On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Razer wrote:

A Redditor is on it. A "Democratic operative" used the toddandclare

It's getting deeper as reddit, chan, and twitter piece together muck on Hillary et al... https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/587lbg/i_have_been_looking_into_... https://twitter.com/realVivaEuropa http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614/pedophile-accusations-from-datin... https://twitter.com/realVivaEuropa/status/788195162950361089 https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/top/?sort=top&t=all Wonder if teh internet sees Trump as the candidate for freedom on the internet...

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:52:59PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:

This storyboard image sums it all up nicely so far...

https://i.imgur.com/s27EVHS.jpg

Awesome entertainment - because it's "real life" :) Thanks grarpamp,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, juan wrote:

...

Wonder if teh internet sees Trump as the candidate for freedom on the internet...

Why? Exposing the left-wing fascists shouldn't entail any kind of support for other fascists.

All other things equal, yes. But why? Who knows, one of many possible observations that could be made... Trump is now directly quoting and praising wikileaks and through that elevating the surrounding parts of the internet / actors / voices / tech that are making wikileaks happen and possible. So it's a happy deal between them. At least until the tide of the intertubes turns its focus elsewhere. But still, for right now, a deal that will last and profit so long as they remain friends. (Whether or not the internet should take friends is another subject.) Meanwhile Hillary et al seem to be doing all they can, including breaking law and ethic, just to stop the flow of sunshine, of information... ie: to stop teh internets, like Arab Spring in reverse. The internet doesn't like that, at all, *do not like!* And tor project is busy kissing the left as usual. The internet doesn't seem to have much activity or interest in doxing Trump, probably because he's mostly a brick and mortar sort of business, not really a politician with any deep geopolitical conspiracies to crack. Which leaves whatever media big scoop of grabbing pussy as just a meme and moment of comic relief for them as it is, before they get back to real business doxing the left.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:13:08 -0400 grarpamp wrote:

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, juan wrote:

...

...

Wonder if teh internet sees Trump as the candidate for freedom on the internet...

Why? Exposing the left-wing fascists shouldn't entail any kind of support for other fascists.

All other things equal, yes. But why? Who knows, one of many possible observations that could be made...

Trump is now directly quoting and praising wikileaks and through that elevating the surrounding parts of the internet / actors / voices / tech that are making wikileaks happen and possible.

Oh, OK. That's possible. But it's also a double edged sword.

So it's a happy deal between them. At least until the tide of the intertubes turns its focus elsewhere. But still, for right now, a deal that will last and profit so long as they remain friends.

The 'deal' may be beneficial if it helps spread a more decent political outlook. But it can also work in reverse and damage assange and co. No doubt all the 'progressive' 'democratic' partisans are going to see any cooperation between wikileaks and trump as proof that assange is a russian mafioso pedophile and putin's nephew.

(Whether or not the internet should take friends is another subject.) Meanwhile Hillary et al seem to be doing all they can, including breaking law and ethic, just to stop the flow of sunshine, of information... ie: to stop teh internets, like Arab Spring in reverse. The internet doesn't like that, at all, *do not like!* And tor project is busy kissing the left as usual.

No surprises there =) Then again, the relationship between military organization and socialist organization is very close - both are based on top-down coercive planning and 'order'. No wonder a military contractor like tor inc is left friendly.

The internet doesn't seem to have much activity or interest in doxing Trump, probably because he's mostly a brick and mortar sort of business, not really a politician with any deep geopolitical conspiracies to crack.

Well obviously trump is not a professional parasite unlike clinton. But he's hardly against the system either. This is what happens to honest businessmen in the US https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/03/26/use-real-money-go-to-fe...

Which leaves whatever media big scoop of grabbing pussy as just a meme and moment of comic relief for them as it is, before they get back to real business doxing the left.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:58:07 -0700 Razer wrote:

I allllmost made it to the bottom and then:

...

"Well obviously trump is not a professional parasite..."

BWHAHAHHHAOAHOJPHOJO (cough gasp ACKACK!) Jajajajajajaj!

DUDE THAT'S ALL HE'S EVER BEEN IN HIS ENTIRE MISERABLE LIFE!

OK, true, but not in the same transparent way as any overtly tax-funded politician. I also 'suggested' that if he were half honest he would be in jail. But he isn't in jail and instead he's a presidential candidate.

Rr

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:51:40PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Razer wrote:

...

A Redditor is on it. A "Democratic operative" used the toddandclare

It's getting deeper as reddit, chan, and twitter piece together muck on Hillary et al...

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/587lbg/i_have_been_looking_into_... https://twitter.com/realVivaEuropa http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614/pedophile-accusations-from-datin... https://twitter.com/realVivaEuropa/status/788195162950361089 https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/top/?sort=top&t=all

Wonder if teh internet sees Trump as the candidate for freedom on the internet...

Sadly, if he is elected (which is certainly less worse than Hitlery "we fucked over Gaddhafi despite his surrender, isn't that great!" Clinton), his stance on "freedom on the internet" will likely depend on whom he listens to most on a daily basis - a president who doesn't do much first hand research of such important matters, depends on his advisers for "comprehension of the issues". So we should probably look at who is around him now, who is his inner circle, to make such an assessment. There's still a small window to influence (prior to election) - the further out you are from election, the greater the leverage potential - which is why I started early this year, and don't bother so much now - the maximum leverage is now done, the throngs have taken their positions, and thankfully, as we see above, there are many who now dig and uncover. Anyway, those who have contacts within any sort of striking distance of Trump, perhaps ought be contacted with some numbers (e.g. "there are X thousands of IT industry employees, and A, B, and C policies are dear to their hearts - what say you, Team Trump ??"). Every bit helps. I have no contacts that I know whatsoever, or I would have been working them months ago, so it's up to you guys - summarise the key numbers, put the A B C together, and pump it. Godo luck :)