On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:26 PM, jim bell wrote:

... It appears that these agencies are trying to teach their staff a way to commit a crime, let's call it "obstruction of justice".

hey now, your "crime" is my mistrial and dismissal with prejudice! don't knock it till you've tried it. ;)

Yeah, it does have to do directly with traffic stops. Check out p180 of the PDF (279 is the number in the document). They even put "traffic stop" in quotes. [image: Inline image 1] And I'm guessing that the B7E redacted word http://i.imgur.com/R9UjhTZ.pngis "bullshit." Essentially, they have constructed an intelligence laundering system. DEA agent asks the spookshttp://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805for intel on an operation, spook uses illegal surveillance to find out intel, spook tells a paid informant, informant anonymously tells DEA agent, DEA agents get local law enforcement to make a "traffic" stop to create a parallel construction, then in the court case none of the original intelligence is used. All perfectly "legal." Since the prosecution is legally required to hand over any information is has which might exonerate a defendant, such as evidence harvested from the "poisonous tree," the Taint Review Board is used as an intermediary to make sure that nobody on the prosecution has any idea where the poison came from. There are a bunch of other gems in here too. p324: True or False, Is racial profiling okay? Answer: [[ Redacted. b(7)(E) ]] R On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:29 AM, MARK GORE wrote:

"Any agency that is above the law [such as CIA] can get away with anything. It's sad, and most people don't know it, or care, but it's true," the source says. "When they invoke national security, everyone just craps their pants, even judges."

Above is from Narco News, check it Rich, Narco news follows all the crap the DEA does, now my question is can we vector the muckrock training mans' to another leak maybe located in cryptome- in order to obtain the code name for HOW the spooks tip-off LEA's to get into court only to reverse engineer (parallel construct) evidence to cover source methods. Its something to do w/ traffic stops? _Mg

mag_foto / blacksetstudio.com

On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rich Jones wrote:

Docs via MuckRock show internal DEA training manuals instructing for parallel construction based on classified / illegally obtained information, combined with an internal review board to shield that information from the public courts.

https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2014/feb/03/dea-parallel-construction...

"Americans don't like it!"

R

It's a reference to the FOIA law itself. 7E is the exemption saying they don't have to talk about police tactics, basically, and that's why that information was redacted. Exemption 7(E) affords protection to all law enforcement information that "would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law." http://www.justice.gov/oip/exemption7e.htm R On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:

"(b)(7)(E)" seems like a cite to a section of a document or regulation, not a retraction: Section b, subsection 7, paragraph E. It is a relative cite URI, with base URI (document ID) implied here.

Stephen

On 2/6/14, 10:08 AM, Rich Jones wrote:

Yeah, it does have to do directly with traffic stops. Check out p180 of the PDF (279 is the number in the document). They even put "traffic stop" in quotes.

[image: Inline image 1] And I'm guessing that the B7E redacted word http://i.imgur.com/R9UjhTZ.pngis "bullshit."

Essentially, they have constructed an intelligence laundering system. DEA agent asks the spookshttp://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805for intel on an operation, spook uses illegal surveillance to find out intel, spook tells a paid informant, informant anonymously tells DEA agent, DEA agents get local law enforcement to make a "traffic" stop to create a parallel construction, then in the court case none of the original intelligence is used. All perfectly "legal." Since the prosecution is legally required to hand over any information is has which might exonerate a defendant, such as evidence harvested from the "poisonous tree," the Taint Review Board is used as an intermediary to make sure that nobody on the prosecution has any idea where the poison came from.

There are a bunch of other gems in here too. p324: True or False, Is racial profiling okay? Answer: [[ Redacted. b(7)(E) ]]

R

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:29 AM, MARK GORE wrote:

...

"Any agency that is above the law [such as CIA] can get away with anything. It's sad, and most people don't know it, or care, but it's true," the source says. "When they invoke national security, everyone just craps their pants, even judges."

Above is from Narco News, check it Rich, Narco news follows all the crap the DEA does, now my question is can we vector the muckrock training mans' to another leak maybe located in cryptome- in order to obtain the code name for HOW the spooks tip-off LEA's to get into court only to reverse engineer (parallel construct) evidence to cover source methods. Its something to do w/ traffic stops? _Mg

mag_foto / blacksetstudio.com

On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rich Jones wrote:

Docs via MuckRock show internal DEA training manuals instructing for parallel construction based on classified / illegally obtained information, combined with an internal review board to shield that information from the public courts.

https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2014/feb/03/dea-parallel-construction...

"Americans don't like it!"

R

-- Stephen D. Williams sdw@lig.net stephendwilliams@gmail.com LinkedIn: http://sdw.st/in V:650-450-UNIX (8649) V:866.SDW.UNIX V:703.371.9362 F:703.995.0407AIM:sdw Skype:StephenDWilliams Yahoo:sdwlignet Resume: http://sdw.st/gres Personal: http://sdw.st facebook.com/sdwlig twitter.com/scienteer