Trump's tonic masculinity: “What the fuck is this?”
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/12/05/tonic-masculinity/ Tonic Masculinity December 5, 2017 by CH Via Libertardian, a great snippet from the new insiders’ book about Trump on the campaign trail, Reading Lewandowski’s book (Let Trump be Trump). ‘When Jason Miller joined the campaign as communications adviser, and Paul Manafort was still the campaign’s chairman, the two would come up with lengthy briefing notes for Trump’s radio interviews containing information like “This guy’s located in X city or market and has been the show’s host for X number of years, and he has an X-thousand-person listenership.” Trump would look at the paper and say, “What the fuck is this? I don’t need all this. Just give me a phone number and tell me who to call.”’ I lol’d. That’s the difference between President Chad and the Studycunt (as MPC so pungently coined it). The Virgin Studycunt vs the Chad President. Tonic masculinity is back in the White House and not a moment too soon.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:00:57AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/12/05/tonic-masculinity/
Tonic Masculinity
December 5, 2017 by CH
Via Libertardian, a great snippet from the new insiders’ book about Trump on the campaign trail,
Reading Lewandowski’s book (Let Trump be Trump).
‘When Jason Miller joined the campaign as communications adviser, and Paul Manafort was still the campaign’s chairman, the two would come up with lengthy briefing notes for Trump’s radio interviews containing information like “This guy’s located in X city or market and has been the show’s host for X number of years, and he has an X-thousand-person listenership.” Trump would look at the paper and say, “What the fuck is this? I don’t need all this. Just give me a phone number and tell me who to call.”’
I lol’d. That’s the difference between President Chad and the Studycunt (as MPC so pungently coined it).
The Virgin Studycunt vs the Chad President. Tonic masculinity is back in the White House and not a moment too soon.
Speaking of tonic masculinity, the science is in - Bear Grills is "the man" and women flock to him - read it and rejoice/ despair as you will :) http://redpilltimes.com/will-2018-see-a-return-to-masculinity/?utm_source=Red+Pill+Times+Newsletter&utm_campaign=0edc9e2080-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a30275c48d-0edc9e2080-85899125 Will 2018 see a return to masculinity? Will Manliness Make A Comeback In 2018? “the end result was invariably the same regardless of the country. While having their own setbacks, the men’s groups do decidedly better in every case, not just because of superior strength, but also superior organizational ability (an evil masculine trait). In the American ‘Survivor’ version of this experiment, which had the groups in proximity to each other, the women inevitably depended on the men for aid. The reality is, when push comes to shove society cannot function without psychological traits that are decidedly masculine. This is why matriarchal (or feminized) societies generally collapse or are highly dysfunctional and regressive. For an example outside of the jungle, read this article by a female entrepreneur who had a utopian idea to build a company made up only of women – a company which suffered complete gridlock and bankruptcy only two years later from employee discord and laziness. Because of the inadequacies of a culture without strong male presence, feminism and “social justice” as ideologies instantly lend themselves to socialism and collectivism. In fact, it’s hard to separate one from the other. Socialism provides the governmental and legal bubble that helps to protect people who cannot or will not protect themselves, and collectivism forces capable people (mostly men) to do all the hard labor necessary to keep a system functioning and safe “for the sake of the group,” whether they want to participate in that group or not. In the beginning this is done through taxation, entitlement programs and the centralizing of wages into metropolitan areas. In the end, it is done through unabashed slavery. If you want to see an example of this simply look up the end result of the Stalinist and Maoist models – a productive minority is always tasked (or forced) to feed, house and clothe the non-producing majority. …
participants (1)
-
Zenaan Harkness