Re: [cryptography] NIST Randomness Beacon

11 Nov
2013
11 Nov
'13
8:45 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> wrote: the unpredictable value (unless they have 51%). With slightly weaker security requirements iterating only a few million times would be decent as well, since attempting to influence the value would result in a performance hit a competitive miner can't afford.
4241
Age (days ago)
4241
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
CodesInChaos