10 Oct
2015
10 Oct
'15
11:51 a.m.
Sorry. I had forgotten that. But once it was clear that multiple copies were out there, I don't get the point of publishing your own copy. Maybe by then, it was a moot point. And still, it was a bad move, if only for you, in that you come across as imprudent.
You realize John refused to acknowledge or fix the leak at that point, and would have continued to mail them out - right? And at that point, it was only clear to me since John denied it? I'd say that stubbornness was far more imprudent and damaging, and is the only thing that made posting the list necessary. Especially once John started saying I was a liar and accusing me of all sorts of things.
3361
Age (days ago)
3361
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Michael Best