What specifically are you claiming was incorrect about my writeup?

No claims, just noting that news outlets, competing coins, etc often cite / claim posts on the internet as saying this or that or whatever, when oftentimes a more detailed reading of the posts alongside their cite / claim shows their error. "Zcash 2nd Ceremony Call for Review / Participation" Because... if Z / privacy tech (or any coin tech) is to become more trusted and used in multitude of applications, or even just for $B's to $T's worth of simple monetary holdings and flow, wide review of the crypto and so on is part of that. The necessity of critical writeups where due (by many people) along the way should be obvious. Linking the easier to read unstriked version for those reviewing or working coins, now and in the future, such that anything noted therein might be considered in that process... https://web.archive.org/web/20171010030051/https://petertodd.org/2016/cypher... And some links collated from it... https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/curves/2016/000742.html http://www.weboftrust.info/ https://www.cloudflare.com/dns/dnssec/root-signing-ceremony/ https://www.iana.org/dnssec/ceremonies