On 8/26/19, Douglas Lucas <dal@riseup.net> wrote:

...

Legends https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECys5ZnWkAAO2ZD.jpg

What about his face and upper body is of importance? Why is it his image memorable, whereas specific of leaked documents and actions taken as a result are forgettable? Every email about Assange is an email not about a leaked document ,when weighing that scale of opprortunity cost, what for you regarding Julian's upper musculature, tendons, facial hair, persuades you to continue the quest to make him the most famous individual ever to have lived during the exterimination of humanity? Or you yet another Goebbels victim - repeat something often enough and it becomes the truth - and gorged by WikiLeaks advertising, fearful or perhaps aroused by @WLTaskForce -- you no longer think and can be nothing but an unpaid repeater station for not even Assange, not even that mammal in Belmarsh, but rather, a mere visual-digital represetnation of Assange? You describe assange as a legend and yet he does not know who you are and you cannot even procure a face to face meeting with your idol, you must be content with merely a jpeg.

Who is the most famous individual in the world currently? What individual has been the most famous individual in the world for the longest period of time? For example, you might imagine individual A has been the most famous person in the world, but only for 5 days, whereas individual B in a different century has been the most famous person in the world, and maintained that unfortunate position for a full five years. That's including only living humans. People's fame might continue after death, or may even precede birth in the case of dynasties, prophecies. Also what of other primates or mammals? Is the dog Laika (a canine) more famous still than even your beloved Julian? If so, will you take arms against a sea of troubles to ensure than Julian is more famous than Laika after your and his death (Laika is already eliminated)? How much will you be paid, in cash, bitcoin, or upvotes, for day in and day out -- as people in Assange circle -- sharing images of Julian, Kristinn Hraffson, gazing so deeply at their faces

-- and what about his face and upper body is it that is of importance? I need some clarification from those wh compulsively, repeatedly, and eternally share his images. Is it his irises that you have a bro crush on? Or is it his shoulders? Might it be his nose? I wish someone would explain in particular what it is that confers upon his visual aspect value --

while of course cables, emails, and other leaked documents languish

When in 2050 human civilization collapses, and without tap water you walk outside to begin migrating across the highways as your neighbors complain with open carry, you will turn to your loved one (if you have any, which is a stretch) and say:

"We saw all this end of civilization coming, we had the documents, we did nothing. But oh! Oh! There is one thing we so profoundly recall, the one take away, the bottom line of my life, now without food clothing an d shelter: A man who I have never met, Julian Assange, I remember: his face. He of course has food clothing and shelter, I do not, but it has been my lot in life, to retweet my betters and to share images of him"