[spam][crazy] coping around codex32 share
what's relevant is that at a time of cyberconflict somebody who is likely a cryptographer stimulated material providing for the performing of relatively modern cryptographic operations offline. presently only for financial assets, not messages. i imagine messages have other approaches too could be wrong dunno what i'm saying
the nature of the share is so complex and biasedish i don't know if the math would have a hard to detect mistake somewhere with messaging misleading the reader if the context is one where that's likely
but it is indeed weird to share this and not share the math. maybe i forgot, or didn't expect this many resources it seems like it's shared like a puzzle so the reader goes and investigates
it’s a cool share to look at! maybe i can find the latex sources i just don’t have the expertise to judge it and it was shared financial only. i feel like there would be more heartening proof shares
here it is https://github.com/apoelstra/volvelle-math-companion/blob/master/main.tex but it has a few auxiliary files
i appreciate the codex32 work but the uncanny-valley experience is not fully explained. sorry, i need an indication of what went wrong to fully support it.
the issue is that these communities are being manipulated with deepfakes. worrying about that can unfortunately impact handling of real valid efforts from difficult situations.
maybe what would have kept me more grounded would have been to email the sharer privately before sharing publicly and ask them why their narrative and citation had its attributes
i'm remembering how appelbaum's work was shared by a third party surreptitiously and wondering if that could be related
participants (1)
-
Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many