. media during the Vietnam War. I suspect these folks had US State sponsors: The FBI's funding and direction of terrorist cells in the U.S. at that time (per evidence in Court cases acquitting "dupes") indicates vigorous political warfare against home grown U.S. dissidents. Failure to field a media personality propaganda front demonizing dissidents would make no sense at all. Following a make-over in the late 70s & early 80s, the New Left and its new recruits call themselves Progressives. Working as freelance profiteers under the sponsorship of folks like Our Mrs. Clinton and her network, our Progressives continue to use every means at their disposal - now a respectable arsenal of propaganda assets, astroturf fronts, friendly elected officials, etc. - to discredit and suppress grass roots Liberal and Pacifist political activism, not to mention anti-Fascist organizers and anything resembling anarchism. :o/
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 20:59:17 -0500 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources.
I know very little people with an 'anarchist orientation' because, obviously, anarchism isn't exactly popular. And the set containing 'anarchist' and 'feminist' is virtually empty as far as my personal sampling goes. But, in general terms... ...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
If that seems "wrong" look up Emma Goldman, Lucy Parsons and Simone De Beauvoir.
Here's the only valuable thing somehow related to some 'feminists' that I can think of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws And yes, Simone De Beauvoir shows up there. But, the abolition of such criminal nonsense as 'age of consent' legislation is a purely libertarian issue, not a 'feminist' one.
Feminazis seem to have originated in the New Left. Presenting a caricature of reactionary Marxism,
Why a caricature? I think that's what real marxism looks like. At any rate, marxism is its own involuntary self-parody.
the New Left rose to prominence in the 1960s,
Well, look at 1984, published in 1948. In 1984 there's 'equality', both men and women are equally enslaved under national english socialism. AND, there's an anti-sex league. And coincidentally the lunatic anti-sex mindset and putting women in the 'labor force' are defining characteristic of 'modern' feminism. Also, the lunatic anti-sex tradition in the 'west' isn't new. It's one of the pilars of jew-kristian theocracy. And it turns out that feminism is nothing but recycled and 'scientific' conservative theocracy.
displacing and discrediting Liberal and Pacifist voices in U.S. media during the Vietnam War.
Not meaning to defend the so called new left, but weren't they at least opposed to the vietnam war?
I suspect these folks had US State sponsors: The FBI's funding and direction of terrorist cells in the U.S. at that time (per evidence in Court cases acquitting "dupes")
Well, controlled opposition certainly makes sense.
indicates vigorous political warfare against home grown U.S. dissidents. Failure to field a media personality propaganda front demonizing dissidents would make no sense at all.
Following a make-over in the late 70s & early 80s, the New Left and its new recruits call themselves Progressives. Working as freelance profiteers under the sponsorship of folks like Our Mrs. Clinton and her network, our Progressives continue to use every means at their disposal - now a respectable arsenal of propaganda assets, astroturf fronts, friendly elected officials, etc. - to discredit and suppress grass roots Liberal and Pacifist political activism, not to mention anti-Fascist organizers and anything resembling anarchism.
:o/
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:44:14AM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 20:59:17 -0500 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources.
I know very little people with an 'anarchist orientation' because, obviously, anarchism isn't exactly popular. And the set containing 'anarchist' and 'feminist' is virtually empty as far as my personal sampling goes. But, in general terms...
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
If that seems "wrong" look up Emma Goldman, Lucy Parsons and Simone De Beauvoir.
Here's the only valuable thing somehow related to some 'feminists' that I can think of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
Well this would handle the CIA's major blackmail tool in use today. And overnight, the CIA would likely lose interest in running orphanages all around the world ... unless we're deeply mistaken and acktshuallay the CIA be a humanitarian gift from $DEITY, masquerading as a global blackmail and torture chamber?
And yes, Simone De Beauvoir shows up there. But, the abolition of such criminal nonsense as 'age of consent' legislation is a purely libertarian issue, not a 'feminist' one.
