On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:31:41PM -0300, juan wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:34:50 +0300 Georgi Guninski wrote:

...

FYI:

http://phrack.org/issues/62/16.html The Feasibility of Anarchy in America

"[anarchy] is a view shared by those who believe that centralized governments or hierarchies of power and authority tend to corrupt those at the upper-levels."

obviously whoever wrote that, knows exactly fuck about anarchy. Anarchists don't object to government power beacuse it 'may' be 'abused' or 'may' 'corrupt' the 'rulers'. Anarchists correctly realize that *any* government is a criminal organization, by definition.

So Georgi you mananged to link a piece of government propaganda. Congrats.

It's true, many of the smart phrack contributors have gone on to the penetration test industry, and some do lots of work for the government. I'm thinking of a certain "viking", initials E.B. (who is a really nice guy).. But.. people do have to make a living. Pedantically attacking write-ups you disagree with sadly doesn't pay the fucking light bill. (unless you work at breitbart ? ;) Looks like the last issue was #69, from may 2016. Phrack was always a million times better than the, IMO, lame 2600 magazine. I wonder if 2600 is still published? Note: I haven't read the phrack article in question, at least not yet.

" it would also be impossible to rid the ajority of the population of the idea of private ownership of property"

oh the author is a commie social engineering go figure....

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 23:27:10 -0400 John Newman wrote:

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:31:41PM -0300, juan wrote:

...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:34:50 +0300 Georgi Guninski wrote:

...

FYI:

http://phrack.org/issues/62/16.html The Feasibility of Anarchy in America

"[anarchy] is a view shared by those who believe that centralized governments or hierarchies of power and authority tend to corrupt those at the upper-levels."

obviously whoever wrote that, knows exactly fuck about anarchy. Anarchists don't object to government power beacuse it 'may' be 'abused' or 'may' 'corrupt' the 'rulers'. Anarchists correctly realize that *any* government is a criminal organization, by definition.

So Georgi you mananged to link a piece of government propaganda. Congrats.

It's true, many of the smart phrack contributors have gone on to the penetration test industry, and some do lots of work for the government. I'm thinking of a certain "viking", initials E.B. (who is a really nice guy).. But.. people do have to make a living.

So? Oh wait. You're right. That's the reason why the american system is based on murdering brown children for fun and profit. Lots of americans have to 'make a living' and they make a 'living' by killing subhumans. And these american workers need technical support from the american IT industry. So the IT industry makes a 'living' by being accomplices to murder. It all makes sense now. Thanks for helping me correct this little oversight.

Pedantically attacking write-ups you disagree with sadly doesn't pay the fucking light bill. (unless you work at breitbart ? ;)

Now that you mention it let me finish my 'pedantic attack' =) See, I didn't bother commenting on the rest of the artticle because it was painfully obvious that the 'hacker' knew fuck about the topic he was writing. But hey. Free speech! Anyway, after showing he didn't know what anarchy means he went on to declare that people are bad so a government is needed to get the bad people to behave well. Sadly he forgot to mention where the members of the good government are going to come from? Oh sorry, maybe that's another 'pedantic attack' on my part?

Looks like the last issue was #69, from may 2016.

I didn't check the date of the article. Since it was text I assumed it must have been from the 60s or early 70s at most (half-joking, just in case...) Oh OK, the date is 2004. Also I must admit I haven't paid too much attention to the underground hacking literature. I guess I should take a more careful look to learn to what degree it's compromised. I would expect the older stuff to me more sincerer but who knows...

Phrack was always a million times better than the, IMO, lame 2600 magazine. I wonder if 2600 is still published?

Note: I haven't read the phrack article in question, at least not yet.

...

" it would also be impossible to rid the ajority of the population of the idea of private ownership of property"

oh the author is a commie social engineering go figure....