US war crimes (david barrett's crimes)
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/01/12/reflecting-on-obamas-presid... "Obama’s embrace and vast expansion of drone strikes against militants and terrorists will be an enduring foreign policy legacy. Whereas President George W. Bush authorized approximately 50 drone strikes that killed 296 terrorists and 195 civilians in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia, Obama has authorized 506 strikes that have killed 3,040 terrorists and 391 civilians." So it's a matter of public record that non human trash obomba murdered '391 civilians'. In reality the '3040 terrorists' were innocent victims too. And in even more reality the real numbers are way higher. At any rate, it's basic fact of reality that the so called 'presidents of the US' are guilty of mass murder. And so is anyone defending the US govt, like barrett. Non human garbage like barrett needs killing.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 1:28 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 09:36:57 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you send this twice? Are you worried people might not consider it?
Yes, and I'm going to send it again a few times, for people who are ignoring it, like you and barrett.
How could you possibly still think I'm ignoring it?
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 13:55:05 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 1:28 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 09:36:57 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you send this twice? Are you worried people might not consider it?
Yes, and I'm going to send it again a few times, for people who are ignoring it, like you and barrett.
How could you possibly still think I'm ignoring it?
You're not literally ignoring it, unlike barrett. But you didn't make any meaningful comment either. But fine, I'll take your not-too-responsive-replies as an acknowledgment of sorts.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 3:20 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 13:55:05 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 1:28 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 09:36:57 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you send this twice? Are you worried people might not consider it?
Yes, and I'm going to send it again a few times, for people who are ignoring it, like you and barrett.
How could you possibly still think I'm ignoring it?
You're not literally ignoring it, unlike barrett. But you didn't make any meaningful comment either. But fine, I'll take your not-too-responsive-replies as an acknowledgment of sorts.
Sounds partisan. Isn't that kind of a waste of time, partisan stuff?
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 15:24:06 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
You're not literally ignoring it, unlike barrett. But you didn't make any meaningful comment either. But fine, I'll take your not-too-responsive-replies as an acknowledgment of sorts.
Sounds partisan. Isn't that kind of a waste of time, partisan stuff?
You're on the US govt party. Otherwise you'd make meaningful comments on the facts I'm presenting. Your fake pretence of 'avoiding conflict' only means you're siding with barrett.
So again, although you're replying to the message, you don't seem
to be paying attention to the fundamental facts that the messages contains, namely the completely criminal nature of your government and your country.
The things I'm receiving from you don't make very meaningful sense to me.
uh oh - you know nothing about the endless list of crimes your govt your country and your democracy commits. Cool. Then again, you're a partisan in barrett's murder party.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 4:00 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 15:24:06 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
You're not literally ignoring it, unlike barrett. But you
didn't
make any meaningful comment either. But fine, I'll take your not-too-responsive-replies as an acknowledgment of sorts.
Sounds partisan. Isn't that kind of a waste of time, partisan stuff?
You're on the US govt party. Otherwise you'd make meaningful comments on the facts I'm presenting.
Still sounds partisan, man!
Your fake pretence of 'avoiding conflict' only means you're siding with barrett.
I'm vulnerable to that insult ('avoiding') right now, no good reply.
So again, although you're replying to the message, you don't seem
to be paying attention to the fundamental facts that the messages contains, namely the completely criminal nature of your government and your country.
The things I'm receiving from you don't make very meaningful sense to me.
uh oh - you know nothing about the endless list of crimes your govt your country and your democracy commits. Cool. Then again, you're a partisan in barrett's murder party.
Apologies for sending too many emails. In a somewhat psychotic state of mind atm. [spam] Let's insult attacking so they don't attack us! Gun comes along. "I will shoot you!" "Show me how gross the bulletwounds you make are!" Gun pauses. Gun feels angry. "I think I still want to shoot you! I think?"
participants (2)
-
Karl -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0