And here I'd thought that "feminism" was only about taxing the "other" half of our population ... and you're saying there's not much more to it than that since most these other "feminist" issues are actually libertarian issues. Your logic-fu is compelling, that's for sure.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:15:20PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:44:14AM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 20:59:17 -0500 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources.
I know very little people with an 'anarchist orientation' because, obviously, anarchism isn't exactly popular. And the set containing 'anarchist' and 'feminist' is virtually empty as far as my personal sampling goes. But, in general terms...
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
If that seems "wrong" look up Emma Goldman, Lucy Parsons and Simone De Beauvoir.
Here's the only valuable thing somehow related to some 'feminists' that I can think of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
Well this would handle the CIA's major blackmail tool in use today.
And overnight, the CIA would likely lose interest in running orphanages all around the world ... unless we're deeply mistaken and acktshuallay the CIA be a humanitarian gift from $DEITY, masquerading as a global blackmail and torture chamber?
And yes, Simone De Beauvoir shows up there. But, the abolition of such criminal nonsense as 'age of consent' legislation is a purely libertarian issue, not a 'feminist' one.
And here I'd thought that "feminism" was only about taxing the "other" half of our population ... and you're saying there's not much more to it than that since most these other "feminist" issues are actually libertarian issues.
Your logic-fu is compelling, that's for sure.
Speaking of "women's rights" and Christians, see about half way down here: The National Review’s David French Nails It in Response to Tucker’s Historic Manifesto Monologue https://dailystormer.name/david-french-nails-it-in-response-to-tuckers-histo... ... Women’s Rights The women’s rights movement was even more absurdly Jewish than the general civil rights movement, as they didn’t need black figureheads. Virtually every single feminist leader in America from the 1950s until the present has been Jewish. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists https://dailystormer.name/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/jewish-feminism-e154684...
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 23:49:59 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> vomited:
The women’s rights movement was even more absurdly Jewish than the general civil rights movement,
Virtually every single feminist leader in America from the 1950s until the present has been Jewish.
Looks like you are a government agent of white-supremacist, christiano-fascist government. In other words the only diference between you and the joo-fascists is the name. And notice how your promotion of right wing national socialism perfectly plays into the hands of left wing national socialists.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:37:00PM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 23:49:59 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> vomited:
The women’s rights movement was even more absurdly Jewish than the general civil rights movement,
Virtually every single feminist leader in America from the 1950s until the present has been Jewish.
Looks like you are a government agent of white-supremacist, christiano-fascist government. In other words the only diference between you and the joo-fascists is the name.
And notice how your promotion of right wing national socialism perfectly plays into the hands of left wing national socialists.
Socialism is a cucked/ undermined position, unfortunately often juxtaposed with natural tribalism. Marxist doctrines dressed up as "PC" socialism undermine self responsibility and non-interference with our fellow Souls on this journey of life. Pride, envy and the sociopathic tendency are the moral compromises existing within our fellow humans, the immoral wedges used by TPTB to jam open authoritarian doors. Much to be done, so bring on World War Meme TYVM: Extremely unpolished “Sounds Like Freedom” memes: - Why take self- and family- responsibility when Big Gov will take from others to provide for you? - Surely Big Gov providing all my worldly needs is ordained by Yahweh? - Surely socialism and public "welfare" could not make the money-printing (((banks))) stronger? - You mean moral and spiritual welfare is NOT endless free gibs paid by 'tax'/thieving from those who work/ farm/ build/ create? - So you're saying that my survival is the responsibility of the government, and a house provided by the government is a "human right", and that the government must take from those who work, to build houses for those who won't work? - Surely a life of dignity doesn't require that I figure out how to survive in this world without the government taking money from others on my behalf? ... Whilst memes continue to trigger the deep state and educate sheeple, said memes Need You! In post-Soviet Russia, Meme create You, MOFO!
