I dont know-know but test it all out irl ask someone in love with you if you can fuck them ...watch the facial expression Steve could be wrong as steve was wrong about that upper eschelon no say fuck I am an artist and have worked with whats considered high level artists ... say fuck more than me which seems impossible and these kind of caste distinctions of words or body functions seem to slap in the face the life of language Well known thinkers and artists minds dont wotk overall in these hierarchies ... exclusionary breaks of fenced off condemnation ... spaces of life - all of them - are expressionable and loved which is actually very difficult in having no good and bad no good and evil is a complexity the western mind - christian mind finds hard to bare Where can they put the control valves and buttons to press if there are no societal goods and evils as if mass stupidity is the overall normative of each and everyone needs instriction booklets with their bodies I like that maybe both realities are acknowledged - saying fuck or mother fucker is now considered a right - to be upheld like other rights and maybe also at the same time a degradation of women or love On Oct 27, 2015 12:06 PM, "Ulex Europae" <europus@gmail.com> wrote:

At 09:25 PM 10/26/2015, Cari Machet wrote:

I do agree with steve that the use of the word fuck is a exploitation or

...

degradation of sex/love which is not that great

Fuck that.

Now, did I say something exploitative or degrading about sex/love or was it merely a coarse rejection of a notional assertion?

The dutch stated using fuck was degrading to love

...

The new yorker stated using cunt was degrading to women

The dutch said degrading love was far worse than degrading women

Word meanings change over time. To not acknowledge and take this into consideration reveals an agenda.

Watch while I now make some vacuous claim about something else:

<insert vacuous claim here>

--ue