On 11/24/2015 06:37 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:

If you ignore several centuries of political machinations and outright warfare then yes, Russia has been pretty friendly to Turkey. With friends like Putin, who needs enemies... Peter.

With two-faced authoritarian mass-murdering (est. millions of Kurds in the last few years) jackasses like Ergodan who needs friends:

"A short-term border violation can never be a pretext for an attack” - ‪Turkish President ‪‎Erdogan‬, 2012, after ‪Syria‬ downed a Turkish AF F-3 Phantom

https://www.rt.com/news/323369-turkey-downed-russian-jet/ Now that it turns out it WASN'T the US State Department backed FSA that shot down that SU-24 and murdered the pilots while ejected (the equivalent Geneva Convention war crime would be indiscriminately killing non-resisting POWS...), but Turkmen commanded by a TURKISH CITIZEN, I just can't wait for that Russian Missile frigate with orders to "Destroy any Threat" to feel, umn, threatened. Incinerating the presidential palace in Ankara like the US incinerated most of Baghdad would be a good start, and millions of Turks would cheer. RR

Seems Turkey miscalculated presumption of NATO support -

They don't need Nato's support. They have got US support. It's just an orchestrated ugly game planned beforehand. violating airspace -

​​

Zenaan, it's not just about the airspace. It's about the fact that Russia's jet was not threatening Turkey. The "funniest" thing is that he was also EMPTY from bombs because he was AFTER his mission where he dropped everything and was on the way home. And even if we would believe in their cheap legend, in 17 seconds you can 'deeefinitely' 10/20 times warn the pilot. and, and, and....Such fucken liars.... I am so sorry for the pilots... so sorry. They were killed *not by declared enemy*, thus unfair and without any chance to survive. Moreover, they were killed pointlessly. Just for the sake of Turkey's bloodthirsty lord... the US. *Indeed, the **US** are the masters of provocations.* 2015-11-25 8:26 GMT+02:00 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>:

Seems Turkey miscalculated presumption of NATO support ... and Russia's reaction - see below.

Reuters: US believes Russian jet was hit inside Syrian airspace http://tass.ru/en/world/839009

Leaked Ankara UN letter claims Su-24's ‘air space violation’ lasted 17

seconds

(Turkey: 17 second air space transit = must ... shoot ... down ... jet) https://www.rt.com/news/323343-turkey-un-syria-russian-plane/

Downed in 17 seconds: Where Turkey’s story of Su-24 violating airspace just does not add up https://www.rt.com/news/323369-turkey-downed-russian-jet/

Russia deploys missile cruiser off Syria coast, ordered to destroy any target posing danger https://www.rt.com/news/323329-russia-suspend-military-turkey/

Russian Air Force Annihilated Militants In Area Where Su-24 Was Shot Down. Erdogan Ordered Turkish Air Force Planes Be Grounded

http://southfront.org/vks-russian-federation-has-annihilated-the-militants-i...

As I wrote yesterday:

This then was not legitimate air-defense but an ambush.

I am not the only one who came to that conclusion. Deep inside a McClatchy piece a "western" diplomat sees it as an "orchestrated" event:

One Western diplomat based in Iraq, but with extensive experience in Syria and Turkey, called the incident “brazenly orchestrated and inevitable,” but asked that the identification of his country not be used in the statement.