Steve K.
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources.
Actually I should haev mentioned that more than a few official 'libertarian' 'anarchists' I know turned out to be feminazi scum, parroting the current propaganda to a tee. I guess that's to be expected from fake libertarians, true intelectual frauds, and so feminism really suits them. me
Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did.
speaking of the clinton cunt...This sums up feminism pretty well "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." Notice how the rabid animal and murderous cunt clinton shows no empathy. The fact that men die is only relevant to the degree that it affects poor womnnyzsd
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:44:14AM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 20:59:17 -0500 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Funny thing: All the feminists I have known had a primarily anarchist orientation. I guess it depends on who you run around with - and/or whether one's information comes from personal contacts or mass media propaganda sources.
I know very little people with an 'anarchist orientation' because, obviously, anarchism isn't exactly popular. And the set containing 'anarchist' and 'feminist' is virtually empty as far as my personal sampling goes. But, in general terms...
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
I have a girlfriend that would disagree with you, at least from a pragmatic point of view. On the way to "true liberty" (i.e anarchy), isn't it appropriate to fight for such things as suffrage, equal pay for women, abortion rights, etc ? I suppose she would say you have to get your hands dirty in the existing system sometimes to accomplish anything, which admittedly is a thin fucking tightrope to balance. <snip>
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:38:22 -0500 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
I have a girlfriend that would disagree with you, at least from a pragmatic point of view. On the way to "true liberty" (i.e anarchy), isn't it appropriate to fight for such things as suffrage, equal pay for women, abortion rights, etc ?
abortion rights, yes, unless by that you mean government run 'medicine' in which case the answer is no. female suffrage? No. Of course, there must not be any 'male' suffrage either. http://www.readliberty.org/liberty/1/22 "Women are human beings, and consequently have all the natural rights that any human beings can have. They have just as good a right to make laws as men have, and no better; AND THAT IS JUST NO RIGHT AT ALL. " equal pay? In a free market? Different people get paid differently. Wanting to create 'economic equaity' by law is the non-plus-ultra of commie statism. It has exactly nothing to do with anarchy.
I suppose she would say you have to get your hands dirty in the existing system sometimes to accomplish anything, which admittedly is a thin fucking tightrope to balance.
The idea that you can get rid of tyranny by voting is just too ridiculous. Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did. This argument isn't related to 'feminism' per se anyawy. It's the typical position argued by 'practical' people of different backgrounds - commie, libertarian etc. Except social democrats I guess since gradualist tyranny by voting is a basic strategy used by them.
<snip>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:31:26PM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:38:22 -0500 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
I have a girlfriend that would disagree with you, at least from a pragmatic point of view. On the way to "true liberty" (i.e anarchy), isn't it appropriate to fight for such things as suffrage, equal pay for women, abortion rights, etc ?
abortion rights, yes, unless by that you mean government run 'medicine' in which case the answer is no.
female suffrage? No. Of course, there must not be any 'male' suffrage either.
http://www.readliberty.org/liberty/1/22
"Women are human beings, and consequently have all the natural rights that any human beings can have. They have just as good a right to make laws as men have, and no better; AND THAT IS JUST NO RIGHT AT ALL. "
equal pay? In a free market? Different people get paid differently. Wanting to create 'economic equaity' by law is the non-plus-ultra of commie statism. It has exactly nothing to do with anarchy.
Equal pay for equal work seems fair. For instance, America is built on slavery. Eventually, within the confines of the statist system (and a pretty fucking ugly war), this was (sort of) ended. Actually, it was more or less replaced with Jim Crow, and the "war on drugs", and mass incarceration, and, umm.. well, yeah. So that's not a great example, but my point is that as much as America is built on slavery, it's built on misogyny, although I obviously had trouble squaring the circle there at the end.. Anyway, she doesn't read this list :P
I suppose she would say you have to get your hands dirty in the existing system sometimes to accomplish anything, which admittedly is a thin fucking tightrope to balance.
