It makes a lot of sense to me that tax equals theft. However, my thoughts about tax goes on like when you buy a cup of coffee. It is a self-choice to decide to commit to enter a shop and order one. Once you committed the order on the counter you've entered into voluntary debt. Now you'll run into problems if you decide to run away without pay. Parallelism with public affairs are: replacing "cup of coffee" with roads, education, health or whatever is considered public services. Opting-in into Gov is like ordering the coffee, although Gov don't allow you to opt-out. Tax is theft since the moment they don't allow you to voluntarily opt in or out. If you opt-in the Tax is no longer tax but paying as a consumer. Problem is how do you opt-out without using public resources. The libertarian approach is good. You use public resources and you voluntarily pay whatever you consider, including not paying at all.. 2 extremes: 1.- Nobody pays Public services deprecate, vanish and nobody cares about. Soon people would start donating bits to increase the quality. 2. Everybody contributes to the pot Public services will adjust to the size of the pot. Individually you would 'vote' to make it better or worst by donating more or less to the pot. Reach an equilibrium which is self-adjusting continuously. In my Public System project I called it Tax, but my 'Tax' must not be confused with the notion of theft. It is more like 1.-commit, 2.-pay. Still finding out the right algorithm, all ideas are welcome. Thanks4reading Other Arkitech Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:44:06 +0000 "other.arkitech" <other.arkitech@protonmail.com> wrote:
Parallelism with public affairs are: replacing "cup of coffee" with roads, education, health or whatever is considered public services.
except your premise is flawed. Most of the 'services' the state provides are criminal in themselves. Take for instance 'education', which is actually kidnapping and indoctrination of children. Or 'national defense', aka mass murder. Or wars against, drugs, sex, or anything else that jew-kristian puritan scum hates. Et cetera.
Opting-in into Gov is like ordering the coffee, although Gov don't allow you to opt-out. Tax is theft since the moment they don't allow you to voluntarily opt in or out.
that's technically correct but notice that even if the payments are voluntary, that doesn't mean the activity is legitimate. Again, goldman sachs can voluntary pay for mercenaries to kill brown children for the greatness of goldman sachs.
If you opt-in the Tax is no longer tax but paying as a consumer.
technically correct
Problem is how do you opt-out without using public resources.
The libertarian approach is good. You use public resources and you voluntarily pay whatever you consider, including not paying at all..
yes, that would be better than the current system. But people would still be subjected to whatever criminal dictates the state declares to be 'law'.
2 extremes: 1.- Nobody pays Public services deprecate, vanish and nobody cares about. Soon people would start donating bits to increase the quality. 2. Everybody contributes to the pot Public services will adjust to the size of the pot. Individually you would 'vote' to make it better or worst by donating more or less to the pot. Reach an equilibrium which is self-adjusting continuously.
In my Public System project I called it Tax, but my 'Tax' must not be confused with the notion of theft. It is more like 1.-commit, 2.-pay.
Still finding out the right algorithm, all ideas are welcome. Thanks4reading Other Arkitech
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
participants (2)
-
other.arkitech -
Punk-Stasi 2.0