From Fox News - Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey admits 'this action was wrong'
Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey admits 'this action was wrong' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story... Jim Bell's comment:. Facebook and Twitter manipulated the 2020 election far more effectively than Russia (which spent $1.5 million per month, for about 4 months) did for the 2016 election.But...I still want to know who delayed the leak of the news of Hunter Biden's laptop from mid-December, when the FBI received that device, until late September 2020. Who had THAT motivation?Biden wasn't selected as nominee for many months after Dec 2019. But certainly by the time of that nomination, the time would have been ripe to leak this material. Why wait much later than that? A stereotypical pro-Trump partisan
On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 11:23:41 AM PST, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote: Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey admits 'this action was wrong' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story... Jim Bell's comment:. Facebook and Twitter manipulated the 2020 election far more effectively than Russia (which spent $1.5 million per month, for about 4 months) did for the 2016 election.But...I still want to know who delayed the leak of the news of Hunter Biden's laptop from mid-December, when the FBI received that device, until late September 2020. Who had THAT motivation?Biden wasn't selected as nominee for many months after Dec 2019. But certainly by the time of that nomination, the time would have been ripe to leak this material. Why wait much later than that? A stereotypical pro-Trump partisan [for some reason, my comment was unintentionally cut off at this point]might be expected to want to wait until Biden's nomination, to ensure that the Democrats commit to Biden. But instead, somebody waited until late September 2020 to spill the beans. WHO benefits from that further delay? Jim Bell
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 2:40 PM jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 11:23:41 AM PST, jim bell < jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey admits 'this action was wrong' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story...
Jim Bell's comment:. Facebook and Twitter manipulated the 2020 election far more effectively than Russia (which spent $1.5 million per month, for about 4 months) did for the 2016 election. But...I still want to know who delayed the leak of the news of Hunter Biden's laptop from mid-December, when the FBI received that device, until late September 2020. Who had THAT motivation? Biden wasn't selected as nominee for many months after Dec 2019. But certainly by the time of that nomination, the time would have been ripe to leak this material. Why wait much later than that? A stereotypical pro-Trump partisan
[for some reason, my comment was unintentionally cut off at this point] might be expected to want to wait until Biden's nomination, to ensure that the Democrats commit to Biden. But instead, somebody waited until late September 2020 to spill the beans. WHO benefits from that further delay?
Jim Bell
The democrats? (And whoever benefits from two balanced primary parties?) Do you use an open source email editor to debug editing issues with?
On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 12:38:34 PM PST, Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 2:40 PM jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote: On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 11:23:41 AM PST, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote: Facebook, Twitter take heat over Hunter Biden story during hearing; Dorsey admits 'this action was wrong' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story... Jim Bell's comment:. Facebook and Twitter manipulated the 2020 election far more effectively than Russia (which spent $1.5 million per month, for about 4 months) did for the 2016 election.But...I still want to know who delayed the leak of the news of Hunter Biden's laptop from mid-December, when the FBI received that device, until late September 2020. Who had THAT motivation?Biden wasn't selected as nominee for many months after Dec 2019. But certainly by the time of that nomination, the time would have been ripe to leak this material. Why wait much later than that? A stereotypical pro-Trump partisan [for some reason, my comment was unintentionally cut off at this point]might be expected to want to wait until Biden's nomination, to ensure that the Democrats commit to Biden. But instead, somebody waited until late September 2020 to spill the beans. WHO benefits from that further delay? Jim Bell
The democrats? (And whoever benefits from two balanced primary parties?) Do you use an open source email editor to debug editing issues with?
Most of my news or article postings, including the one above, I send from my Android smartphone, which allows me to 'share' the item by email and send it to the CP list. Usually, that seems to work well, although I often do not include many comments with them. THIS time, it cut off the end of my comments; I don't know why that happened, I don't recall seeing that before. Jim Bell
[for some reason, my comment was unintentionally cut off at this point]
Do you use an open source email editor to debug editing issues with?
Most of my news or article postings, including the one above, I send from my Android smartphone, which allows me to 'share' the item by email and send it to the CP list. Usually, that seems to work well, although I often do not include many comments with them. THIS time, it cut off the end of my comments; I don't know why that happened, I don't recall seeing that before.
