More #$%& from #$%&#$ %&#$%&#$ Re: [ PFIR ] Netanyahu's son removes anti-Semitic meme from Facebook following outcry
juan juan.g71 at gmail.com Thu Sep 21 20:05:07 PDT 2017
I don't see how the pic is related
My sides, from laughing, pic is of robot laughing. Lol.
I would appreciate it if you didn't send megabytes of retarded spam like you do.
The pic is 170KB, modanon. I do not enjoy spam, even though I live in Hawaii.
sorry you are babbling nonsense. intellectual 'property' is not a right privileges Are Not Rights
gtfoh. You are asserting that only others can grant a person something, you authoritarian swine. A single and self governing person, or animal, can rightfully defend the possession of something it created. As is the creature's self-granted right. Using the word "privilege" only shows you support giving authority to others.
bullshit
What a well thought rebuttal to my claims. Maybe you forgot that you aren't posting as the Rayzer or jnn but as Juan.
nazi
I am not Jewish.
you should stop saying stupid things?
Like "things I cannot see are not real, aylmao".
this isn't even half entertaining anymore. [I Quit!]
I get it. You are pic related. Well played, sir.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:31:00 +0000 Hollow Domer <shediedfrombeingtoof@redchan.it> wrote:
sorry you are babbling nonsense. intellectual 'property' is not a right privileges Are Not Rights
gtfoh. You are asserting that only others can grant a person something, you authoritarian swine.
A single and self governing person, or animal, can rightfully defend the possession of something it created.
as long as he doesn't infringe other people's rights. So you can defend your 'right' to intellectual non-property by keeping your amazing ideas in your head, but the moment you publish them they are not 'yours' anymore. Another problem for you is of course that 'your' ideas actually are 99.99999999% not 'yours', they come from other people.
As is the creature's self-granted right.
Using the word "privilege" only shows you support giving authority to others.
privilege : a non-right granted and enforced by the animals you call your government. That's what copyright and patents are. And you are accusing me of doing what *you* do? please.
bullshit
What a well thought rebuttal to my claims. Maybe you forgot that you aren't posting as the Rayzer or jnn but as Juan.
at some point the cost of writing a full counterargument to a piece of bullshit is too high.
nazi
I am not Jewish.
except the jews are not the only nazis out there you know. Or maybe you don't know for instance that the United States Of America was founded in 1776 as a slave society/concentration camp? The joos didn't do that. It was the 'anglos'.
you should stop saying stupid things?
Like "things I cannot see are not real, aylmao".
like, your argument for national borders is a wrong analogy, so you have no argument.
this isn't even half entertaining anymore. [I Quit!]
I guit because I get tired of cheaters...at times =)
I get it. You are pic related. Well played, sir.
On Friday, September 22, 2017, 12:13:04 PM PDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:31:00 +0000 Hollow Domer <shediedfrombeingtoof@redchan.it> wrote:
gtfoh. You are asserting that only others can grant a person something, you authoritarian swine.
A single and self governing person, or animal, can rightfully defend the possession of something it created.
as long as he doesn't infringe other people's rights. So you can defend your 'right' to intellectual non-property by keeping your amazing ideas in your head, but the moment you publish them they are not 'yours' anymore. Another problem for you is of course that 'your' ideas actually are 99.99999999% not 'yours', they come from other people.
Sometimes somebody gets a new idea. Jim Bell
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:30:42 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sometimes somebody gets a new idea.
And the new idea is based on (a lot of) old ideas. At best it's a new rearrangement of old elements. Especially in technical fields where valid ideas have to stick to physical/mathematical principles that are *not* invented, but discovered. And at any rate, even if an idea is 'very original'(TM), it doesn't follow that copyright and patents are legitimate. Also I'd expect libertarians to be well aware of the way intellectual property is 'abused' for non-libertarian purposes, like destroying competition and censorship. Though arguably it's not being abused because that's the true purpose of IP. Last but not least, intellectual property is mercantilistic monopoly with close ties to monarchy. As Mr. Quinn helpfully noted.
Jim Bell
On Friday, September 22, 2017, 1:38:28 PM PDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:30:42 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sometimes somebody gets a new idea.
> And the new idea is based on (a lot of) old ideas. At best it's a new rearrangement of old elements. Especially in technical fields where valid ideas have to stick to physical/mathematical principles that are *not* invented, but discovered. Here's a brain-teaser: Is mathematics "discovered" or "invented"? That's not my question. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/04/great-math-mystery/ Jim Bell
Here's a brain-teaser: Is mathematics "discovered" or "invented"?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/04/great-math-mystery/
Religion was invented to fit facts discovered earlier. If the first fact was invented, parallel dimensions exist.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:47:16 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Here's a brain-teaser: Is mathematics "discovered" or "invented"? That's not my question. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/04/great-math-mystery/ Jim Bell
Here's an interesting piece of engineering https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/36/Paralia_sulcata_di... I'm sure it's fully patented ^-^
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:31:22 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
The pic is 170KB, modanon.
actually there was another 1.4 mbytes pic coming from the same redchan domain. and to put things in 'context', Alice's Adventures in Wonderland is ~150kb or less.
It was shy of 166KiB in proper data storage context. Or shy of 170kB, but that representation is unfit context. And "K" isn't valid binary or decimal prefix. lern2units punkanons.
participants (4)
-
grarpamp -
Hollow Domer -
jim bell -
juan