This article is copiously linked at Moon of Alabama http://www.moonofalabama.org/2015/11/the-context-of-yesterdays-turkish-attac... November 25, 2015 Was The U.S. Involved In The Turkish Attack Against The Russian Jet? Erdogan criticized Syria harshly on Tuesday for shooting down the Turkish fighter jet, saying: "Even if the plane was in their airspace for a few seconds, that is no excuse to attack." "It was clear that this plane was not an aggressive plane. Still it was shot down," he said.Turkey hardens military position after Syria downs jet June 27, 2012 A violation of one to two kilometers is accepted as "natural" given the speed of aircraft, the statement [by the the General Staff] said. This year's violations of Turkish airspace lasted between 20 seconds and nine minutes, which showed "airspace violations can be resolved by warning and interceptions," the statement said. Turkey could have downed 114 planes for airspace violations: Army June 25, 2012 Turkish fighter jets and military helicopters have dramatically increased their incursions into Greek airspace, according to a study based on data from the Greek military, forcing the cash-strapped Greek air force to respond. Turkey buzzes weakened Greece - In growing numbers Ankara’s fighter jets test Greek territorial claims. - July 23, 2015 Turkey also regularly violates Iraq's airspace by flying bombing attacks against Kurds in north Iraq. All this provides that yesterday's incident in which Turkey shot down a Russian jet was not a case of an ordinary airspace violation but a deliberate act to take down a Russian plane. The surviving co-pilot of the Russian jet insists that it neither flew through Turkish airspace nor was warned of an imminent attack. As I wrote yesterday: This then was not legitimate air-defense but an ambush. I am not the only one who came to that conclusion. Deep inside a McClatchy piece a "western" diplomat sees it as an "orchestrated" event: One Western diplomat based in Iraq, but with extensive experience in Syria and Turkey, called the incident “brazenly orchestrated and inevitable,” but asked that the identification of his country not be used in the statement. The Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov also came to that conclusion: The downing of a Russian warplane in Syria by Turkey appears to be a pre-planned provocation, the Russian Foreign Minister said. Ankara failed to communicate with Russia over the incident, he added. “We have serious doubts that this act was unintentional. It looks very much like a preplanned provocation,” Lavrov said, citing Turkey’s failure to maintain proper communication with Russia, the abundance of footage of the incident and other evidence. Several NATO ambassadors will have had the same though when they admonished Ankara over the act: "There are other ways of dealing with these kinds of incidents," said one diplomat who declined to be named. The attack on the Russian plane was preconceived on November 22 when a security summit was held with the Turkish government under Prime Minister Davutoğlu and the Turkish Armed Forces. Davutoğlu personally gave the order to shoot down Russian planes. This, Turkey says, was necessary to stop Russian bombing of "Turkmen" in north Syria's Latakia near the Turkish border. Many of the "Syrian Turkmen" fighting against the Syrian people are from Central Asia and part of the terrorist groups of Jabhat al-Nusra, Ansar Al Shams, Jabhat Ansar Ad Din and Ahrar al Shams. Uighurs smuggled in from China and fighting under the "Turkistan Islamist Party" label even advertise their ‘little jihadists’ children training camps in the area. The few real Syrian Turkmen work, as even the BBC admits, together with al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. Their leader and spokesman, one Alparslan Celik, is a Turkish citizen from Elazığ. The Turkish claim of defending "Turkmen" in Syria is a sham. It is defending mostly foreign Islamist terrorists. Whoever planned the ambush on the Russian jet miscalculated the reaction. NATO will not come to Turkey's help over this or the next such incident. NATO countries know that the Russian plane was hit within Syria. Russia will not be scared into drawing back. Instead it massively increased the bombing of targets in that area: At least 12 air strikes hit Latakia's northern countryside as pro-government forces clashed with fighters from al Qaeda's Nusra Front and Turkmen insurgents in the Jabal Akrad and Jabal Turkman areas, the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. A Turkmen commander said missiles fired from Russian warships in the Mediterranean were also hitting the area, as well as heavy artillery shelling. Russian jets also bombed insurgency supply trucks (video) in al-Qaeda controlled Azaz, north of Aleppo and just some two kilometers from the Turkish border. They also bombed the Bab al-Hawa border crossing to Turkey. That is a big FU to Erdogan. The Russian missile cruiser Moskva with its extensive air defense systems is now covering the area. Russia will officially deploy two S-400 air defense systems to cover all of north-west Syria and southern Turkey. Russia also has lots of electronic wizardry it can (and will) apply. The preparation of additional airfields is ongoing. There will be no outward military revenge against Turkey unless it crosses into Syria. The "safe zone" within Syria Erdogan dreams of would have to be won by defeating Russian forces. The 4.5 million Russian tourists who visited Turkey this year will not come again. Turkish business in Russia, mostly in the building industry and agricultural products, will shrink to nearly zero. That the scheming to take down a Russian air plane may have negative consequences for Turkey suddenly also dawned to Davutoğlu who now pretends that we wants to make nice again: Turkey is not aiming to escalate tension with Russia, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu said Nov. 25, echoing President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan following the downing of a SU-24 Russian jet the previous day. “Russia is our friend and neighbor. Our bilateral communication channels are open. But our security, as for every friendly country, should be based on the principle of respect under international law. It’s normal to protect our national airspace,” Davutoğlu said, addressing party members in parliament. And it is normal for Russia to defend its ally Syria. Against all enemies. By all means. But back to Turkey's motive. The way this is played one might believe that this was a indeed a lonely Turkish idea to defend its immediate interests in Syria - the "Turkmen" as well as the oil business Erdogan's son has with the Islamic State. But there is also a bigger game going on and it is likely that Erdogan has a new contract and Obama's backing for this escalation. James Winnefeld, the deputy chief of General Staff of the U.S. military, was in Ankara when the incident happened. The cooperation between U.S. and Turkish military and especially the air forces is quite tight. It is hard to believe that there was no communication about what was prepared to happen. After the Islamic State attack in France President Hollande attempted to create a global coalition against IS which would include Russia and Iran as well as the U.S. led anti-ISIS block. But such a coalition, which makes a lot of sense, would have to agree to leave Syria alone and to help Syrian ground forces to effectively fight the Islamic State. It does not make sense to destroy the Syrian state and to just hope that the outcome would be something better than an emboldened IS or AlQaeda ruling in Damascus. That outcome is certainly not in Europe's interest. But a global coalition is not in U.S. or Turkish interests. It would end their common plans and efforts to overthrow the Syrian government and to install a "Sunni" state in Syria and Iraq as a Turkish protectorate. The Russian jet incident decreased the likelihood of such a coalition. Holland, visiting Washington yesterday, had to pull back with his plan and was again degraded to parrot Obama's "Assad must go" nonsense. Obama feels emboldened and now pushes to widen the conflict in Syria: The Obama administration is using the current moment of extreme anger and anxiety in Europe to press allies for sharp increases in their contributions to the fight against the Islamic State. Suggestions include more strike aircraft, more intelligence-sharing, more training and equipment for local fighters, and deployment of their own special operations ­forces. ... While new contributions would be added to anti-Islamic State campaigns across the board, the attention is clearly on Syria, marking a shift in what began as an “Iraq first” focus when Obama authorized airstrikes in the region last fall. ... Obama, speaking beside Hollande on Tuesday, restated his insistence that Assad is part of the problem, not the solution, and that he must go. The Obama administration is also preparing to install the Turkish dream of a "safe zone" between Aleppo and the Turkish border north of it. Among several coalition priorities in Syria, the United States has begun a series of airstrikes in an area known as the “Mar’a line,” named for a town north of Aleppo in the northwest. There, a 60-mile stretch to the Euphrates River in the east is the only remaining part of the Syria-Turkey border under Islamic State control. The administration had delayed beginning operations in the area because U.S. aircraft were needed in operations farther east, and it has been uncertain that local opposition forces­ would be able to hold the territory if it could be cleared with airstrikes. The increased Russian air defense and the likely increase of its deployed planes will make those "safe zone" plans impossible. But Obama, in my conclusion, still wants to drag NATO into Syria and wants to assemble enough forces "against ISIS" to be able to overwhelm the Syrian government and its Russian protectors. If that does not work he at least hopes to give Russia the Afghanistan like "quagmire" in Syria he and other U.S. officials promised. The again increasing tensions with U.S. proxy Ukraine only help in that regard. But there is even more to that plan. Just by chance (not) the NYT op-ed pages launch a trial balloon today for the creation of a Sunni state in east Syria and west Iraq. But that (Islamic) State is already there and the "containment" strategy Obama practices towards it guarantees that it will fester. Obama continues his immensely destructive policies in the Middle East with zero regard to the all the bad outcomes these are likely to have for the people there as well as for Europe. One again wonders if all these action follow from sheer incompetence or from some devilish, ingenious strategic planning. Posted by b on November 25, 2015 at 10:26 AM http://www.moonofalabama.org/2015/11/the-context-of-yesterdays-turkish-attac...

