Voluntarism.dev, an anonymous group of ‘old-guard miners and whales’, launched a 51% attack on Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) https://decrypt.co/49819/bitcoin-cash-rebels-launch-51-attack-to-destroy-bch... What separates this attack from earlier ones is how politically charged it is. In a tweet statement, the group justified its 51% attack on grounds that the “ABC violated the NAP.” The NAP is very clear on such terrorist violence stating firmly that " No braindead libertarian moron may injure any anarchist or, through inaction, allow any anarchist to come to harm ".
On 2020-11-29 07:04, professor rat wrote:
Voluntarism.dev, an anonymous group of ‘old-guard miners and whales’, launched a 51% attack on Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA)
https://decrypt.co/49819/bitcoin-cash-rebels-launch-51-attack-to-destroy-bch...
What separates this attack from earlier ones is how politically charged it is. In a tweet statement, the group justified its 51% attack on grounds that the “ABC violated the NAP.” The NAP is very clear on such terrorist violence stating firmly that " No braindead libertarian moron may injure any anarchist or, through inaction, allow any anarchist to come to harm ".
The non aggression principle allows self defense. You commies started this, we are going to finish it. Self defense has to be collective to be effective, and collective self defense is apt to become not very libertarian, let alone anarchist, at all, but the difference is that anarchists intend to impose a just peace in which the non aggression principle is observed, because of what happens when it is not observed.
participants (2)
-
jamesd＠echeque.com -
professor rat