The idea that you can get rid of tyranny by voting is just too ridiculous. Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did.
In the modern oligarchic surveillance-state technocracy in which we live, I don't see any way to get rid of tyranny altogether, practical, or otherwise. In any case, it's enough to just make one want to live life as best as one can and let the fucking apocalypse sort itself out. Also: don't have kids. Resistance may or may not be futile, but it fucking feels that way.
This argument isn't related to 'feminism' per se anyawy. It's the typical position argued by 'practical' people of different backgrounds - commie, libertarian etc. Except social democrats I guess since gradualist tyranny by voting is a basic strategy used by them.
<snip>
-- GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4 C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:14:59PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:31:26PM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:38:22 -0500 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
...Feminism is conceptual nonsense. If there are legal restrictions placed on women those have to be abolished based on the principle of equality before the law, but that's a *liberal* tenet not a 'feminist' one. In other words 'feminism' is not needed. And no wonder in practice feminism is just another tool of oppression.
I have a girlfriend that would disagree with you, at least from a pragmatic point of view. On the way to "true liberty" (i.e anarchy), isn't it appropriate to fight for such things as suffrage, equal pay for women, abortion rights, etc ?
abortion rights, yes, unless by that you mean government run 'medicine' in which case the answer is no.
female suffrage? No. Of course, there must not be any 'male' suffrage either.
http://www.readliberty.org/liberty/1/22
"Women are human beings, and consequently have all the natural rights that any human beings can have. They have just as good a right to make laws as men have, and no better; AND THAT IS JUST NO RIGHT AT ALL. "
equal pay? In a free market? Different people get paid differently. Wanting to create 'economic equaity' by law is the non-plus-ultra of commie statism. It has exactly nothing to do with anarchy.
Equal pay for equal work seems fair. For instance, America is built on slavery. Eventually, within the confines of the statist system (and a pretty fucking ugly war), this was (sort of) ended. Actually, it was more or less replaced with Jim Crow, and the "war on drugs", and mass incarceration, and, umm.. well, yeah. So that's not a great example, but my point is that as much as America is built on slavery, it's built on misogyny,
Well, obviously already! 2 + j = "misogyny is necessary to build a nation"
although I obviously had trouble squaring the circle there at the end..
Anyway, she doesn't read this list :P
I suppose she would say you have to get your hands dirty in the existing system sometimes to accomplish anything, which admittedly is a thin fucking tightrope to balance.
The idea that you can get rid of tyranny by voting is just too ridiculous. Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did.
In the modern oligarchic surveillance-state technocracy in which we live, I don't see any way to get rid of tyranny altogether, practical, or otherwise.
Recreational nukes? The dems might even be in favour of this one :D Democrat Threatens To “Nuke” American Citizens Who Won’t Give Up Guns https://conservativedailypost.com/democrat-threatens-to-nuke-american-citize...
In any case, it's enough to just make one want to live life as best as one can and let the fucking apocalypse
Is that an "apocalypse of no fucking" or something more wierderer?
sort itself out. Also: don't have kids.
Oh. Dear me. I really do feel sorry for you sheeple types - always one meal away from sheer insanity. Always remember, Jon, CNNPC and MSNPC have your back... which is important since just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
Resistance may or may not be futile, but it fucking feels that way.
You Dems are the "resist miscegenation, stop having children today" crowd. Really, I do know a good psychiatrist who might even tolerate you for an hour a week.
This argument isn't related to 'feminism' per se anyawy. It's the typical position argued by 'practical' people of different backgrounds - commie, libertarian etc. Except social democrats I guess since gradualist tyranny by voting is a basic strategy used by them.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:14:59 -0500 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
Equal pay for equal work seems fair.
That IS fair. And that is NOT 'womynz' only issue.