On 11/25/15, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote: ...

This article is copiously linked at Moon of Alabama http://www.moonofalabama.org/2015/11/the-context-of-yesterdays-turkish-attac...

[numerous foreign airspace violations by Turkey elided] Out of interest, is there a word for "hypocrite" in the Turk's native language?

The attack on the Russian plane was preconceived on November 22 when a security summit was held with the Turkish government under Prime Minister Davutoğlu and the Turkish Armed Forces. Davutoğlu personally gave the order to shoot down Russian planes. This, Turkey says, was necessary to stop Russian bombing of "Turkmen" in north Syria's Latakia near the Turkish border.

Well that plan didn't quite come together - with Russia's navy now on a hair trigger "shoot to kill any air based threat" order (and Russia closing their military comm lines with Turkey), Turkey had no option but to ground their F-16 fleet. There's a saying widely used in Russia - Russia never starts a war, but she always ends them. The terrorists, whether you call them moderate or otherwise, have spread from the middle east (including Syria) to France, Russia and other countries. Russia will end this war in Syria, with or without support from "the West" - in defence of the sovereignty of Syria (the overthrow of which by Western powers as we now know was planned and attempted since decades ago), in defence of the Christians and other minorities of Syria, and in defence of Russia's interests such as the defence of a long time ally, as dignity and pride demands. France's Napoleon, the Ottoman Empire, WWII Germany and more - when you begin war against Russia, you sign your own "going to lose" warrant. So Rule #1 of war is, make agreement with Russia prior to starting war, no matter who else you are going to war with. Rule #2 of war - refer to Rule #1. Quite simple really. Regards, Zenaan