NSA, Love and Math 2
Brian Carroll has been exploring these possibilities since 1999: http://cryptome.org/jya/arch-elec.htm http://org.noemalab.eu/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/pdf/b_carroll_seeing_cy...
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Brian Carroll has been exploring these possibilities since 1999:
http://cryptome.org/jya/arch-elec.htm
http://org.noemalab.eu/sections/ideas/ideas_articles/pdf/b_carroll_seeing_cy...
I owe a bit of an apology to Brian... I didn't think to look him up before wondering what he was going on about and trying to develop.
(no apologies, my words are understandably reckless in the context they arrive in, unless somehow JYA already has blasted through the ideology in advance, creating a zone to share hypotheses within. his support and encouragement have been vital for investigating and interrogating the institutionalized madness. his advice to me that i consider the electromagnetic context for my independent thesis, versus electric only, critical to opening the interpretation beyond my limits and inexperience. these ruminations of 'electromagnetic architecture', though, not yet discussed or developed, though would unite many disciplines in a new empirical structural relation. given existing ~public forums, usually my approach is oppositional, dismantling ideas, so it tends to be brutal and is usually unwelcome. insofar as it is about the ideas, it is not personal. the most common dismissal is to be called schizophrenic for trying to access grounded truth in shared observational frameworks to discuss the nature of reality. believe it or not- deferring to logical evaluation is the quickest route to be labeled insane these days.)
participants (3)
-
brian carroll
-
grarpamp
-
John Young