For instance, America is built on slavery. Eventually, within the confines of the statist system (and a pretty fucking ugly war), this was (sort of) ended. Actually, it was more or less replaced with Jim Crow, and the "war on drugs", and mass incarceration, and, umm.. well, yeah. So that's not a great example,
Oh but it is =) - The US was built on slavery and corporatism. And that applies to the rest of the world as well.
but my point is that as much as America is built on slavery, it's built on misogyny,
haha - though in reality such cosmic bullshit is actually not funny...
although I obviously had trouble squaring the circle there at the end..
Anyway, she doesn't read this list :P
So you can drop the feminist bullshit? =) - But wait. You cannot, because, after all, we live in a global surveillance village so you cannot tell the truth about feminism without facing 'consequences'.
I suppose she would say you have to get your hands dirty in the existing system sometimes to accomplish anything, which admittedly is a thin fucking tightrope to balance.
The idea that you can get rid of tyranny by voting is just too ridiculous. Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did.
In the modern oligarchic surveillance-state technocracy in which we live, I don't see any way to get rid of tyranny altogether, practical, or otherwise.
So at least don't vote since "voting only encourages them" and gives some sort of pseudo-legitimacy to the charade.
In any case, it's enough to just make one want to live life as best as one can and let the fucking apocalypse sort itself out. Also: don't have kids.
Yep, that's a pretty good point. Now it would be interesting to find out how many 'feminist' womynz don't want to have kids compared to the number of feminists who want to be single mothers bankrolled by the state, or marry a guy, accuse him of 'rape' and steal all his assets, etc.
Resistance may or may not be futile, but it fucking feels that way.
Yeah, the mix of 'progressive technology' with christiano-fascism, judeo-fascism, feminism, eco-fascism and all the rest of niceties produced by judeo-christian 'civilization' is completely toxic.
This argument isn't related to 'feminism' per se anyawy. It's the typical position argued by 'practical' people of different backgrounds - commie, libertarian etc. Except social democrats I guess since gradualist tyranny by voting is a basic strategy used by them.
<snip>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:14:51PM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:14:59 -0500 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
In any case, it's enough to just make one want to live life as best as one can and let the fucking apocalypse sort itself out. Also: don't have kids.
Yep, that's a pretty good point. Now it would be interesting to find out how many 'feminist' womynz don't want to have kids compared to the number of feminists who want to be single mothers bankrolled by the state, or marry a guy, accuse him of 'rape' and steal all his assets, etc.
Oh COME on! Womynz are pure and prefect in every way and can never do no wrong‼
Resistance may or may not be futile, but it fucking feels that way.
Yeah, the mix of 'progressive technology' with christiano-fascism, judeo-fascism, feminism, eco-fascism and all the rest of niceties produced by judeo-christian 'civilization' is completely toxic.
The Judeos have had run of this planet for ~4,500 years, certainly not the Christians.
Actually you can have your 'female suffrage' if you want and see how women vote for tyranny exactly like they did.
Hilary Clinton, in droves. Would have been nothing but more *unequal* laws and preferential policies, quotas, more war, theft, prison, murder as usual,"Mothers against..." almost anything, etc. All just more unequal force. Anyone, woman, man, alien from the next galaxy... wanting some sort of "law" for something... is probably trying to both foist some unequal unfree scam on you, and stay in power over you so they can keep fucking you forever. Strip out all the preferential laws and you might be free enough to become and enjoy own equality.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 07:54:28PM -0300, Punk wrote:
feminazi scum (aka feminists) got a 200 millions loan from the americunt government.
Notice how feminist scum in a banana republic is 'financed' by the supreme scum of the planet, the americunt government. Though of course, the loan will be repaid with money stolen from argie taxpayers. So americunt scum will actually get back their 'capital' PLUS usury.
How very ... Christian ;)
participants (5)
-
grarpamp -
John Newman -
Punk -
Steve Kinney -
Zenaan Harkness