Jim Bell
Well, obviously that happens to me a ton, and I want to work with others to improve the situation. I guess this was a small issue for you, so it might not be too interesting yet. If you do have interest: If we were to switch to K-9 Mail or P=P or somesuch we could put our heads together to resolve such issues, and identify their causes etc. I suspect that companies are legally expected to provide products that work as advertised and fairly among users, to some degree, too.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:17:24 -0500 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: bell vomited :
Most of my SPAM, including the one above, I send from my Android-NSA retardphone , Usually, that seems to work well, although I often do not include many comments with them. THIS time, it cut off the end of my comments; I don't know why that happened, I don't recall seeing that before.
Jim Bell
Well, obviously that happens to me a ton, and I want to work with others to improve the situation.
you can pretty easy improve the situation by 1) getting rid of your NSA-RETARDPHONE 2) or if you 'must'(...) use a retardphone get a kinda open-source-hardware linux phone. I think there's like 1 option with a decent price.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 4:51 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
Well, obviously that happens to me a ton, and I want to work with others to improve the situation.
you can pretty easy improve the situation by
1) getting rid of your NSA-RETARDPHONE
It's hard. I'm addicted. They actually have AI algorithms trained to get people addicted. It is harder to stop using a smartphone than it is to stop eating. Do you use a smartphone?
2) or if you 'must'(...) use a retardphone get a kinda open-source-hardware linux phone. I think there's like 1 option with a decent price.
Any link? btw I'm kinda handling a psychotic break today/yesterday
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, November 17, 2020 10:01 PM, Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: ...
2) or if you 'must'(...) use a retardphone get a kinda open-source-hardware linux phone. I think there's like 1 option with a decent price.
Any link?
btw I'm kinda handling a psychotic break today/yesterday
hey Karl, remember to breathe - all things are temporary. this too, will pass :) the problem with linux phones is the basband radios. back in the day, there was OpenMoko. conveniently someone leaked specs for the radio in this hardware, and you could use open source drivers to make calls (!) you also had open sores luggable "phones" made from SDRs and Linux mini computers. nowadays you can find better mostly-open devices, and some fully open (baseband) devices, with many of them approaching actually useful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_mobile_phones to communicate is human. don't let fear of surveillance drive you to isolation, but *do* harden what you can, and use open over closed where possible...
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:16:06 +0000 coderman <coderman@protonmail.com> wrote:
to communicate is human. don't let fear of surveillance drive you to isolation,
now, that's a false dichotomy. As if the only options were to use the ARPANET or be 'isolated'. When in reality if you want true communication then the arpanet and all the rest of garbage produced by US technofascists is useless, or even counterproductive.
but *do* harden what you can, and use open over closed where possible...
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:23 PM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote: ...
now, that's a false dichotomy. As if the only options were to use the ARPANET or be 'isolated'. When in reality if you want true communication then the arpanet and all the rest of garbage produced by US technofascists is useless, or even counterproductive.
not to put too fine a point on it, but the SS7 telephone network is different from (but equally compromised as) the Internet. radio point to point links, while avoiding a trusted third party, are still just as much an RF emanation privacy risk as a standard cell phone. maybe free space optics with narrow fresnel zone makes the most work for Eves' everywhere? regardless of technology - the point stands: communications technologies are flawed, so protect what you can and mitigate what you can't. and of course, physical and operational security are key components - those aren't communications technologies, but secure communication demands them. best regards,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:01:23 -0500 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
It's hard. I'm addicted. They actually have AI algorithms trained to get people addicted. It is harder to stop using a smartphone than it is to stop eating.
oh come on =)
Do you use a smartphone?
No. I don't have a cellphone of any kind and never had. When cellphones came out they were stupidly expensive, useless and used by snobs. Now they are still expensive, still useless and a highly dangerous weapon against their 'users'.
2) or if you 'must'(...) use a retardphone get a kinda open-source-hardware linux phone. I think there's like 1 option with a decent price.
Any link?
https://www.pine64.org/pinephone/ of course like any other computer it's a bunch of completely untrustable chips, so use at your own risk... There may be some better options out there, I didn't look too hard.
btw I'm kinda handling a psychotic break today/yesterday
well, if the psychiatric mafia is telling you that you're crazy then you're sane.
"Can We Build Trustable Hardware?" https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=5706
participants (4)
-
coderman -
jim bell -
Karl -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0